Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

High frequency of Human Cytomegalovirus DNA in the Liver of Infants with Extrahepatic Neonatal Cholestasis

  • Adriana MA De Tommaso1Email author,
  • Paula D Andrade2,
  • Sandra CB Costa2,
  • Cecília AF Escanhoela3 and
  • Gabriel Hessel1
Contributed equally
BMC Infectious Diseases20055:108

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-5-108

Received: 07 March 2005

Accepted: 01 December 2005

Published: 01 December 2005

Abstract

Background

Biliary atresia (BA) is the most severe hepatic disorder in newborns and its etiopathogenesis remains unknown. Viral involvement has been proposed, including the human cytomegalovirus (HCMV). The aims of the study were to use the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to screen the liver tissue of infants with extrahepatic cholestasis for HCMV and to correlate the results with serological antibodies against HCMV and histological findings.

Methods

A retrospective study in a tertiary care setting included 35 patients (31 BA, 1 BA associated with a choledochal cyst, 2 congenital stenosis of the distal common bile duct and 1 hepatic cyst). HCMV serology was determined by ELISA. Liver and porta hepatis were examined histologically. Liver samples from infants and a control group were screened for HCMV DNA.

Results

Twelve patients had HCMV negative serology, 9 were positive for IgG antibodies and 14 were positive for IgG and IgM. Nine liver and seven porta hepatis samples were positive for HCMV DNA but none of the control group were positive (general frequency of positivity was 34.3% – 12/35). There was no correlation between HCMV positivity by PCR and the histological findings. The accuracy of serology for detecting HCMV antibodies was low.

Conclusion

These results indicate an elevated frequency of HCMV in pediatric patients with extrahepatic neonatal cholestasis. They also show the low accuracy of serological tests for detecting active HCMV infection and the lack of correlation between HCMV positivity by PCR and the histopathological changes.

Background

The most common cause of extrahepatic neonatal cholestasis is biliary atresia (BA). BA is an obstructive cholangiopathy and the end result of a destructive inflammatory process that affects the biliary ductal system. This disease is more common in girls and involves 0.8–1/10000 live births [1]. The etiology of BA remains unknown but viral infections have been implicated with several viruses studied [212], including human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) [1317]. The etiology of the other causes of extrahepatic neonatal cholestasis remains unknown.

HCMV is a slow replicating virus that belongs to the herpesvirus family (betaherpesvirus subfamily). Congenital infection by HCMV occurs in approximately 1% of all neonates. Of this 1%, only 5–10% have a typical cytomegalic inclusion disease with hepatosplenomegaly, jaundice and petechias. Another 10% will have a subclinical congenital infection [18], and the remaining 80–85% will be asymptomatic. Virus detection in the urine, saliva or tissues of neonates during the first three weeks of life defines congenital infection [19]. In contrast to infections such as rubella and congenital toxoplasmosis, maternal immunity against HCMV does not always provide adequate protection against intrauterine transmission [19]. Hepatic involvement is frequent and clinical evidence of hepatitis is occasionally found [2022].

Perinatal infection is diagnosed in children who do not eliminate the virus in urine at birth but who begin to show the virus between the 4th and 12th week of life. The infection results from viral transmission during delivery, through maternal milk or by blood transfusions, the first two of these being the most important. The vast majority of infants remain asymptomatic [19].

The purpose of this study was to screen the liver tissue of infants with extrahepatic neonatal cholestasis for the presence of HCMV using PCR, and to correlate the results with the HCMV serologies (ELISA systems) and histopathological findings in these patients.

Methods

Thirty-five patients (13 males and 22 females) with extrahepatic neonatal cholestasis were evaluated upon admission to the Pediatric Gastroenterology Service of the university hospital at UNICAMP, from September 1992 to July 2000. The median infant age at the time of the first visit was 82.5 days (range 25–239 days). Neonatal cholestasis was secondary to BA in 31 infants and BA was associated with a choledochal cyst in one, to distal choledochal stenosis in two, and to hepatic cyst (measuring 3.2 × 3.4 cm, close to the porta hepatis, compressing the biliary tree and leading to obstructive cholestasis) in one.

The diagnosis of BA was confirmed by intraoperative cholangiogram. The diagnosis of choledochal cyst was made by ultrasound and the distal choledochal stenosis was diagnosed by intraoperative cholangiogram.

Liver tissue samples of nine infants were included as controls and had presented the following diagnoses: 1 had drug-related hepatotoxicity, 2 had alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency, 2 had galactosemia, 1 had cystic fibrosis, 1 had congenital hepatic fibrosis, 1 had hepatoblastoma and 1 had a metabolic disease of undefined cause. The median infant age was 46 days (range 28–180 days).

Serological investigation

The patients were divided into three groups, based on the CMV serology results (by ELISA commercial system: SORIN BIOMEDICA, Italy): 1) ELISA IgG-/IgM-; 2). ELISA IgG+/IgM-, and 3) ELISA IgG+/IgM+. IgM antibodies were detected by ELISA-capture assay.

Histological Analysis

All histological analyses were done by the same pathologist. Fifty three samples (33 liver tissues and 20 porta hepatis fragments) were evaluated by PCR. Of the 33 liver tissues evaluated, 10 were collected by percutaneous biopsies, while the others were surgical biopsies. The following characteristics were evaluated: portal fibrosis (0 = absent, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe), septa (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe), nodules (P = present, A = absent), cholestasis and cholangitis (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe), giant cell transformation (P = present, A = absent), eosinophils (P = present, A = absent), myeloid metaplasia (P = present, A = absent), siderosis (0 = absent, I = degree I, II = degree II, III = degree III), cytomegalic inclusion (P = present, A = absent), microabscesses (P = present, A = absent), ductal proliferation (0 = absent, 1 = slight, 2 = moderate, 3 = intense), porta hepatis (normal, chronic inflammatory process with predominance of lymphomononuclear cells or chronically active with predominance of polymorphonuclear neutrophils or macrophages) and inflammatory process of the porta hepatis (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe).

DNA extraction/amplification

DNA was extracted from fresh material (4 patients) according to Rogers et al. [23] and from formalin-fixed paraffin-embbeded fragments by phenol-chloroform procedure described by Latchman [24]. PCR conditions for HCMV and β-globin were the same. Five sections of 10 μm thick were obtained for DNA amplification [25]. The human β-globin gene was amplified according SAIKI et al. [26]. HCMV was detected by PCR and nested-PCR, according Saiki et al. [26], Shibata et al. [27] and Demmler et al. [28].

The amplifications were done in a DNA thermocycler (Robocycler 40 – Stratagene) using 35 cycles of 94°C for 45 s, 55°C for 45 s and 72°C for 1 min. The cycles were preceded by an initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 min and were followed by a final extension for 7 min at 72°C. The primers for the human β-globin gene were: PCO3+ (5' CCTCTGACACAACTGTGTTCACTAGC 3') and PCO4+ (5' TCACCACCAACTTCATCCACGTTCACC 3'). The primers for HCMV DNA were: MIE4 (CCA AGC GGC CTC TGA TAA CCA AGC C), MIE5 (CAG CAC CAT CCT CCT CTT CCT CTG G), IE1 (CCA CCC GTG GTG CCA GCT CC) and IE2 (CCC GCT CCT CCT GAG CAC CC). The MIE4 and MIE5 primers were used for the first reaction (PCR) and IE1 and IE2 for the nested-PCR.

The reaction mixture consisted of 0.5 – 1.0 μl of DNA in a total volume of 20 μl containing 50 mM KCl, 10 mM Tris (pH 8.4), 3 mM MgCl, 0.1 mM of each primer, 200 mM of each deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate (dATP, dGTP, dCTP, dTTP) and 2–4 units Taq polymerase. Water was used to complete the total reaction volume. The mixture was covered with a drop of mineral oil.

The reaction products were separeted by electrophoresis in 2% agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under ultraviolet light. For each CMV reaction, fibroblast fluid containing strain AD 169 was used as a positive control and the reaction mixture without the strain was used as a negative control. Recommended procedures were used to avoid contamination [23].

The statistical analysis consisted of a descriptive analysis with a frequency table, Fisher's exact test, the Kappa coefficient and accuracy measurements. The significance level was set at 5%. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Faculty of Medical Sciences, UNICAMP, and all infant's parents provided their informed consent prior to enrolling in the study.

Results

Active HCMV infection was defined if one or both of the following conditions are present: positive result for HCMV DNA by PCR and a positive test for IgM HCMV antibodies.

Twelve patients had HCMV negative serology (group I), 9 were positive for IgG antibodies (group II) and 14 were positive for IgG and IgM (group III). In group I, 11 patients had BA (associated with a situs inversus in one patient) and one patient had a distal choledochal stenosis. All of the patients in group II had BA and in group III, 12 children had BA (associated with a choledochal cyst in one of them), one had a distal choledochal stenosis and another had a hepatic cyst. The general characteristics of the patients are show in Table 1. All were full term neonates. The median time between HCMV serology and liver biopsy was 8 days.
Table 1

Gender and median of birth weigh, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) and direct bilirubin (DB) in the patients.

CHARACTERISTICS/DIAGNOSIS

GENDER

BIRTH WEIGH

ALTi

GGTi

DBi (mg%)

BA* (10)

5F/5M

3180 g

4

12.2

22.7

Hepatic cyst* (1)

F

2970 g

2.9

3.5

19.7

Stenosis of the distal common bile duct *(1)

F

?

6.6

5.4

31

BA (21)

13F/8M

2950 g

5.3

16

23.7

BA + Choledocal cyst (1)

F

3100 g

2.5

27.5

15.2

Stenosis of the distal common bile duct (1)

F

3100 g

2.3

11.8

11.7

* = pcr positive patients, M = male; F = female; ALTi = ALT divided by the upper reference value; GGTi = GGT divided by the upper reference value; DBi = DB divided by the upper reference value;

Of 33 liver samples screened by PCR, 9 (27.3%) were positive for HCMV DNA and 7 out of 20 (35%) porta hepatis fragments were positive (figure 1). There was adequate agreement between these results (Kappa coefficient = 0.51), albeit some divergences. Two patients had HCMV DNA in the liver but not in porta hepatic. Three children were positive for HCMV DNA in the porta hepatis but negative for HCMV in the liver tissue. The overall frequency of HCMV DNA was 34.3% (12/35) based on a positive result in one of the two tissue samples. Based on the PCR distribution among the groups there were three positive patients in group I, three in group II and six in group III.
Figure 1

HCMV DNA results in some patients. 1 = Ladder 2 = Positive control 3 = Porta-hepatis fragment from patient A (CMV-) 4 = Liver tissue from patient A (CMV+) 5 = Liver tissue from patient B (CMV+) 6 = Urine from patient B (CMV+) 7 = Empty lane 8 = Negative control

The histological characteristics of HCMV positive patients are show in Table 2 and of HCMV negative patients in Table 3. The pathologist did not observe the presence of cytomegalic cells in any case. No significant correlation was observed between any of the findings.
Table 2

Histological characteristics of HCMV positive patients.

Diagnosis

PHF

Liver tissue

  

PF

GCT

Ductal proliferation

Septs

Nodules

Cholestasis

Cholangitis

Eosinophils

BA

MoCIP

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

BA#

no surgery

+

-

+

+

+

+

-

-

BA

normal

+

+

+

+

-

+

-

+

BA

MoCAP

+

+

+

+

-

+

+

+

BA

MCIP

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

BA

MCIP

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

BA

MCIP

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

BA

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

?

BA

MCAP

+

-

+

+

+

+

-

-

BA

normal

+

+

+

+

-

+

-

-

DCS

No

+

-

+

+

+

+

+

+

HC

No

+

+

+

+

+

+

-

+

BA = biliary atresia, DCS = distal choledocal stenosis, HC = hepatis cyst, PHF = porta hepatis fragment, # = situs inversus PF = portal fibrosis, GCT = giant cell transformation, MCIP = mild chronic inflammatory process, MoCIP = moderate chronic inflammatory process, MCPA = mild chronic active inflammatory process, MoCAP = moderate chronic active inflammatory process.

Table 3

Histological characteristics of HCMV negative patients.

Diagnosis

PHF

Liver tissue

  

PF

GCT

Ductal proliferation

Septs

Nodules

Cholestasis

Cholangitis

Eosinophils

BA

MoCAP

+

+

+

+

+

+

-

+

BA

SCAP

+

+

+

+

+

+

-

-

BA

MoCAP

+

+

+

+

-

+

-

-

BA

no surgery

+

-

+

+

-

+

-

-

BA

MCAP

+

+

+

+

+

+

-

+

BA

MCIP

+

+

+

+

+

+

-

+

BA

no surgery

+

-

+

+

+

+

-

+

BA

MCIP

+

+

+

+

-

+

+

-

BA

SCAP

+

+

-

-

-

+

-

-

BA

MCAP

+

+

+

+

-

+

+

+

BA

no surgery

+

-

+

-

-

+

-

-

BA

MoCAP

+

+

+

+

-

+

-

+

BA

MoCIP

+

+

+

+

+

+

-

+

BA

no surgery

+

+

+

+

+

-

+

 

BA

no surgery

+

+

+

+

+

+

-

+

BA

MoCAP

+

+

+

+

+

+

-

+

BA

MoCAP

+

+

+

+

+

+

-

+

BA

MoCAP

+

-

+

+

-

+

-

+

BA

no surgery

+

+

+

+

+

+

-

+

BA

?

+

-

+

+

+

+

-

-

BA+CC

MoCAP

+

-

+

+

+

+

-

+

CC

MoCIP

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

+

DCS

No

+

-

+

+

+

+

_

+

BA = biliary atresia, DCS = distal choledocal stenosis, CC = choledocal cyst, PHF = porta hepatis fragment, PF = portal fibrosis, GCT = giant cell transformation, MCIP = mild chronic inflammatory process, MoCIP = moderate chronic inflammatory process, MCAP = mild chronic active inflammatory process, MoCAP = moderate chronic active inflammatory process, SCAP = severe chronic active inflammatory process.

Compared to PCR, serology had a low accuracy (59%) to detect active HCMV infection, with 54% sensitivity and 61% specificity. The patients' specimens from the control group had no HCMV DNA detected by PCR analysis. The table 4 shows the results of serology and PCR in all patients.
Table 4

Results of serology and PCR for detecting HCMV.

PATIENT

SEROLOGY

PCR – LIVER

PCR – PORTA HEPATIS

AFS

IgM-/IgG+

POSITIVE

POSITIVE

ADS

NEGATIVE

POSITIVE

NR

ADPS

IgM+/IgG+

NEGATIVE

NEGATIVE

AHL

IgM+/IgG+

NR

NEGATIVE

AGP

NEGATIVE

NEGATIVE

NEGATIVE

ACHA

NEGATIVE

NEGATIVE

NR

ACNG

IgM+/IgG+

NEGATIVE

NR

CT

IgM+/IgG+

POSITIVE

NR

CAAM

IgM+/IgG+

NEGATIVE

NR

CCA

NEGATIVE

POSITIVE

POSITIVE

DAMG

NEGATIVE

NEGATIVE

NR

DRA

IgM+/IgG+

NEGATIVE

POSITIVE

ESC

IgM-/IgG+

NEGATIVE

NEGATIVE

FRNP

NEGATIVE

NEGATIVE

NEGATIVE

GDS

IgM+/IgG+

NEGATIVE

NR

GFO

IgM-/IgG+

POSITIVE

POSITIVE

JG

NEGATIVE

NEGATIVE

NEGATIVE

JSO

IgM-/IgG+

NEGATIVE

NEGATIVE

LaGS

IgM-/IgG+

POSITIVE

NEGATIVE

LiGS

NEGATIVE

NEGATIVE

NEGATIVE

LS

IgM-/IgG+

NEGATIVE

NR

MCC

IgM+/IgG+

NEGATIVE

NEGATIVE

MFRF

NEGATIVE

NEGATIVE

NR

MFV

IgM+/IgG+

POSITIVE

NEGATIVE

NFAM

IgM-/IgG+

NEGATIVE

NR

PAL

IgM+/IgG+

POSITIVE

NR

RCM

IgM+/IgG+

NEGATIVE

POSITIVE

RRF

IgM-/IgG+

NEGATIVE

NR

RRX

IgM-/IgG+

NEGATIVE

NR

SCF

IgM+/IgG+

NR

POSITIVE

TDF

NEGATIVE

POSITIVE

POSITIVE

TFMF

IgM+/IgG+

NEGATIVE

NEGATIVE

YSR

NEGATIVE

NEGATIVE

NEGATIVE

WROS

IgM+/IgG+

NEGATIVE

NR

WGSS

NEGATIVE

NEGATIVE

NR

NR = no results

Discussion

Progress has been made in the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of BA and other causes of extrahepatic cholestasis. The etiopathogenic origin of the disease still remains unknown, although viral involvement has been suggested. Based on several diagnostic methods, including PCR, cytomegalovirus has been found in association with BA [13, 14, 16, 17]. However, other studies have found no such correlation [12, 15]. Of the other causes of obstructive neonatal cholestasis, only choledochal cysts have been associated with viral infections.

Sokol et al. [10] found no positivity for reovirus type 3 (29 patients with BA, 1 with a choledochal cyst) and Tyler et al. [15] found positivity in 7 of 9 children with choledochal cysts. Our study is the first to investigate the ocurrence of HCMV in other causes of extrahepatic neonatal cholestasis. HCMV DNA was found in patients with a hepatic cyst and a distal choledochal stenosis.

Serological screening revealed a seroprevalence of HCMV infection of 65.7% [23/35]. Previous studies made in Brazil have evaluated the incidence of congenital infection and prevalence of antibodies in mothers. Pannuti et al. [29] showed a prevalence of HCMV antibodies in mothers of 84.4% and the incidence of congenital infection was 0.98% in the low socioeconomic population. In the middle socioeconomic cohort, the maternal prevalence and incidence of congenital infections were 66.5% and 0.39%, respectively [29]. Yamamoto et al. [30] showed a prevalence of congenital infection of 2.6% with maternal seropositivity of 95%. On the other hand, the acquisition risk of perinatal infection was 30.9% [31]. Unfortunately, we don't have data regarding the serologic pattern of our patient's mothers since this test is not part of our institution's routine clinical practice.

The accuracy of serology to detected active HCMV infection compared with PCR in this study was low. The correlation between serology and PCR results suggests the need for caution in concluding, based on positive serology, that HCMV is responsible for the observed cholestasis. When the 14 patients with positive IgM serology were analyzed by PCR in biopsies, only 6 were positive. Thus, although 8 patients had an active HCMV infection detected by serology, the cholestasis was not secondary to this infection and its cause requires further investigation.

In several cases, a positive serology delayed referral of the patient to our service since they were considered to have hepatitis secondary to viral infection. This is important since most pediatricians begin the investigation of cholestasis by determining that infectious agents are involved, and suspend further analysis when a positive serology is found. Another factor to be considered in patients with positive IgM serology and negative PCR is the possibility of a false-positive result for IgM. False-positives can be secondary to the presence of rheumatoid factor (IgM of the neonate against maternal IgG), or to cross-reaction with other herpesviruses [22]. Until the screening of IgM antibody is improved, physicians should use more than one method in their diagnosis [22].

Of the 9 IgG+/IgM- patients, 3 were positive for HCMV DNA. The presence of IgG may represent the transplacental passage of maternal IgG (the infant being infected or not). With such a serological profile, the physician should be concerned not only with completing the investigation, but also with repeating the serology because of the possibility of IgM appearing in a subsequent collection, especially when the infant is infected. Another possibility would be to measure IgG levels as well, since they remain high in congenital or perinatal infection [32]. In patients with a positive PCR, the absence of IgM antibodies could represent a false-negative result. False-negative results may be secondary to the competition between the high levels of maternal IgG antibodies and the relatively low levels of fetal IgM [22]. In the post-natal period, when facing an antigenic stimulus, IgM levels rise rapidly during the first month of life and increase gradually. At around one year of age, these values reach approximately 60% of the adult levels [33].

Of the 12 ELISA-negative patients, 3 were positive by PCR. Sample contamination cannot be excluded, despite the low probability of this occurring in view of the care taken during extraction and PCR, including the use of nested PCR.

There was good agreement between liver and porta hepatis tissues when analysed separately. However, two patients with HCMV DNA in liver tissue were negative in the porta hepatis. In both, the band representing β-globin DNA in the porta hepatis fragment was considered weakly positive, while the corresponding hepatic band was considered strongly positive. This may indicate a false-negative result, judging by the sample DNA quality. Two patients were positive for HCMV DNA in the porta hepatis and negative in the liver. They had a positive serology (IgG+/IgM+) and very intense β-globin band. Since the HCMV was not genotyped, we cannot exclude the possibility of the existence of strains with different affinity for ducts or hepatocytes, and of strains with differences in their virulence. Further studies are needed to clarify this question.

In the absence of in situ hybridization it is unclear whether the detected HCMV was within the hepatocytes and/or biliary duct cells, or whether it was simply circulating in the plasma or in leucocytes.

In this study the pathologist did not observed the presence of cytomegalic cells or microabscess in any case. Similar results have been reported by others [9, 14, 16].

The 34.3% positivity for HCMV DNA found in infants with extrahepatic cholestasis contrast with the lack of positivity in any of the controls. These findings, and those of Fischler et al. [13] and Domiati-Saad et al. [11], indicate that cytomegalovirus may be involved in the etiopathogenesis of BA. This hypothesis could be tested with an experimental model of BA induced by HCMV in animals using the methodology described by Petersen et al. [34].

In contrast, Chang et al. [9] and Jevon et al. [14] found no HCMV involvement in the etiopathogenesis of BA. In the study by Jevon et al. [14], no HCMV was found in 12 infants with BA. A probable explanation for this finding could be the low prevalence of the infection in a Canadian population, which would not exclude viral participation in cholestasis. Chang et al. [9] examined the occurrence of HCMV in 50 infants with neonatal hepatitis (26 with BA) and 30 controls, and found positivity in two cases with BA, in 23 with hepatitis, but in none of the controls. A possible explanation for this finding could be the strain of virus involved.

The hypothesis that biliary epithelial cells function as antigen presenters was considered. In normal liver, MHC (major histocompatibility complex) class I antigens are expressed on the sinusoidal cells, large vessel and sinusoidal endothelium, biliary epithelium, and dendritic cells. Class II antigens are found only on the sinusoidal cells, capillary endothelium and dendritic cells. The ductal epithelium of BA patients has an aberrant expression of class II antigens [35]. Recently, specific morphological alterations in the biliary ducts has been described [36, 37]. Injury to the epithelium secondary to an immune modulated response may be triggered by a viral infection.

If a viral infection contributes to this injury, then antiviral therapy in the infants with HCMV infection can be considered as a possible intervention and consequently may improve outcomes. Further controlled randomized studies are needed to clarify this aspect.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the frequency of HCMV detected by PCR was high (34.3%). The accuracy of serology for detecting active HCMV infection was low compared to PCR, and there was no correlation between the presence of HCMV and the typical histopathological alterations (microabscess and cytomegalic cells) or the inflammatory process in porta hepatis in our patients.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the FAPESP and CAPES for the financial of this study.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP)
(2)
Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP)
(3)
Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP)

References

  1. Howard ER: Extrahepatic biliary atresia: a review of current management. Br J Surg. 1983, 70: 193-197.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bobo L, Ojeh C, Chiu D, Machado A, Colombani P, Schwarz K: Lack of evidence for rotavirus by polymerase chain reaction/enzyme immunoassay of hepatobiliary samples from children with biliary atresia. Pediatr Res. 1997, 41: 229-234.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Drut R, Gomez MA, Drut RM, Cueto Rua E, Lojo M: Virus Papiloma Humano, hepatitis gigantocelular neonatal y atresia de vias biliares. Acta Gastroent Latinoamer. 1998, 28: 27-31.Google Scholar
  4. Glaser JH, Balistreri WF, Morecki R: Role of reovirus type 3 in persistent infantile cholestasis. J Pediatr. 1984, 105: 912-915.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Morecki R, Glaser JH, Cho S, Balistreri WF, Horwitz MS: Biliary atresia and reovirus type 3 infection. N Engl J Med. 1982, 307: 481-484.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Petersen C, Grasshoff S, Luciano L: Diverse morphology of biliary atresia in an animal model. J Hepatol. 1998, 28: 603-607. 10.1016/S0168-8278(98)80283-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Riepenhoff-Talty M, Gouvea V, Evans MJ, Syensson L, Hoffenberg E, Sokol RJ, Uhnoo I, Greenberg SJ, Schael K, Zhaori G, Fitzgerald J, Chong S, El-Yousef M, Nemeth A, Brown M, Piccoli D, Hyams J, Ruffin D, Rossi T: Detection of group C Rotavirus in infants with extrahepatic biliary atresia. J Infect Dis. 1996, 174: 8-15.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Riepenhoff-Talty M, Schaekel K, Clark F, Mueller W, Uhnoo I, Rossi T, Fisher J, Ogra PL: Group A Rotaviruses produce extrahepatic biliary obstruction in orally inoculated newborn mice. Pediatr Res. 1993, 33: 394-399.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang M-H, Huang H-H, Huang E-S, Kao C-L, Hsu H-Y, Lee C-Y: Polymerase Chain Reaction to detect human cytomegalovirus in livers of infants with neonatal hepatitis. Gastroenterology. 1992, 103: 1022-1025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Sokol RJ, Endo N, Ohara J, Lilly J, Levin M, Silverman A, Brown WR: Reovirus 3 RNA not detected by polymerase chain reaction in tissues from infants with extrahepatic biliary atresia [Abstract]. Hepatology. 1991, 14: 125A-Google Scholar
  11. Domiati-Saad R, Dawson DB, Margraf LR, Finegold MJ, Weinberg AG, Rogers BB: Cytomegalovirus and human herpesvirus 6, but not human papillomavirus, are present in neonatal giant cell hepatitis and extrahepatic biliary atresia. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2000, 3: 367-373. 10.1007/s100240010045.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Steele MI, Marshall CM, Lloyd RE, Randolph VE: Reovirus 3 not detected by reverse transcriptase-mediated polymerase chain reaction analysis of preserved tissue from infants with cholestatic liver disease. Hepatology. 1995, 21: 697-702. 10.1016/0270-9139(95)90520-0.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. FischlerR B, Ehrnst A, Forsgren M, Orvell C, Nemeth A: The viral association of neonatal cholestasis in Sweden: a possible link between cytomegalovirus infection and extrahepatic biliary atresia. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1998, 27: 57-64. 10.1097/00005176-199807000-00010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Jevon GP, Dimmick JE: Biliary atresia and cytomegalovirus infection: a DNA study. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 1999, 2: 11-14. 10.1007/s100249900083.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Tyler KL, Sokol RJ, Oberhaus SM, Le M, Karrer FM, Narkewicz MR, Tyson RW, Murphy JR, Low R, Brown WR: Detection of reovirus RNA in hepatobiliary tissues from patients with extrahepatic biliary atresia and choledochal cysts. Hepatology. 1998, 27: 1475-1482. 10.1002/hep.510270603.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Tarr PI, Haas JE, Christie DL: Biliary atresia, cytomegalovirus and age at referral. Pediatrics. 1996, 97: 828-831.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Lurie M, Elmalach I, Schuger L, Weintraub : Liver findings in infantile cytomegalovirus infection: similarity to extrahepatic biliary obstruction. Histopathol. 1987, 11: 1171-1180.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Boppana SB, Pass RF, Britt WJ, Stagno S, Alford CA: Symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection: neonatal morbidity and mortality. Pediatr Inf Dis. 1992, 11: 93-99.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Stagno S, Pass RF, Dworsky ME, Alford CA: Congenital and perinatal cytomegalovirus infections. Sem Perinatol. 1983, 7: 31-42.Google Scholar
  20. Alix D, Castel Y, Gouedard H: Hepatic calcification in congenital cytomegalic inclusion disease. J Pediatr. 1978, 92: 856-View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Ansari BM, Davis DB, Jones MR: Calcification in liver associated with congenital cytomegalic inclusion disease. J Pediatr. 1977, 90: 661-662.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Stagno S: Cytomegalovirus. Infectious diseases of the fetus and newborn infant. 1995, W.B. Saunders Company. Philadelphia, 312-353. 4Google Scholar
  23. Rogers BB, Alpert LC, Hine EAS, Buffone GF: Analysis of DNA in fresh and fixed tissue by the polymerase chain reaction. Am J Pathol. 1990, 136:Google Scholar
  24. Latchman DS: The basics of molecular biology. PCR: Applications in Pathology. Principles and practice. 1995, Oxford, 6-53.Google Scholar
  25. Kwok S, Higuchi R: Avoiding false positives with PCR. Nature. 1989, 339: 237-238. 10.1038/339237a0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Saiki RK, Scharf S, Faloona F, Mullis KB, Horn GT, Erlich HÁ, Arnheim N: Enzymatic amplification of β-globin genomic sequences and restriction site analysis for diagnosis of sickle cell anemia. Science. 1985, 230: 1350-1354.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Shibata D, Martin J, Appleman MD, Causey DM, Leedom JM, Arnheim N: Detection of cytomegalovirus DNA in peripheral blood of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. J Infect Dis. 1988, 158: 1185-1192.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Demmler GJ, Buffone GJ, Schimbor CM, May RA: Detection of cytomegalovirus in urine from newborns by using polymerase chain reaction DNA amplification. J Infect Dis. 1988, 158: 1177-1184.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pannuti CS, Vilas-Boas LS, Angelo MJO, Carvalho RPS, Segre CM: Congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Occurrence in two socioeconomically distinct populations of a developing country. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo. 1985, 27: 105-107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Yamamoto AY, Figueiredo LTM, Mussi-Pinhata MM: Prevalence and clinical aspects of congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J Pediatr (Rio J). 1999, 75: 23-28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Machado CM, Fink MCDS, Vilas-Boas LS, Sumita LM, Weinberg A, Shiguematsu K, Souza IC, Casanova LD, Pannuti CS: Infecção perinatal pelo cytomegalovirus em hospital público do município de São Paulo: estudo prospectivo. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo. 1991, 33: 159-166.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Santos PH, Iazzetti AV: Citomegalia congênita e perinatal. Pediatria Moderna. 2000, 36: 805-826.Google Scholar
  33. Lewis DB, Wilson CB: Developmental immunology and role of host defenses in neonatal susceptibility to infection. Infectious diseases of the fetus and newborn infant. 1995, W.B. Saunders Company. Philadelphia, 20-98. 4Google Scholar
  34. Petersen C, Biermanns D, Kuske M, Schäel K, Meyer-Junghäel L, Mildenberg H: New aspects in a murine model for extrahepatic biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg. 1997, 32: 1190-1195. 10.1016/S0022-3468(97)90680-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Kobayashi H, Puri P, O'briain DS, Surana R, Miyano T: Hepatic overexpression of MHC class II antigens and macrophage-associated antigens (CD68) in patients with biliary atresia of poor prognosis. J Ped Surg. 1997, 32: 590-593. 10.1016/S0022-3468(97)90714-4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Broomé U, Nemeth A, Hultcrantz R, Scheynius A: Different expression of HLA-DR and ICAM-1 in livers from patients with biliary atresia and Byler's disease. J Hepatol. 1997, 26: 857-862. 10.1016/S0168-8278(97)80253-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Davenport M, Gonde C, Redkar R, Koukoulis G, Tredger M, Mieli-Vergani G, Portmann B, Howard ER: Immunohistochemistry of the liver and biliary tree in extrahepatic biliary atresia. J Pediatr Surg. 2001, 36: 1017-1025. 10.1053/jpsu.2001.24730.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/5/108/prepub

Copyright

© De Tommaso et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2005

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement