Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Epidemic spread of Pandoraea pulmonicola in a cystic fibrosis center

  • Nicolas Degand1,
  • Romain Lotte1, 2, 3Email author,
  • Célia Decondé Le Butor1,
  • Christine Segonds4,
  • Michelle Thouverez5,
  • Agnès Ferroni6,
  • Christine Vallier7,
  • Laurent Mély7 and
  • Jacqueline Carrère8
Contributed equally
BMC Infectious Diseases201515:583

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-1327-8

Received: 10 July 2015

Accepted: 17 December 2015

Published: 26 December 2015

Abstract

Background

Pandoraea spp. are recently discovered bacteria, mainly recovered from cystic fibrosis (CF) patients, but their epidemiology and clinical significance are not well known. We describe an epidemic spread of Pandoraea pulmonicola from 2009 in our CF center, involving 6 out of 243 CF patients.

Methods

Bacterial identification used amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA), MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and 16S rDNA gene sequencing. The clonal link between strains was assessed with pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) using XbaI. Clinical data were gathered for all patients.

Results

The index case was chronically colonized since 2000. The main hypothesis for this bacterial spread was a droplet cross-transmission, due to preventive measures not being strictly followed. Antibiotic susceptibility testing revealed resistance to beta-lactams, ciprofloxacin and colistin. However, there was susceptibility to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. All patients were chronically colonized with Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and the acquisition of P. pulmonicola resulted in chronic colonization in all patients. Three patients died, and two patients remained clinically stable, whereas one patient had a decline in lung function.

Conclusions

This study, which is the first to describe an epidemic spread of P. pulmonicola, notes the potential transmissibility of this bacterial species and the need for infection control measures.

Keywords

Pandoraea pulmonicola Epidemic Cystic fibrosis

Background

Pandoraea spp. are non-fermentative aerobic Gram negative bacilli first described in 2000 by Coenye et al. [1]. Initially, the genus Pandoraea was comprised of five bacterial species (Pandoraea apista, Pandoraea pulmonicola, Pandoraea pnomenusa, Pandoraea sputorum and Pandoraea norimbergensis). Since then, four other unnamed genomospecies and four other named species (Pandoraea thiooxidans, Pandoraea oxalativorans, Pandoraea faecigallinarum and Pandoraea vervacti) have been characterized [24]. These bacteria are ubiquitous in the environment and have been recovered from the soil, sea, and drinking water [5, 6]. In humans, Pandoraea spp. are mainly isolated from Cystic Fibrosis (CF) patients, and may cause chronic lung colonization [79]. Several Pandoraea species have been reported in CF patients. P. apista was involved in an epidemic spread in six CF patients in Denmark in 2003 [10]. More recently, P. sputorum was an agent of chronic CF lung colonization in Spain [8]. In addition to lung colonization, invasive infections due to Pandoraea species were also reported, although mostly in non-CF patients [11, 12]. However, a case of bacteraemia due to Pandoraea sp. was described in a CF patient [13]. This study reports an epidemic spread of P. pulmonicola in six patients attending our CF center and is the first description of an epidemic involving this bacterial species.

Methods

Patients

In 2008, P. pulmonicola was identified as a non-fermentative Gram negative organism, responsible for chronic lung colonization that started in 2000 in one of our CF patients. During 2009, five of the 243 patients attending our CF center contracted P. pulmonicola. In order to analyze the clinical impact of P. pulmonicola in the 6 patients, the following data were collected: age, sex, type of CFTR mutations, date of first P. pulmonicola isolation, associated pathogens, best forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) value per year, number of intravenous antibiotic courses per year, clinical status, transplantation and clinical outcome.

Microbiology

Microbiological analysis of sputa was performed by growing sputa aerobically on both usual media and Burkolderia cepacia selective medium (BCSA) (Biomérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France). Bacteria that grew on the BCSA were used for bacterial identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). Bacterial identification for each suspected strain was performed using API 20NE strips (Biomérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France), molecular techniques including amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA), 16S rDNA gene sequencing, and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). ARDRA was completed as previously described [14] with five restriction enzymes (AluI, CfoI, DdeI, MspI, and XmnI). The gyrB gene was amplified for further restriction analysis, according to Coenye [15], using the P. apista LMG 16407 type strain as a positive control. Moreover, the 16S rDNA-based species-specific PCRs were performed as described by Coenye [16]. Identification with the 16S rDNA gene sequencing was performed as previously described [17]. Sequence alignment used the NCBI/BLAST (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast) and BIBI (https://umr5558-bibiserv.univ-lyon1.fr/lebibi/lebibi.cgi) programs. Sample preparation for MALDI-TOF MS analysis was conducted using MicroFlex LT with the Biotyper v2.3 database (Bruker Daltonics). Briefly, colonies from overnight bacterial cultures were smeared onto the target plate (1 spot per strain), and 1 μL of α-cyano-hydroxycinnamic acid was added. For strain comparison, one strain from each patient was tested with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) using XbaI, as previously described [18]. Antibiotic susceptibility was determined on Mueller-Hinton agar plates (Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France) using both the disk diffusion method with Bio-Rad disks (Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France) and the Epsilometer test (E-test) (Biomérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) according to the guidelines of the “Comité d’antibiogramme de la société française de microbiologie” (CASFM) 2013 for Burkholderia cepacia [19].

Results

The first identification of Pandoraea pulmonicola in our CF center occurred in January 2008 in a 64-year-old man (patient 1), who was previously considered chronically colonized with Achromobacter xylosoxidans, as detected by the API 20NE strip. This patient was also chronically colonized with mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The systematic recovery of this strain on the BCSA and its full resistance to colistin (absence of inhibition zone around a 50 μg disk) prompted the sending of one isolate to the Observatoire Burkholderia cepacia (Hôpital Purpan, Toulouse, France) for analysis. The strain was analyzed by ARDRA, which resulted in genus level identification of Pandoraea sp.; however, it could not discriminate between P. apista and P. pulmonicola. Among the 16S rDNA based PCRs described by Coenye [16], a positive amplification was obtained with the primer pair appuF-panR, specific for P. apista and P. pulmonicola. However, the gyrB gene failed to be amplified. This strain was also analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS to confirm that the genus level identification of the Pandoraea sp. (log score value >2) matched the reference strain Pandoraea sp [2] 65 RLT. This identification was achieved through 16S rDNA gene sequencing. Sequence alignment of the 655 bp amplicon using NCBI/BLAST (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast) and BIBI (https://umr5558-bibiserv.univ-lyon1.fr/lebibi/lebibi.cgi) led to the identification of the strain as P. pulmonicola with 99.8 % sequence identity (654/655 bp) with P. pulmonicola strain CCUG 38759 (sequences NR_1151861 and AY268173 in NCBI and BIBI, respectively) and P. pulmonicola strain LMG 18106 (sequences NR_028750.1 and AF139175 in NCBI and BIBI, respectively, see the phylogenetic tree in Fig. 1). Retrospective identification of previous isolates from patient 1 recovered from 2000 to 2008 (50 sputum samples) rectified the identification as P. pulmonicola (misidentified as A. xylosoxidans) and was used to assess whether patient 1 was chronically colonized with P. pulmonicola. From March 2009 to December 2009, five additional patients acquired P. pulmonicola. Demographic, bacteriological and clinical data for the six patients are summarized in Table 1. Concerning bacterial identification, one strain from each patient was identified by ARDRA, 16S rDNA gene sequencing and MALDI-TOF MS, which had the same results as patient 1. In order to analyze the clonality of the strains, one strain per patient was used for PFGE analysis. All strains displayed the same PFGE type, demonstrating a clonal link between strains (Fig. 2). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed on one isolate per patient (recovered in 2009). All strains involved in the epidemic spread (patient 1 strains in 2009, and patient 2 to 6 strains) displayed the same antimicrobial susceptibility pattern with the same MIC values using the E-test methods. According to the interpretative standards for Burkholderia cepacia, the epidemic strain was resistant to piperacillin (>256 μg/mL), piperacillin-tazobactam (>256 μg/mL), ticarcillin-clavulanic acid (>256 μg/mL), ceftazidime (>256 μg/mL), cefepime (>256 μg/mL), imipenem (>32 μg/mL), meropenem (>32 μg/mL), ciprofloxacin (>32 μg/mL) and colistin (>256 μg/mL). The strain was susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (0.5 μg/mL) and intermediate to rifampicin (8 μg/mL). MIC values for cefotaxime (3 μg/mL), ceftriaxone (8 μg/mL) and tigecyclin (4 μg/mL) could not be interpreted because no breakpoint values were available.
Fig. 1

Phylogenetic tree based on the 16S rDNA sequence of our Pandoraea sp. epidemic strain. The tree was constructed using a neighbor-joining method, and 1000 bootstrap by using MEGA5 (Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 5.0.) software as previously described (21). Values above the lines are bootstrap values expressed as percentages

Table 1

Patients characteristics and clinical outcome

  

Patient 1

Patient 2

Patient 3

Patient 4

Patient 5

Patient 6

Age (years)

 

64

23

39

29

18

18

Sex

 

M

M

M

F

M

M

CFTR mutation

 

1717-1GA/2789 + 5GA

F508del/F508del

F508del/F508del

F508del/F508del

F508del/R553X

F508del/F508del

Date of first P. pulmonicola isolation

 

2000

March 2009

June 2009

October 2009

November 2009

December 2009

Associated pathogens

 

mucoid P. aeruginosa

mucoid P. aeruginosa

mucoid P. aeruginosa

mucoid P. aeruginosa

S. aureus, mucoid. P. aeruginosa, A. xylosoxidans, A. fumigatus

S. aureus, mucoid P. aeruginosa, A. fumigatus, G. argillacea

Best Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) value per year

2009

25

45

33

43

47

61

 

2010

/

41

25

35

44

42

 

2011

/

40

20

/

42

41

 

2012

/

31

19

/

/

59

 

2013

/

42

19

/

/

60

Number of intravenous antibiotic courses per year

2009

8

2

6

10

7

8

 

2010

/

3

5

3

8

5

 

2011

/

1

4

/

7

6

 

2012

/

3

6

/

/

1

 

2013

/

0

3

/

/

0

Organ transplantation

 

No

No

No (listed for heart and lung transplantation)

Lung transplantation (March 2010)

Lung and liver transplantation (April 2012)

Lung transplantation (January 2012)

Clinical outcome

 

Death (October 2009) from severe comorbidities

Stable

Decline in lung function

Death (April 2010) from post transplantation bacteremia due to P. aeruginosa

Death (May 2012) from severe multiple post transplantation organ failure

Stable

Fig. 2

Dendrogram of the percent similarity between XbaI-digested genomic DNAs from P. pulmonicola isolates

Discussion

One of the patients attending our CF center was chronically colonized with P. pulmonicola since 2000, and five out of the 243 patients acquired this bacterium in 2009. Among Pandoraea species, P. pulmonicola was already reported in CF chronic lung colonization. This bacterial species was also reported to be the most predominant Pandoraea species among Irish CF patients [20]. Phenotypical characteristics of strains are consistent with the initial description made by Coenye et al. [1], since all strains displayed catalase and oxidase activity, polar motility and grew aerobically on usual media, such as Mueller-Hinton agar and also on BCSA. Notably, all strains recovered from patients 2 to 6 were non-pigmented, except for a brown pigmented strain recovered from patient 1 in 2008 and identified as P. pulmonicola by MALDI-TOF MS. The API20NE results were not reliable with an identity score of 58.9 % (T = 0.64) for the species A. xylosoxidans and an identity score of 22.2 % for Alcaligenes faecalis 2 (T = 0.6, biochemical profile: 0040476). Biochemical identification of Pandoraea spp. was not suitable because this genus is not included in the API20NE database. This explains the misidentification of the strain recovered from patient 1 prior to molecular identification. Previous studies have reported the misidentification of P. sputorum as A. xylosoxidans [11] and the misidentification of other Pandoraea species as A. faecalis, A. denitrificans, CDC IV C2 and Acinetobacter spp. [21]. ARDRA, as well as 16S rDNA-based PCRs, resulted in a genus level identification of the Pandoraea sp., but could not discriminate between P. apista and P. pulmonicola. Interestingly, the gyrB gene restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), which had been shown to be a reliable identification method for Pandoraea spp., could not be performed due to amplification failure of the gyrB gene for all the strains. Coenye et al. also reported low amplification of the gyrB gene from the three P. pulmonicola strains tested in their study [15]. Neither the 16S rDNA-based specific PCR proposed by Coenye et al. in 2001 [16] nor the ARDRA test [14] were able to differentiate P. pulmonicola from P. apista. Nevertheless, our 655 bp 16S rDNA gene sequence displayed more identity with the P. pulmonicola type strain LMG 18106 (99.8 %) than with the P. apista type strain LMG 16407 T (98.9 %). Comparing this sequence with other available 16S rDNA Pandoraea strain sequences using the blast2N program (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/bl2seq/wblast2.cgi) resulted in 99.8 % homology with P. pulmonicola LMG 18106 T, 99.7 % with P. pnomenusa LMG 18087 T, 99 % with P. apista LMG 16407 T, 98.9 % with P. sputorum LMG 18819 T, and 98.4 % with P. norimbergensis LMG 18379 T. MALDI-TOF MS found the closest match with reference strain Pandoraea sp [2] 65 RLT (score value > 2 for all six strains). Interestingly, Pandoraea sp [2] 65 RLT displayed 99.8 % sequence identity with Pandoraea pulmonicola (accession number AF139175) and 99.5 % sequence identity with Pandoraea pnomenusa (accession number AY268170) (data provided by Bruker Daltonics). These results were consistent with the 16S rDNA sequence identity obtained above. The results from ARDRA, 16S rDNA sequencing and MALDI-TOF MS indicated that these methods should be used together in order to achieve an accurate identification at the species level.

In our assay, the epidemic strain was resistant to colistin, aminoglycosides, fosfomycin, pefloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ticarcillin, ticarcillin-clavulanic acid, meropenem, ceftazidime, and aztreonam, which was similar to previous reports for other Pandoraea species [8, 10, 11]. Until 2003, all P. pulmonicola strains recovered from patient 1 displayed a more susceptible phenotype with lower MIC values to piperacillin (32 μg/mL), piperacillin-tazobactam (24 μg/mL) and imipenem (3 μg/mL). This susceptibility pattern is similar to the P. sputorum strain described by Fernandez-Olmos et al. [8] with susceptibility to imipenem (MIC value of 4 μg/mL) and piperacillin-tazobactam (MIC value ≤ 16 μg/mL). Notably, patient 1 received piperacillin-tazobactam for the first time in 2007 and imipenem for the first time in January 2009, after the strain became resistant to these antibiotics. After 2003, all recovered strains from patient 1 displayed the same AST pattern as the epidemic strain (resistance to piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam and imipenem). Jørgensen et al. already reported intermediate susceptibility to ceftriaxone in P. apista strains [10]. Susceptibility to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was also reported in P. sputorum strains [8].

Analyses of hospitalization periods for patients 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 are consistent with the chronological acquisition of P. pulmonicola (data not shown). In 2009, the source patient was hospitalized eight times. The clonality of the strains isolated from all six patients was assessed by PFGE analysis. The main hypothesis to explain the bacterial spread between patients is droplet cross-transmission. In our center, all patients have to follow standard precautions and are asked to use an alcohol hand rub. Specific droplet cross-transmission preventive measures consist in the use of respiratory masks for patients chronically colonized with P. aeruginosa and cohorting patients chronically colonized with the B. cepacia complex. In 2009, the number of patients in our center who were chronically colonized with P. aeruginosa was 150 out of 243 (61.7 %). The preventative measures were not strictly followed, and the patients had several contacts without respiratory masks, which is likely to have enabled droplet cross-transmission of P. pulmonicola. However, we cannot completely exclude an indirect droplet mediated cross-transmission or the possibility of exposure to a common bacterial source. Finally, by applying strict cross-transmission prevention measures, i.e. segregation of colonized patients in single hospitalization rooms with use of gowns for medical staff, consultations in specific rooms and on specific days, forbidden access to common areas, use of respiratory masks and use of specific spirometers with single use turbines and mouthpieces, the epidemic spread was controlled. In our study, all patients were chronically colonized with the mucoid P. aeruginosa, and associated pathogens were found in two patients. It would be interesting to determine whether chronic P. aeruginosa colonization is a condition that facilitates the acquisition and colonization of P. pulmonicola. All patients remained chronically colonized with P. pulmonicola after the date of first acquisition, which is consistent with previously described data regarding the ability of this bacterial species to chronically colonize lungs of CF patients. For example, in 2009, P. pulmonicola was recovered from 4/4 sputa (patient 2), 14/14 sputa (patient 3), 10/10 sputa (patient 4), 20/20 sputa (patient 5) and 6/6 sputa (patient 6). As for patient 1, the total number of positive sputa was 50 since the year 2000. The main features for all six patients concerning the clinical outcomes after P. pulmonicola acquisition are summarized in Table 1. Three patients died (patient 1, patient 4 and patient 5). Patient 1 died in October 2010 from severe comorbidities. Patient 4 died in the context of P. aeruginosa bacteraemia (P. pulmonicola was not retrieved in blood cultures). Patient 5 died in May 2012 from multiple-organ failure one month after lung and liver transplantation (blood cultures grew P. pulmonicola, P. aeruginosa, and A. xylosoxidans). Several patients displayed declined lung function (Patient 3, Patient 4 and Patient 5). Two patients are clinically stable (patient 2 and patient 6). Patient 6 had a lung transplantation in January 2012 and is still chronically colonized with P. pulmonicola after bilateral lung transplantation. Altogether, the specific role played by P. pulmonicola in declined lung function is difficult to determine since it is associated with the chronic colonization of P. aeruginosa. However, recent data reported virulence of P. pulmonicola strains, mentioning that P. pulmonicola strains were more virulent than other Pandoraea species and could translocate through polarized lung epithelia with an in vivo virulence comparable to that of B. cenocepacia [21].

Conclusions

Our study notes the role of P. pulmonicola as an emerging pathogen that can cause chronic lung colonization in CF patients. Identification tools need to be accurate and must be based on molecular techniques and MALDI-TOF MS. Cross-transmission preventive measures also need to be strictly followed to avoid an epidemic spread. Hopefully, the use of whole genome sequencing will provide significant additional information concerning the virulence of P. pulmonicola.

Consent

Informed consent was obtained from the six patients that were reported in this article. For this retrospective observational study, ethics adherence was not required.

Notes

Abbreviations

ARDRA: 

amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis

AST: 

antimicrobial susceptibility testing

BCSA: 

Burkolderia cepacia selective medium

CF: 

cystic fibrosis

FEV: 

forced expiratory volume

MALDI-TOF MS: 

matrix-assisted laser desorption/Ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry

PFGE: 

pulsed-field gel electrophoresis

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Departments of Bacteriology of Nice teaching hospital, France and Giens general hospital, France for the technical support. We also would like to thank Vanessa NKamga for her contribution to the 16S sequence analysis.

Funding

This work has been supported by FRM (Grant#FDM20150632804 to RL). We also would like to thank the CRCM of Giens General Hospital for the financial support.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Hôpital Archet II
(2)
INSERM 1065-Centre Méditerranéen de Médecine moléculaire, « Toxines microbiennes dans la relation hôte-agents pathogènes », Bâtiment Universitaire Archimed
(3)
Faculté de Médicine, Université de Nice Sophia-Antipolis
(4)
Observatoire Burkholderia cepacia, Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Hôpital Purpan
(5)
Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Hôpital Jean Minjoz
(6)
Laboratoire de Bactériologie, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades
(7)
CRCM, Hôpital Renée Sabran
(8)
Laboratoire de Biologie, Hôpital Renée Sabran

References

  1. Coenye T, Falsen E, Hoste B, Ohlén M, Goris J, Govan JR, et al. Description of Pandoraea gen. nov. with Pandoraea apista sp. nov., Pandoraea pulmonicola sp. nov., Pandoraea pnomenusa sp. nov., Pandoraea sputorum sp. nov. and Pandoraea norimbergensis comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2000;50:887–99.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Anandham R, Indiragandhi P, Kwon SW, Sa TM, Jeon CO, Kim YK, et al. Pandoraea thiooxydans sp. nov., a facultatively chemolithotrophic, thiosulfate-oxidizing bacterium isolated from rhizosphere soils of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010;60:21–6.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Daneshvar MI, Hollis DG, Steigerwalt AG, Whitney AM, Spangler L, Douglas MP, et al. Assignment of CDC weak oxidizer group 2 (WO-2) to the genus Pandoraea and characterization of three new Pandoraea genomospecies. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:1819–26.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Sahin N, Tani A, Kotan R, Sedlácek I, Kimbara K, Tamer AU. Pandoraea oxalativorans sp. nov., Pandoraea faecigallinarum sp. nov. and Pandoraea vervacti sp. nov., isolated from oxalate-enriched culture. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2011;61:2247–53.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Fera MT, Maugeri TL TL, Gugliandolo C, Bonanno D, La Camera E, Papasergi S, et al. Occurrence of Burkholderia cepacia complex, Ralstonia and Pandoraea species DNAs in the coastal environment of the Straits of Messina (Italy). Mar Pollut Bull. 2007;54:803–8.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Silbaq FS. Viable ultramicrocells in drinking water. J Appl Microbiol. 2009;106:106–17.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Pérez De Ayala-Balzola A, Buendía-Moreno B, Girón-Moreno RM, López-Brea M. Pandoraea pulmonicola isolation in patients with cystic fibrosis. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2006;24:473–4.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Fernández-Olmos A, Morosini MI, Lamas A, García-Castillo M, García-García L, Cantón R, et al. Clinical and Microbiological Features of a Cystic Fibrosis Patient Chronically Colonized with Pandoraea sputorum Identified by Combining 16S rRNA Sequencing and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:1096–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Moore JE, Reid A, Millar BC, Jiru X, Mccaughan J, Goldsmith CE, et al. Pandoraea apista isolated from a patient with cystic fibrosis: problems associated with laboratory identification. Br J Biomed Sci. 2002;59:164–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Jørgensen IM, Johansen HK, Frederiksen B, Pressler T, Hansen A, Vandamme P, et al. Epidemic spread of Pandoraea apista, a new pathogen causing severe lung disease in cystic fibrosis patients. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2003;36:439–46.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Pimentel JD, MacLeod C. Misidentification of Pandoraea sputorum isolated from sputum of a patient with cystic fibrosis and review of Pandoraea species infections in transplant patients. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:3165–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Stryjewski ME, LiPuma JJ, Messier Jr RH, Reller LB, Alexander BD. Sepsis, multiple organ failure, and death due to Pandoraea pnomenusa infection after lung transplantation. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:2255–7.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson LN, Han JY, Moskowitz SM, Burns JL, Qin X, Englund JA. Pandoraea bacteremia in a cystic fibrosis patient with associated systemic illness. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004;23:881–2.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Segonds C, Paute S, Chabanon G. Use of amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis for identification of Ralstonia and Pandoraea species: interest in determination of the respiratory bacterial flora in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:3415–8.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Coenye T, LiPuma JJ. Use of the gyrB gene for the identification of Pandoraea species. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002;19:15–9.Google Scholar
  16. Coenye T, Liu L, Vandamme P, LiPuma JJ. Identification of Pandoraea species by 16S ribosomal DNA-based PCR assays. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:4452–5.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Rosey AL, Abachin E, Quesnes G, Cadilhac C, Pejin Z, Glorion C, et al. Development of a broad-range 16S rDNA real-time PCR for the diagnosis of septic arthritis in children. J Microbiol Methods. 2007;68:88–93.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Talon D, Dupont MJ, Lesne J, Thouverez M, Michel-Briand Y. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis as an epidemiological tool for clonal identification of Aeromonas hydrophila. J Appl Bacteriol. 1996;80:277–82.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Comité de l’Antibiogramme de la Société Française de Microbiologie (CASFM). 2013. Communiqué 2013. Société Française de Microbiologie. Home page at: http://www.sfm-microbiologie.org/.
  20. Costello A, Herbert G, Fabunmi L, Schaffer K, Kavanagh KA, Caraher EM, et al. Virulence of an emerging respiratory pathogen, genus Pandoraea, in vivo and its interactions with lung epithelial cells. J Med Microbiol. 2011;60:289–99.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28(10):2731–9.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Degand et al. 2015