Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Streptococcus pyogenes strains in Sao Paulo, Brazil: molecular characterization as a basis for StreptInCor coverage capacity analysis

  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 2,
  • 5, 6,
  • 1, 2,
  • 1, 2,
  • 3,
  • 3,
  • 7,
  • 1, 2, 4 and
  • 1, 2, 8Email author
Contributed equally
BMC Infectious Diseases201515:308

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-1052-3

  • Received: 16 March 2015
  • Accepted: 22 July 2015
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Several human diseases are caused by Streptococcus pyogenes, ranging from common infections to autoimmunity. Characterization of the most prevalent strains worldwide is a useful tool for evaluating the coverage capacity of vaccines under development. In this study, a collection of S. pyogenes strains from Sao Paulo, Brazil, was analyzed to describe the diversity of strains and assess the vaccine coverage capacity of StreptInCor.

Methods

Molecular epidemiology of S. pyogenes strains was performed by emm-genotyping the 229 isolates from different clinical sites, and PCR was used for superantigen profile analysis. The emm-pattern and tissue tropism for these M types were also predicted and compared based on the emm-cluster classification.

Results

The strains were fit into 12 different emm-clusters, revealing a diverse phylogenetic origin and, consequently, different mechanisms of infection and escape of the host immune system. Forty-eight emm-types were distinguished in 229 samples, and the 10 most frequently observed types accounted for 69 % of all isolates, indicating a diverse profile of circulating strains comparable to other countries under development. A similar proportion of E and A-C emm-patterns were observed, whereas pattern D was less frequent, indicating that the strains of this collection primarily had a tissue tropism for the throat. In silico analysis of the coverage capacity of StreptInCor, an M protein-conserved regionally based vaccine candidate developed by our group, had a range of 94.5 % to 59.7 %, with a mean of 71.0 % identity between the vaccine antigen and the predicted amino acid sequence of the emm-types included here.

Conclusions

This is the first report of S. pyogenes strain characterization in Sao Paulo, one of the largest cities in the world; thus, the strain panel described here is a representative sample for vaccine coverage capacity analysis. Our results enabled evaluation of StreptInCor candidate vaccine coverage capacity against diverse M-types, indicating that the vaccine candidate likely would induce protection against the diverse strains worldwide.

Keywords

  • Candidate Vaccine
  • Necrotizing Fasciitis
  • Coverage Capacity
  • Noninvasive Isolate
  • Simpson Reciprocal Index

Background

Streptococcus pyogenes, or Group A Streptococcus (GAS), is an exclusively human pathogen responsible for a broad variety of clinical manifestations ranging from pharyngitis and impetigo to invasive diseases, such as necrotizing fasciitis and toxic shock syndrome. Some strains can also trigger autoimmune diseases, such as acute rheumatic fever, rheumatic heart disease and glomerulonephritis [1]. GAS infections are the major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The prevalence of severe GAS diseases is at least 18.1 million cases, which cause approximately 517,000 deaths per year [2].

M protein is a surface component of GAS and one of the main virulence factors due to its anti-phagocytic properties [3]. This protein contains a hyper variable amino terminal end that serves as substrate for gold standard emm-typing for strain identification. More than 220 different emm-types have been described [4]. Systematic epidemiological reviews clearly highlight significant differences in emm-type distribution across different regions of the world. Relatively limited numbers of emm-type are recovered from high-income settings, while a much higher diversity of strains circulates in low-income settings [5, 6]. A complementary typing system, emm-pattern typing, is based on the presence and arrangement of emm and emm-like genes located in the mga locus within the S.pyogenes genome. This classification is correlated with tissue tropism as follows: A-C emm-pattern isolates are usually recovered from the throat infections, D emm-pattern strains are usually isolated from the skin (impetigo), and E emm-patterns are recovered from both biological sites [7, 8].

Sanderson-Smith et al. recently proposed a functional classification of the emm-types in clusters according to the phylogenetic origin and microbiological characteristics of the strain. The cluster classification enabled comparison between strains and serves as a tool for vaccine development [9].

GAS contains numerous genes encoding virulence factors, such as streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxins (Spe proteins). These proteins constitute a family of bacterial toxins with powerful mitogenic effects on T cells expressing a particular Vβ domain of the T cell receptor molecule, inducing non-specific polyclonal activation of the immune system by binding directly to class II MHC molecules [10]. Several studies have reported that Spe exotoxin content is correlated with emm-types and associated with clinical manifestations [1113]. Spe exotoxins most likely contribute to the severity of GAS infections. However, the exact molecular mechanism involved in specific pathologies is still not understood [14].

To date, no anti-streptococcal A vaccine is available; however, several candidates based on both N- and C- terminal portions of the M protein are in different stages of development [15]. Briefly, the 30-valent is based on the highly variable amino-terminal region of the M protein [16], and the J8 candidate vaccine a construction of minimal B-cell epitope from the C-repeat region [17].

StreptInCor candidate vaccine is based on amino acid sequences of the conserved region of the M5 protein. This candidate vaccine, in contrast to the others, contains both B and T cell epitopes to provide a strong protective immune response [18].

Although GAS infections are common in several regions of Brazil, only a few studies on the prevalence, emm-type profiles and virulence factors of the strains are available [1921]. Here, we described the emm-type and superantigen profile of the most prevalent strains in Sao Paulo and assessed the theoretical coverage vaccine.

Methods

S.pyogenes strain collection

GAS isolates were obtained from patients treated at the Clinical Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, and the Special Clinical Microbiology Laboratory (LEMC), Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil, between 2001 and 2008. The bacterial samples were defined according to their isolation sites (skin, throat and other invasive sites).

Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was obtained from the Heart Institute Ethics Committee (CAPPesq; approval number-0646/07) at the University of Sao Paulo. Patient informed consent was waived because this study is a retrospective analysis of strains from a microbiology collection.

The GAS diagnostic criteria were based on beta hemolysis in blood agar and sensitivity to bacitracin. Then, the specimens were cultured on sheep blood agar (Vetec, Brazil), followed by growth in Todd-Hewitt broth (Himedia, India) until OD600 of 0.4 and stored at −80 °C.

DNA isolation, emm-typing, patterning and emm-cluster distribution

The genomic DNA extraction, emm-gene PCR amplification and sequencing and emm-type identification were performed according to the protocol described by the CDC (http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/biotech/strep/strepblast.html) using the primers MF2 and MR1 for amplification and sequencing, respectively, as previously described [19]. The emm-pattern for each emm-type was deduced using the table of correspondence provided by a recent multi-center study [4]. The emm-cluster classification of the strains identified in this study was based on the new functional classification recently proposed by Sanderson-Smith et al. [9].

Superantigen profile

To identify the superantigens each gene carried by strain, PCR reactions were performed using specific primers and singleplex PCR as previously described for speA, speC, speG, speH, speI, speJ, ssa [13] and smeZ [12]. speB (cysteine protease) was used as a positive control in our PCR reaction.

Statistical analysis

The Simpson Reciprocal Index (1/D) of 1 corresponds to a theoretical situation in which only one emm-type/cluster is recovered, representing the lowest diversity possible. The maximum Simpson Reciprocal Index corresponds to the total number of emm-type/cluster recovered in one area. Higher values indicate greater diversity. A Simpson Index was calculated using the following formula: D = ∑ (n/N) 2, where “n” is the total number of isolates of a given emm-type or belonging to a given cluster and “N” is the total number of isolates of all the emm-types/clusters recovered in an area [22, 23]. Confidence intervals were calculated as previously described [24].

M protein sequence analyses

M proteins complete sequences and C repeat annotation from each emm-type included in this study were derived from previous study [4]. Multiple proteic alignments were obtained using Muscle software as implemented in Geneious® version R8.

