Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Infectious Diseases

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

HBV immunization and vaccine coverage among hospitalized children in Cameroon, Central African Republic and Senegal: a cross-sectional study

  • Claudine Bekondi1,
  • Roberta Zanchi2,
  • Abdoulaye Seck3,
  • Benoit Garin4,
  • Tamara Giles-Vernick2,
  • Jean Chrysotome Gody5,
  • Petulla Bata6,
  • Angèle Pondy7,
  • Suzie Moyo Tetang8,
  • Mamadou Ba9,
  • Chantal Same Ekobo8,
  • Dominique Rousset10,
  • Jean-Marie Sire11, 12,
  • Sarah Maylin13,
  • Loïc Chartier2,
  • Richard Njouom14 and
  • Muriel Vray2Email author
BMC Infectious Diseases201515:267

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-1000-2

Received: 30 March 2015

Accepted: 26 June 2015

Published: 12 July 2015

Abstract

Background

Hepatitis B is a major health concern in Africa. The vaccine against hepatitis B virus (HBV) was introduced into the Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) of Cameroon and Senegal in 2005, and of CAR (Central African Republic) in 2008. A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess HBV immunization coverage following the vaccine’s introduction into the EPI and factors associated with having been vaccinated.

Methods

All hospitalized children, regardless of the reasons for their hospitalization, between 3 months and 6 years of age, for whom a blood test was scheduled during their stay and whose condition allowed for an additional 2 mL blood sample to be taken, and who provided the parent’s written consent were included. All children anti-HBs- and anti-HBc + were tested for HBsAg.

Vaccination coverage was assessed in three different ways: immunization card, maternal recall and serologic anti-HBs profile.

Results

1783 children were enrolled between April 2009 and May 2010. An immunization card was only available for 24 % of the children. The median age was 21 months.

Overall HBV immunization coverage based on immunization cards was 99 %, 49 % and 100 % in Cameroon, CAR and Senegal, respectively (p < 0,001). The immunization rate based on maternal recall was 91 %, 17 % and 88 % in Cameroon, CAR and Senegal, respectively (p < 0,001). According to serology (anti-HBs titer ≥ 10 mUI/mL and anti-HBc-), the coverage rate was 68 %, 13 % and 46 % in Cameroon, CAR and Senegal, respectively (p < 0,001). In Senegal and Cameroon, factors associated with having been vaccinated were: mother’s higher education (OR = 2.2; 95 % CI [1.5–3.2]), no malnutrition (OR = 1.6; 95 % CI [1.1–2.2]), access to flushing toilets (OR = 1.6; 95 % CI [1.1–2.3]), and < 24 months old (OR = 2.1; 95 % CI [1.3–3.4] between 12 and 23 months and OR = 2.7; 95 % CI [1.6–4.4] < 12 months). The prevalence of HBV-infected children (HBsAg+) were 0.7 %, 5.1 %, and 0.2 % in Cameroon, CAR and Senegal, respectively (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Assessing immunization coverage based on immunization cards, maternal recall or administrative data could be usefully reinforced by epidemiological data combined with immunological profiles. Serology-based studies should be implemented regularly in African countries, as recommended by the WHO. Malnutrition, lack of maternal education and poverty are factors associated with vaccine non-compliance. The countries’ vaccination programs should actively address these problems.

Keywords

HBV markersHBV vaccineAfrican childrenCross-sectional survey

Background

Infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a public health problem worldwide [1], with more than 350 million chronic carriers [2], 25–30 % of whom will die from the consequences of chronic infection [1].

In sub-Saharan Africa, contact with HBV, as measured by the prevalence of anti-HBc antibodies, varies from 65 to 85 % [3]; HBsAg prevalence ranges from 9 to 20 % [4], and the predominant source of HBV transmission is horizontal [5].

Antiviral treatment can reduce morbidity and mortality, but access remains limited in developing countries. Prevention of HBV by vaccination is a key and often the sole control strategy [6].

The anti-HBV vaccine is well tolerated and highly immunogenic in all age groups [7]. In 1991, the Global Advisory Group of the EPI (Expanded programme on immunization) recommended integrating it into all national immunization programmes [8]. For more than a decade, the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) has actively supported HBV vaccination in eligible countries throughout the world.

Cameroon, Central African Republic (CAR) and Senegal present high HBV endemicity. In Cameroon, the prevalence of HBsAg positivity varies from 7.7 % among pregnant women [9, 10] to 25 % in children > 4 years of age [11]. CAR reports 14 % HBsAg-positivity among young adults [12], 15 % among hospitalized patients in Bangui [13] and 10.6 % in rural areas [14]. In Senegal, the HBV chronic infection prevalence varies between 7 % among newborns [15] to 17 % among blood donors [16].

In response to WHO recommendations, Cameroon and Senegal introduced the vaccine into their EPIs in 2005 and CAR in 2008. All three countries administer three doses of the pentavalent vaccine (Zilbrix™, a DTPw-HBV combination vaccine [17], in Cameroon and CAR, QuinvaxemTM, a DTwP-HepB-Hib vaccine, in Senegal) to infants at 6, 10 and 14 weeks of age. At the time of our study, the monovalent HBV vaccine was not available in the three countries, and thus infants did not receive a birth dose, even though universal vaccination with Hepatitis B at birth is a current recommendation [1].

We conducted a cross-sectional study in a selected population of hospitalized children in the sub-Saharan African capitals of Cameroon, CAR and Senegal. On the basis of this study, we previously published an article highlighting the low protection rate (58 %) in Senegal compared to Cameroon (92 %) among children immunized with three injections of anti-HBV vaccine and in possession of an immunization card [18].

Here we reported results on i) HBV immunization coverage using different methods and HBV infection in a selected population of hospitalized children in the capitals of Cameroon, CAR and Senegal, ii) factors associated with having been vaccinated in Senegal and Cameroon in this selected population.

Methods

Study population

A cross-sectional study was conducted in five children’s hospitals: one hospital in Bangui (CAR), two in Yaoundé (Cameroon) and two in Dakar (Senegal). Both the Yaoundé and Dakar study sites included one pediatric hospital treating infants from families of impoverished socioeconomic status, and one general hospital serving a relatively well-off population. The Bangui site was a pediatric hospital serving children from families of all socioeconomic levels living in the city and its outskirts.

Between April 2009 and May 2010, children aged 3 month to 6 years, hospitalized for any reason, with a blood sample prescribed during hospitalization, health conditions allowing an extended blood sample between 2 mL and 5 mL according to the age. Children were consecutively enrolled after their parents or legal guardians received an information notice and oral explanation in the local language and provided a written consent.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Senegal Health Research National Council, the National Ethics Committee of Cameroon and the Scientific Committee responsible for validation protocols and study results in Central African Republic.

Data collection

Data collected were: i) general characteristics (age, sex, weight), ii) clinical features (reasons for hospitalization, vaccination records on the immunization card), iii) socio-economic characteristics (place of residence, number of people in the household, mother’s education (higher level: at least primary education), personal transportation, electricity, running water, toilets type) and iv) serological data (anti-HBs antibodies, anti-HBc antibodies, HBsAg, HBeAg) and HBV DNA, when the child was HBsAg-positive.

If the enrolled child’s immunization card was available, vaccination against HBV and dates of vaccination were recorded. Otherwise, the mother was asked about the child’s vaccination status.

Complete vaccination was defined as having received all three injections according to the vaccination card in compliance with the WHO vaccination schedule (6, 10 and 14 weeks of age). Partial vaccination was defined as having received one or two doses according to the immunization card, regardless of the immunization schedule.

Nutritional status was estimated separately for boys and girls by the Z-score, calculated on the weight for age, according to WHO standards for children between 3 and 60 months old, and to CDC standards for older children. Moderate or severe malnutrition was defined as a Z-score ≤ −2 SD [1921].

HBV markers

All samples were tested for anti-HBc and quantified for anti-HBs by Enzyme ImmunoAssay (EIA) (DiaSorin Biomedica, Sallugia, Italy). The correlate of protection for HBV is an anti-HBs titer ≥10 mIU/mL [22, 23]. All children anti-HBs-negative and anti-HBc-positive were tested for HBsAg by automated EIA (AxSYM, Abbott laboratories, Chicago, USA). All HBsAg-positive children’s mothers were called by phone so that children could be retested free of charge six months later. Viral loads were measured by the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HBV assay, v2.0 (Roche Diagnostics, Meylan, France) at Saint-Louis Hospital. The limit of detection was 20 IU /mL. Except for viral load quantification, all laboratory tests were performed in each country.

Statistical analysis

The children’s characteristics were described as medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) for continuous variables and percentages for discrete variables.

For univariate and multivariate analysis, quantitative variables were expressed as dichotomous variables using either the median or a clinically relevant threshold.

Univariate analysis was based on the Fisher’s exact test for discrete variables and by analysis of variance or the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables. All variables associated with “having been vaccinated” in univariate analysis (p < 0.25) were included in a backward stepwise logistic regression model. A p value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Adequacy of the model was established through the Hosmer Lemeshow tests. Interactions between the variables found to be associated with “having been vaccinated” in the univariate analysis were tested using likelihood-ratio test. Our data on immunization coverage estimated by serological markers in children born one year after integration of vaccine into EPI (2005 in Cameroon and Senegal, and 2008 in CAR) were compared with data reported by WHO on immunization coverage of surviving infants between 2006 and 2009 [2426].

Data were analyzed using STATA software version 12.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas).

Selected populations for analysis

Using the only publication showing that it is possible to distinguish between the passive transfer of maternal anti-HBc and HBV exposure in children ≥12 months [27], we divided subjects between children younger than 12 months and those older than 12 months.
  1. 1)

    To evaluate the anti-HBV vaccination coverage from serology analysis, anti-HBs + and anti-HBc + children < 12 months were removed: their vaccination status could not be determined, since anti-HBs antibodies can be derived from the mother. Anti-HBs + and anti-HBc- children, regardless of age, were considered vaccinated and protected for an anti-HBs level titer ≥10 mIU/mL, assuming that most sub-Saharan African mothers were unvaccinated [10].

     
  2. 2)

    To evaluate vaccination coverage by combining serology and vaccination card documentation: those considered to be vaccinated were children with serological protection (anti-HBs titer ≥10 mIU/mL), as well as children who were unprotected based on serology, but who had received a complete HBV vaccination according to their immunization cards.

     
  3. 3)

    To evaluate factors associated with having been vaccinated against HBV (regardless of serological status, protection or non-protection): an analysis was conducted in Cameroon and Senegal for children born in 2006 and after, i.e., at least one year after the integration of the HBV vaccine into the EPIs. CAR children were not included because the vaccine was integrated later. The variable “vaccinated” implied having received a complete HBV vaccination according to the immunization card, or if no immunization card existed, by anti-HBs + and anti-HBc- status (with anti-HBs titer ≥10mIU/mL). All anti-HBs + and anti-HBc + children with no immunization card were removed because we could not know whether they were vaccinated but not protected, or if they were not vaccinated at all.

     
  4. 4)

    HBV current infection was estimated by the number of children with HBsAg-positivity.

     

Results

General characteristics of the children

Table 1

Characteristics of children and their families

 

  Cameroon n = 763

  CAR n = 535

  Senegal n = 485

  Total n = 1783

  p

Sex, female

  329 (43)

  247 (46)

  212 (44)

  788 (44)

  0.54

Age (months) a 13

  17 [10; 33]

  27 [19; 37]

  20 [10; 36]

  21 [12; 36]

  <0.001

Immunization card (availability) 123

  177 (23)

  41 (8)

  210 (43)

  428 (24)

  <0.001

   Completeb

  166 (22)

  13 (2)

  172 (35)

  351 (20)

  <0.001

   Partialc

  10 (1)

  7 (1)

  38 (8)

  55 (3)

 

Moderate or severe malnutrition23 (yes)

  104 (14)

  68 (13)

  225 (46)

  397 (23)

  <0.001

Reasons for hospitalisation

    

  <0.001

   Gastro-intestinal infection

  172 (23)

  103 (19)

  108 (22)

  383 (21)

 

   Respiratory infection

  117 (15)

  42 (8)

  137 (28)

  296 (17)

 

   Malaria

  91 (12)

  289 (54)

  12 (2)

  392 (22)

 

   Other infectious syndrome

  253 (33)

  39 (7)

  59 (12)

  351 (20)

 

   Other

  130 (17)

  62 (12)

  169 (35)

  361 (20)

 

Place of residence 123 (capital)

  723 (95)

  441 (82)

  127 (26)

  1291 (72)

  <0.001

No of people per householda 123

  6 [4; 8]

  8 [5; 10]

  12 [7; 18]

  7 [5; 10]

  <0.001

Household ≥ 7 people 123

  287 (38)

  329 (62)

  367 (76)

  983 (55)

  <0.001

Mother’s education 123 (higher leveld)

  751 (99)

  489 (92)

  242 (51)

  1482 (84)

  <0.001

Personal transportation 13 (Car or motorcycle)

  149 (20)

  48 (9)

  70 (14)

  267 (15)

  <0.001

Electricity (yes) 123

  754 (99)

  227 (42)

  424 (87)

  1405 (79)

  <0.001

Running water (yes) 123

  382 (50)

  62 (12)

  411 (85)

  855 (48)

  <0.001

Flushing toilets inside house 123 (yes)

  327 (43)

  18 (3)

  86 (18)

  431 (24)

  <0.001

a Median [IQ1; IQ3]

b three injections in the immunization schedule

c at least one injection

d at least primary education

1: significant difference between Cameroon and CAR (p ≤ 0.05)

2: significant difference between Cameroon and Senegal (p ≤ 0.05)

3: significant difference between Senegal and CAR (p ≤ 0.05)

A total of 1783 children were recruited: 763 in Cameroon, 535 in CAR and 485 in Senegal. No mothers of eligible children refused to participate in the study.

General characteristics of the children are summarized in Table 1. Forty-four percent of the children were female, and the median age was 21 months [12–36 months]; children were significantly older in CAR.

The main causes of the children’s hospitalization were other infectious syndrome (33 %) and gastro-intestinal infections (23 %) in Cameroon; malaria in CAR (54 %); and respiratory infections (28 %) and other reasons (35 %) in Senegal.

Immunization cards were available for 24 % of all children. Senegalese subjects possessed a higher percentage of immunization cards (43 %) compared to those in Cameroon (23 %) and CAR (8 %), (p < 0.001). Among the 1355 children without an available immunization card, maternal recall of HBV immunization was documented for 636 children (79, 460 and 97 children in Cameroon, CAR and Senegal, respectively).

In Senegal, 51 % of the mothers had received primary or secondary education, compared to 99 % in Cameroon and 92 % in CAR (p < 0.001). Senegalese children suffered significantly more from malnutrition (46 %) than in Cameroon (14 %) and CAR (13 %), (p < 0.001). In CAR, families lived under poorer conditions than elsewhere.

Comparisons between the two Cameroonian hospitals and between the two Senegalese hospitals confirm the different socioeconomic levels of the populations served. For instance, at one Cameroonian hospital, 65 % (173/265) of the families had indoor flushing toilets, whereas only 31 % (154/496) of those at the other hospital had them. Similarly, in Senegal, 50 % (21/42) of patients attending one hospital came from families with indoor flushing toilets, compared with just 15 % (65/443) at the other. Concerning access to running water, our results resembled those pertaining to indoor flushing toilets: the two Cameroonian hospitals serving 72 % (190/265) compared to 39 % (192/497) of families whose homes had piped water. Overall, our subjects came from a wide range of families, from well-off functionary families to very poor ones.

HBV serological markers

Table 2

HBV serological markers N (%)

  

  Cameroon n = 763

  CAR n = 535

  Senegal n = 485

  Total n = 1783

  p

Anti-HBc- (N = 1437)

Anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/mL

  482 (63)

  67 (13)

  206 (42)

  755 (42)

  <0.001

Anti-HBs < 10 mIU/mL

  176 (23)

  331 (62)

  175 (36)

  682 (38)

  <0.001

Anti-HBc + (N = 346)

Anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/mL

  80 (10)

  35 (7)

  65 (13)

  180 (10)

  0.001

Anti-HBs < 10 mIU/mL

  25 (3)

  102 (19)

  39 (8)

  166 (10)

  <0.001

- HBsAg-positive

  5

  27

  1

  33

 

- HbsAg-negative

  20

  75

  38

  133

 

HBV serological markers are summarized in Table 2. Forty-two percent (755/1783) of children were anti-HBs titer ≥10 mIU/mL and anti-HBc-: Cameroon had a significantly higher percentage than did CAR and Senegal (63 %, 13 % and 42 %, respectively, p < 0.001).

Thirty-eight percent (682/1783) of children were anti-HBs titer <10 mIU/mL and anti-HBc-. Cameroon and Senegal had a significantly lower proportion of children anti-HBs titer <10 mIU/ml and anti-HBc- (23 % and 36 %, respectively), compared to the 62 % of children observed in CAR, p < 0.001).

Among the 346 children anti-HBc+, 33 were HBsAg-positive. The remaining 313 children were anti-HBs titer ≥10 mIU/mL and anti-HBc + (n = 180), or anti-HBs titer <10 mIU/mL and anti-HBc+, HBsAg-negative (n = 133). Sixty percent (188/313) of these children were ≥12 months.

Vaccination coverage according to immunization card, maternal recall and serology

Table 3

HBV vaccination coverage according to immunization card, maternal recall or serology: n/N (%)

 

  Cameroon n = 763

  CAR n = 535

  Senegal n = 485

  Total n = 1783

  p

Immunization card (availability) 123

  177 (23)

  41 (8)

  210 (43)

  428 (24)

  <0.001

  Vaccinated123a

  176/177 (99)

  20/41 (49)

  210/210 (100)

  406/428 (95)

  <0.001

   Complete vaccinationb

  166

  13

  172

  351

 

   Partial vaccinationc

  10

  7

  38

  55

 

   Anti-HBs titer ≥10 mIU/mL

  156/176 (89)

  17/20 (85)

  128/210 (61)

  301/406 (74)

 

Maternal recall 123 d

  72/79 (91)

  80/460 (17)

  85/97 (88)

  237/636 (37)

  <0.001

   Anti-HBs titer ≥10 mIU/mL

  54/72 (75)

  47/80 (59)

  65/85 (76)

  166/237 (70)

 

Serology 123 (Anti-HBs titer ≥10 mIU/mL12 and Anti-HBc-) e

  482/712 (68)

  67/534 (13)

  206/444 (46)

  755/1690 (45)

  <0.001

Immunization card (complete vaccination) or serology f

  527/737 (72)

  68/535 (13)

  294/467 (63)

  889/1739 (51)

  <0.001

a received at least one dose injection

b received all three doses injections

c received one or two doses injections

d documented for 636 children without available immunization card

e children < 12 months excluded (n = 93)

f children < 12 months without available immunization card excluded (n = 44)

1: significant difference between Cameroon and CAR (p ≤ 0.05)

2: significant difference between Cameroon and Senegal (p ≤ 0.05)

3: significant difference between Senegal and CAR (p ≤ 0.05)

HBV vaccination coverage according to immunization card, maternal recall or serology are shown in Table 3. Among these 428 children who had an immunization card, 9 were vaccinated outside of the official vaccination programme (EPI) (7 with complete vaccination and 2 with partial vaccination). Almost all Cameroonian and Senegalese children had been vaccinated (with partial or complete vaccination) (99 % and 100 %, respectively), exceeding that of CAR (49 %). Children with an immunization card tended to be younger, 13 months versus 21 months for the entire study population, (p = 0.006).

The delay between vaccination doses revealed adherence to the recommended schedule: the median time between birth and the first vaccine dose was 47 days (28- 66); between the first and second dose, 32 days (28- 29); and between the second and third dose, 32 days (29, 30). Among the children vaccinated according to the immunization card, Cameroon displayed the highest percentage of children with complete vaccination (94 % (166/176) against 65 % (13/20) in CAR and 82 % (172/210) in Senegal. Seventy-four percent (301/406) had an anti-HBs titer ≥10 mIU/mL (89 %, 85 % and 61 % in Cameroon, CAR and Senegal, respectively).

On the basis of the 636 maternal recalls, estimates of immunization coverage reached 37 % overall. In Cameroon and Senegal, coverage (91 % and 88 %, respectively) was substantially higher than in CAR, p < 0.001.

Seventy percent (166/237) of children reported as vaccinated by their mothers were protected based on serological data (anti-HBs titer ≥10 mIU/mL): 75 % in Cameroon, 59 % in CAR and 76 % in Senegal.

To estimate the immunization coverage from serological results, 93 anti-HBs + and anti-HBc + children < 12 months were removed: their vaccination status could not be determined since anti-HBs antibodies can be derived from the mother. On the basis of only serological results (anti-HBs titer ≥10 mIU/mL and anti-HBc-), overall immunization coverage was 45 % (755/1690). In Cameroon, coverage (68 %) was significantly higher than in CAR (13 %) and Senegal (46 %), (p <0.001). When immunization coverage was estimated both for serological results as defined above and, for children who were unprotected based on serology, from complete HBV vaccination according to immunization cards, vaccination coverage reached 51 % (889/1739) (44 children were excluded because they were anti-HBs + and anti-HBc + < 12 months without immunization card).

While the two approaches led to similar results in Cameroon and CAR, a difference of 17 % (46 % versus 63 %) was observed between the two estimates in Senegal.

HBV immune protection (anti-HBs titer ≥10 mIU/mL among anti-HBc-) according to year of birth and country and comparisons with WHO estimates

Fig. 1

HBV immune protection (anti-HBs + ≥10 mIU/ml among anti-HBc-) according to the year of birth and the country compared to WHO coverage estimates. Y axis: percentage of immunized children

The percentages of children serologically protected gradually increased between 2006 and 2009 from 63 % (47/75) to 82 % (151/185) in Cameroon and from 2 % (2/83) to 50 % (27/54) in CAR. In Senegal, however, the percentage of children serologically protected fluctuated between 42 % (24/57) and 50 % (52/103) during these same years (Fig. 1).

Factors associated with the fact of having been vaccinated

Table 4

Factors associated with having been vaccinated for children born in 2006 or later in Cameroon or Senegal

N (%)

  Non-vaccinateda

  Vaccinatedb

  Univariate analysis

  Multivariate analysis

 

  (n = 244)

  (n = 731)

  OR [CI95%]

  P

  OR [CI95%]

  p

Mother’s education

      

No education

  79 (33)

  101 (14)

  1

 

  1

 

Higher education (at least elementary)

  161 (67)

  625 (86)

  3.0 [2.2;4.3]

  <0.001

  2.2 [1.5;3.2]

  <0.001

Nutritional status

      

Malnutrition

  93 (39)

  169 (24)

  1

 

  1

 

No malnutrition

  147 (61)

  539 (76)

  2.0 [1.5;2.8]

  <0.001

  1.6 [1.1;2.2]

  0.011

Age

      

   <12 months

  67 (27)

  269 (37)

  2.5 [1.5; 3.9]

  <0.001

  2.7 [1.6;4.4]

  <0.001

   [12–24]

  81 (33)

  271 (37)

  2.0 [1.3; 3.2]

  0.002

  2.1 [1.3;3.4]

  0.003

   [24–36]

  55 (23)

  124 (17)

  1.4 [0.8; 2.3]

  0.21

  1.4 [0.8;2.4]

  0.21

   ≥36 months

  41 (17)

  67 (9)

  1

 

  1

 

Toilets

      

Without flushing

  190 (78)

  453 (62))

  1

 

  1

 

With flushing

  54 (22)

  277 (38)

  2.2 [1.5;3.0]

  <0.001

  1.6 [1.1;2.3]

  0.009

a Children anti-HBs- and anti-HBc- or anti-HBs- and anti-HBc+

b Children anti-HBs + and anti-HBc-, or based on the immunization card, with complete vaccination

In Cameroon and Senegal, four factors were identified as independently associated with having been vaccinated: mother’s higher level of education (OR = 2.2), no malnutrition (OR = 1.6), access to flushing toilets (OR = 1.6), and being <24 months old (OR = 2.1 between 12 and 23 months and OR = 2.7 < 12 months) (Table 4). There was no evidence for the interactions between the variables associated with having been vaccinated.

HBV infections

The percentage of HBV-infected children was significantly lower in Cameroon [0.7 % (5/763)] and Senegal [0.2 % (1/485)] compared to CAR [5.1 % (27/535)] (p < 0.001). The overall median viral load was 8 log IU/mL. Among the 27 HBsAg-positive children in CAR, 14 (52 %) were IgM anti-HBc + and 20 (74 %) were HBeAg-positive. Among the twelve children who returned six months later, six were HBsAg-positive. In Cameroon and Senegal, among the six HBsAg-positive children, the two children who returned six months later were confirmed to be HBsAg-positive. In CAR, 20 out of 27 infected children were ≥24 months, indicating that they were infected before the HBV vaccine’s introduction into the EPI. Among the seven children <24 months, only one 15 months old child possessed an immunization card documenting that he was not vaccinated. No information about the vaccination status of six other children was available, but all were born before September 2008. In Cameroon, among the five children HBsAg-positive, only one was under 24 months old; no information about the child’s vaccine status was available. The other four children were born prior to July 2005. The only Senegalese child infected was born at the end of 2006.

Discussion

Immunization coverage was estimated using different methods: the immunization card, maternal recall and serological profile, and a combination of immunization card and serology. Immunization rates calculated from serology showed higher coverage in Cameroon (68 %) and Senegal (46 %) than in CAR (13 %), because of the very recent introduction of the HBV vaccine in CAR. In Cameroon and CAR, the percentage of children immunized and protected increased over time from 2006 to 2009. This increased coverage relates to the level of investment and time required to set up the necessary delivery infrastructures and to reach isolated areas [31]. In both countries, results based on both vaccination and anti HBs profile convene closely to those based exclusively on serology, confirming that children vaccinated according to the immunization cards are protected.

In Senegal, the percentage of children vaccinated and protected fluctuated over time, with a maximum of 50 % in 2009 and a minimum of 38 % in 2007. If the results of subjects’ immunization cards are factored in, some children vaccinated according to the immunization cards were not, in fact, protected. Possible hypotheses for this lack of response to the vaccine, including storage conditions, cold chain issues or immunogenicity of the different vaccines, were previously reported [18].

The WHO/UNICEF, in assessing national immunization coverage of surviving infants, draws from several information sources: administrative data (reports from vaccination services), official data (the best estimates from authorities, which account for administrative data and any other available information) and monitoring survey data [29]. As shown in Fig. 1, in Cameroon, immunization coverage rates reported by the WHO for 2006–2009 (81 % to 88 %) are close to our results [23]. Similarly, in CAR, the WHO estimated coverage at 42 % in 2009, a rate similar to our results [24]. In Senegal, the WHO, relying on administrative and official data, estimated coverage at 89 % in 2006, 94 % in 2007, and 88 % in 2008 [25]. Serological analysis in our study produced substantially lower results. An external review of the EPI and a MICS (Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey) was carried out in Senegal in 2009 and reported immunization coverage of 74 % and 83 %, but the WHO did not use the results in its final estimates. Our results differed from WHO estimates when coverage analysis was based on serology results (50 %). These disparities may have different explanations. The WHO has noted that administrative data are subject to biases that can distort immunization coverage calculations [29], for example, when they include all vaccines delivered to vaccination centres, and not just vaccinations among children adhering to the immunization schedule [32]. Although vaccination is free, non-adherence to vaccination occurs in Senegal and Cameroon. We identified four factors associated with having been vaccinated against HBV (regardless of protection): mother’s higher education, having access to indoor flushing toilets, a child not being malnourished and being younger. The gradual increase in coverage following the vaccine’s introduction explains the association with age. Some studies have shown a link between mother’s education and acceptance of immunization [33]. Regarding the association between non-vaccination and malnutrition, studies have established a link between poor health and delayed vaccination of children [3436]. The association with lack of indoor flushing toilets can be explained by families’ lower socio-economic status, entailing, for example, distance to a vaccination centre and transport costs [30].

The low rate of HBsAg carriers (0.7 % in Cameroon and 0.2 % in Senegal) suggests the effectiveness of the countries’ EPIs and of GAVI’s support for HBV vaccination in these two countries. Nevertheless, a significant number of children who are 12 months or more (220/1348); 9 % (46/527) in Cameroon and 13 % (45/341) in Senegal came into contact with the virus (anti-HBc+), suggesting the importance of improving hepatitis B vaccine coverage. Moreover, as recommended by the WHO, advancing the first dose within 24 h of birth could further reduce contact with the virus in these populations.

Our study has limitations. This hospitalized-based population from whom a blood sample was collected does not constitute a representative sample and cannot be considered representative of the entire child population. Unlike studies using nationally representative data from the household-based Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) or two-stage cluster sampling methodology, we have studied only children hospitalized in five hospitals in three capitals. The selected hospitals, which serve different socioeconomic populations, probably do not significantly over- or underestimate immunization coverage and the generalizability of the serological findings. But it remains difficult to determine how much these findings differ from immunization coverage among rural populations. Canavan et al. recently show that in East Africa, urban residence is associated with increased odds of complete vaccination status [28].

The selection of hospitalized children, including 23 % of moderate or severe malnourished children may also have affected these estimates. In addition, the cross-sectional design allows us to draw conclusions about associations with complete vaccination, but causality cannot be ascertained from our data. Serology estimates did not account for children with anti-HBs + and anti-HBc + under 12 months old (93/1783). However, 53 % (49/93) of these children had an immunization card documenting them as vaccinated. We argue that the exclusion of 44 children had a limited impact on our overall results. In contrast, the strength of our study is that our Pasteur team evaluated the serological markers of samples from children admitted to the five capital city hospitals.

Conclusion

Five years after the integration of the hepatitis B vaccine in their EPI, vaccination programmes must persist in improving vaccination coverage. Assessing immunization coverage based on immunization cards, maternal recall or administrative data could be usefully reinforced by epidemiological data combined with immunological profiles. Serology-based studies should be implemented regularly in African countries, as recommended by the WHO. Among the African populations studied, malnutrition, lack of maternal education and poverty are factors associated with vaccine non-compliance. The countries’ vaccination programs should actively address these problems.

Ethical approval

The study was conducted in conformity with country regulations concerning ethical review and informed consent.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the cooperation and support of the field staff, health sector personnel and laboratory personnel and thank the families for their time and effort devoted to the study.

Funding

The study was funded by the “Actions Concertées du Réseau International des Instituts Pasteur,” France.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratoire des Virus Oncogènes, Institut Pasteur de Bangui
(2)
Unité d’Epidémiologie des Maladies Emergentes, Institut Pasteur
(3)
Laboratoire de Biologie Médicale, Institut Pasteur de Dakar
(4)
Institut Pasteur de Madagascar
(5)
Services des soins intensifs, Complexe Pédiatrique
(6)
Complexe Pédiatrique
(7)
Centre Mère-Enfant, Fondation Chantal Biya
(8)
Centre Hospitalier d’Essos
(9)
Hôpital Albert Royer
(10)
Laboratoire de Virologie, Institut Pasteur Guyane
(11)
Département de virologie, Hôpital Saint Louis
(12)
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Faculté de Médecine Paris-Diderot
(13)
Service de Microbiologie CHU St Louis
(14)
Service de Virologie, Centre Pasteur du Cameroun

References

  1. WHO. Hepatitis B vaccines. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2009;84:405–20.Google Scholar
  2. André F. Hepatitis B, epidemiology in Asia, the Middle East and Africa. Vaccine. 2000;18 Suppl 1:S20–2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kramvis A, Kew MC. Epidemiology of hepatitis B virus in Africa, its genotypes and clinical associations of genotypes. Hepatol Res. 2007;37(s1):S9–S19.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Kiire CF. The epidemiology and prophylaxis of hepatitis B in sub-Saharan Africa: a view from tropical and subtropical Africa. Gut. 1996;38 suppl 2:S5–S12.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Hyams KC. Risks of chronicity following acute hepatitis B virus infection: a review. Clin Infect Dis. 1995;20:992–1000.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lavanchy D. Worldwide epidemiology of HBV infection, disease burden, and vaccine prevention. J Clin Virol. 2005;34 Suppl 1:S1–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. André F. Overview of a 5-year clinical experience with a yeast-derived hepatitis B vaccine. Vaccine. 1990;8(Suppl):S74–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Van Damme P, Kane M, Meheus A. Integration of hepatitis B vaccination into national immunisation programmes. Viral Hepatitis Prevention Board. BMJ. 1997;314(7086):1033–6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Kfutwah AK, Tejiokem MC, Njouom R. A low proportion of HBeAg among HBsAg-positive pregnant women with known HIV status could suggest low perinatal transmission of HBV in Cameroon. Virol J. 2012;9:62.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Fomulu NJ, Morfaw FL, Torimiro JN, Nana P, Koh MV, William T. Prevalence, correlates and pattern of Hepatitis B among antenatal clinic attenders in Yaounde-Cameroon: is perinatal transmission of HBV neglected in Cameroon? BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13(1):158.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Garrigue G, Merlin M, Durand JP, Josse R, Trepo C, Bemba DL et al. Prevalence of markers of viral hepatitis B in northern Cameroon. Bull Soc Pathol Exot Filiales. 1985;78:883–9.Google Scholar
  12. Pawlotsky JM, Belec L, Gresenguet G, Deforges L, Bouvier M, Duval J et al. High prevalence of hepatitis B, C, and E markers in young sexually active adults from the Central African Republic. J Med Virol. 1995;46:269–72.Google Scholar
  13. Meunier DM, Vohito MD, Courrouce AM, Lesbordes JL, Georges-Courbot MC, Georges AJ. Prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen and determination of its subtypes in the Central African Republic. Bull Soc Pathol Exot Filiales. 1984;77:249–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Komas NP, Bai-Sepou S, Manirakiza A, Leal J, Bere A, Le Faou A. The prevalence of hepatitis B virus markers in a cohort of students in Bangui, Central African Republic. BMC Infect Dis. 2010;10:226.Google Scholar
  15. Roingeard P, Diouf A, Sankale JL, Boye C, Mboup S, Diadhou F et al. Perinatal transmission of hepatitis B virus in Senegal, west Africa. Viral Immunol. 1993;6:65–73.Google Scholar
  16. Vray M, Debonne JM, Sire JM, Tran N, Chevalier B, Plantier JC et al. Molecular epidemiology of hepatitis B virus in Dakar, Senegal. J Med Virol. 2006;78:329–34.Google Scholar
  17. Gatchalian S, Reyes M, Bernal N, Lefevre I, David MP, Han HH et al. A new DTPw-HBV/Hib vaccine is immunogenic and safe when administered according to the EPI (Expanded Programme for Immunization) schedule and following hepatitis B vaccination at birth. Hum Vaccin. 2005;1:198–203.Google Scholar
  18. Rey-Cuille MA, Seck A, Njouom R, Chartier L, Sow HD, Mamadou, Ka AS et al. Low immune response to hepatitis B vaccine among children in Dakar, Senegal. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e38153.Google Scholar
  19. WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth Standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Pædiatrica. 2006; Suppl 450:76–85.Google Scholar
  20. De Onis M, Garza C, Onyango AW, Borghi E. Comparison of the WHO child growth standards and the CDC 2000 growth charts. J Nutr. 2007;137(1):144–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Guo SS, Grummer-Strawn LM, Flegal KM, Mei Z et al. 2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: methods and development. Vital Health Stat 11. 2002;246:1–190.Google Scholar
  22. Jack AD, Hall AJ, Maine N, Mendy M, Whittle HC. What level of hepatitis B antibody is protective? J Infect Dis. 1999;179:489–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Plotkin SA. Correlates of protection induced by vaccination. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2010;17(7):1055–65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. WHO, Unicef. Cameroon. WHO and UNICEF estimates of immunization coverage: 2012 revision. WHO and UNICEF estimates of national immunization coverage 2013 Jun 30. who.int/immunization/monitoring-surveillance/en/. Accessed 22 Nov 2013.
  25. WHO, Unicef. Central African Republic. WHO and UNICEF estimates of immunization coverage: 2012 revision. WHO and UNICEF estimates of national immunization coverage 2013 Jun 30. who.int/immunization/monitoring-surveillance/en/. Accessed 22 Nov 2013.
  26. WHO, Unicef. Senegal. WHO and UNICEF estimates of immunization coverage: 2012 revision. WHO and UNICEF estimates of national immunization coverage 2013 Jun 30. who.int/immunization/monitoring-surveillance/en/. Accessed 22 Nov 2013.
  27. Rey-Cuille MA, Njouom R, Bekondi C, Seck A, Gody C, Bata P et al. Hepatitis B virus exposure during childhood in Cameroon, Central African Republic and Senegal after the integration of HBV vaccine in the expanded program on immunization. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2013;32(10):1110–5.Google Scholar
  28. Canavan ME, Sipsma HL, Kassie GM, Bradley EH. Correlates of complete childhood vaccination in East African countries. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e95709.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Burton A, Monasch R, Lautenbach B, Gacic-Dobo M, Neill M, Karimov R et al. WHO and UNICEF estimates of national infant immunization coverage: methods and processes. Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87(7):535–41.Google Scholar
  30. Schwarz NG, Gysels M, Pell C, et al. Reasons for non-adherence to vaccination at mother and child care clinics (MCCs) in Lambarene, Gabon. Vaccine. 2009;27(39):5371–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lim SS, Stein DB, Charrow A, Murray CJ. Tracking progress towards universal childhood immunisation and the impact of global initiatives: a systematic analysis of three-dose diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis immunisation coverage. Lancet. 2008;372(9655):2031–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Murray CJ, Shengelia B, Gupta N, Moussavi S, Tandon A, Thieren M. Validity of reported vaccination coverage in 45 countries. Lancet. 2003;362(9389):1022–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Bhuiya A, Bhuiya I, Chowdhury M. Factors affecting acceptance of immunization among children in rural Bangladesh. Health Policy Plan. 1995;10(3):304–12.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Goodman KJ, Wu JS, Frerichs RR. Compliance with childhood immunizations in Kern County, California. J Immigr Health. 2000;2(4):213–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Thomas M, Kohli V, King D. Barriers to childhood immunization: findings from a needs assessment study. Home Health Care Serv Q. 2004;23(2):19–39.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Yawn BP, Xia Z, Edmonson L, Jacobson RM, Jacobsen SJ. Barriers to immunization in a relatively affluent community. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2000;13(5):325–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Bekondi et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement