Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Antibodies to group A streptococcal virulence factors, SIC and DRS, increase predilection to GAS pyoderma

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 15, Article number: 113 (2015) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Streptococcus pyogenes (group A streptococcus; GAS) is an etiological agent for pharyngitis, pyoderma, and invasive infections in humans. Pharyngitis and pyoderma may lead to serious immune sequelae such as rheumatic heart disease and post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis (PSGN). Streptococcal Inhibitor of Complement (SIC) and its orthologue, distantly related to SIC (DRS), are virulence factors expressed by only four of more than 100 M types of GAS. These four types (M1, M57, M12 and M55) are among the M types, which are associated with PSGN. In several populations PSGN has been shown to be a risk factor for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Previous studies showed SIC or DRS antibody-prevalence was associated with PSGN, and seroprevalence of SIC antibodies is significantly high among CKD and ESRD patients in Mumbai.

Methods

Streptococcal isolates recovered from GAS pyoderma cases were typed. Seropositivity for SIC and DRS antibodies in subjects with pyoderma, PSGN pediatric cases, age matched healthy controls and non-GAS pyoderma cases were determined.

Results

We confirm in this study an association between seroprevalence to SIC and DRS antibodies, and PSGN in Mumbai population despite low point prevalence of M1, M12, M55 and M57. In addition we extended the study to GAS-pyoderma and non-GAS pyoderma cases. To our surprise, we found a positive association between the seroprevalence to SIC and DRS antibodies, and GAS-pyoderma owing to infection with diverse M types. The mechanism of increased predisposition to pyoderma owing to infection by diverse GAS among SIC or DRS antibody-positive population is not clear. Nonetheless, our findings could be explained by a phenomenon akin to antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).

Conclusions

This is the first report showing a small number of GAS M types conferring predisposition to pyoderma by diverse types. Implications of this ADE-like phenomenon are discussed in the light of evolutionary advantage to GAS, vaccine design and control of renal diseases.

Peer Review reports

Background

Streptococcus pyogenes (group A streptococcus; GAS), a human-specific pathogen, is responsible for diverse diseases such as pharyngitis, pyoderma, cellulitis, necrotising faciitis, toxic shock syndrome and life-threatening immune sequelae including rheumatic heart disease and post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis (PSGN) [1,2]. Pharyngitis and pyoderma caused by some GAS strains (emm types) are associated with PSGN, of which emm1, 12, 55, 57 are among the major ones. These emm types express a major secretory antigen called Streptococcal Inhibitor of Complement (SIC; in emm1 and emm57) or its orthologue called distantly related to SIC (DRS; in emm12 and emm55) [3-5]. Although Sagar et al. [6] reported that SIC was expressed by isolates of emm1-2 type which was claimed to be distinct from emm1 subtypes, isolates of both emm1 and emm1-2 are clonally related. Both SIC and DRS elicit high antibody responses during natural infections and the antibodies are persistent [7,8].

Serological reactions to several GAS antigens have been observed subsequent to PSGN [9]. In an earlier community-based study seropositivity to DRS, but not to SIC, was found to be associated with history of PSGN among the Indigenous Australians [8]. Subsequently a Swedish hospital-based study found an association between acute PSGN cases and IgM antibodies to SIC in sera from pediatric cases [10]. The apparent differences in the above results could be because of differences in the distribution of emm types in these two geographical regions, to the differences in study design or both. Although the prognosis of PSGN is generally excellent, many studies suggest that PSGN is a strong risk factor for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) [11-14]. Interestingly we recently showed [15] that SIC antibody seroprevalence is higher in CKD and ESRD patients than in control subjects in Mumbai, a region endemic for streptococcal diseases. Furthermore we found that anti-SIC seropositivity in CKD patients may result in poor prognosis, the disease progressing to ESRD. These findings warranted a hospital-based investigation of association between SIC and DRS antibody-prevalence and PSGN in Mumbai area.

We now show that acute PSGN pediatric patients have high seroprevalence for SIC and DRS antibodies. We also extended this study to pyoderma patients attending outpatient wards of the same hospital. To our surprise we found that significantly greater proportion of GAS pyoderma patients are positive to SIC and DRS antibodies than those with non-GAS pyoderma patients, or age-matched healthy control subjects. Despite this observation, SIC or DRS positive emm types were not overly represented among the isolates from the GAS pyoderma cases. This startling finding clearly highlights increased predisposition to GAS pyoderma in Mumbai region among the subjects seropositive to SIC or DRS antibodies due to past infection with emm types expressing these antigens. We attribute this to a phenomenon akin to antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of skin infection. However, only a limited number of GAS strains seem to confer ADE of infection by diverse GAS types. Such ADE may have a role in the evolution of GAS as a highly successful human pathogen. We discuss implications of our findings in relation to the management of CKD patients and vaccine strategy.

Methods

Subjects, swabs and blood collection

Informed consent was obtained from all participants and guardians. The study was conducted under ethics committee approval from Seth G.S. Medical College & KEM Hospital (reference number, EC/GOVT-4/2010). All the patients and control subjects are of similar demography. All the subjects included were from low socio-economic strata living in vicinity of KEM Hospital and the study was conducted in 2 years between June 2011 and June 2013. They were therefore temporally and geographically matched populations. The control 1 subjects were age-matched to that of PSGN patients; they are paediatric population. The control 2 subjects and the cases of non-GAS pyoderma (caused by Staphylococcus) were age matched to that of GAS pyoderma cases (mainly adult population).

Swabs from 701 patients attending skin-outpatient department at KEM hospital were collected during 2 years of the study period. GAS isolates were recovered from 150 subjects with primary GAS pyoderma diagnosed as impetigo, superficial folliculitis, ecthyma and furuncles. Multiple isolates were available from the same swab for 20 cases among the pyoderma cases. For further 17 cases while mixed infections with GAS and Staphylococcus were found in some skin sores, no multiple strains of GAS was recovered from a patient.

Blood samples for sera were collected from a) the above 150 GAS pyoderma subjects (mean age 25.1 ± 17.09 years; range 2–48 years) at the time of their visit to the hospital’s outpatient department, and b) 25 children with PSGN (mean age 7.12 ± 3.13 years; range 1–11 years) admitted to the pediatric ward of KEM hospital diagnosed as acute nephritic syndrome and having ASO titres > 300 IU (see below).

Blood samples were also collected from 50 non-GAS pyoderma cases (mean age 25 years; range 2–37 years) and two age-matched control groups (control group 1 for PSGN [n = 25; mean age 6.6 years]; and control group 2 for pyoderma [n = 50; mean age 25.8 years]). Sera samples from patients and healthy individuals were stored at −80°C until used.

GAS emm typing

The isolates were characterized by emm typing according to the protocol described at www.cdc.gov/ncidod/biotech/strep/strepblast.htm.

Serology

Anti-streptolysin O (ASO) titers in sera were determined according to Karmarkar et al. [16]. Both control groups had no known history of streptococcal infections. ASO titers were <300 IU for control groups. Non-GAS pyoderma are ASO negative.

Serum antibody titres for SIC and DRS were measured by Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) as described by Karmarkar et al. [15]. Briefly, high binding flat bottomed immune plates (Himedia) were coated by adding 100μl of recombinant his-thioredoxin-tagged SIC, DRS or recombinant his-tagged thioredoxin (100 μg/ml; in carbonate buffer, pH 9.6) per well and incubating overnight at 4°C. After blocking with denatured casein hydrolysate (5% in PBS) for 2 hours, the bound protein was allowed to react with a 1 in 300 dilution of human serum for 1 hour in the same buffer containing 0.05% Tween-20 at room temperature. After washing 5 times with 0.05% Tween-20 in PBS, secondary anti-human IgG antibody conjugated with peroxidase (Sigma-Aldrich) was added and the reactions were detected with 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (Sigma-Aldrich). The reaction was terminated with stopping solution after 30 min incubation and optical density (OD) was measured at 450 nm. Seropositivity or seronegativity was determined by using cutoff values as described below (see statistical analysis). Experimental controls with no antigen, recombinant his-tagged thioredoxin, no sera, and no secondary antibodies were included.

Competitive ELISA

Serum samples (1 in 300 dilution in PBS, pH 7.4) were pre-incubated at 37°C with competitor antigens for 1 hour before adding to plates coated with SIC or DRS. The competing antigens were: a) no antigen (control), b) 10 μg of SIC, DRS or both, c) 50 μg of SIC, DRS or both. The rest of ELISA conditions were as described above.

Urinalysis

Urine was collected for all PSGN cases and the control group 1. Proteinuria, protein-creatinine ratio, blood cells in urine were determined as described earlier [17,18].

Statistical analysis

Cutoff values to assess whether or not a serum sample should be regarded as positive for SIC or DRS antibody were determined as before [15] and were obtained by taking two standard deviations above the mean OD values for control groups for SIC and DRS separately. Sera samples with OD values above the cutoff are scored as positive. Statistical significance was calculated by unpaired t-test.

Results

Heterogeneity of strains recovered from pyoderma cases

Of the 701 patients, GAS isolates were recovered from 150 pyoderma cases. Multiple isolates from the same skin sore for each subject were analyzed for 20 pyoderma patients, and in an additional 17 pyoderma cases isolates from multiple skin sores were emm typed. In all, the isolates belonged to 57 emm types or sub-types over the 2 year study period, and each type is represented by 1–5 isolates in a year (Table 1). Hence there was no evidence for expansion or outbreak of a particular type during this study. Of the 150 isolates only 7 (4.7%) were emm1 and emm12 which express SIC and DRS respectively (marked by # in Table 1); emm55 and emm57 were not recovered. Despite high diversity, multiple GAS isolates from patients (different colonies from the same swab or different swabs; n = 37) were of the same type for each patient. Taken together our results show it is unlikely that SIC- or DRS-positive types per se are main contributors to pyoderma in these subjects; instead diverse emm types circulating in the community are responsible for skin infection.

Table 1 Types and subtypes recovered in the two years of study period
Full size table

Anti-SIC and anti-DRS seroprevalence

Sera from a) the 150 GAS pyoderma subjects, b) 25 children with PSGN, c) 50 non-GAS pyoderma cases, d) two age-matched control groups; control 1 for PSGN and control 2 for GAS pyoderma were analysed for various parameters. Both the control groups and the non-GAS pyoderma cases had no known history of streptococcal infections, and ASO titres were <300 IU. This suggested no recent GAS infection in these individuals. Furthermore, urinalysis of the control 1 showed no proteinuria, protein-creatinine ratio <0.2, and absence RBCs or pus cells suggesting no subclinical PSGN or CKD in this control group. Figure 1A shows optical density values for SIC and DRS antibodies, median and quartiles for control 1 and PSGN cases. The mean values for PSGN are significantly higher than those of the control (p < 0.05, >0.01; Figure 1 legend). The calculated cutoff values (mean + 2× standard deviation of the corresponding control) which are used to determine seroprevalence, are shown in Figure 1A and C (dotted lines).

Figure 1
figure 1

Seroprevalence for SIC and DRS antibodies in PSGN, pyoderma and control groups. Recombinant SIC and DRS proteins with a thioredoxin tag were used as the streptococcal antigens for ELISA. Background optical density (OD450) readings to thioredoxin were subtracted from all ODs. OD values for control 1 and PSGN cases (n = 25 each) are shown in panel A and for control 2 (n = 50), GAS pyoderma (n = 150) and non-GAS pyoderma (n = 50) cases in panel C. The box-whisker plots show median (cross bar in the box), quartiles, and range. The mean OD values for control 1 are 0.081 and 0.042 for SIC and DRS respectively; and those for control 2 are 0.12 and 0.076 respectively. These means and those for non-GAS pyoderma cases (0.14 and 0.09 for SIC and DRS respectively) are not significantly different. The means for PSGN and GAS pyoderma cohorts are significantly higher than their controls for both SIC and DRS (p < 0.05, >0.01 for PSGN; and p < 0.0001 for GAS pyoderma). The calculated cutoff values (mean + 2x Standard deviation for the corresponding control) is shown as dotted line across. Samples scoring equal to or above the cutoff values were scored as positive. Panels B and D show per cent seropositive samples for SIC antibodies (black bars) or DRS antibodies (shaded bars) in each group and compared with respective controls. Lines with asterisks indicate statistically significant differences (** = 0.05 ≤ p > 0.0001; *** = p ≤ 0.0001) between the means in 1A and 1C, and between proportion of seropositives in 1B and 1D. Lack of such lines means there is no significant differences between groups (eg; control 2 and non-GAS pyoderma groups in 1C and 1D).

Full size image

The low recovery rates of SIC- and DRS-positive types (emm1 and emm12) among the pyoderma cases in the 2 years (4.7%, see above) may simply be a reflection of low prevalence of these types circulating in the KEM hospital catchment-community. Since SIC and DRS antibodies are persistent [7,8], we would expect rates of seroprevalence for these antibodies to be commensurate with the low abundance of these types. In accordance with this, we observed that 4-6% of the control 1 (also in control 2 and non-GAS pyoderma; see later) was seropositive to SIC, DRS or both (Figures 1B). By contrast, antibody seroprevalence rates (proportion greater than mean + 2SD of control 1) in the PSGN patients were significantly high; 24% and 36% for SIC and DRS respectively (Figure 1B; correspondingly p = 0.0279; p = 0.0297). Odds ratio (OR) for SIC and DRS antibody positivity are 7.56 (95% CI 0.84, 68.46; p = 0.07) and 13.5 (95% CI 1.56, 117.14; p = 0.0182) respectively. Our results in Mumbai population, which is highly endemic for streptococcal diseases, are concordant with earlier observations from the Australian Indigenous population and Swedish pediatric cases [8,10], and thereby provide further support to the observation of positive association between seroprevalence of these antibodies and PSGN.

We then extended seroprevalence study to GAS pyoderma cases and compared to age matched control 2 and non-GAS pyoderma cases (Figure 1C and D). It is interesting that mean values for control group 2 and non-GAS pyoderma are not significantly different with each other or with control 1 (see Figure 1 legend), despite the differences in mean age of the two healthy control groups. Together, the data for the two control groups and the non-GAS pyoderma cohort establish base-level seroprevalence rate of <5% for SIC or DRS antibodies in this population (Figure 1B and D); and this rate is in agreement with the recovery rates of SIC- or DRS-positive emm types in the community (Table 1).

Unexpectedly as shown in Figure 1D, 58 (38.7%) of GAS pyoderma patients are anti-SIC positive and 56 (37.3%) are anti-DRS positive. These proportions are significantly higher (p <0.0001 for each) than for the corresponding control group (control 2). The OR for SIC is 15.13 (95%CI 3.54, 64.64; p =0.0002) and for DRS is 9.33 (95%CI 2.77, 31.40; p =0.0003).

Interestingly, the proportion of the samples reacting to both SIC and DRS antigens was found to be 28.66% in the pyoderma cases. This is significantly higher than in the control group 2 (p = 0.0051; Chi square). The fact that some patients exhibit seroreaction to one or the other antigen, suggests that double seropositivity is not due to possible cross-reactions of the antibodies with the antigens. Moreover, mature SIC and DRS proteins have only limited homology; mostly confined to the proline-rich region [5]. To confirm the true nature of the double seropositivity, we carried out competitive ELISAs on a) 6 sera showing reactions to both antigens, b) 4 sera showing reactions to SIC only and c) 4 sera showing reactions DRS only. While all the 8 sera showing reactions only to SIC or DRS can be competed out by pre-incubating the sera with homologous but not heterologous antigen, the 6 sera reacting to both SIC and DRS required both the antigens for full competition. Results with representative sera for each category are shown in Figure 2. These findings confirm that the samples with double seropositivity are not artifacts, but represent true results.

Figure 2
figure 2

Competitive ELISAs. Sera samples positive to SIC only, DRS only or to SIC + DRS were pre-incubated with homologous, heterologous or both competitor antigens at 0 μg, 10 μg and 50 μg prior to incubation with SIC (Panel A) or DRS (Panel B) coated plates for ELISA.

Full size image

Since seroprevalence to these antibodies in non-GAS pyoderma cases, like in the control group 2, is significantly lower than in GAS pyoderma cases (p < 0.0001 for SIC and DRS), we believe this phenomenon of high SIC and DRS antibody seroprevalence is specific to GAS pyoderma cases.

Discussion

SIC and DRS antibodies are persistent, and overwhelming evidence show that the distribution of the SIC and DRS genes is restricted to mainly four emm types [7,8,19]. The isolation rate of these four types from our pyoderma cohort is low (<5%), and our previous study from this region also show that these types are recovered in low numbers in Mumbai population [15]. Given these scenarios, this current observation of high seroprevalence rates to SIC and DRS antibodies specifically in patients with GAS pyoderma caused by many circulating types is indeed startling. Clearly it points out to increased predisposition to GAS pyoderma among the subjects who are seropositive to SIC or DRS antibodies owing to past exposure to emm types expressing these antigens. We attribute this to a possible role of SIC and DRS antibodies in a mechanism akin to antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of infection by GAS. While ADE of infection is common occurrences in viruses, bacteria too could deploy such strategies. For instance, ADE of infection has been reported in S. pneumoniae [20,21]. Cleavage of IgA1 by bacterial IgA1-protease enhanced adherence of S. pneumoniae to respiratory epithelial cells. More recently ADE-like phenomenon was observed in Pseudomonas aeruginosa wherein increased severity of respiratory infections was found to be associated with elevated levels of IgG2 against the bacterial O antigen [22]. The ADE-like phenomenon we observed here is different in an important way to what is known in other pathogens; only persistent antibodies to SIC or DRS owing to past infection by GAS strains expressing these antigens seem to confer ADE on all strains.

The seroprevalence rate is 38.7% for SIC antibodies in GAS pyoderma cases, and that for DRS antibodies is 37.3% (Figure 1D). Therefore, we would expect approximately 14% (38.7% of 37.3%) of the patients to show seropositivity to both the antibodies. However, we observed 28.66% of the cases were positive to both SIC and DRS antibodies - twice the expected frequency (the observed-to-expected ratio of ~2). A likely explanation for this observation is that SIC or DRS antibody mediated ADE predisposes to skin infections by many GAS strains including the SIC or DRS positive types. The above observed-to-expected ratio of 2 suggests that the rate of enhancement of infection due to SIC or DRS antibodies may be in the vicinity of two.

Further work is warranted, and being planned, to demonstrate the SIC and DRS mediated ADE-like phenomenon in pharyngeal infections. Also, demonstration of the ADE of infection in cell culture or in animal models may provide further support to this phenomenon. If ADE of GAS infections occur at both the major tissue sites, it may offer continued stability for the host-pathogen interaction in evolutionary terms, and may be important factor in GAS’s success as a human-specific pathogen. We suggest that the four SIC and DRS positive types (emm 1, 12, 55 and 57) are “core types” and the rest “non-core types”. Global distributions of emm types clearly show, whereas in most regions one or more of the 4 “core types” are recovered, the distributions of the “non-core types” vary considerably with some types predominating in many places and others are rarely found or not at all [23,24]. This suggests that it is possible that there are differences in infectivity among the emm types. Should the differences persist, it is possible that contributions to the GAS genetic pool by the low-infective types would be depleted at the expense of a few expanding types. ADE by the “core” types may partly correct this imbalance. Such a scenario may offer a possible novel strategy for efficient control of GAS diseases by targeting future vaccine candidates against the “core types”. By such intervention, a decrease in overall GAS infection may be achieved.

In many populations PSGN is an independent risk factor for CKD [11-14]. We recently showed that greater proportion of CKD and ESRD patients was positive to SIC antibody than that of healthy controls in the Mumbai population. However, no association between DRS antibodies and CKD or ESRD was found [15]. Taken together our studies show that whereas both SIC and DRS seropositivity may predispose to pyoderma through an ADE-like mechanism, and consequently result in increased seroprevalence in the PSGN patients, only the SIC antibody-positive PSGN patients have greater predilection to CKD and ESRD. Hence we suggest regular monitoring of children positive for SIC antibodies for signs of stage 1 CKD may provide an opportunity to offer proactive treatments early, so progression to ESRD may be averted or delayed.

Conclusions

The role of SIC and DRS is not well understood. It is intriguing that only four types express these antigens. They elicit persistent antibody response. Therefore, antibody prevalence in a population is cumulative result of past infections by one of these four “core” types. Intuitively, one would expect that the rate of prevalence would be the same in a given population among various subjects; namely subjects with pyoderma, non-GAS pyoderma, PSGN cases or healthy controls. However, contrary to this expectation we found that the rate of seroprevalence is high specifically in GAS pyoderma cases. Since the pyoderma is resultant of diverse GAS strains not necessarily expressing these antigens, we interpret the results to mean that antibodies to SIC or DRS predispose subjects to skin infection by GAS. This is a unique phenomenon of ADE of infection rendered by a small number of GAS strains on a wide number of strains. Such a mechanism could have implications to maintenance of GAS gene pool despite possible inherent variations in infectivity.

References

  1. Cunningham MW. Pathogenesis of group A streptococcal infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2000;13(3):470–511.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Walker MJ, Barnett TC, McArthur JD, Cole JN, Gillen CM, Henningham A, et al. Disease manifestations and pathogenic mechanisms of group a Streptococcus. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27(2):264–301.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Akesson P, Sjoholm AG, Bjorck L. Protein SIC, a novel extracellular protein of Streptococcus pyogenes interfering with complement function. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(2):1081–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Binks M, McMillan D, Sriprakash KS. Genomic location and variation of the gene for CRS, a complement binding protein in the M57 strains of Streptococcus pyogenes. Infect Immun. 2003;71(12):6701–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Hartas J, Sriprakash KS. Streptococcus pyogenes strains containing emm12 and emm55 possess a novel gene coding for distantly related SIC protein. Microb Pathog. 1999;26(1):25–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sagar V, Kumar R, Ganguly NK, Chakraborti A. Comparative analysis of emm type pattern of Group A Streptococcus throat and skin isolates from India and their association with closely related SIC, a streptococcal virulence factor. BMC Microbiol. 2008;8:150.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hoe NP, Kordari P, Cole R, Liu M, Palzkill T, Huang W, et al. Human immune response to streptococcal inhibitor of complement, a serotype M1 group A Streptococcus extracellular protein involved in epidemics. J Infect Dis. 2000;182(5):1425–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sriprakash KS, Hartas J, White A. Antibodies to streptococcal inhibitor of complement function and M peptides in a post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis endemic region of Australia. J Med Microbiol. 2002;51(7):589–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yoshizawa N. Acute glomerulonephritis. Intern Med. 2000;39(9):687–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Skattum L, Akesson P, Truedsson L, Sjoholm AG. Antibodies against four proteins from a Streptococcus pyogenes serotype M1 strain and levels of circulating mannan-binding lectin in acute poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2006;140(1):9–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Baldwin DS, Gluck MC, Schacht RG, Gallo G. The long-term course of poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis. Ann Intern Med. 1974;80(3):342–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoy WE, White AV, Dowling A, Sharma SK, Bloomfield H, Tipiloura BT, et al. Post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis is a strong risk factor for chronic kidney disease in later life. Kidney Int. 2012;81(10):1026–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lopes AA, Silveira MA, Martinelli RP, Rocha H. Association between race and incidence of end-stage renal disease secondary to glomerulonephritis: influence of the histologic type and presence of arterial hypertension. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2001;47(1):78–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. White AV, Hoy WE, McCredie DA. Childhood post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis as a risk factor for chronic renal disease in later life. Med J Aust. 2001;174(10):492–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Karmarkar MG, Hule GP, Hase NK, Mehta PR, Walter SR, Sriprakash KS. Seroprevalence of Streptococcal Inhibitor of Complement (SIC) suggests association of streptococcal infection with chronic kidney disease. BMC Nephrol. 2013;14:101.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Karmarkar MG, Venugopal V, Joshi L, Kamboj R. Evaluation & revaluation of upper limits of normal values of anti-streptolysin O & anti-deoxyribonuclease B in Mumbai. Indian J Med Res. 2004;119(Suppl):26–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Husdan H, Rapoport A. Estimation of creatinine by the Jaffe reaction. A comparison of three methods. Clin Chem. 1968;14(3):222–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pesce MA, Strande CS. A new micromethod for determination of protein in cerebrospinal fluid and urine. Clin Chem. 1973;19(11):1265–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sagar V, Kumar R, Ganguly NK, Menon T, Chakraborti A. DRS is far less divergent than streptococcal inhibitor of complement of group A streptococcus. J Bacteriol. 2007;189(7):2933–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Mahalingam S, Lidbury BA. Antibody-dependent enhancement of infection: bacteria do it too. Trends Immunol. 2003;24(9):465–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Weiser JN, Bae D, Fasching C, Scamurra RW, Ratner AJ, Janoff EN. Antibody-enhanced pneumococcal adherence requires IgA1 protease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(7):4215–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Wells TJ, Whitters D, Sevastsyanovich YR, Heath JN, Pravin J, Goodall M, et al. Increased severity of respiratory infections associated with elevated anti-LPS IgG2 which inhibits serum bactericidal killing. J Exp Med. 2014;211(9):1893–904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. McMillan DJ, Dreze PA, Vu T, Bessen DE, Guglielmini J, Steer AC, et al. Updated model of group A Streptococcus M proteins based on a comprehensive worldwide study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19(5):E222–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Steer AC, Law I, Matatolu L, Beall BW, Carapetis JR. Global emm type distribution of group A streptococci: systematic review and implications for vaccine development. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9(10):611–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Therese Vu for preparing the recombinant antigens and Mrs. Sayali Mirgal for her technical assistance. The National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and Indian Council of Medical Research supported the work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India

    Mohan G Karmarkar, Gouri P Hule, Preeti R Mehta, Uday Khopkar & Niwrutti K Hase

  2. QIMR Berghofer Medical Centre, 300, Herston road, Brisbane, QLD, 4006, Australia

    Ainslie Cameron & Kadaba S Sriprakash

  3. Present Address: Griffith University, Gold Coast Campus, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia

    Ainslie Cameron

Authors
  1. Mohan G Karmarkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gouri P Hule
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ainslie Cameron
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Preeti R Mehta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Uday Khopkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Niwrutti K Hase
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kadaba S Sriprakash
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kadaba S Sriprakash.

Additional information

Competing interests

MGK, GPH, AC, PRM, UK, NKH and KSS do not have financial or non-financial competing interests. In the past five years, the authors have not received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this manuscript, either now or in the future. Such an organization is not financing this manuscript. The authors do not hold and will not in future hold stocks or shares in an organization that may in any way gain or lose financially from the publication of this manuscript. The authors do not hold and are not applying for any patents relating to the content of the manuscript. The authors have not received reimbursements, fees, funding, or salary from an organization that holds or has applied for patents relating to the content of the manuscript. The authors do not have non-financial competing interests (political, personal, religious, ideological, academic, intellectual, commercial or any other) to declare in relation to this manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

MGK and KSS conceived the study and designed the experiments. GPH and AC performed laboratory based experiments. PRM and MGK were responsible for microbiology. NKH was responsible for PSGN studies. UK was responsible for pyoderma studies. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karmarkar, M.G., Hule, G.P., Cameron, A. et al. Antibodies to group A streptococcal virulence factors, SIC and DRS, increase predilection to GAS pyoderma. BMC Infect Dis 15, 113 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0857-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-015-0857-4

Keywords

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us