Results

emm-types

The distribution of emm-types among the 229 GAS isolates is described in Table 1. The clinical origin was known for 214 isolates. Most samples were associated with invasive infection (n = 123, 57 %), whereas the remaining samples were recovered from throat (n = 57, 27 %) and skin infections (n = 34, 16% ). Forty-eight different emm-types were identified. The most frequent emm-types were emm1 (22 %), emm87 (8 %), emm22 (7 %), emm12 (7 %), emm77 (6 % ), emm6 (6 % ), emm89 (5 %), emm33 (3 %), emm75 (3 %) and emm3 (3 %) (Fig. 1). Taken together, these emm-types accounted for 69 % of the GAS isolates. To better understand the strain diversity present in our study, and its likely consequence for multivalent vaccine coverage, we have calculated the reciprocal Simpson index of diversity which results was 12.7 (95 % CI, 10.1-17.0).
Table 1

Distribution of emm-types among 229 GAS isolates obtained during the 2004-2008

emm types

N/% of each strain per year

N/% among total

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

Unknown

1

3/18.8

5/22.7

11/25.6

6/40

6/15.0

1/3.4

6/16.7

4/40.0

8/44.4

50/21.8

87

1/6.3

 

5/11.6

1/6.7

1/2.5

3/10.3

5/13.9

1/10.0

1/5.6

18/7.8

22

5/31.3

2/9.0

2/4.7

1/6.7

1/2.5

1/3.4

 

3/30.0

2/11.1

17/7.4

12

  

2/4.7

2/13.4

6/15

1/3.4

4/11.1

  

15/6.5

77

 

2/9.0

4/9.3

 

3/7.5

1/3.4

2/5.6

1/10.0

1/5.6

14/6.1

6

  

1/2.3

 

4/10.0

6/20.7

2/5.6

  

13/5.7

89

  

1/2.3

  

3/10.3

3/8.3

1/10.0

3/16.7

11/4.8

75

2/12.5

1/4.5

1/2.3

3

     

7/3.0

33

  

0

 

3/7.5

2/6.9

1/2.8

 

1/5.6

7/3.0

3

 

1/4.5

2/4.7

  

3/10.3

   

6/2.6

183

  

0

 

4/10.0

1/3.4

   

5/2.1

78

 

1/4.5

4/9.3

      

5/2.1

53

  

0

   

3/8.3

 

1/5.6

4/1.7

64

 

1/4.5

0

 

1/2.5

 

1/2.8

  

3/1.3

92

 

1/4.5

1/2.3

 

1/2.5

    

3/1.3

108

 

2/9.0

    

1/2.8

  

3/1.3

95

      

3/8.3

  

3/1.3

41

1/6.3

  

1/6.7

     

2/0.9

4

1/6.3

    

1/3.4

   

2/0.9

44

    

1/2.5

 

1/2.8

  

2/0.9

49

  

1/2.3

 

1/2.5

    

2/0.9

58

 

2/9.0

0

      

2/ 0.9

59

 

0

1/2.3

 

1/2.5

    

2/0.9

73

 

1/4.5

0

 

1/2.5

    

2/0.9

80

  

1/2.3

  

1/3.4

   

2/0.9

101

  

0

 

1/2.5

   

1/5.6

2/0.9

102

  

1/2.3

  

1/3.4

   

2/0.9

115

     

2/6.9

   

2/0.9

127

    

1/2.5

 

1/2.8

  

2/0.9

99

 

1/4.5

  

1/2.5

    

2/0.9

Othera

3/18.8

2/9.0

5/11.6

1/6.7

3

2/6.9

3/8

  

19/8.3

Total/year

16/100

22/100

43/100

15/100

40/100

29/100

36/100

10/100

18/100

229/100

aemm-types with one sample only: 57, 63, 66, 67, 68, 71, 76, 83, 85, 86, 88, 90, 94, 119, 122, 184, 186, 193. N/percentage: number and percentage of each strain per year

Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Frequency of emm-types. A total of 48 emm-types were represented in the collection. Abbreviation: GAS, group A streptococcus

emm-pattern and emm-cluster distribution

We inferred the emm-pattern for 213 of 214 emm-types, except for emm127 (previously named st223). Pattern E and A-C emm-types were present at similar proportions (43 and 38 %), whereas pattern D strains were less frequent (18 %).

The strains were classified according to the emm-clusters, and the strains fit into 12 of 19 different emm-clusters. Most strains belonged to emm-cluster A-C3 (21 %), followed by E4 (20 %), E3 (13 %), D4 (12 %), single protein cluster clade Y (9 %), A-C4 and E6 (7 %), A-C5 and E1 and E2 (3 %), D2 and D5 (1 %) (Table 2).
Table 2

emm-cluster classification

emm type

Number of samples

emm cluster

% emm cluster

1

50

A-C3

21

12, 193

16

A-C4

7

3

6

A-C5

3

71

1

D2

1

33, 41, 53, 64, 80, 83, 86, 101, 108, 119, 186

27

D4

12

184

1

D5

1

4, 78

7

E1

3

66, 68, 76, 90, 92

7

E2

3

44, 49, 58, 87, 183

30

E3

13

22, 73, 77, 88, 89, 102

47

E4

20

59, 63, 67, 75, 85, 94, 99, 115

17

E6

7

6, 57, 95, 122

18

single protein cluster clade Y

9

The emm-types obtained fit into 12 different emm-clusters: A-C3 (21 %), E4 (20 %), E3 (13 %), D4 (12 %), single protein cluster clade Y (9 %), A-C4 and E6 (7 %), A-C5 and E1 and E2 (3 %), D2 and D5 (1 %)

Superantigen profile

The superantigen gene encoding profile was analyzed in 219/229 isolates (96 %). The chromosomally located superantigens genes smeZ, speG, and speJ were present in 219 (95.6 %), 201 (88 %) and 79 (35 %) isolates, respectively. The speG and smeZ genes were present at high frequencies in all strains, whereas speJ was absent or uncommon in diverse emm-types and presented a higher frequency only in emm1, emm33 and emm87 (n = 72, 86 %). Among the phage-encoded genes, speC was the most prevalent (n = 109, 48 %), followed by ssa (n = 61, 27 %), speA (n = 43, 19 %), speH (n = 37, 16 %), and speI (n = 31, 14 %). Among the most prevalent emm-types, speA was present in emm3 (100 %) and emm1 (62 %) but in only one sample of emm6. The emm-type speC was associated with all strains but was less frequent in emm1, emm3, emm183 and emm75 (n = 12, 33 %) and more frequent in the remaining strains (n = 38, 93 %). Additionally, speI was absent or less frequent in most samples, except for emm12 and emm183 (53 % and 60 %, respectively). Finally, speH was also absent or uncommon in most emm-types and occurred at a higher frequency only in emm183, emm12 and emm78 (n = 40, 72 %), and ssa was absent in only one isolate, with a frequency range of 7-86 % (Table 3).
Table 3

Superantigen profile of the most frequent emm-types identified in Sao Paulo, Brazil

emm type

Number of samples

Superantigens number (%)

  

speG

smeZ

speC

ssa

speH

speI

speJ

speA

emm1

48

45(94)

48(100)

6(12)

10(21)

1(2)

3(6)

39(81)

30(62)

emm 53

4

4(100)

3(75)

3(75)

1(25)

1(25)

1(25)

1(25)

-

emm33

7

7(100)

6(86)

4(57)

5(71)

2(29)

1(14)

6(86)

-

emm 22

16

14(87)

16(100)

13(81)

11(69)

2(12)

1(6)

-

-

emm 12

15

13(87)

15(100)

14(93)

1(7)

8(53)

8(53)

-

-

emm78

5

4(80)

5(100)

3(60)

1(20)

2(40)

-

1(20)

-

emm 6

12

12(100)

12(100)

83(77)

2(17)

-

1(8)

1(8)

