Impact of long-term viral suppression in CD4+ recovery of HIV-children on Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy

The efficacy of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is shown by the fact that many patients achieve suppression of viral load (VL) below the limits of detection (uVL) along with an increase of CD4⁺ T-lymphocytes (CD4⁺) [1, 2], resulting in a good clinical outcome [3, 4]. Immediate suppression of VL is often achieved with HAART, but long-term suppression of VL is not always feasible [1]. Children receiving treatment usually have higher VL and lower virologic response rates than adults [1, 5]. Moreover, the effects of HAART may differ between children and adults because children have a developing immune system, but the long-term immunological outcome in HIV-infected children on HAART is not well-known [6]. A major aim of our study was to determine CD4+ evolution associated with long-term VL control.

During follow-up, one child progressed to AIDS and one child died. Moreover, the Non-Responders group presented a significantly higher number of ART switches, higher number of different drugs used in ART than children of the Responders group (p ≤ 0.05) (Table 1).

Long-term viral load suppression was achieved in only about 20% of followed children. This low figure is mostly related to poor adherence by the non-responders group (48% vs 91% in responders) (Table 1). There were not significant differences in adherence according to hospital and region involved.

Table 2 shows the first line HAART schemes. We did not find significant differences in PI used in first line HAART between groups. Moreover, there were 3320 VL assays performed on samples obtained from HIV-infected children during the 4 years of follow-up; 1054 (47.3%) of those did not reach the lower limit of detection of 400 HIV-RNA copies/mL. The VL tests performed were similar for the two groups, but the Responders group had a higher number of tests with VL ≤400 copies/ml. Moreover, the median of time between the first and last VL ≤400 copies/ml measurement was lower in the Responder group than the Non-responder group (Table 2). The Responders group had uVL after the 1^st year on HAART and the Non-Responders group had a low decrease of VL during the 4 years of follow-up (Figure 1A). Furthermore, the Responders group had a higher percentage of children with CD4⁺ >30% than the Non-Responders group after 1^st year on HAART (Figure 1B).

	Responders	Non-Responders
HAART during follow-up
NNRTI or PI in first-line of HAART (b)
Ritonavir	4 (12.1%)	32 (25.1%)
Saquinavir	6 (18.2%)	12 (9.4%)
Indinavir	8 (24.2%)	28 (22.1%)
Nelfinavir	10 (30.3%)	44 (34.6%)
Amprenavir	3 (9.1%)	5 (3.9%)
Nevirapina	0 (0%)	6 (4.7%)
Efavirenz	6 (18.1%)	10 (7.8%)
ART-protocols switches (a)	1 (0; 4)	1 (0; 11) *
Drugs switches (a)	1 (0;7)	3 (0;12) *
Adherence >95% (b)	30 (90.9%)	61 (48%) *
VL tests
Total VL tests (a)	20 (6; 34)	21 (3; 48)
Number of tests with VL ≤400 copies/mL (a)	15 (5; 28)	3 (0; 23) *
Time to first uVL measure (a)	3.7 (0.2; 12)	29.4 (0.9; 59.8) *
Time to last uVL measure (a)	49.8 (16.1; 59.6)	57.5 (31.8; 60) *

Values are expressed as: a) median (min; max), and b) absolute (percentage). ART: antiretroviral therapy; VL: viral load; PI: protease inhibitor; NNRTI. Differences between groups (*: p < 0.01).

The introduction of HAART represented a major breakthrough in the therapeutics of HIV-infected patients. However, the overall effectiveness of long-term HAART on HIV-infected children has been scarcely studied. Thus, to date, few studies reflect the evolution of a large cohort of HIV-infected children throughout long-term HAART [6]. To analyze this, we recruited a large group of HIV-infected children starting HAART and tracked their progress for 4 years. Our retrospective longitudinal study provides evidence from current clinical practice that HAART always show long-term sustained uVL only in a low proportion of children (20.6%) just as it has previously been showing in published results in adults [7].

CD4⁺ recovery despite virological failure has been referred to as discordant responses and this phenomenon has been observed in children [8]. However, in children on HAART, levels of CD4⁺ recovery were not comparable for virological responders and non-responders, indicating that CD4⁺ recovery during virological suppression is more profound than during virological failure [8]. This may reflect the inhibitory effect of HIV on thymic function since a marked decrease or suppression in VL is necessary to allow the thymus to replenish the CD4⁺ T-cells. Moreover, CD4⁺ T-cells are productively infected by HIV, undergoing apoptosis induced by abnormal cellular activation when the VL is not controlled [9].

In children with virological failure and good immunological and clinical outcomes observations have that virological failure does not always equal clinical failure [10, 11]. Others authors have suggested that in children VL suppression may not be the best way to clinically evaluate ART success as it seem to be for HIV-infected adults [7]. Addition, HIV-infected children on HAART usually have higher VL and lower virological response rates than adults [12]. Thus, maintaining constant or improving CD4⁺ counts may represent alternative indices of ART success in children [13]. We found an increase of CD4⁺ counts in the Responders and the Non-Responders groups. This indicates that VL suppression was not indispensable to the recovery of the immune system in vertically HIV-infected children. Moreover, only one Non-Responders child died during follow-up and another evolved to AIDS. We carried out indirect measurement between responders and non-responders (hospitalization rates, weight/height growth curves, and numbers of opportunistic infections), and we found an improvement in these indices but not find differences between groups (data not shown). Therefore, virological failure does not always equal clinical failure and virological suppression does not necessarily mean proper function. However, long-term suppression of VL allowed higher values of CD4⁺ counts.

High VL is associated with immune system activation which is used as a predictive marker of virologic failure [14, 15]. Moreover, viral suppression is a powerful predictor of CD4⁺ increase [16]. About 30% of HIV-infected adults receiving HAART exhibit a sustained CD4⁺ increase despite therapy failure, or they have persistently low CD4⁺ counts despite a significant decrease in VL [17]. In this study, approximately 30% of HIV-infected children also had an increase of CD4⁺ to a level ≥25% at 24 (57.39%-35.52%), 36 (62.38%-35.52%), and 48 (62.88%-35.52%) months.

The capacity for CD4⁺ regeneration during long-term HAART has not been well defined. In our study, children reached a plateau in CD4⁺ cell after 2 years on HAART just as others authors have published results in adults [18, 19]. Moreover, Hunt et al. present strong evidence that CD4⁺ counts continue to increase up to 4 years after HAART [20]. However, the rate of CD4⁺ recovery in adults is slow and a steady state is not usually reached after 4 years most likely because the adult thymus is less functional than in children [21].

A limitation of our study was that we did not have virologic resistance data previous to HAART and during follow-up. Increasingly many clinicians and investigators are describing multi-drug resistant HIV among children who are extensively HAART experienced [22]. Moreover, high baseline VL and substantial but imperfect levels of adherence were associated with HIV-resistance [23] and may facilitate an earlier virological failure [22]. Therefore, adherence to medication is extremely important and may have a significant, effect unaccounted for in the interpretation of our results. All efforts were made by health personnel to improve adherence in each child. Traditionally, children's adherence to ART has been limited, even though response to therapy has been shown to be highly dependent on the patient's adherence [24, 25]. In this study, the adherence to ART was not strictly monitored, as opposed to standard clinical trials. We also found that adherence to ART was the most important variable associated with long-term VL suppression (data not shown). However, therapy adherence is almost impossible to reliably measure, and accurately reproduce in a long-term dynamic cohort [7]. This low adherence in the Non-Responders group is not related to the level of training received by the health personal who provided the medical care. Furthermore, the number of doctor visits was similar in both groups of children, but the Responders group had a higher number of tests with VL ≤400 copies/mL and a lower time with the first uVL measurement than the Non-Responders group.

In conclusion, long-term VL suppression induces large beneficial effects in immunological responses. However, it is not indispensable to recover CD4⁺ counts (levels).