- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Epidemiology of community-onset Staphylococcus aureus infections in pediatric patients: an experience at a Children's Hospital in central Illinois
© Mongkolrattanothai et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
- Received: 09 February 2009
- Accepted: 16 July 2009
- Published: 16 July 2009
The nation-wide concern over methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has prompted many clinicians to use vancomycin when approaching patients with suspected staphylococcal infections. We sought to characterize the epidemiology of community-onset S. aureus infections in hospitalized children to assist local clinicians in providing appropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy.
From January 2005–June 2008, children (0–18 years old) admitted to the Children's Hospital of Illinois with community-onset S. aureus infections were identified by a computer-assisted laboratory-based surveillance and medical record review.
Of 199 patients, 67 (34%) had invasive infections, and 132 (66%) had skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). Among patients with invasive infections, S. aureus isolates were more likely to be susceptible to methicillin (MSSA 63% vs. MRSA 37%), whereas patients with SSTIs, S. aureus isolates were more likely to be resistant to methicillin (MRSA 64% vs. MSSA 36%). Bacteremia and musculoskeletal infections were the most common invasive infections in both groups of S. aureus. Pneumonia with empyema was more likely to be caused by MRSA (P = 0.02). The majority (~90%) of MRSA isolates were non-multidrug resistant, even in the presence of healthcare-associated risk factors.
Epidemiological data at the local level is important for antimicrobial decision-making. MSSA remains an important pathogen causing invasive community-onset S. aureus infections among hospitalized children. In our hospital, nafcillin in combination with vancomycin is recommended empiric therapy in critically ill patients with suspected invasive staphylococcal infections. Because up to 25% of MSSA circulating in our area are clindamycin-resistant, clindamycin should be used cautiously as empiric monotherapy in patients with suspected invasive staphylococcal infections.
- Soft Tissue Infection
- Invasive Infection
Infections caused by community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) have been increasingly reported worldwide. Such isolates differ from healthcare-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA) by a distinct antimicrobial susceptibility pattern, usually being susceptible to non-β-lactam antimicrobial agents and having different genetic backgrounds as determined by SCCmec elements, multilocus sequence types (MLST), and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis [1–4]. Many studies suggest that CA-MRSA have replaced their methicillin-susceptible counterparts as the major cause of skin and soft tissue infections and other invasive diseases [5–9]. These findings have important clinical implications for the selection of antimicrobial agents. In areas where CA-MRSA is common, antimicrobial agents that are active against CA-MRSA should be advocated for empiric treatment of patients with potential S. aureus infections, until the culture and susceptibility results are available [5, 8–10].
It is important to note that most data on CA-MRSA come from large tertiary care centers, many of which are located in large metropolitan areas. Thus, these data may not be generalizable to other hospitals in smaller, mid-size or more rural communities. Knowledge of the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns at the local level is essential for selecting appropriate empiric therapy of the wide variety of S. aureus infections. At the Children's Hospital of Illinois (CHOI), we have observed significant numbers of patients with community-onset infections caused not only by MRSA but also by MSSA. We thus needed a better understanding of the epidemiology of community-onset S. aureus infections in children admitted to our institution.
The Children's Hospital of Illinois at OSF Saint Francis Medical Center has 127 inpatient beds and about 5000 admissions annually. It serves as the academic, tertiary care referral center for the central region of Illinois.
A database of laboratory records from the OSF System Laboratory was used to identify pediatric patients 18 years of age or younger who were hospitalized from January 1, 2005 through June 30, 2008 and had microbiologic specimens that yielded S. aureus. For each case of S. aureus isolated from clinical specimens, the relevant medical information was examined, including diagnosis, onset of infection, infection sites, demographics (age, gender), underlying illnesses, risk factors for healthcare-associated infections, and isolate antimicrobial susceptibility. The study was approved by the Peoria Institutional Review Board.
Patients with community-onset S. aureus infections were included if (a) the patients' isolates were recovered within 48 hours of admission, based on the criteria established by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC, Atlanta) or if (b) their isolates were obtained after 48 hours of admission but patients had clinical evidence of diseases prior to admission.
A case of invasive infection was defined by 1 or more of the following conditions: bacteremia, endocarditis, pneumonia, lymphadenitis, septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, or another illness in which S. aureus was isolated from normally sterile body fluids. Infections involving the skin or soft tissue structures such as abscess or cellulitis were regarded as skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs).
Patients were excluded if they had positive culture results but no signs of infection; or if a diagnosis of MRSA infection was made on the basis of positive MRSA screening cultures (nose, axilla, perineum, or rectum); or if the diagnosis of staphylococcal pneumonia was based solely on the isolation of S. aureus from a tracheal aspirate or sputum. Patients with orbital or otogenic infections were excluded if the S. aureus isolates were recovered from the swabs of the eye or ear drainage only.
For individuals with multiple hospital admissions for SSTIs during a single year, data were obtained from the first hospitalization. Risk factors for healthcare-associated infections included hospitalization or surgery in the preceding 12 months, the presence of an indwelling catheter or a percutaneous device, or frequent exposure to a healthcare facility related to an underlying condition. A hospital birth without any postnatal complications was not considered a risk factor.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing
An automated system (Vitek 2; bioMérieux) was used to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility profile of S. aureus isolates in accordance with the recommendations of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. For isolates that tested resistant to erythromycin but susceptible to clindamycin, a D-test was performed to detect inducible resistance to clindamycin. Among MRSA, multidrug resistance (MDR) was used and defined as resistance to three or more non-β-lactam antimicrobial agents (ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin, clindamycin, erythromycin, gentamicin, tetracycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, rifampin, vancomycin).
Differences in variables between groups were calculated by chi-square test or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
We identified 212 hospitalized pediatric patients whose S. aureus infections were considered community-onset. Thirteen patients were excluded: four patients had no clinical evidence of diseases and received no antibiotic therapy, including three with a positive blood culture and one who grew S. aureus from the gall bladder after elective cholecystectomy; nine had invasive diseases, but their infections could not be definitely proved to be caused by S. aureus, including three with orbital cellulitis, two with otomastoiditis, and one each with pneumonia, retropharyngeal abscess, possible staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome, and fasciitis of the chest wall.
Demographic and clinical features of patients with community-onset S. aureus infections.
n = 89
n = 110
Skin and soft tissue infections
Healthcare-associated risk factors
Characteristics of invasive infections and healthcare-associated risk factors.
Healthcare-associated Risk factors
Presence of an indwelling catheter or a percutaneous device
Underlying medical illnesses
Congenital heart diseases
Exposure to healthcare-associated risk factors was not significantly different between MSSA and MRSA groups (P = 0.57). In the subgroup of patients who had no documented healthcare-associated risk factors, bacteremia (n = 9) and musculoskeletal infections (n = 9) remained the most common invasive infections caused by MSSA, whereas pneumonia with pleural empyema (n = 7) was the most common invasive infection caused by MRSA.
Resistance patterns of MRSA isolates* stratified by healthcare-associated (HA) risk factors.
HA risk factors
HA risk factors
Non-MDR MRSA isolates
n = 29
n = 70
MDR MRSA isolates
n = 4
n = 5
In this study, the percentages of S. aureus causing SSTIs that are methicillin-resistant have increased yearly and accounted for 70–75% during 2007–2008. This finding was not different from other regions of the United States. Nevertheless, MSSA remains a common pathogen causing invasive community-onset S. aureus infections. It is of note that, in year 2007, there may have been a trend toward an increase in invasive MRSA infections (Figure 1). However, in the nine months since the end of this study, we have seen 13 more cases of community-onset invasive MSSA infections, but only 2 cases of community-onset invasive MRSA infections. The finding that MSSA was the predominant pathogen of invasive staphylococcal infections might not be unexpected in a region of low MRSA prevalence such as western Sweden . A recent study of community-associated S. aureus infections in Greece was similar to our findings that MSSA predominated among children with invasive infections, whereas CA-MRSA predominated among children with SSTIs . McCaskill et al. reported the increase of invasive infections caused by MSSA, of which 35% of isolates were related to USA300, the predominant clone of CA-MRSA . It is plausible that some USA300 strains may have lost their SCCmec elements, thereby becoming MSSA, or alternatively, the ancestor of CA-MRSA USA300 was from an MSSA clone that acquired its resistance before spreading in the community .
The majority of community-onset MRSA isolates from hospitalized children, including individuals with healthcare-associated risk factors, were non-MDR – a characteristic commonly observed in molecularly defined "CA-MRSA" isolates. In this study, presence of healthcare-associated risk factors was neither associated with multidrug-resistant MRSA infections nor reliably predictive of the susceptibility to methicillin in S. aureus isolates causing community-onset infections. The use of healthcare-associated risk factors in exclusion criteria in studies of CA-MRSA epidemiology may have underestimated the CA-MRSA burden. Conversely, infections in patients who have healthcare-associated risk factors are diverse and, therefore, they are at increased risk for S. aureus infection not only by MRSA, but by MSSA as well.
The emergence of MRSA infections in the community has prompted clinicians to prescribe antibiotics that are active against CA-MRSA in patients with any suspected S. aureus infection. At CHOI, we have observed a significant increase in the use of vancomycin as empiric therapy, driven by growing concern for CA-MRSA. This practice has contributed to inappropriate vancomycin use and has been detrimental in several cases of invasive MSSA infections. A number of studies have demonstrated that vancomycin is inferior to β-lactams for the treatment of invasive MSSA infections [14–16]. Higher infection-related mortality has been reported in patients with invasive MSSA infections, even if vancomycin was switched to β-lactams once the culture results became available . Clindamycin, another antibiotic that is active against many CA-MRSA and MSSA isolates, has been used empirically . However, based on the surveillance for antimicrobial resistance among S. aureus circulating in our area (data not shown), the percentage of clindamycin resistance in MSSA isolates from 2005 to 2008 has been 20–25%. Because invasive S. aureus infections are associated with increased morbidity and mortality, and MSSA remains the predominant cause of invasive S. aureus infections, it is prudent for us to administer nafcillin in combination with vancomycin in critically ill patients with invasive staphylococcal infections, until susceptibility results are known. This recommendation has been supported and discussed elsewhere [18, 19].
In contrast, the majority of community-onset MRSA isolates were non-MDR and were susceptible to clindamycin. Clindamycin is the recommended empirical anti-staphylococcal therapy for hospitalized pediatric patients with clinical syndromes likely caused by CA-MRSA, such as cutaneous abscesses or pneumonia with empyema. Its use avoids unnecessary exposure to vancomycin. In addition, the penetration of vancomycin into lung tissue and pulmonary lining fluid has been reported to be relatively low [20, 21] and may limit the effectiveness of vancomycin in the therapy of MRSA pneumonia. Moreover, clindamycin inhibits toxin synthesis [22, 23], including Panton-Valentine leukocidin, a toxin which is associated with suppurative skin and soft tissue infections and necrotizing pneumonia [24–26]. It also may be responsible for the increased virulence in some CA-MRSA isolates [1, 27]. However, clindamycin is not appropriate for the treatment of endocarditis because of a high rate of relapse, presumed to be due to its bacteriostatic action, nor is it appropriate for meningitis because of poor central nervous system penetration. It should not be used as the empiric monotherapy in critically ill patients. There is also a risk of treatment failure during therapy if the isolate exhibits inducible clindamycin resistance . At CHOI, to minimize the development of antimicrobial resistance, the empiric use of linezolid or daptomycin is discouraged. Once the minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) are available, for MRSA isolates in which vancomycin MICs are 1.5–2 mg/L it would be appropriate to treat MRSA infections with linezolid or daptomycin, since failure rate is higher for such organisms treated with vancomycin.
There are limitations to our study. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were used, thus possibly underestimating the true prevalence of community-onset S. aureus infections among hospitalized children. Information about other potentially important risk factors was not always documented in medical records, particularly the history of MRSA skin infections among patients or family members. Nevertheless, the findings from our study have clinically relevant implications for patient management. While it is important that clinicians be aware of the emergence of CA-MRSA infections, the diversity of epidemiology of S. aureus infections should also be recognized. Because antimicrobial resistance continues to evolve, it is imperative to continue monitoring S. aureus infections at the local level. This provides valuable data on resistance trends and contributes to more effective treatment recommendations for local and regional use.
We have described the characteristics of community-onset S. aureus infections among hospitalized children in Central Illinois. We found that MRSA is increasing as a cause of skin and soft tissue infections, but that MSSA remains a common cause of invasive infections. In our institution, nafcillin in combination with vancomycin is recommended empiric therapy in critically ill patients with suspected invasive staphylococcal infections. Because up to 25% of MSSA circulating in our area are clindamycin-resistant, clindamycin should be used cautiously as empiric monotherapy in patients with suspected invasive staphylococcal infections unless antimicrobial susceptibility is known.
We acknowledge the assistance of Teresa Endicott and OSF System Laboratory at St. Francis Medical Center in retrieving clinical information. We thank the reviewers and Dr. David Slagle for their critiques.
- Boyle-Vavra S, Daum RS: Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: the role of Panton-Valentine leukocidin. Lab Invest. 2007, 87: 3-9. 10.1038/labinvest.3700501.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fey PD, Said-Salim B, Rupp ME, Hinrichs SH, Boxrud DJ, Davis CC, Kreiswirth BN, Schlievert PM: Comparative molecular analysis of community- or hospital-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003, 47: 196-203. 10.1128/AAC.47.1.196-203.2003.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Naimi TS, LeDell KH, Como-Sabetti K, Borchardt SM, Boxrud DJ, Etienne J, Johnson SK, Vandenesch F, Fridkin S, O'Boyle C, Danila RN, Lynfield R: Comparison of community- and health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. JAMA. 2003, 290: 2976-2984. 10.1001/jama.290.22.2976.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Okuma K, Iwakawa K, Turnidge JD, Grubb WB, Bell JM, O'Brien FG, Coombs GW, Pearman JW, Tenover FC, Kapi M, Tiensasitorn C, Ito T, Hiramatsu K: Dissemination of new methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones in the community. J Clin Microbiol. 2002, 40: 4289-4294. 10.1128/JCM.40.11.4289-4294.2002.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Moran GJ, Krishnadasan A, Gorwitz RJ, Fosheim GE, McDougal LK, Carey RB, Talan DA: Methicillin-resistant S. aureus infections among patients in the emergency department. N Engl J Med. 2006, 355: 666-674. 10.1056/NEJMoa055356.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frazee BW, Lynn J, Charlebois ED, Lambert L, Lowery D, Perdreau-Remington F: High prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in emergency department skin and soft tissue infections. Ann Emerg Med. 2005, 45: 311-320. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.10.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gonzalez BE, Hulten KG, Dishop MK, Lamberth LB, Hammerman WA, Mason EO, Kaplan SL: Pulmonary manifestations in children with invasive community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2005, 41: 583-590. 10.1086/432475.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pannaraj PS, Hulten KG, Gonzalez BE, Mason EO, Kaplan SL: Infective pyomyositis and myositis in children in the era of community-acquired, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2006, 43: 953-960. 10.1086/507637.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baker C: Large CA-MRSA disease burden mandates prompt diagnosis, appropriate management. AAP News. 2007, 28: 1 and 9-Google Scholar
- Miller LG, Perdreau-Remington F, Bayer AS, Diep B, Tan N, Bharadwa K, Tsui J, Perlroth J, Shay A, Tagudar G, Ibebuogu U, Spellberg B: Clinical and epidemiologic characteristics cannot distinguish community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection from methicillin-susceptible S. aureus infection: a prospective investigation. Clin Infect Dis. 2007, 44: 471-482. 10.1086/511033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jacobsson G, Dashti S, Wahlberg T, Andersson R: The epidemiology of and risk factors for invasive Staphylococcus aureus infections in western Sweden. Scand J Infect Dis. 2007, 39: 6-13. 10.1080/00365540600810026.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sdougkos G, Chini V, Papanastasiou DA, Christodoulou G, Stamatakis E, Vris A, Christodoulidi I, Protopapadakis G, Spiliopoulou I: Community-associated Staphylococcus aureus infections and nasal carriage among children: molecular microbial data and clinical characteristics. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008, 14: 995-1001. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02064.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McCaskill ML, Mason EO, Kaplan SL, Hammerman W, Lamberth LB, Hulten KG: Increase of the USA300 clone among community-acquired methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus causing invasive infections. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007, 26: 1122-1127. 10.1097/INF.0b013e31814536e0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lodise TP, McKinnon PS, Levine DP, Rybak MJ: Impact of empirical-therapy selection on outcomes of intravenous drug users with infective endocarditis caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007, 51: 3731-3733. 10.1128/AAC.00101-07.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chang FY, Peacock JE, Musher DM, Triplett P, MacDonald BB, Mylotte JM, O'Donnell A, Wagener MM, Yu VL: Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: recurrence and the impact of antibiotic treatment in a prospective multicenter study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2003, 82: 333-339. 10.1097/01.md.0000091184.93122.09.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kim SH, Kim KH, Kim HB, Kim NJ, Kim EC, Oh MD, Choe KW: Outcome of vancomycin treatment in patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008, 52: 192-197. 10.1128/AAC.00700-07.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martinez-Aguilar G, Hammerman WA, Mason EO, Kaplan SL: Clindamycin treatment of invasive infections caused by community-acquired, methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2003, 22: 593-598. 10.1097/00006454-200307000-00006.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kaplan SL: Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in children. Semin Pediatr Infect Dis. 2006, 17: 113-119. 10.1053/j.spid.2006.06.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baker C: Large CA-MRSA disease burden mandates prompt diagnosis, appropriate management. AAP News. 2007, 28: 1-9Google Scholar
- Cruciani M, Gatti G, Lazzarini L, Furlan G, Broccali G, Malena M, Franchini C, Concia E: Penetration of vancomycin into human lung tissue. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996, 38: 865-869. 10.1093/jac/38.5.865.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lamer C, de Beco V, Soler P, Calvat S, Fagon JY, Dombret MC, Farinotti R, Chastre J, Gibert C: Analysis of vancomycin entry into pulmonary lining fluid by bronchoalveolar lavage in critically ill patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993, 37: 281-286.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Dumitrescu O, Boisset S, Badiou C, Bes M, Benito Y, Reverdy ME, Vandenesch F, Etienne J, Lina G: Effect of antibiotics on Staphylococcus aureus producing Panton-Valentine leukocidin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007, 51: 1515-1519. 10.1128/AAC.01201-06.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Stevens DL, Ma Y, Salmi DB, McIndoo E, Wallace RJ, Bryant AE: Impact of antibiotics on expression of virulence-associated exotoxin genes in methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis. 2007, 195: 202-211. 10.1086/510396.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gillet Y, Issartel B, Vanhems P, Fournet JC, Lina G, Bes M, Vandenesch F, Piemont Y, Brousse N, Floret D, Etienne J: Association between Staphylococcus aureus strains carrying gene for Panton-Valentine leukocidin and highly lethal necrotising pneumonia in young immunocompetent patients. Lancet. 2002, 359: 753-759. 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07877-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamasaki O, Kaneko J, Morizane S, Akiyama H, Arata J, Narita S, Chiba J, Kamio Y, Iwatsuki K: The association between Staphylococcus aureus strains carrying panton-valentine leukocidin genes and the development of deep-seated follicular infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2005, 40: 381-385. 10.1086/427290.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lina G, Piemont Y, Godail-Gamot F, Bes M, Peter MO, Gauduchon V, Vandenesch F, Etienne J: Involvement of Panton-Valentine leukocidin-producing Staphylococcus aureus in primary skin infections and pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 1999, 29: 1128-1132. 10.1086/313461.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bocchini CE, Hulten KG, Mason EO, Gonzalez BE, Hammerman WA, Kaplan SL: Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes are associated with enhanced inflammatory response and local disease in acute hematogenous Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in children. Pediatrics. 2006, 117: 433-440. 10.1542/peds.2005-0566.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Siberry GK, Tekle T, Carroll K, Dick J: Failure of clindamycin treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus expressing inducible clindamycin resistance in vitro. Clin Infect Dis. 2003, 37: 1257-1260. 10.1086/377501.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/9/112/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.