1(8)

emm 87

18

13(72)

18(100)

15(83)

13(72)

-

-

13(72)

-

emm 77

13

6(46)

11(85)

5(38)

2(15)

-

-

1(8)

-

emm 89

11

11(100)

11(100)

8(82)

2(18)

-

-

4(36)

-

emm3

6

6(100)

5(83)

1(17)

3(50)

-

-

-

6(100)

emm 183

5

5(100)

5(100)

1(20)

-

4(80)

3(60)

-

-

emm 75

6

6(100)

6(100)

2(33)

3(50)

-

-

-

-

Vaccine coverage

Theoretical vaccine coverage capacity of StreptInCor candidate vaccine was accessed considering the amino acid sequence alignment with the M protein C-terminal region for the 46 emm-types identified here (the complete M protein sequence was missing for both emm127 and emm99). The identities ranged from 94.5 % to 59.7 % (mean of 71 %). Some emm-types presented with an insertion of 7 amino acid residues in their sequences, as previously described (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2

In silico analysis of StreptInCor coverage capacity. Amino acid sequence alignment of StreptInCor candidate vaccine with the 46 emm-types identified here (the complete M protein sequence was missing for both emm127 and emm99)

Discussion

Streptococcus pyogenes is an important human pathogen responsible for several invasive and non-invasive diseases in Brazil and worldwide. In this study, we characterized 229 invasive and non-invasive Streptococcus pyogenes samples from patients treated at the Clinical Hospital in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Great diversity of emm-types was observed. Forty-eight emm-types were observed in the 229 samples, with the 10 most frequent emm-types accounting for 69 % of all isolates. In terms of GAS strain diversity, a Simpson Reciprocal Index of 1 corresponding to a theoretical situation where only one emm-type/cluster has been recovered, representing the lowest diversity possible. The maximum value of the Simpson Reciprocal Index corresponds to the total number of emm-type/cluster recovered in one area. The higher the value is, the greater the diversity. The reciprocal Simpson index of diversity found in this study was relatively low (12.7) when compared to the index of 26.72 for Brasilia (in the central region of Brazil) [19]. On the other hand, our results were similar to those reported for high incomes suburbs from Salvador, in northeastern Brazil [20].

The distribution of the strains identified in this study is comparable to those found in other countries, particularly in high-income countries in Asia, the Middle East and Latin America, in which emm1 and emm12 were the most common types, as reviewed by Steer [6]. Interestingly, emm1, emm12 and emm89 have also been found in various studies conducted recently in several countries in Europe and China; these types were frequently correlated with invasive and/or noninvasive isolates [25]. emm77 had a high frequency in the invasive isolates found here. In addition, this strain has been associated with non-invasive diseases in Germany [26] and was found in both invasive and non-invasive isolates in Spain [12]. Among the 229 isolates, E and A-C emm-patterns were found in similar proportions, whereas pattern D was less frequent. Interestingly, studies from Brasilia, in the Central region of Brazil [19], revealed a higher proportion of E and D patterns (51 % and 36 %, respectively), whereas A-C patterns was rarely observed (9.5 %). The data demonstrate the variability of streptococcal strains in Brazil, which may be related to socio-economic differences and can be extended to other countries in which there are also social disparities.

Other factors that play a role in the clinical manifestation of S. pyogenes infection may be due to the associations between emm-types and superantigens.

In this study, the chromosomally encoded genes smeZ and speG occurred at high frequency in nearly all isolates (95.6 and 88 %, respectively); both were present in all emm-types at high frequencies (<70 %), except speG in emm77(43 %), in according with a variety of others studies [12, 2729].

The other chromosomal gene, speJ, was present in only 35 % of isolates and was absent in diverse emm-types, similar to others studies [12, 29, 30].

Among the phage-encoded genes, speC was the most prevalent, detected in 48 % of the isolates, followed by ssa (27 %), speA (19 %), speH (16 %), and speI (14 %). The speC, ssa, speH and speI genes presented similar frequencies to those found in others studies, whereas the speA gene generally had a lower frequency in our samples [25, 30, 31]. speA was present in emm3 (100 %), emm1 (62 %) and only one sample of emm6. The speA genes has been commonly detected among 1 isolate in several studies [32].

Currently, no anti-streptococcal vaccine is available in animal models of streptococcal disease, despite extensive efforts. Some models of anti-streptococcal vaccines are in different stages of development. Among them, the 30-valent contains short peptides from the highly variable amino-terminal region of the M protein [16], and the J8 vaccine candidate comprises a 12 amino acid minimal B-cell epitope from the C-repeat region flanked by 16 amino acids of a yeast DNA-binding protein conjugated to the diphtheria toxoid [17].

The vaccine candidate developed by our group, called StreptInCor, is based on the M5 protein C-terminal region [18], specifically the C2 and C3 region that is conserved among serotypes. Through in silico analysis with predicted amino acid sequence alignment, StreptInCor candidate vaccine had high sequence identity with 46 of the 48 emm-types described here (identity ranged from 94.5 % to 59.7 %, mean of 71 %), which is an important property for the probability of protection. In previous data, we described the structural, chemical, and biological properties of the StreptInCor peptide and demonstrated that the molecule is stable, which is an important property for a vaccine candidate. The possibility of the StrepInCor vaccine candidate epitope being processed by antigen-presenting cells (APCs) generating diverse peptides has also been previously demonstrated. The approach resulted in the observation that the vaccine epitope could be recognized by any individual, thus enabling a broad coverage capacity to trigger specific immunity [33].

The efficacy of this vaccine in animal models was evaluated in inbred and outbred mice, and a strong humoral response with high IgG production was observed [18]. Immunized Swiss mice challenged with the emm1 strain had a survival rate of 87 % at 21 days compared with lower survival in controls (53 %) [34].

Similar results have been observed in HLA class II transgenic mice, which also presented a specific and long-lasting immune response without developing deleterious reactions after one year. These results indicated that StreptInCor is a safe candidate vaccine [35].

In addition, the four most common emm-types included here (emm1, emm12, emm22 and emm87) were opsonized by StreptInCor-induced antibodies [36]. The strains identified here were fit into 12 of the 19 different emm-clusters and exhibited diverse phylogenetic origin and consequently different mechanisms of infection and resistance to escape the host immune system, supporting the hypothesis that StreptInCor vaccination would likely protect against infection caused by strains from different emm-clusters.

Conclusions

This is the first study investigating the epidemiology of streptococcal strains in Sao Paulo, one of the largest cities in the world. These data enabled evaluation of the StreptInCor candidate vaccine coverage capacity against diverse M-types, indicating that the vaccine candidate would likely induce protection against the diverse strains observed worldwide.

Notes

Declarations

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Heart Institute (InCor), School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, 01246-000, Brazil
(2)
Institute for Immunology Investigation, National Institute of Science and Technology, Sao Paulo, 01246-000, Brazil
(3)
Microbiology Laboratory of Clinical Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, 01246-000, Brazil
(4)
Clinical Immunology and Allergy Division, School of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, 01246-000, Brazil
(5)
Laboratoire de Génétique et Physiologie Bactérienne, Institute de Biologie et de Médecine Moléculaires, Faculté des Sciences, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, 1050, Belgium
(6)
Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, 3052, Australia
(7)
Special Clinical Microbiolgy Laboratory (LEMC), Federal Univeristy of São Paulo/UNIFESP, São Paulo, Brazil
(8)
Laboratory of Immunology, Clinical Hospital, Heart Institute (HC-FMUSP), Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 44, Sao Paulo, 05403-000, Brazil

References

  1. Cunningham MW. Pathogenesis of group A streptococcal infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000;13(3):470–511.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Carapetis JR, Steer AC, Mulholland EK, Weber M. The global burden of group A streptococcal diseases. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5(11):685–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Smeesters PR, McMillan DJ, Sriprakash KS. The streptococcal M protein: a highly versatile molecule. Trends Microbiol. 2010;18(6):275–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. McMillan DJ, Drèze PA, Vu T, Bessen DE, Guglielmini J, Steer AC, et al. Updated model of group A Streptococcus M proteins based on a comprehensive worldwide study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19(5):E222–229.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Smeesters PR, McMillan DJ, Sriprakash KS, Georgousakis MM. Differences among group A streptococcus epidemiological landscapes: consequences for M protein-based vaccines? Expert Rev Vaccines. 2009;8(12):1705–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Steer AC, Law I, Matatolu L, Beall BW, Carapetis JR. Global emm type distribution of group A streptococci: systematic review and implications for vaccine development. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9(10):611–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bessen DE, Carapetis JR, Beall B, Katz R, Hibble M, Currie BJ, et al. Contrasting molecular epidemiology of group A streptococci causing tropical and nontropical infections of the skin and throat. J Infect Dis. 2000;182(4):1109–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. McGregor KF, Spratt BG, Kalia A, Bennett A, Bilek N, Beall B, et al. Multilocus sequence typing of Streptococcus pyogenes representing most known emm types and distinctions among subpopulation genetic structures. J Bacteriol. 2004;186(13):4285–94.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Sanderson-Smith M, De Oliveira DM, Guglielmini J, McMillan DJ, Vu T, Holien JK, et al. A systematic and functional classification of Streptococcus pyogenes that serves as a new tool for molecular typing and vaccine development. J Infect Dis. 2014;210(8):1325–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Commons RJ, Smeesters PR, Proft T, Fraser JD, Robins-Browne R, Curtis N. Streptococcal superantigens: categorization and clinical associations. Trends Mol Med. 2014;20(1):48–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ma Y, Yang Y, Huang M, Wang Y, Chen Y, Deng L, et al. Characterization of emm types and superantigens of Streptococcus pyogenes isolates from children during two sampling periods. Epidemiol Infect. 2009;137(10):1414–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Rivera A, Rebollo M, Miró E, Mateo M, Navarro F, Gurguí M, et al. Superantigen gene profile, emm type and antibiotic resistance genes among group A streptococcal isolates from Barcelona, Spain. J Med Microbiol. 2006;55(Pt 8):1115–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Luca-Harari B, Ekelund K, van der Linden M, Staum-Kaltoft M, Hammerum AM, Jasir A. Clinical and epidemiological aspects of invasive Streptococcus pyogenes infections in Denmark during 2003 and 2004. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46(1):79–86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bisno AL, Brito MO, Collins CM. Molecular basis of group A streptococcal virulence. Lancet Infect Dis. 2003;3(4):191–200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. McNeil SA, Halperin SA, Langley JM, Smith B, Warren A, Sharratt GP, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of 26-valent group a streptococcus vaccine in healthy adult volunteers. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(8):1114–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Dale JB, Penfound TA, Chiang EY, Walton WJ. New 30-valent M protein-based vaccine evokes cross-opsonic antibodies against non-vaccine serotypes of group A streptococci. Vaccine. 2011;29(46):8175–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Batzloff MR, Hayman WA, Davies MR, Zeng M, Pruksakorn S, Brandt ER, et al. Protection against group A streptococcus by immunization with J8-diphtheria toxoid: contribution of J8- and diphtheria toxoid-specific antibodies to protection. J Infect Dis. 2003;187(10):1598–608.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Guilherme L, Faé KC, Higa F, Chaves L, Oshiro SE, Freschi de Barros S, et al. Towards a vaccine against rheumatic fever. Clin Dev Immunol. 2006;13(2–4):125–32.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Smeesters PR, Vergison A, Campos D, de Aguiar E, Miendje Deyi VY, Van Melderen L. Differences between Belgian and Brazilian group A Streptococcus epidemiologic landscape. PLoS One. 2006;1, e10.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Tartof SY, Reis JN, Andrade AN, Ramos RT, Reis MG, Riley LW. Factors associated with Group A Streptococcus emm type diversification in a large urban setting in Brazil: a cross-sectional study. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10:327.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Teixeira LM, Barros RR, Castro AC, Peralta JM, Da Glória S, Carvalho M, et al. Genetic and phenotypic features of Streptococcus pyogenes strains isolated in Brazil that harbor new emm sequences. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39(9):3290–5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Smeesters PR, Dramaix M, Van Melderen L. The emm-type diversity does not always reflect the M protein genetic diversity--is there a case for designer vaccine against GAS. Vaccine. 2010;28(4):883–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Smeesters PR, Mardulyn P, Vergison A, Leplae R, Van Melderen L. Genetic diversity of Group A Streptococcus M protein: implications for typing and vaccine development. Vaccine. 2008;26(46):5835–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Grundmann H, Hori S, Tanner G. Determining confidence intervals when measuring genetic diversity and the discriminatory abilities of typing methods for microorganisms. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39(11):4190–2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Imöhl M, Reinert RR, Ocklenburg C, van der Linden M. Epidemiology of invasive Streptococcus pyogenes disease in Germany during 2003–2007. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2010;58(3):389–96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Lintges M, van der Linden M, Hilgers RD, Arlt S, Al-Lahham A, Reinert RR, et al. Superantigen genes are more important than the emm type for the invasiveness of group A Streptococcus infection. J Infect Dis. 2010;202(1):20–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rogers S, Commons R, Danchin MH, Selvaraj G, Kelpie L, Curtis N, et al. Strain prevalence, rather than innate virulence potential, is the major factor responsible for an increase in serious group A streptococcus infections. J Infect Dis. 2007;195(11):1625–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Maripuu L, Eriksson A, Norgren M. Superantigen gene profile diversity among clinical group A streptococcal isolates. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2008;54(2):236–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Meisal R, Andreasson IK, Høiby EA, Aaberge IS, Michaelsen TE, Caugant DA. Streptococcus pyogenes isolates causing severe infections in Norway in 2006 to 2007: emm types, multilocus sequence types, and superantigen profiles. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48(3):842–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Friães A, Pinto FR, Silva-Costa C, Ramirez M, Melo-Cristino J, Infections PGftSoS. Group A streptococci clones associated with invasive infections and pharyngitis in Portugal present differences in emm types, superantigen gene content and antimicrobial resistance. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12:280.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Michaelsen TE, Andreasson IK, Langerud BK, Caugant DA. Similar superantigen gene profiles and superantigen activity in norwegian isolates of invasive and non-invasive group a streptococci. Scand J Immunol. 2011;74(5):423–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Rantala S, Vähäkuopus S, Siljander T, Vuopio J, Huhtala H, Vuento R, et al. Streptococcus pyogenes bacteraemia, emm types and superantigen profiles. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31(5):859–65.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Guilherme L, Alba MP, Ferreira FM, Oshiro SE, Higa F, Patarroyo ME, et al. Anti-group A streptococcal vaccine epitope: structure, stability, and its ability to interact with HLA class II molecules. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(9):6989–98.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Postol E, Alencar R, Higa FT, Freschi de Barros S, Demarchi LM, Kalil J, et al. StreptInCor: a candidate vaccine epitope against S. pyogenes infections induces protection in outbred mice. PLoS One. 2013;8(4), e60969.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Guerino MT, Postol E, Demarchi LM, Martins CO, Mundel LR, Kalil J, et al. HLA class II transgenic mice develop a safe and long lasting immune response against StreptInCor, an anti-group A streptococcus vaccine candidate. Vaccine. 2011;29(46):8250–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. De Amicis KM, Freschi de Barros S, Alencar RE, Postól E, Martins CO, Arcuri HA, et al. Analysis of the coverage capacity of the StreptInCor candidate vaccine against Streptococcus pyogenes. Vaccine. 2014;32(32):4104–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© de Barros et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement