- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
La cuerda dulce – a tolerability and acceptability study of a novel approach to specimen collection for diagnosis of paediatric pulmonary tuberculosis
© Chow et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2006
- Received: 20 December 2005
- Accepted: 04 April 2006
- Published: 04 April 2006
Recent data demonstrate the utility of the string test for the diagnosis of sputum-scarce HIV-associated TB in adults. We hypothesized that, if well-tolerated by children, this simple tool might offer a breakthrough in paediatric TB diagnosis. Thus the objective of this study, undertaken in the paediatric service of the Hospital Nacional Dos de Mayo, Lima, Perú, was to determine the tolerability and acceptability of the string test to paediatric TB suspects, their parents and nursing staff.
22 paediatric subjects aged 3–14 years (median 8) under investigation for TB were invited to undergo 2 string tests (four-hour downtime each). Subjective and objective pain and discomfort rating scales were used to assess the perception of the subject, parent and attending nurse.
Patients as young as 4 years tolerated the procedure extremely well with 84% willing to undergo a second procedure. Peak discomfort at the time of swallowing and of string retrieval was mild (30% of maximum possible score) and brief as judged by visual analogue ratings and objective indicators. Good concordance of parent/child and objective/subjective ratings strengthened the validity of these findings.
The string test is well tolerated and achievable for most paediatric TB suspects as young as 4 years. A formal prospective paediatric efficacy study is now needed.
- Pulmonary Tuberculosis
- String Test
- Sputum Induction
- Gastric Aspiration
- Microscopic Observation Drug Susceptibility
Paediatric tuberculosis (TB) has long been neglected despite annual estimated morbidity of over 880,000 cases globally [1, 2]. This partly reflects a global strategy (DOTS) focused upon transmission reduction in which children are deemed to play a small part and partly the notorious difficulty of diagnosing tuberculosis in this population, factors which are clearly related.
Paediatric TB suspects are frequently unable to spontaneously produce adequate sputum specimens, and samples tend to be paucibacillary. The poor sensitivity of even optimal current approaches yield a microbiological diagnosis in only 40% of children with tuberculosis disease [3, 4].
The inadequacy of current diagnostics for pediatric tuberculosis dictates that the inherently unsatisfactory standard practice is empirical treatment based on clinical and epidemiological factors . Ideally because of the difficulty of obtaining specimens from pediatric patients, these precious samples should be cultured but the benefits of greater sensitivity and specificity are conventionally diminished by delays of three to eight weeks. Using the rapid, inexpensive microscopic observation drug susceptibility assay (MODS) [6, 7] reliable culture and susceptibility results are returned in a median of 9 days . Inadequacy of respiratory secretion samples remains problematic. Gastric washings and nasopharyngeal aspiration may be used [9, 10], but neither procedure is well tolerated. HIV-infected adults with tuberculosis co-infection, like children, often have difficulty producing sputum. We have recently demonstrated the superiority of the string test over sputum induction in this patient group; thus M tuberculosis was detected by culture using the string test in 15 of 160 HIV+ adult TB suspects, of whom only nine had positive induced sputum cultures (p = 0.03) . The string test, originally developed for the retrieval of enteric pathogens [12, 13] and Helicobacter pylori, consists of a coiled nylon string inside a gel capsule. The string unravels through a hole in the end of the weighted capsule as it descends into the stomach and the capsule then dissolves in the stomach, allowing the string to become coated with gastro-intestinal secretions containing whatever pathogens are present. When the string is retrieved four hours later, the capsule and weight have detached and are digested or passed unnoticed in the faeces.
A paediatric string test has previously been used in children for the detection of enteric pathogens [12, 14–16], diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux, confirmation of contaminated small-bowel syndrome and assessment of neonatal cholestasis [16–21]. To our knowledge, it has not been previously used in the diagnosis of tuberculosis in children nor has tolerability previously been investigated.
If well tolerated, the string test combined with MODS or other sensitive, rapid diagnostic tests such as MGIT or the Griess method could represent a significant step forward in our ability to diagnose tuberculosis in children. As the preliminary stage of a process to evaluate the efficacy of the string test in the diagnosis of pediatric tuberculosis, our objective was to investigate the tolerability and acceptability of the string test in children undergoing investigation for tuberculosis.
Sites and subjects
Subjects were recruited and procedures performed at Hospital Nacional Dos de Mayo (Lima, Perú) between July and September 2003; cultures were performed at Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (Lima). Children between three and seventeen years attending outpatients, the emergency department or admitted to the paediatric ward, and undergoing investigation for possible pulmonary tuberculosis were invited to participate. Paediatric contacts of infectious adults under evaluation for tuberculosis were also invited to participate. Children receiving tuberculosis treatment or prophylaxis were ineligible. Usual medical care was unaffected by study participation.
Procedure – clinical
The parent(s)/guardian(s) of all eligible children were invited to join the study, which was explained to both parent/guardian and subject; consenting parents/guardians read and signed an information sheet and consent form. Written assent of children over seven years, indicating their independent willingness to participate in the study, was also required.
Children then underwent the first of two string tests using string capsules made in-house for <$0.20 each, with market-purchased gelatin capsules. All procedures were performed early in the morning after an overnight fast. The procedure method evolved during the course of the study (see Results). Once swallowed, the trailing string was taped to the subject's cheek, remaining in-situ for four hours prior to controlled removal by the study nurse unless earlier removal was requested. Children were occupied and distracted with quiet activities (puzzles, drawing etc.) during the "down-time" to minimize irritation and the opportunity for inadvertent or deliberate string removal. None of the study nurses had any prior experience of administering the string test but followed the simple instructions and easily learnt how to encourage the children and achieve successful outcomes.
Objective and subjective scale scores by time period of string test procedure
Time period and description
Number of procedures with data
Difference between parental and child scores $
Mean child rating * (0 – 5)
Mean parental rating# (0 – 5)
Mean behavioural pain scale § (out of 10)
Mean objective pain scale § (out of 10)
(1) before swallowing the capsule
p = 0.001
(2) at the time of swallowing of the capsule
(3) 10 minutes after swallowing the capsule
(4) one hour after swallowing the capsule
(5) two hours after swallowing the capsule
(6) three hours after swallowing the capsule
(7) at the time of removal of the string
(8) immediately after removal of the string
p = 0.01
(9) 30 minutes after removal of the string
Subjects indicated their distress/discomfort using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating scale  (0 = Very Happy Face, 5= Very Sad Face). Open questions were also used and post-procedure subjects were encouraged to describe to an imaginary friend waiting for a string test how best to prepare for it.
Parents/guardians used a visual analogue pain scale correlated with the Wong-Baker Scale (0 = No distress, 5 = Very distressed), and also indicated their own distress at each timepoint. They were asked to report the ease with which the capsule was swallowed, whether the test was excessively or unnecessarily uncomfortable for the subject, and how tolerability might be improved.
Nurses used the Behavioral Pain Assessment Scale (Campbell, Detroit Medical Center 2000), assigning scores of 0–2 in the categories of Face, Restlessness, Muscle Tone, Vocalization, and Consolability (0/10 = no pain, 10/10 = maximum pain). Concurrently an Objective Pain Scale  was completed with a 0–2 score given in the categories of Percentage Change in Blood Pressure, Crying, Movement, Agitation and Verbal Evaluation or Body Language (0/10 = no pain, 10/10 = maximum pain).
If the subject and parent(s)/guardian(s) agreed to a second test, the procedure was repeated.
Procedure – laboratory
Removed strings were transported to the laboratory within three hours in 15 ml Falcon tubes containing 1.5 ml 0.9% saline. Secretions adsorbed onto the string were eluted; this sample was decontaminated with NaOH-NALC. All samples were cultured in Löwenstein-Jensen and MODS, the latter as described previously (Caviedes, 2000).
Ethical approval was granted by Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia (UPCH), Asociación Benéfica PRISMA (AB PRISMA), Imperial College London, DISA Lima-Ciudad (Ministry of Health) and the Hospital Nacional Dos de Mayo.
Study population and participants
The participation of 23 subjects was invited through their parent(s)/guardian(s), of whom one declined. One recruited subject refused to attempt to swallow the capsule. Thus it was possible to attempt to conduct at least one test in 21 of 22 (95%) eligible subjects. Median participant age was eight years (range 3 to 14); 55% were female. All subjects were undergoing investigation for possible pulmonary tuberculosis, 10 (48%) as in-patients and 11 (52%) as outpatients; 14 (67%) had a history of known tuberculosis contact, 12 of whom were symptom-free.
In accordance with the adult protocol in use at Hospital Nacional Dos de Mayo, a four-hour "downtime" was required. Of the 33 tests performed, the down time for every test was the full four hours except in three instances. Two of these were self-removal by the patient at two hours (one inadvertent, one deliberate); the third was an inpatient admitted with vomiting, who successfully swallowed the capsule but vomited it back up within five minutes.
Evolution of the procedure
Adults swallow the capsule with water, but to enhance the tolerability of the procedure for children we hypothesized that the use of a "sweetener" might be helpful ("la cuerda dulce" is Spanish for "the sweet string"). The study protocol allowed iterative evolution of the procedure method, in an effort to optimize participant tolerability. Embedding the capsule in a spoonful of flavoured jelly failed and was abandoned because of partial capsule dissolution, impairment of swallowing and because unraveling of the string from the descending capsule was impeded. Greater success was achieved by swallowing using either water alone or with a spoonful of honey followed by the capsule with water.
Once in-situ the drinking of warm liquid jelly helped to alleviate any discomfort from the string in the throat. Of the 33 successful swallows, 23 used water alone while 10 used honey and water.
Rating of procedure overall
Few parents felt that improvements in tolerability were necessary; 92% reported not feeling upset or bothered at any point during the procedure.
Eighty-four percent of patients indicated a willingness to repeat the test the following day; 92% of parents said that they would be willing to persuade their child to repeat the test the next day. The youngest age that parents thought a child would be able to manage the string test varied from two and a half to six years.
Time-course of the procedure (figure 3)
Of the nine time periods subjects, parents and nurses all agreed that most difficulty was encountered at time points 2 (capsule swallowing) and 7 (string removal).
The table shows the mean scores reported for subjects and their parent/guardian for each of these time points. Paired analyses revealed no significant differences between parental and subject responses except for the pre-procedure and immediate post-procedure periods when parents rated their children as more distressed than the children themselves.
Subjects' descriptions of string removal varied; most reported feeling fine, that nothing bad happened and that there was no worst part of the removal; some reported a tickling, pricking or scraping sensation in the throat; a few described the removal as if they were being choked and couldn't breathe, or that they felt nauseated. Many reported feeling afraid during the removal.
The overall mean distress/discomfort scores for the whole procedure as assessed by the two objective scales were 0.6 and 0.4 (out of 10). Figure 3 illustrates two key points – firstly, outside of the two time points identified by subjects and parents alike as being the most difficult, the test caused virtually no distress; and secondly that the information provided by these objective measures corresponded well with that reported by the child participants and their parents (table 1).
The mean scores on the Behavioural Pain Assessment Scale and Objective Pain Scale (out of 10) were 1.3 and 0.6 at the time of swallowing the capsule and 2.6 and 1.0 at the time of string removal respectively, indicating only mild distress. Scores returned almost to baseline within 10 minutes of swallowing and immediately after string removal, indicating a very short duration of distress.
Perceived ease of procedure
In general, parents and nurses rated the procedure as straightforward. Using a visual analogue scale (0 = Very Easy, 5 = Very Difficult) 77% and 63% of procedures were rated as 0, 1 or 2 by nurses and parents respectively. The capsule was successfully swallowed at the first attempt in 15 of the 33 successful procedures, on the 2nd to 5th attempt in 16 procedures and after more than five attempts in two cases.
Fear of string removal and associated discomfort and gag provocation associated were the reasons given for three subjects declining a second test. The youngest of the four patients unable to swallow the capsule was aged three and had never previously swallowed a capsule; though co-operative she chewed the capsule instead of swallowing it. The second youngest was a four year-old to whom the capsule was offered embedded within spoonfuls of solid jelly. She separated the capsule from jelly using her tongue, swallowed the jelly and retained the capsule in her mouth.
There were no positive cultures for tuberculosis from any of the subjects, TB suspects or contacts, in this study.
The results of this study indicate that the string test is acceptable to and well tolerated by the majority of children down to the age of four years. The brief moments of capsule swallowing and string retrieval were least well tolerated but recovery was rapid. That the majority of participants were happy to undertake the test a second time reflects how relatively benign they regarded the experience. In a separate community-based study in Lima using the string test for Helicobacter pylori in children, subjects reported the procedure as preferable to an injection (Unpublished data, Kevin Nemethy 2003). One limitation of this data is the lack of children under 3 years of age, in whom rates of TB, particularly the most severe military and meningitic forms of disease, are highest. Given the potential difficulties of the crucial step of capsule swallowing in these patients it is clear that these data cannot be extrapolated to this group.
To our knowledge this is the first formal evaluation of the tolerability and acceptability of any procedure for retrieval of respiratory specimens from children and of the use of the string test (for any reason) in children. Our findings are consistent with previous anecdotal reports [16, 17, 20].
The concordance of all four subjective and objective measures of distress validates these indices and strengthens our assertion that this procedure is highly acceptable to children, and importantly also to their carers and attendant nursing staff. One study nurse was responsible for procedure supervision and another for completing the objective scale scores – it is not possible to exclude the play of bias in the assessments though we believe the concordance of scores from the different sources suggests this was not relevant. The willingness of all three parties to engage in the procedure is key to its success.
Our study design allowed for evolution and optimization of the procedural methodology in the light of our experience. Though child-dependent it soon became clear that either swallowing with water or in honey ("la cuerda dulce") was superior to the use of solid jelly (our initial working plan).
As a novel approach to the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in swallowed respiratory secretions the string test shows great promise for adults with unproductive cough . In this study, designed to assess tolerability and acceptability and not efficacy, no gold-standard comparator procedures were performed. Nevertheless it was very disappointing that we failed to confirm a microbiological diagnosis in any participant, several of whom were treated empirically for TB. This may reflect the use of an unnecessarily harsh (NaOH-NALC) decontamination procedure from which it is accepted that only 5–10% of mycobacteria survive. The impact of this effect is likely to be greater in children than adults owing to lower bacillary loads at the outset, which would explain why we did not encounter similar problems in HIV-infected adults . Subsequent efficacy studies in children will need to explore less astringent decontamination, as recommended for gastric aspirates  particularly since the MODS methodology includes an antimicrobial cocktail in the media which reduces the necessity for harsh decontamination.
Of the variety of methods for obtaining clinical specimens for bacteriological confirmation of paediatric tuberculosis, gastric aspiration to obtain swallowed bronchial secretions is the most commonly used [25–27]. Nasopharyngeal aspirates have been used successfully , and have the advantage over gastric aspirates (and the string test) that they can be performed at any time of day. Data on the acceptability of any of the methodologies is lacking though clinical experience indicate that they are poorly tolerated. The yields of bronchoalveolar lavage (beyond the resources of most high TB-burden settings), sputum induction and gastric aspiration are broadly comparable with some data suggesting a modest advantage in favour of sputum induction and gastric aspirate culture [9, 10, 25]. Since the string test outperforms sputum induction in HIV-infected adults , a comparative efficacy and acceptability study of sputum induction, gastric aspiration and the string test for the diagnosis of paediatric pulmonary TB is now needed.
This work has clearly established that the string test methodology is well tolerated by children as young as four years of age and is highly acceptable to the children, their parents and their attending nursing staff. Whether this procedure can enhance our ability to achieve a microbiological diagnosis in children with pulmonary tuberculosis can now be tested in formal efficacy studies.
We wish to thank all the participants and their parents without whom this study would not have been possible. Thanks also to the staff of the Department of Paediatrics at Hospital Nacional Dos de Mayo, Lima for their essential collaboration and assistance. This work was largely funded by a generous award from the Sir Halley Stewart Trust, Cambridge, UK. Dr David Moore is a Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Fellow in Tropical Medicine and Senior Lecturer in Infectious Diseases at Imperial College London (Fellowship award number 064672/Z/01). Felicia Chow was supported by a Dean's Stipend for Johns Hopkins University Summer Research Program.
- Corbett EL, Watt CJ, Walker N, Maher D, Williams BG, Raviglione MC, Dye C: The growing burden of tuberculosis: global trends and interactions with the HIV epidemic. Arch Intern Med. 2003, 163: 1009-1021. 10.1001/archinte.163.9.1009.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nelson LJ, Wells CD: Global epidemiology of childhood tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2004, 8: 636-647.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eamranond P, Jaramillo E: Tuberculosis in children: reassessing the need for improved diagnosis in global control strategies. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2001, 5: 594-603.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Starke JR: Pediatric tuberculosis: time for a new approach. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2003, 83: 208-212. 10.1016/S1472-9792(02)00088-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Van Rheenen P: The use of the paediatric tuberculosis score chart in an HIV-endemic area. Trop Med Int Health. 2002, 7: 435-441. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2002.00882.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Caviedes L, Lee TS, Gilman RH, Sheen P, Spellman E, Lee EH, Berg DE, Montenegro-James S: Rapid, efficient detection and drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum by microscopic observation of broth cultures. The Tuberculosis Working Group in Peru. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38: 1203-1208.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Park WG, Bishai WR, Chaisson RE, Dorman SE: Performance of the microscopic observation drug susceptibility assay in drug susceptibility testing for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2002, 40: 4750-4752. 10.1128/JCM.40.12.4750-4752.2002.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Moore DA, Mendoza D, Gilman RH, Evans CA, Hollm Delgado MG, Guerra J, Caviedes L, Vargas D, Ticona E, Ortiz J, Soto G, Serpa J: Microscopic observation drug susceptibility assay, a rapid, reliable diagnostic test for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis suitable for use in resource-poor settings. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 4432-4437. 10.1128/JCM.42.10.4432-4437.2004.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Abadco DL, Steiner P: Gastric lavage is better than bronchoalveolar lavage for isolation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in childhood pulmonary tuberculosis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1992, 11: 735-738.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Somu N, Swaminathan S, Paramasivan CN, Vijayasekaran D, Chandrabhooshanam A, Vijayan VK, Prabhakar R: Value of bronchoalveolar lavage and gastric lavage in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in children. Tuber Lung Dis. 1995, 76: 295-299. 10.1016/S0962-8479(05)80027-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vargas D, Garcia L, Gilman RH, Evans C, Ticona E, Navincopa M, Luo RF, Caviedes L, Hong C, Escombe R, Moore DA: Diagnosis of sputum-scarce HIV-associated pulmonary tuberculosis in Lima, Peru. Lancet. 2005, 365: 150-152. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17705-8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Gilman RH, Hornick RB: Duodenal isolation of Salmonella typhi by string capsule in acute typhoid fever. J Clin Microbiol. 1976, 3: 456-457.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Beal CB, Viens P, Grant RG, Hughes JM: A new technique for sampling duodenal contents: demonstration of upper small-bowel pathogens. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1970, 19: 349-352.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gilman RH, Islam S, Rabbani H, Ghosh H: Identification of gallbladder typhoid carriers by a string device. Lancet. 1979, 1: 795-796. 10.1016/S0140-6736(79)91316-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Benavente L, Gotuzzo E, Guerra J, Grados O, Guerra H, Bravo N: Diagnosis of typhoid fever using a string capsule device. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1984, 78: 404-406. 10.1016/0035-9203(84)90134-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Antony TJ, Patwari AK, Anand VK, Pillai PK, Aneja S, Sharma D: Duodenal string test in typhoid fever. Indian Pediatr. 1993, 30: 643-647.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Korman SH: The duodenal string test. A simple multipurpose diagnostic tool in clinical pediatrics. Am J Dis Child. 1990, 144: 803-805.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liebman WM, Rosenthal P: The string test for gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Dis Child. 1980, 134: 775-776.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rosenthal P, Liebman WM: Comparative study of stool examinations, duodenal aspiration, and pediatric Entero-Test for giardiasis in children. J Pediatr. 1980, 96: 278-279. 10.1016/S0022-3476(80)80826-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liebman WM, Rosenthal P: Evaluation of the string test in intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Am J Dis Child. 1983, 137: 1177-1178.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rosenthal P: Collection of duodenal bile in infants and children by the string test. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1985, 4: 284-285.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wong DL, Hockenberry-Eaton M, Wilson D, Winkelstein ML, Schwartz P: Wongs Essentials of Paediatric Nursing. 2001, 6thGoogle Scholar
- Tuffrey C, Muir KR, Walker DA: Development of a treatment tolerability scale for use with young patients receiving intensivive treatment for cancer. J Cancer Care. 1995, 4: 105-110.Google Scholar
- Collins CH, Grange JM, Yates MD: Tuberculosis bacteriology. Organization and Practice. 1997, Oxford, UK, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2ndGoogle Scholar
- Zar HJ, Tannenbaum E, Apolles P, Roux P, Hanslo D, Hussey G: Sputum induction for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in infants and young children in an urban setting in South Africa. Arch Dis Child. 2000, 82: 305-308. 10.1136/adc.82.4.305.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hesseling AC, Schaaf HS, Gie RP, Starke JR, Beyers N: A critical review of diagnostic approaches used in the diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2002, 6: 1038-1045.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shingadia D, Novelli V: Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis in children. Lancet Infect Dis. 2003, 3: 624-632. 10.1016/S1473-3099(03)00771-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Franchi LM, Cama RI, Gilman RH, Montenegro-James S, Sheen P: Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in nasopharyngeal aspirate samples in children. Lancet. 1998, 352: 1681-1682. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61454-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/6/67/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.