- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Prevalence of transfusion-transmitted Chagas disease among multitransfused patients in Brazil
© De Paula et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 30 May 2007
Accepted: 16 January 2008
Published: 16 January 2008
Blood transfusion has always been an important route for Chagas Disease (CD) transmission. The high prevalence of CD in Latin America and its lifelong asymptomatic clinical picture pose a threat for the safety of the blood supply. The outcome of measures designed to improve transfusion safety can be assessed by evaluating the prevalence of CD among multitransfused patients
In order to assess the impact of CD control measures on the safety of the blood supply, an observational cross-sectional study was designed to determine the prevalence of CD in 351 highly transfused patients, in which vectorial transmission was excluded. This study compared patients that received transfusion products before (n = 230) and after (n = 121) 1997, when measures to control transfusion-transmitted CD were fully implemented in Brazil.
The study group consisted of 351 patients exposed to high numbers of blood products during their lifetime (median number of units transfused = 51, range 10–2086). A higher prevalence of transfusion-transmitted CD (1.30%) was observed among multitransfused patients that received their first transfusion before 1997, compared with no cases of transfusion-transmitted CD among multitransfused patients transfused after that year. The magnitude of the exposure to blood products was similar among both groups (mean number of units transfused per year of exposure = 25.00 ± 26.46 and 23.99 ± 30.58 respectively; P = 0.75, Mann-Whitney test).
Multiple initiatives aimed to control vector and parental transmission of CD can significantly decrease transfusion-transmitted CD in Brazil. Our data suggest that mandatory donor screening for CD represents the most important measure to interrupt transmission of CD by blood transfusions.
Chagas disease (CD), caused by the protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi is considered the most important parasitic disease of the Americas in terms of socioeconomic impact . Despite major improvements in the control of vectorial transmission in endemic areas, CD still infects nearly 10 million people , and transfusions have always been an important route of transmission . Furthermore, since most patients with CD are asymptomatic and unaware of their condition, these potential blood donors represent a serious threat to the safety of the blood supply of non-endemic areas .
Since 1988, in Brazil as in many Latin American countries, it is mandatory to screen blood donations for anti-T. cruzi antibodies, and since 1997, 100% serological coverage was reached in blood banks. . Concomitantly, the control of vectorial transmission has significantly reduced the prevalence of CD among blood donors .
One of the strategies used to assess blood supply safety is to evaluate the prevalence of transfusion-transmitted infections among multitransfused patients . In contrast to numerous studies on prevalence of to T. cruzi infection among blood donors, only few reports have described its prevalence among multitransfused patients, all of which were published before donated blood started to be regularly screened [8–10]. Therefore, the aim of this study was (1) to assess the prevalence of CD among multitransfused patients in Brazil, (2) to describe the changes in the prevalence over time, and (3) to describe the epidemiological characteristics of transfusion-transmitted CD, with emphasis on transfusion-related risk factors.
Three hundred and fifty-one multitransfused patients were recruited from three health public institutions located in the city of Campinas, Sao Paulo state, Brazil. The metropolitan region of Campinas, with 3.2 million inhabitants, is located in a non-endemic area of CD, in the most densely populated region of Brazil. Informed consent was obtained from all patients or legal guardian, and the study was approved by the local Institution Review Board. Patients were considered multitransfused if they had been transfused with at least 10 units of blood products or blood derivatives divided between at least two occasions, with the last occasion being at least 15 days apart from recruitment date. One unit of blood product was defined as 1 unit of whole blood, 1 unit of packed red blood cells, 1 unit of a platelet concentrate or platelet apheresis, 1 unit of plasma, 1 unit of cryoprecipitate (Cryo) or 1 vial of lyophilized coagulation factor concentrate. Patients who were aware of a positive test for CD before the first transfusion event were excluded from the study. Clinical and epidemiological data were obtained through a standard interview and from the patient's medical records. This interview was performed by one member of the team using a structured questionnaire after consent was obtained. The questionnaire covered clinical and epidemiological details of the transfusion history of the patients such as: diagnosis, type and number of blood products used, date of first transfusion event and number of facilities in which the patient was transfused. The questionnaire also included questions about alternative routes for transmission of common blood-borne pathogens such as intravenous drug use and previous history of invasive medical interventions and/or alternative medical interventions. In order to exclude other routes of CD transmission in the study population, patients were questioned about living in CD-endemic areas, in dwellings with mud/mud-brick walls or known to be infested with triatomine bugs. Patients were also questioned about relatives or other household contacts with confirmed diagnosis of CD.
Each calendar-year during which the patient received any number of transfusions was recorded as one year of exposure to transfusions. Donor exposure was estimated assuming 1 unit:1 donor for all blood products, except lyophilized factor concentrates that were not included in this estimation, because of the assumption that T. cruzi lose viability during the production of lyophilized clotting factor concentrates. In fact, there are no reports of transmission of CD by these types of blood products.
Blood samples were drawn at the day of recruitment. Serum samples were tested in duplicate using an enzyme immunoassay (Hemobio Chagas, Embrabio, São Paulo, SP, Brazil), according to manufacturer's instructions. The results of anti-T. cruzi test were expressed as the optical densities of the samples (S) divided by the cut-off value (C). S/C values ≤ 0.8 were considered seronegative, S/C values between 0.8 and 1.2 were considered indeterminate and S/C values ≥ 1.2 were considered seropositive. Positive results were confirmed in a second sample, specifically collected for to confirm these results, by immune-fluorescence assay (Imuno Cruzi and Fluoline H, Biolab-Meriéux, RJ, Brazil). For the purpose of this study, samples were considered true positive if they were seropositive in both tests.
The observed prevalence of CD was then calculated. To estimate the impact on the safety of the blood supply of the implementation of 100% coverage of serological screening of CD among blood donors, January 1st 1997 was selected to define the experimental groups. The mean number of units transfused per year of exposure was compared using the Mann-Whitney test and a P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Characteristics of patients included in the study (n = 351)
Age (Mean ± SD)
36.0 ± 19.8
Sex distribution (%)
Diagnosis responsible for multiple transfusions – number of patients (%)
Acute blood loss
Units transfused per patient (Median/Range)
Years exposed to transfusions (Median/Range)
1 st transfusion before 1997 (%)
Characteristics of patients seropositive for Chagas disease.
Year of 1st Transfusion
Units transfused (before/after 1997)
Other risk factors for Chagas Disease
Estimated donor exposure *
In this study we evaluated a population of 351 patients exposed to an extremely high number of blood transfusions for multiple reasons. The possibility of vectorial or other forms of transmission of CD among seropositive patients was discarded by the exclusion of patients with a previous diagnosis of CD, and by an extensive interview covering other known epidemiological risk factors for CD. The laboratory strategy used to assess the prevalence of CD was in agreement with current regulations established by the Brazilian National Health Surveillance Agency for the screening of blood donors for CD , and all positive samples were confirmed by an indirect immunofluorescence test in a different sample. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report the prevalence of CD among multitransfused patients after the implementation of serological screening. Given the substantial social and economical regional differences observed in Brazil, our results cannot be extended to the whole country, where prevalence rates and transmission patterns of CD are expected to differ. However, the fact that this study was conducted in an area without vectorial transmission strengthens the association between our results and changes in the risk for transfusion-transmitted CD.
The risk of transfusion-transmitted CD depends on five factors: the prevalence of infection among blood donors, the proportion of blood units actually screened in an area, characteristics of the tests used, the risk of infection per unit of blood transfused and the number of blood units transfused . Assuming that the risk of infection per unit of blood transfused has not substantially changed over time, and considering that the magnitude of exposure to blood products in our study population was high, both in terms of number of units (median 51, range 10 – 2086) and of length in years (median 3, range 1 – 52), we can infer that the chance of acquiring CD among our patients was largely dependent on the first 3 factors.
The main finding of our study was a clear difference in the prevalence rate of CD between patients transfused before and after 1997, with no new cases of transfusion-transmitted CD in the latter group. This difference was observed despite a similar number of blood products transfused per year of exposure in both groups (25.00 ± 26.46 and 23.99 ± 30.58 units in seropositive and seronegative patients respectively; P = 0.75). Improvements in coverage and quality of screening tests for CD are the most important determinant of this change. Indeed, the proportion of blood services performing at least one serological test for CD increased from 69% in 1988 to 95.3% in 1990 in the state of Sao Paulo , reaching 100% in 1997. Concomitantly, the sensitivity of screening tests, as well as alternative screening strategies using combinations of methods, further decreased the risk of T. cruzi positive blood units of entering in the blood supply . Finally, the decreasing prevalence of CD among blood donors during the last decades, from a median above 2% reported in the 70's to values in the range of 0.6–0.8% during the last 10 years, are also a determinant of the observed results. In a study with only first-time blood donors in the city of Sao Paulo, the prevalence of CD was still decreasing at a significant rate during the late 90's, from 0.47% in 1995 to 0.34% in 2001, with cumulative rates of 0.39% and 0.48% before and after 1997 respectively .
As the prevalence of transfusion-transmitted diseases among multitransfused patients is a good indicator of the safety of the blood supply, our results confirm the assumption that after 1997 blood transfusions no longer represented a significant route for the transmission of CD in the most densely populated area of Brazil.
In conclusion, the prevalence of CD among multitransfused patients declined significantly as a result of the implementation of multiple interventions aimed to reduce the transmission of CD in Brazil. Permanent vigilance is essential to identify points that could be further improved to minimize the risk of transfusion-transmitted CD such as the accuracy of screening tests.
This study was supported by a grant provided by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, through the Pan American Health and Education Foundation (PAHEF), in collaboration with the Laboratory and Blood Services of the Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), Washington, DC, USA. The authors also thank Dr. J. R. Cruz for suggestions during the preparation of the manuscript, and R. Susana for reviewing the final manuscript.
- World Development Report 1993: Investing in Health. 1993, New York, World BankGoogle Scholar
- Schofield CJ, Jannin J, Salvatella R: The future of Chagas disease control. Trends Parasitol. 2006, 22: 583-588. 10.1016/j.pt.2006.09.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Prata A: Clinical and epidemiological aspects of Chagas disease. Lancet Infect Dis. 2001, 1: 92-100. 10.1016/S1473-3099(01)00065-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kirchhoff LV, Paredes P, Lomeli-Guerrero A, Paredes-Espinoza M, Ron-Guerrero CS, Delgado-Mejia M, Pena-Munoz JG: Transfusion-associated Chagas disease (American trypanosomiasis) in Mexico: implications for transfusion medicine in the United States. Transfusion. 2006, 46: 298-304. 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.00715.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schmunis GA: Prevention of transfusional Trypanosoma cruzi infection in Latin America. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1999, 94 Suppl 1: 93-101.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sabino EC, Goncalez TT, Salles NA, Silva GR, Chamone DF: Trends in the prevalence of Chagas' disease among first-time blood donors in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Transfusion. 2003, 43: 853-856. 10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.t01-2-00432.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Paula EV, Goncales NS, Xueref S, Addas-Carvalho M, Gilli SC, Angerami RN, Verissimo MP, Goncales FL: Transfusion-transmitted infections among multi-transfused patients in Brazil. J Clin Virol. 2005, 34 Suppl 2: S27-32. 10.1016/S1386-6532(05)80031-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cerisola JA, Rabinovich A, Alvarez M, Di Corleto CA, Pruneda J: Chagas' disease and blood transfusion. Bol Oficina Sanit Panam. 1972, 73: 203-221.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Amato Neto V, Nagasse TK, Moreira AA, Gomes AE, Campos R: Use, in polytransfusions, of the research on anti-Trypanosoma cruzi and anti-Toxoplasma gondii IgM antibodies to detect recent postransfusion infections. Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 1984, 26: 83-86.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lorca M, Lorca J, Child R, Atias A, Canales M, Lorca E, Gutierrez J: Prevalence of infection by Trypanosoma cruzi in patients with multiple blood transfusions. Rev Med Chil. 1988, 116: 112-116.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- ANVISA: ANVISA. [http://www.anvisa.gov.br/sangue/legis/index.htm]
- Moraes-Souza H: Chagas infection transmission control: situation of transfusional transmission in Brazil and other countries of Latin America. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1999, 94 Suppl 1: 419-423.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Valerio-Wanderley DM, Moraes e Souza H, Gonzalez TT, Pereira MSCA: Inquerito sobre a situação do controle do sangue no estado de São Paulo. Rev Soc Brasil Med Trop. 1992, 25 (Suppl): 35-Google Scholar
- Pirard M, Iihoshi N, Boelaert M, Basanta P, Lopez F, Van der Stuyft P: The validity of serologic tests for Trypanosoma cruzi and the effectiveness of transfusional screening strategies in a hyperendemic region. Transfusion. 2005, 45: 554-561. 10.1111/j.0041-1132.2005.04214.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/8/5/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.