- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Optimal use of plasma and urine BK viral loads for screening and predicting BK nephropathy
- Peter Boan†1Email author,
- Christopher Hewison†2,
- Ramyasuda Swaminathan3,
- Ashley Irish3,
- Kevin Warr3,
- Rajalingam Sinniah4,
- Todd M. Pryce2 and
- James Flexman2
© The Author(s). 2016
- Received: 1 December 2015
- Accepted: 7 June 2016
- Published: 22 July 2016
BK virus is a polyoma virus causing renal allograft nephropathy. Reduction of immunosuppression with the early recognition of significant BK viral loads in urine and plasma can effectively prevent BKV associated nephropathy (BKVN), however the optimal compartment and frequency of BK viral load measurement post renal transplantation are undetermined. Our purpose was to examine time to detection and viral loads in urine compared to plasma, and establish viral load cut-offs associated with histological BKVN.
We performed a retrospective analysis of the BKV screening frequency and compartment(s) of 277 adult renal transplant recipients (RTR).
BKVN was histologically diagnosed in 17 (6.1 %) RTR. In cases where both urine and plasma were tested fortnightly for 6 months (n = 53), BKV was detected in the urine 29 days earlier than plasma. Fortnightly (n = 72) versus 3-monthly (n = 78) testing demonstrated that BKV was detected in the urine significantly earlier (median 63 versus 97 days, p = 0.001) and at a lower level (median 3.27 versus 6.71 log10 c/mL, p < 0.001) with more frequent testing, but this difference was not evident in plasma first detection (80 versus 95 days, p = 0.536) or first positive viral load (3.18 versus 3.30 log10 c/mL, p = 0.603). The optimum cut-off BK viral load for histological diagnosis of BKVN was 4.10 log10 c/mL for the first positive urine, 3.79 log10 c/mL for the first positive plasma, 9.24 log10 c/mL for the peak urine, and 4.53 log10 c/mL for the peak plasma.
Frequent urinary BK viral load screening for the prevention of BKVN is suggested due to its high sensitivity and earlier detection.
- BK virus nephropathy
- BK viraemia
- BK viruria
- Polyoma virus
- Renal transplantation
BK virus (BKV) is a ubiquitous polyoma virus that causes a clinically important pattern of renal allograft injury in approximately 5 % of renal transplant recipients (RTR). Although viral replication can occur in up to 60 % of recipients , in its most severe form, invasive disease leads to tubulointerstitial nephritis and allograft dysfunction with a significant risk of allograft failure in 15–50 % of affected individuals. Recognised risk factors for BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) include the intensity of immunosuppression, treatment of acute rejection, male gender, ureteral trauma, and diabetes mellitus . Strategies involving early screening and pre-emptive management (mainly reduction in immunosuppression) can prevent long term graft dysfunction due to invasive disease . Once BKVN is established, treatment options apart from reduction in immunosuppression are unproven and largely untested by clinical trials. Measures for the early identification of risk in order to prevent progression of viral replication and progressive infection are therefore preferred.
Screening for BK virus can be performed by examination for urinary decoy cells, Haufen on electron microscopy of the urine, or more commonly by urine or plasma detection of virus by molecular methods. Recommendations on the suggested frequency of screening are largely opinion based but in general suggest 1–3 monthly in the first 6 months post transplantation followed by 3 monthly testing until 1 to 5 years post transplantation [2–4]. Definitive evidence of BKVN requires histological evidence of viral injury and exclusion of other causes of graft dysfunction by renal biopsy. Typically, extensive tubulointerstitial nephritis with positive immunohistochemical staining of the SV40 large T antigen is noted, however disease can be focal and missed by renal biopsy if sample size is inadequate . Some studies suggest that BKVN can be presumptively diagnosed when the plasma viral load exceeds 104 copies/mL [2, 4]. However in the absence of a quantitative international standard for BK virus assays, such cut-off values for individual assays need to be validated at an institutional level.
In Western Australia, the two renal transplant services independently introduced different screening strategies such that the renal transplant centre at Royal Perth Hospital performed fortnightly BKV screening of both urine and plasma for the first 6 months post transplantation, whilst Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital tested 3-monthly urine and plasma for the first 6 months. The introduction and adherence to these strategies varied over time within both centres. This “quasi-randomisation” by hospital allows unique comparison of the performance of different compartments and frequencies utilised in screening for BKVN.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of the 277 consecutive adult renal transplants performed over the 5 year period between January 2008 and December 2012 at Royal Perth and Sir Charles Gairdner Hospitals who had at least 12 months clinical follow up. We extracted laboratory data from the electronic pathology results and patient clinical records and recorded the histological diagnoses and scores assigned to renal biopsies (performed for protocol or investigation of renal dysfunction), specifically relating to the coding of acute rejection and BKVN. We recorded all BKV plasma and urine viral load results and screening frequency then determined the timing and level of the first positive and the peak BK viral load for urine and plasma. Data were evaluated to 31 December 2013.
In Western Australia patients receive Basiliximab induction and routine triple immunosuppression with Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate sodium or mofetil and oral Prednisolone. Target levels are usually 5–10 mcg/L for Tacrolimus for the first 3 months and Prednisolone is tapered to 5–10 mg daily by 3 months.
All renal histology was performed by histopathologists trained in renal histology and reported for the purposes of clinical management only. Histology diagnosed as acute rejection (borderline, grade I-III), acute humoral rejection or BKVN were coded dichotomously as biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) rejection (yes/no) and BKVN (yes/no). All BKVN cases demonstrated positive immunostaining against SV40. Rejection episodes diagnosed by biopsy were managed with an increment in steroids as intravenous pulses, and for unresponsive cases additional treatment with anti-T cell therapies were commenced.
The four value MDRD study equation for creatinine values standardised to creatinine reference materials was used to calculate eGFR in mL/min per 1.73 m2 = 175 × SCr-1.154× Age0.203 × (0.742 if female) × (1.21 if black). We did not apply the correction factor for “black” race to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders as there is insufficient evidence it applies to this specific indigenous group.
Samples were EDTA plasma or sterile urine. Extraction, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and detection was performed as previously described with some modifications . Briefly, 200 μL of sample was extracted with the MagNaPure LC instrument using the Total Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit. A 50 μL volume of elution buffer was used. A total of 5 μL of eluted nucleic acid was added to 15 μL of PCR mix comprising 2 μL FastStart 10X Reaction Mix Hybridisation probes, 2 μL MgCl2 at 25 μmol/L, 1 μL each of forward and reverse primer at 20 μmol/L, 0.2 μL BKV probe at 20 μmol/L and 8.8 μL of water. PCR Amplification of the BK virus capsid protein-1 (VP-1) gene was performed using the LightCycler 1.5 instrument with 45 cycles amplification at 95°C 10 s, 60°C 20 s, 72°C 15 s. Oligonucleotide sequences used for the BKV forward primer were 5’ GCA GCT CCC AAA AAG CCA AA 3’, for the BK reverse primer were 5’ CTG GGT TTA GGA AGC ATT CTA 3’, and for the BKV probe were 5’ 6FAM--ACC CGT GCA AGT GCC AAA ACT AC--BHQ1 3’. An entire genome of Dunlop strain BKV in a pBR322 plasmid served as a quantitative standard of 1 × 106 copies/reaction with a crossing point of 22 cycles. Positive and negative controls were utilised for each PCR run. The lower and upper limits of quantification are 2.7 log10 and 9.87 log10 copies/mL.
Categorical variables were compared with Fisher’s exact test, and continuous variables by Mann Whitney U test (of log10 results in the case of viral load measurements). Urine and plasma viral load association were determined by simple linear regression and determination of Pearson’s correlation coefficient after log-transformation. Receiver operator characteristic analysis was performed according to DeLong . MedCalc version 184.108.40.206 was used for statistical analysis. Statistical significance was defined by p-value <0.05 with two-tailed tests.
The study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Royal Perth Hospital and was conducted according to the principles of the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research .
Characteristics of renal transplants with and without BK nephropathy
BK nephropathy (n = 17)
No BK nephropathy (n = 260)
Follow up (years)
eGFR at 12 months (mLs/min)
BK nephropathy cases
BKVN was confirmed histologically in 17 (6.1 %) transplants. The median time to a histological diagnosis of BKVN was 233 days: in 4 patients virologically screened fortnightly this was 55, 67, 136, 283 days compared with eight patients screened every 3 months at 89, 99, 103, 170, 194, 233, 271, 324 days (p = 0.368). The time to BKVN was 469, 920, 1113 days in the three cases with no screening in the 6 months post transplantation, 806 days for one case screened 6 monthly, and 666 days for one case screened monthly. Patients with BKVN had a non-significant trend towards higher reported BPAR and significantly reduced eGFR at 12 months (Table 1). There were no episodes of BPAR following the diagnosis of BK nephropathy.
Urine compared with plasma viral load screening
Comparison of screening frequencies
Comparison of fortnightly and 3-monthly BK viral load screening strategies
Fortnightly (n = 72)
3-monthly (n = 78)
First positive urine viral load
First positive plasma viral load
Peak urinary viral load
Peak plasma viral load
Time to first positive urine viral load
Time to first positive plasma viral load
eGFR at 12 months
Urine and plasma viral loads for predicting BK nephropathy
First and peak urine and plasma viral loads with and without BK nephropathy
No BK nephropathy
First positive urine
First positive plasma
Receiver Operator Characteristic analysis of optimal viral load cut-offs for detecting BK nephropathy
First positive urine
First positive plasma
We examined and compared the frequency and compartment of BK viral load testing in relation to BKVN diagnosed by renal histopathology and defined potential receiver operator characteristic derived cut-offs for diagnostic accuracy. In our subset of 53 cases where fortnightly testing of both urine and plasma were performed, BKV was detected 29 days sooner in urine than plasma. Therefore monitoring of urine allows the earliest identification of viral replication, in agreement with other studies [8, 9]. Subgroup analysis of 14 cases by Funk et al. found BKV in the plasma became detectable 50 days after the urine compartment, however the frequency of testing and time from transplant were not recorded.8 Babel et al. recorded viremia 6 weeks after viruria from 233 patients tested monthly for BKV in blood and urine .
It was anticipated that more frequent screening (fortnightly versus 3-monthly) would detect BKV in the urine earlier and at a lower viral load as shown in our study, however we demonstrate that there was no statistical difference in the time to first detection or the initial viral load for the plasma compartment between the two screening frequencies. We reason that this discrepancy relates to BKV appearing in the plasma much later than in urine such that less advantage is found by more frequent plasma screening early post transplantation. We could not detect a difference in BKVN prevalence between these two screening frequencies although this may be due to insufficient sample size. We cannot explain the low prevalence of BKVN demonstrated for those transplants in whom no virological screening was performed. Although renal biopsy was performed for a similar percentage of these transplants, it is possible there was less active case-finding associated with unmeasured variables in this group. We do not advocate cessation of BK viral load screening on account of this finding of uncertain significance.
We confirmed that our in-house BKV quantitative assay is able to predict the risk of histologically proven BKVN and show that the ROC analysis identifies an optimal viral load cut-off for BKVN of 4.10 log10 c/mL for the first positive urine, 3.79 log10 c/mL for first positive plasma, 9.24 log10 c/mL for peak urine and 4.53 log10 c/mL for peak plasma. Kudose et al. obtained similar optimal BK viral load cutoffs of 7.2 and 3.7 log10 copies/mL in urine and plasma respectively for the detection of BKVN in concurrent biopsy , another study identifying plasma BK viral load of 4.1 log10 copies/mL as the best discriminator of BKVN . Therefore viral load cut-offs proposed in the literature of 7 log10 c/mL in urine and 4 log10 c/mL in plasma are similar to our results [2, 3, 12, 13], after accounting for our difference between initial and peak cut-offs.
However since the object of screening is to prevent the development of BKVN, based on our data, we deduce that the urine must be utilised if regular screening is performed early post transplantation to provide an advantage in earlier detection of BKV at a low viral load. There is no advantage in regular screening of plasma because there was no significant difference found in the time to first detection or initial viral load between fortnightly and 3-monthly testing. Additionally in contrast to the urine compartment, there is little difference in initial and peak ROC derived plasma viral load cut-offs for BKVN, suggesting the moment BKV is detected in the plasma the patient is at imminent risk for BKVN. If only plasma is screened, there is limited lead time for intervention to prevent BKVN. Adding to these concerns of relying on testing of the plasma compartment to screen or presumptively diagnose BKVN is a single study showing 11 of 31 patients with BKVN had plasma BK viral loads consistently <4 log10 copies/mL .
Accordingly, our adopted practice is regular urine BK viral load testing as the primary screening strategy due to its high sensitivity and earlier detection than the plasma compartment, with restriction of plasma testing to patients with a urine viral load exceeding 7 log10 c/mL. We suggest that utilising a urine first strategy provides an early warning to clinicians to take measures to modify the risk of progressive BKV replication. We confirm that a plasma BK viral load greater than 4 log10 c/mL is predictive of a risk of BK nephropathy and should prompt diagnostic biopsy and significant modification of immunosuppression or additional therapy according to the clinical situation. This study validates the approach previously proposed by Hirsch et al. .
The major limitation of the study relates to the reliance on histopathology for the diagnosis because histopathological changes occur late in the disease and disease can be missed by biopsy due to focal involvement. Biopsies were performed at the discretion of the treating physician rather than as part of a protocol and the decision to biopsy the patient may have been influenced by the BK viral loads leading to ascertainment bias. Due to logistical constraints, we lack information about risk factors for the development of BKVN and the management of presumptive or confirmed BKVN, however this was not the aim of this study. The transplants screened 3-monthly and fortnightly were largely from two different transplant centres, and BKV management was not protocolised across the centres. Bias according to centre could have potentially contributed to the outcomes of the two groups.
As the presence of BKV antigen-specific T-cell responses are associated with control of BKV replication [15–18], and there are scant reports of the association of BKV genotype with BKVN [19, 20], with further study it would be interesting to evaluate BKV specific T-cell immunity and BKV genotype for differences in cases with low or undetectable BK viral loads, high BK viral loads without BKVN, and those cases with BKVN.
In this retrospective observational study, we have not been able to demonstrate that better clinical outcomes are associated with more frequent BK viral load testing or testing of a particular compartment. However we have shown if frequent BK viral load testing is employed early post transplantation, the advantage of earlier detection is found for urine but not plasma testing. Additionally, the initial detection of BKV in the plasma occurs at a level already predicting a risk of BKV nephropathy. For these reasons we suggest urine rather than plasma as the optimal compartment for BK viral load screening.
ATSI, aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander; BKV, BK virus; BKVN, BK virus nephropathy; c/mL, copies per millilitre; CI, confidence interval; IQR, interquartile range; PCR, polymerase chain reaction
There was no funding source for this study.
No funding was obtained for this study.
Availability of data and materials
Sharing of data was not approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Royal Perth Hospital.
PB contributed to the research design, writing of the paper, performance of research, data analysis. CH contributed to the research design, performance of research, data analysis. Ramyasuda Swaminathan contributed to the research design, writing of the paper, data analysis. AI contributed to the research design, writing of the paper, data analysis. KW contributed to the research design, data analysis. Rajalingam Sinniah contributed to the performance of research, data analysis. TP contributed to the research design, performance of research, data analysis. JF contributed to the research design, data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study and consent waiver was approved by the Royal Perth Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee, reference number REG 13-118. Patient consent was waivered due to the difficulty in contacting patients, and the low risk of the study.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Bressollette-Bodin C, Coste-Burel M, Hourmant M, Sebille V, Andre-Garnier E, Imbert-Marcille BM. A prospective longitudinal study of BK virus infection in 104 renal transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2005;5(8):1926–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirsch HH, Randhawa P. BK Polyomavirus in solid organ transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2013;13:179–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Transplant Work Group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2009;9 Suppl 3:S1–S157.Google Scholar
- Hirsch HH, Brennan DC, Drachenberg CB, Ginevri F, Gordon J, Limaye AP, et al. Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in renal transplantation: interdisciplinary analyses and recommendations. Transplantation. 2005;79:1277–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lim L, Kay ID, Palladino S, Flexman J. Variability in patterns of BK viral load after renal transplantation. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008;61(3):302–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837–45.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council, Australian Vice-Chancellors’ Committee: National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. 2007. http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/file/publications/synopses/e72.pdf. Accessed 21 Oct 2015.
- Funk GA, Gosert R, Comoli P, Ginevri F, Hirsch HH. Polyomavirus BK replication dynamics in vivo and in silico to predict cytopathology and viral clearance in kidney transplants. Am J Transplant. 2008;8:2368–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Babel N, Fendt J, Karaivanov S, Bold G, Arnold S, Sefrin A, et al. Sustained BK viruria as an early marker for the development of BKV-associated nephropathy: analysis of 4128 urine and serum samples. Transplantation. 2009;88:89–95.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Randhawa P, Ho A, Shapiro R, Vats A, Swalsky P, Finkelstein S, et al. Correlates of quantitative measurement of BK Polyomavirus (BKV) DNA with clinical course of BKV Infection in renal transplant patients. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(3):1176–80.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kudose S, Dong J. Clinical validation study of quantitative real-time PCR assay for detection and monitoring of BK virus nephropathy. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2014;44(4):455–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pollara CP, Corbellini S, Chiappini S, Sandrini S, De Tomasi D, Bonfanti C, et al. Quantitative viral load measurement for BKV infection in renal transplant recipients as a predictive tool for BKVAN. New Microbiol. 2011;34(2):165–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hirsch HH, Knowles W, Dickenmann J, Passweq J, Klimkait T, Mihatsch MJ, et al. Prospective study of polyomavirus type BK replication and nephropathy in renal-transplant recipients. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:488–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hassan S, Mittal C, Amer S, Khalid F, Patel A, Delbusto R, et al. Currently recommended BK virus (BKV) plasma viral load cutoff of ≥4 log10/mL underestimates the diagnosis of BKV-associated nephropathy: a single transplant center experience. Transpl Infect Dis. 2014;16(1):55–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Costa C, Mantovani S, Piceghello A, Di Nauta A, Sinesi F, Sidoti F, et al. Evaluation of polyomavirus BK cellular immune response by an ELISpot assay and relation to viral replication in kidney transplant recipients. New Microbiol. 2014;37:219–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Costa C, Saldan A, Cavallo R. Evaluation of virus-specific cellular immune response in transplant patients. World J Virol. 2012;1(6):150–3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chakera A, Bennett S, Lawrence S, Morteau O, Mason PD, O’Callaghan CA, et al. Antigen-specific T cell responses to BK polyomavirus antigens identify functional anti-viral immunity and may help to guide immunosuppression following renal transplantation. Clin Exp Immunol. 2011;165:401–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Schachtner T, Muller K, Stein M, Diezemann C, Sefrin A, Babel N, et al. BK virus-specific immunity kinetics: a predictor of recovery from polyoma BK-associated nephropathy. Am J Transplant. 2011;11:2443–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Randhawa PS, Khaleel-Ur-Rehman K, Swalsky PA, Vats A, Scantlebury V, Shapiro R, et al. DNA sequencing of viral capsid protein VP-1 region in patients with BK virus interstitial nephritis. Transplantation. 2002;73(7):1090–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boldorini R, Omodeo-Zorini E, Suno A, Benigni E, Nebuloni M, Garino E, et al. Molecular characterization and sequence analysis of polyomavirus strains isolated from needle biopsy specimens of kidney transplant recipients. Am J Clin Path. 2001;116(4):489–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar