- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Reduction of Clostridium Difficile and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus contamination of environmental surfaces after an intervention to improve cleaning methods
© Eckstein et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
- Received: 06 December 2006
- Accepted: 21 June 2007
- Published: 21 June 2007
Contaminated environmental surfaces may play an important role in transmission of some healthcare-associated pathogens. In this study, we assessed the adequacy of cleaning practices in rooms of patients with Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) colonization or infection and examined whether an intervention would result in improved decontamination of surfaces.
During a 6-week period, we cultured commonly touched surfaces (i.e. bedrails, telephones, call buttons, door knobs, toilet seats, and bedside tables) in rooms of patients with CDAD and VRE colonization or infection before and after housekeeping cleaning, and again after disinfection with 10% bleach performed by the research staff. After the housekeeping staff received education and feedback, additional cultures were collected before and after housekeeping cleaning during a 10-week follow-up period.
Of the 17 rooms of patients with VRE colonization or infection, 16 (94%) had one or more positive environmental cultures before cleaning versus 12 (71%) after housekeeping cleaning (p = 0.125), whereas none had positive cultures after bleach disinfection by the research staff (p < 0.001). Of the 9 rooms of patients with CDAD, 100% had positive cultures prior to cleaning versus 7 (78%) after housekeeping cleaning (p = 0.50), whereas only 1 (11%) had positive cultures after bleach disinfection by research staff (p = 0.031). After an educational intervention, rates of environmental contamination after housekeeping cleaning were significantly reduced.
Our findings provide additional evidence that simple educational interventions directed at housekeeping staff can result in improved decontamination of environmental surfaces. Such interventions should include efforts to monitor cleaning and disinfection practices and provide feedback to the housekeeping staff.
- Taurocholic Acid
- Direct Plating
- Toilet Seat
- Cleaning Practice
- Environmental Decontamination
Patients colonized or infected with healthcare-associated pathogens often shed these organisms onto their skin and into the environment . Although direct contact with patients is generally considered the major source for acquisition of pathogens on healthcare workers' hands and subsequent transmission to other patients, several recent studies suggest that contaminated environmental surfaces may also play an important role in pathogen transmission [2–10]. For example, we found that vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) and Staphylococcus aureus were frequently acquired on hands of investigators after contact with contaminated objects such as bed rails and bedside tables in colonized patients' rooms [2, 3]; daily disinfection of environmental surfaces in VRE-colonized patients' rooms was associated with reduced acquisition of VRE on investigators' hands . In a medical intensive care unit, Hayden et al  found that enforcing routine environmental cleaning measures was associated with decreased VRE contamination on surfaces and healthcare workers' hands, and also with a significant reduction in VRE cross-transmission. In two other recent reports, control of VRE outbreaks has been attributed in part to implementation of a program of environmental decontamination [5, 6]. Environmental decontamination with 10% bleach has also been associated with reductions in Clostridium difficile infections [9, 10].
Beginning in 2002, our institution has experienced a significant outbreak of C. difficile-associated disease (CDAD) that has been associated with emergence of the recently described epidemic strains in the Cleveland area [[11, 12], and authors' unpublished data]. Despite control measures including contact precautions for patients with documented and confirmed CDAD and environmental disinfection of CDAD patients' rooms with 10% bleach, we continued to experience high rates of infection (~15 CDAD cases/1,000 patient discharges). Because we and others have demonstrated that frequently touched objects in patients' rooms may not be adequately disinfected by housekeeping staff [3, 13], we assessed the adequacy of cleaning practices for CDAD rooms in our institution and examined whether an intervention would result in improved decontamination of frequently touched surfaces. For comparison, we also examined the adequacy of cleaning practices in rooms of patients colonized or infected with VRE because these rooms receive routine terminal cleaning after patient discharge.
The Cleveland Veterans Affairs Medical Center is a 368-bed acute care medical facility. Patients with CDAD are placed in contact precautions until diarrhea has resolved. Two years prior to the start of the study, the infection control department instituted bleach disinfection as a control measure for C. difficile. The housekeeping staff was in-serviced on the C. difficile outbreak and the importance of their role in preventing transmission was emphasized. The housekeepers were instructed to use 10% bleach solution (Sunstorm, State Chemical, Cleveland, OH) for terminal disinfection of CDAD patients' rooms. Terminal disinfection was to be performed using a clean cloth or mop soaked in 10% bleach, and it was stressed that frequently touched objects such as bed rails, bedside tables, and call buttons were to be disinfected. Subsequently, the housekeeping staff was periodically contacted to reinforce the bleach disinfection policy.
Patients with VRE colonization or infection were included as a comparison group because they are currently managed with standard precautions and routine terminal cleaning is performed. According to the housekeeping staff, routine terminal disinfection was to include bed rails and bedside tables, but telephones, call buttons, and door handles were not cleaned unless they were obviously soiled. The disinfectant used for routine decontamination of patient rooms is Super HDQ Neutral (Spartan Chemical Company, Inc., Maumee, OH), which is a quaternary ammonium compound.
Pre-intervention assessment of cleaning practices
A prospective 6-week before-after study was performed to assess the adequacy of terminal cleaning and disinfection practices in rooms of patients with CDAD and VRE colonization or infection. All patients with known CDAD and VRE colonization or infection during the study period were considered for enrollment; however, only those patients who were discharged between 9 AM and 5 PM from Monday to Friday were included in the assessment of housekeeping cleaning practices. Standardized chart review was performed to collect information regarding demographics, medical conditions, and culture results. The hospital's Institutional Review Board approved the study protocol.
Baseline cultures of environmental surfaces were obtained within 3 days of patient discharge from the room. Six sites were cultured in each room, including the bedrail, telephone, call button, door knob, toilet seat, and bedside table. Two sterile, pre-moistened cotton-tipped swabs were applied directly onto the selected surfaces in a uniform fashion. For rooms of VRE-colonized patients, one swab was plated directly onto Enterococcosel agar (Becton Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD) containing 20 μg/mL of vancomycin and the other swab was placed directly into Enterococcosel broth (Becton Dickinson) containing 20 μg/mL of vancomycin. The plates and broth enrichment cultures were incubated for 48 hours at 37°C; broth cultures were then plated onto Enterococcosel agar containing 20 μg/mL of vancomycin and incubated another 48 hours. Colonies with unique morphology were subjected to identification and susceptibility testing in accordance with Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines .
For rooms of CDAD patients, the swabs were placed into an eppendorf tube and transferred to an anaerobic chamber within 1 hour of collection (Coy Laboratories, Grass Lake, MN). One swab was directly plated onto cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar containing 0.1% taurocholic acid (CCFA-TA) and the other was placed into 300 μl of CCF broth containing 0.1% taurocholic acid and incubated for 48 hours prior to plating onto CCFA-TA. Plates were incubated for 72 hours at 37°C. Isolates were confirmed to be C. difficile on the basis of typical odor and appearance of colonies and by a positive reaction using Pro Disk (Key Scientific Products, Round Rock, TX). C. difficile isolates were tested for in-vitro cytoxin production using C. difficile Tox A/B II (Wampole Laboratories, Princeton, NJ), and isolates that did not produce toxin were not included in the number of positive cultures.
In order to assess the adequacy of housekeeping cleaning and disinfection practices, cultures of the same surfaces in the rooms were obtained after terminal cleaning was performed by the housekeeping staff, but prior to admission of another patient. Finally, in order to confirm the efficacy of 10% bleach for decontamination of C. difficile and VRE, one of us (B.C.E.) disinfected the same surfaces using a 10% bleach solution (Dispatch, Caltech Industries, Inc. Midland, MI). The surfaces were wiped with a cloth soaked with 10% bleach to provide physical removal of dirt or other substances and sprayed with bleach to ensure that the surfaces were thoroughly wet. The surfaces were allowed to air dry. Cultures were then obtained from the same surfaces.
Intervention and post-intervention assessment
After completion of the initial assessment of adequacy of housekeeping cleaning, the research team presented their findings to the housekeeping staff. Education was provided regarding the importance of environmental cleaning as a means to reduce transmission of pathogens. The importance of cleaning and disinfecting frequently touched surfaces was emphasized. In addition, the housekeeping staff was encouraged to provide input regarding measures that might improve their ability to perform adequate terminal cleaning. To assess the effect of the intervention, additional cultures were obtained before and after the housekeeping staff performed terminal cleaning of rooms of several patients with CDAD or VRE colonization or infection during the 10-week period after the intervention.
Data were analyzed using STATA 9.0 (StataCorp, College Station, TX). In describing the study population, continuous data were analyzed using unpaired t tests and categorical data were assessed using Fisher's exact test. In evaluating the effectiveness of the intervention, an exact McNemar's chi-square test was used to compare VRE and C. difficile culture positivity in rooms and on specific surfaces prior to and after cleaning by housekeeping staff. This test of significance was used to then compare culture positivity after cleaning by housekeeping staff and after cleaning by research staff.
Pre-intervention assessment of cleaning practices
Prior to the intervention, we studied 17 patients with VRE colonization and 9 patients with CDAD. All of the patients were male. The average ages of the VRE and CDAD patients were 70.0 (range 42 to 86) and 63.8 (range 28 to 80), respectively. Of the 17 patients with VRE colonization, 5 (29%) were incontinent of feces, 6 (35%) had diarrhea, 6 (35%) were receiving antibiotic therapy, 11 (64%) were in multiple-bed rooms, and 4 (24%) were in an intensive care unit. Of the 9 patients with CDAD, all were in private rooms and were receiving therapy for C. difficile, 4 (44%) were incontinent of feces, and 1 (11%) was in an intensive care unit.
Intervention and post-intervention assessment
As noted previously, the intervention was initiated with a presentation of the initial culture findings at a housekeeping staff meeting followed by discussion of factors that impacted their ability to perform thorough cleaning. The housekeeping staff expressed concern that the time permitted for terminal cleaning was not adequate and that there were often significant delays before they were notified that a room was ready to be cleaned. The hospital administration agreed to allow the housekeeping staff additional time for terminal cleaning (30 minutes/room) and the nursing staff was asked to provide more rapid notification of when rooms were ready for cleaning. The housekeeping staff also expressed concern that the cleaning agents being used might not adequately kill the pathogens. We therefore performed in vitro studies on a laboratory bench top to assess killing of C. difficile spores and VRE by the cleaning agents used in our hospital. Freshly-prepared Sunstorm bleach, Sunstorm obtained from housekeeping carts, and Dispatch bleach efficiently killed an inoculum of ~106 colony-forming units of C. difficile spores or VRE in 10 μl of phosphate-buffered saline that was allowed to air dry on the surfaces; the contaminated surfaces were disinfected and cultured in the same manner as described for the environmental surfaces in rooms. Super HDQ disinfectant killed VRE but not C. difficile spores (data not shown).
After the intervention, the housekeeping staff agreed to apply 10% bleach solution to disinfect frequently touched surfaces (e.g. bed rails, bedside tables, call buttons, telephones, toilet seats, door handles) in rooms of CDAD patients using a spray bottle. The surfaces were then allowed to air-dry. In addition, without prompting from the research team, the housekeeping staff elected to incorporate this method of bleach disinfection of commonly touched objects into their terminal cleaning practices for all patient rooms in our facility. Although there were initially concerns that bleach might cause damage to surfaces in the rooms, no complaints regarding such damage have been reported. In addition, interviews with the housekeeping staff were conducted, and no complaints related to the application of bleach were reported.
To assess the effect of the intervention, we performed environmental cultures before and after housekeeping cleaning in rooms of 10 patients with VRE colonization or infection and 10 patients with CDAD during the 4-month period after the intervention. Eight (80%) rooms of patients with VRE colonization or infection had one or more positive environmental cultures before cleaning versus 0 (0%) after housekeeping cleaning (p < 0.001). Nine (90%) of rooms of patients with CDAD had one or more positive cultures prior to cleaning versus 2 (20%) after housekeeping cleaning (p < 0.01). The Infection Control Department currently meets monthly with the housekeeping staff to provide feedback regarding culture results and to maintain awareness of the importance of environmental cleaning as a means to control healthcare-associated pathogens.
Two years prior to our study, the infection control department instituted a bleach disinfection program as a control measure for C. difficile. The housekeeping staff was in-serviced, and it was stressed that frequently touched objects such as bed rails, bedside tables, and call buttons were to be disinfected. Despite the initial intervention and periodic reminders of the policy, we found that frequently touched surfaces in rooms of patients with CDAD were often contaminated after terminal cleaning and disinfection by housekeeping staff. Similar results were obtained in rooms of patients with VRE colonization or infection. An educational intervention was well-received by the housekeeping staff and resulted in modification of cleaning practices and improved decontamination of frequently touched surfaces. Our findings provide additional evidence that simple interventions can result in improved environmental decontamination in healthcare institutions.
Our experience also demonstrates that environmental cleaning interventions should include some means of monitoring the efficacy of decontamination with feedback to the housekeeping staff. Such monitoring of cleaning performance has been recommended in recently published guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America [15–17]. Although our intervention included environmental cultures, less labor-intensive methods of monitoring cleaning practices may also be effective. For example, Carling et al  used an invisible fluorescent marker to monitor cleaning practices; feedback to housekeeping staff led to a sustained improvement in cleaning of surfaces. Hayden et al  performed environmental cultures, but also observed cleaning practices and provided feedback to housekeepers.
Our study has several limitations. First, only one hospital was included, and our findings may not be applicable to all institutions. Second, we monitored the effect of the intervention on cleaning practices for only 4 months for the purposes of the study. However, we intend to continue ongoing monitoring of environmental disinfection practices because we believe that such monitoring will be essential to maintain compliance. Third, molecular typing was not performed to confirm that the organisms recovered from surfaces were genetically related to isolates recovered from the stool of patients occupying the rooms. Fourth, although bleach is required for disinfection of CDAD patients' rooms, it should be noted that non-sporicidal disinfectants are equally effective for elimination of other pathogens (i.e., the improvement in disinfection of VRE by housekeeping is likely attributable to improved performance and would have been achieved with agents other than bleach). Fifth, our disinfection method was performed after patients were discharged from the rooms and included spraying of bleach solution onto surfaces; wiping with a soaked cloth is preferred if patients or healthcare workers are present to limit exposure to bleach. Finally, we have not included an assessment of the impact of the intervention on rates of CDAD. Such an assessment will be performed after monitoring rates of CDAD over a longer period of time.
Frequently touched surfaces in rooms of patients with CDAD or VRE colonization or infection were often contaminated with these pathogens after terminal cleaning by housekeeping staff. Simple educational interventions directed at housekeepers can result in improved environmental decontamination, but these interventions should include efforts to monitor cleaning practices and provide feedback to the housekeeping staff.
This work was supported in part by an Advanced Research Career Development Award from the Department of Veterans Affairs to CJD.
- Donskey CJ: The role of the intestinal tract as a reservoir and source for transmission of nosocomial pathogens. Clin Infect Dis. 2004, 39: 219-26. 10.1086/422002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ray AJ, Hoyen CK, Das SM, Taub TF, Eckstein EC, Donskey CJ: Nosocomial transmission of vancomycin-resistant enterococci from surfaces. JAMA. 2002, 287: 1400-1401. 10.1001/jama.287.11.1400.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bhalla A, Pultz NJ, Gries DM, Ray AJ, Eckstein EC, Aron DC, Donskey CJ: Acquisition of nosocomial pathogens on hands after contact with environmental surfaces near hospitalized patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004, 25: 164-167. 10.1086/502369.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hayden MK, Bonten JM, Blom DW, Lyle EA, van de Vijver D, Weinstein RA: Reduction in acquisition of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus after enforcement of routine environmental cleaning measures. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2006, 42: 1552-60. 10.1086/503845.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Falk PS, Winnike J, Woodmansee C, Desai M, Mayhall CG: Outbreak of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in a burn unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2000, 21: 575-582. 10.1086/501806.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sample ML, Gravel D, Oxley C, Toye B, Garber G, Ramotar K: An outbreak of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in a hematology-oncology unit: Control by patient cohorting and terminal cleaning of the environment. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002, 23: 468-470. 10.1086/502088.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Duckro AN, Blom DW, Lyle EA, Weinstein RA, Hayden MK: Transfer of vancomycin-resistant enterococci via health care worker hands. Arch Intern Med. 2005, 165: 302-307. 10.1001/archinte.165.3.302.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Denton M, Wilcox MH, Parnell P, Green D, Keer V, Hawkey PM, Evans I, Murphy P: Role of environmental cleaning in controlling an outbreak of Acinetobacter baumannii on a neurosurgical intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect. 2004, 56: 106-110. 10.1016/j.jhin.2003.10.017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mayfield JL, Leet T, Miller J, Mundy LM: Environmental control to reduce transmission of Clostridium difficile . Clin Infect Dis. 2000, 31: 995-1000. 10.1086/318149.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wilcox MH, Fawley WN, Wigglesworth W, Parnell P, Verity P, Freeman J: Comparison of the effect of detergent versus hypochlorite cleaning on environmental contamination and incidence of Clostridium difficile infection. J Hosp Infect. 2004, 56: 78-79. 10.1016/j.jhin.2003.10.008.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- McDonald LC, Killgore GE, Thompson A, Owens RC, Kazakova SV, Sambol SP, Johnson S, Gerding DN: An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile . N Engl J Med. 2005, 353: 2503-5. 10.1056/NEJMoa051590.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Loo VG, Poirier L, Miller MA, Oughton M, Libman MD, Michaud S, Bourgault AM, Nguyen T, Frenette C, Kelly M, Vibien A, Brassard P, Fenn S, Dewar K, Hudson TJ, Horn R, Rene P, Monczak Y, Dascal A: A predominantly clonal multi-institutional outbreak of Clostridium difficile -associated diarrhea with high morbidity and mortality. N Engl J Med. 2005, 353: 2442-2449. 10.1056/NEJMoa051639.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Carling PC, Briggs JL, Perkins J, Highlander D: Improved Cleaning of Patient Rooms Using a New Targeted Method. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2006, 42: 385-388. 10.1086/499361.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards: Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard, M7. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. 2005, Wayne, PAGoogle Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Healthcare Infection Control Advisory Committee (HICPAC): Management of multidrug-resistant organisms in healthcare settings, 2006. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2006, [http://www.cdc.gov]Google Scholar
- Muto CA, Jernigan JA, Ostrowsky BE, Richet HM, Jarvis WR, Boyce JM, Farr BM: SHEA guideline for preventing nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003, 24: 362-386. 10.1086/502213.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Healthcare Infection Control Advisory Committee (HICPAC): Guidelines for environmental infection control in healthcare facilities. MMWR. 2003, 52 (RR 10): 1-44.Google Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/7/61/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.