Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Patterns of geohelminth infection, impact of albendazole treatment and re-infection after treatment in schoolchildren from rural KwaZulu-Natal/South-Africa

  • Elmar Saathoff1, 2Email author,
  • Annette Olsen2,
  • Jane D Kvalsvig3 and
  • Chris C Appleton4
BMC Infectious Diseases20044:27

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-4-27

Received: 23 June 2004

Accepted: 13 August 2004

Published: 13 August 2004

Abstract

Background

Geohelminth infection is a major health problem of children from rural areas of developing countries. In an attempt to reduce this burden, the Department of Health of the province of KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) established in 1998 a programme for helminth control that aimed at regularly treating primary school children for schistosomiasis and intestinal helminths. This article describes the baseline situation and the effect of treatment on geohelminth infection in a rural part of the province.

Methods

Grade 3 schoolchildren from Maputaland in northern KZN were examined for infections with hookworm, Ascaris lumbricoides, and Trichuris trichiura, treated twice with 400 mg albendazole and re-examined several times over one year after the first treatment in order to assess the impact of treatment and patterns of infection and re-infection.

Results

The hookworm prevalence in the study population (83.2%) was considerably higher than in other parts of the province whereas T. trichiura and especially A. lumbricoides prevalences (57.2 and 19.4%, respectively) were much lower than elsewhere on the KZN coastal plain. Single dose treatment with albendazole was very effective against hookworm and A. lumbricoides with cure rates (CR) of 78.8 and 96.4% and egg reduction rates (ERR) of 93.2 and 97.7%, respectively. It was exceptionally ineffective against T. trichiura (CR = 12.7%, ERR = 24.8%). Re-infection with hookworm and A. lumbricoides over 29 weeks after treatment was considerable but still well below pre-treatment levels.

Conclusion

High geohelminth prevalences and re-infection rates in the study population confirm the need for regular treatment of primary school children in the area. The low effectiveness of single course albendazole treatment against T. trichiura infection however demands consideration of alternative treatment approaches.

Background

Geohelminth infections are among the most prevalent diseases in developing countries. Children are the group with the highest prevalences and infection intensities and are also very vulnerable to the effects of worm infection. These include nutritional deficiencies [1, 2] and impaired physical and mental development [35], resulting in additional insults to an already disadvantaged group. Thus, even though the proportion of cases that develops clinical disease is relatively low, the enormous number of infections warrants attention to this public health problem [6].

Consequently in 1998 the KwaZulu-Natal (KZN) Department of Health initiated a pilot helminth control programme which aimed to regularly apply treatment for intestinal helminths and schistosomiasis to primary school children [7]. This group was treated without prior screening of infection status. The rationale behind this and similar programmes elsewhere is not to eliminate infection, since this could most likely only be achieved by a combination of health education, improvements in sanitation, population chemotherapy and general development which would presently overburden most developing countries. Instead the aim is to keep infection intensities in this vulnerable age group low in order to prevent serious morbidity [8, 9].

Our objectives were to describe the initial pattern of geohelminth infection, assess the impact of treatment with 400 mg albendazole and to monitor re-infection after treatment in order to develop recommendations for further local and regional control efforts.

Methods

Study area and population, treatment and ethics

The study was conducted in central Ingwavuma district in northern KwaZulu-Natal (Figure 1). This area was selected because of its high geohelminth prevalences [10]. It is situated on both sides of the perennial Pongola river (Figure 2), covering approximately 28 × 16 km. The climate in the area is tropical to subtropical with a hot and wet summer (November – February) and a cooler and dry winter (June – August) (Figure 3).
Figure 1

Location of the study area in northern KwaZulu-Natal

Figure 2

Map of the study area

Figure 3

Long-term monthly averages of rainfall and temperature in the area. Data from 1966 to 1990 for Makatini research station, about 30 km south of the study area [35].

The study population was limited to one grade in order to keep disturbance of the school routine low. Grade 3 was selected because it should represent the infection situation in a primary school relatively well [11]. All pupils attending grade 3 at the start of the study in all ten primary schools in the area were eligible for participation with one exception: during the baseline survey two out of five and one out of four grade 3 classes in two large schools had to be excluded due to time constraints. These classes were however included during treatments and successive surveys. Otherwise only children who refused to participate or who were absent or unable to produce a specimen during each of our repeated visits were not included in the analysis of the respective surveys due to lack of data. They were however included for those parts of the study where they participated in order not to increase bias due to the likely difference in infection status between absentees and pupils who attended school [12]. High rates of absenteeism during treatment and stool collections thus result in variable sample sizes which are therefore reported together with the results. Characteristics of the pupils who took part in the first survey are given in Table 1.
Table 1

Prevalence and intensity (EPG) of geohelminth infection at baseline

 

Males

Females

M/F Ratio* (95%CI or P)

n =

445

572

 

Median Age (Inter quartile range)

11.2 (10.1–12.3)

10.7 (9.7–11.8)

 

Prevalence (%)

   

Hookworm

86.5

80.6

1.07 (1.02 to 1.13)

A. lumbricoides

15.7

22.2

0.71 (0.54 to 0.92)

T. trichiura

57.3

57.2

1.00 (0.90 to 1.12)

Mean Intensity (EPG)

   

Hookworm

984

792

1.24 (P < 0.001)

A. lumbricoides

876

2948

0.30 (P = 0.008)

T. trichiura

240

332

0.72 (P = 0.671)

* Male to Female ratios for prevalence and mean intensity of infection and 95% confidence interval (for prevalence) or P-value of 2-sided Mann-Whitney-U-test (for differences in mean EPG). Arithmetic mean EPG including uninfected pupils.

Treatment in all primary schools in the entire district was carried out by school nursing teams from the two local hospitals as part of the helminth control programme. Consenting children from all grades were treated for intestinal helminths with 400 mg albendazole (Zentel®, SmithKline Beecham). Treatment in the studied schools was administered in April and in October 1998. The study team assisted the nurses with treatment and also recorded those of the study population who were treated and those who were not. During the first round of treatment the pupils were also treated for schistosomiasis with 40 mg/kg praziquantel (Biltricide®, Bayer). However, results regarding schistosomiasis will be reported elsewhere. After the end of the study the participants were included in the normal treatment routine of the control programme.

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Natal/Durban and the study was also approved by the Central Medical Ethics Committee in Denmark. Before the onset of the study, information meetings were held with the staff and parents of the schools in the study. At these meetings informed consent was obtained from the parents and the staff were asked for their unpaid co-operation. The children were asked for their consent directly before the first specimen collection.

Specimen collection and processing

After an initial survey to monitor the infection situation at baseline, two separate treatments were each followed by a survey to monitor treatment success 3 weeks later. Re-infection was assessed 16 weeks after the first and 18 and 29 weeks after the second treatment. The timing of treatments and assessments was done so as to accommodate the necessities of the treatment programme and was also restricted by the school terms.

On our visits to the schools pupils were provided with sampling equipment and asked to provide a stool specimen. Each school was visited three times during each survey in order to include children who were absent or unable to deliver a specimen on the first occasion. Apart from the pre-treatment baseline survey, where only one specimen was collected due to the above mentioned time constraints, an effort was made to obtain two stool specimens per pupil. Pupils who provided only one stool specimen (between 7 and 14% in each post-treatment survey) were nevertheless included in the analysis in order not to increase bias.

Specimens were kept cool until preparation of the slides. Duplicate 50 mg Kato-Katz cellophane thick smears were prepared from each faecal sample. They were examined by trained microscopists twice: first for hookworm eggs within one hour of preparation and later for A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura eggs within one day after preparation [13]. Accurate egg counts for both thick smears were recorded. Repeat counts by different microscopists were done on a sub sample of about 5% of the slides for quality control purposes. These counts revealed no bigger discrepancies.

Diarrhoeal specimens and slides that were too dark were not examined. Instead the respective pupils were asked to provide another specimen. Infection intensities are expressed as eggs per gram of faeces (EPG) calculated as the arithmetic mean number of eggs per thick smear multiplied by 20.

Statistics

Data were double entered into Microsoft Excel 97 and corrected for data entry errors. Data analysis was carried out in SPSS 10.0.5 for Windows.

Prevalence ratios (PR) and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the SPSS "Tables" procedure [14]. Cure rates (CR) and egg reduction rates (ERR) were calculated for the examinations three weeks after treatment using the formulae below [11]:

Only data from the first of the two samples we received per pupil in each post-treatment survey were used for the above calculations in order to make them comparable to the baseline survey. Otherwise differences in sensitivity between surveys would have caused misleading results. Re-infection was however calculated for both obtained samples because the main purpose was not to compare with the baseline situation but to estimate trends in re-infection reliably.

Results

Infection patterns at baseline

The cumulative prevalence of all three geohelminths combined was as follows: At baseline 90.0% of the pupils were infected with one or more species, 55.9% were infected with two or more species and 30.9% of the children were infected with all three geohelminths. Figure 4 shows the intensity distribution of the three helminths in the study population and Table 1 demonstrates significant differences between the sexes for A. lumbricoides infection. With a PR of 0.71, males were about 30% less likely to be Ascaris infected than females and they also had lower infection intensities. The prevalence and intensity of hookworm infection were slightly (but nevertheless statistically significantly) higher in male pupils and the prevalence of T. trichiura was nearly identical in the two groups.
Figure 4

Cumulative prevalence of geohelminth infection at baseline (n = 1017). The prevalence of infection > = any intensity threshold of interest can be read from the percentage scale (x-axis). 10 EPG correspond to one egg on one of two slides, the minimum for a positive reading. Thus the intersection of each graph with the x-axis corresponds to the total prevalence of infection of the respective helminth.

Treatment

With more than 96% of the infected children cured three weeks after the first treatment and the total egg output reduced by more than 97%, albendazole was highly effective against A. lumbricoides infection (Table 2). It was slightly less effective against hookworm infection, but nevertheless more than 75% of the pupils were cured after the first, and more than 90% three weeks after the second treatment, and the ERR already exceeded 90% after one treatment.
Table 2

Cure rates and egg reduction rates at three weeks after the first and after the second treatment with 400 mg albendazole (n = 592)*

 

Hookworm

A. lumbricoides

T. trichiura

Prevalence (%)

   

   Baseline Survey

82.9

22.0

59.8

   After Treatment 1

17.6

0.8

52.2

   After Treatment 2

5.7

0.5

39.9

Cure rate (%)

   

   1 Treatment

78.8

96.4

12.7

   2 Treatments

93.2

97.7

33.3

Arithmetic Mean EPG

   

   Baseline Survey

881

2213

319

   After Treatment 1

60

52

240

   After Treatment 2

11

3

166

ERR (%)

   

   1 Treatment

93.2

97.7

24.8

   2 Treatments

98.8

99.8

47.8

* Including only pupils who participated in both treatments, the baseline survey and in the surveys directly after the first and second treatment and calculated only using the first of two samples that were obtained in the post-treatment surveys. Calculated including uninfected children.

Albendazole treatment was considerably less effective for T. trichiura infection: even after two treatments only one third of the participants were cured, and the ERR was still below 50%.

Re-infection

The prevalences of hookworm and A. lumbricoides infection at 29 weeks after the second treatment were about 40% of those measured at baseline. Mean infection intensities were still considerably below this level (Table 3). Hookworm re-infection was low during the 16 weeks after the first treatment with only 10% of those pupils who were found uninfected after treatment acquiring new infections. It was markedly higher 18 weeks after the second treatment, with 21% acquiring new infections. In contrast, A. lumbricoides re-infection rates during both periods were fairly similar to each other.
Table 3

Development of prevalence and intensity after one and after two rounds of treatment with 400 mg albendazole*

 

Post-Treatment 1

Re-infection 1

Post-Treatment 2

Re-infection 2a

Re-infection 2b

n =

801

790

803

739

731

Time of survey

May/Jun 98

Aug 98

Oct/Nov 98

Feb 99

Apr/May 99

Weeks since last treatment

3

16

3

18

29

Prevalence (%)

     

   Hookworm

21.2

24.8

10.1

24.6

36.7

   A. lumbricoides

1.0

4.3

0.7

3.0

8.6

   T. trichiura

54.6

50.9

44.0

44.8

43.4

Mean intensity (EPG)

     

   Hookworm

77

184

14

65

139

   A. lumbricoides

55

115

3

59

351

   T. trichiura

227

215

116

174

175

* Included are all pupils who participated in both treatments (n = 864) and in the respective survey (n given in table). Calculated using both samples that were obtained in each survey. Arithmetic mean EPG for all pupils including uninfected. The two treatments were administered in April and October 1998 respectively.

Due to the low treatment efficacy it is difficult to make detailed conclusions about re-infection with T. trichiura. It is however remarkable that prevalence and intensity of this helminth apparently decreased during the re-infection period following the first treatment and that the prevalence during the 29 weeks after the second treatment appears to have been nearly stable.

Discussion

Infection patterns at baseline

The hookworm prevalence in the study population was higher than in comparable populations from other parts of KZN [15, 16]. The predominant type of hookworm in the area seems to be Necator americanus although Ancylostoma duodenale has also been found close to the study location[16]. Prevalences of T. trichiura and A. lumbricoides were lower than in other areas on the KZN coastal plain where they usually exceed 70% [16]. A possible explanation for the latter difference is the greater distance of our study area from the coast and the resulting decrease in rainfall [17] when compared to the narrower southern parts of the coastal plain where all schools assessed [16] were relatively close to the sea.

The patterns reported here are in agreement with those reported by SCHUTTE et al. [10] who surveyed 45 schools in Maputaland about twenty years earlier. They also found considerably lower A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura prevalences in four schools that were situated in the area of our study than in schools closer to the coast.

The high hookworm prevalence is probably attributable to high temperature and humidity and the sandy soils in the study area which all seem to favour hookworm transmission [18, 19]. Higher A. lumbricoides prevalences and intensities in females when compared to males are a common occurrence in many parts of the world [20] and are often attributed to different patterns of soil contact. In this study population the higher incidence of soil eating among girls might be one reason for this difference as shown in an earlier paper [21]. However, that same article found that even when geophagy preference was adjusted for, girls were still at a higher risk for A. lumbricoides infection at baseline. Interestingly this was not true for re-infection after treatment where boys were more often infected than girls.

Treatment

A review that summarises numerous studies reports a median CR of 95% for A. lumbricoides infection and a median ERR of over 99% after a single dose of 400 mg albendazole. The corresponding numbers for hookworm infection are just above 80% and just below 90% [22]. Our results are well in agreement with these rates for both helminths.

In contrast, the CR and ERR for T. trichiura infection found in our study were among the lowest documented in the literature. The above cited review reports a median CR of 38% and a median ERR of 80%. Our respective rates are only about 1/3 of these. The lowest CR found in any of the 28 studies that were analysed in the review was 4.9%, the lowest ERR (23 studies) was about 27% which is still about 2% higher then the ERR that we found in this study.

A study that was conducted in Durban only about 350 km south of the study area found that albendazole reduced the median EPG of children infected before treatment by 44.1% [23]. The same outcome measure when calculated for our data is only 31.0%. But a study that was conducted in three schools about 50 km east of the area of our study also found that single dose albendazole treatment had little effect on T. trichiura: 6 months after treatment the treated pupils had the same prevalence (61%) as a placebo treated control group [24].

Although the CR and ERR as measured in most field studies including ours are notoriously unreliable and can only approximately indicate the true treatment success [25], the very low success rates that we found for the treatment of T. trichiura infection warrant attention. It is unlikely that the low CR and ERR in our study are due to low compliance: Tablet intake was monitored by the school nurses and the study team and only pupils recorded as treated were included in the analysis. Moreover, if a considerable number of children had only pretended to take the tablets, this would also have affected the impact of treatment on hookworm and A. lumbricoides infection. It is also unlikely that the low efficacy is due to drug resistance because of prior treatment. There were no previous control programmes in the area, to our knowledge hospitals and clinics had not been using albendazole or any other benzimidazole until recently and benzimidazoles were also not available in local shops.

High infection intensities, as they are frequently found in schoolchildren, are often mentioned in the literature as a reason for low cure rates [22, 26] and this may partly explain our results. As expected the CR (but not the ERR) in our population was a lot lower in children with high pre-treatment intensities of infection than in children with lower intensities (data not shown), and in a school-based study on Pemba Island, where intensity and prevalence rank among the highest in the world, the CR for T. trichiura was only 10.5% [27]. But even in this population the geometric mean ERR including uninfected children was 73.3% which is in good agreement with the above cited median ERR of 80% [22] but about twice as high as the same measure for our study (36.1%). Furthermore, although it is obvious that high infection intensities can result in lower CRs, it is not clear why they should also negatively influence the ERR.

Currently there are no drugs available that are highly effective against T. trichiura infection as single dose treatments, but other studies show that two or three repeated doses of albendazole on consecutive days are more effective than a single dose [24, 26, 28, 29]. It may be worthwhile to test whether this is also the case in the study area. If applied intermittently with single dose treatments this would increase drug costs but not necessarily increase the workload for the school nursing teams, as the additional doses could be administered by teachers, which is common practice in other control programmes [6, 30].

The proportion of children treated in our study can not be regarded as representative for the control programme in general, because study participants were more informed about it than their schoolmates. Therefore it was not analysed statistically. However, it should be noted that although only seven pupils openly refused to be treated, absenteeism was unusually high during the first round of treatment. This improved greatly in the second treatment, when – according to the opinion of school staff – pupils and their parents had realised that treatment was beneficial.

Re-infection

In accordance with the pre-treatment infection levels, hookworm re-infection over 29 weeks after the second treatment was relatively high and thus confirms the need for regular treatment. The moderate re-infection with A. lumbricoides is also in accordance with the pre-treatment situation.

The markedly higher re-infection with hookworm during the 18 weeks after the second treatment when compared to the 16 weeks after the first treatment is most likely only partly due to the slightly longer re-infection period. The difference in season could also be important [19, 31]: The 16 weeks' period (April to August) fell into the relatively cool and very dry winter, whereas the 18 weeks after the second treatment (October to February) fell into the hot and humid summer. Contrastingly the absence of a clear difference between these two periods regarding re-infection with A. lumbricoides is not too surprising. As opposed to hookworm that is restricted to the humid tropics and subtropics, this helminth also occurs in temperate climates [20]. Its eggs are relatively robust and are thus less dependent on suitable weather conditions than the fragile free-living hookworm larvae.

Although the low efficacy of treatment for T. trichiura complicates conclusions, the data seem to indicate that re-infection was low. Therefore, if a more effective treatment approach could be utilised, the resulting decrease in prevalence and intensity of T. trichiura infections might be relatively long-lasting.

Conclusion

This study has shown that the high prevalence and intensity of geohelminth infection necessitate regular treatment of primary schoolchildren in the study area according to WHO criteria [6]. This is underlined by the fact that our baseline data and those from Schutte et al. are little different despite the passage of 20 years which indicates that transmission and epidemiology appear not to have changed much. This means that without intervention, geohelminths will likely remain a problem in the area.

Because high prevalences in primary schoolchildren may also indicate relatively high community prevalences [32] it should be investigated whether other high risk groups e.g. pre-schoolers and pregnant women also need treatment for geohelminths [33, 34].

Our study has also demonstrated that a single course of treatment with 400 mg of albendazole is a powerful tool to control hookworm and A. lumbricoides infection, but that it is much less effective for the treatment of T. trichiura infection in the study area. It would be important to find out whether albendazole treatment is similarly ineffective against T. trichiura in other parts of the province and to test the effectiveness of treatment alternatives.

To answer the question whether hookworm transmission is really seasonal as this study seems to suggest would necessitate a cohort study over at least one year. Nevertheless it might be worthwhile to investigate when in the year transmission is highest in order to schedule treatment accordingly.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the children, staff and parents of the participating schools and the school nursing teams of Manguzi and Mosvold hospitals. The study was funded by the Danish Bilharziasis Laboratory. The KwaZulu-Natal Department of Health provided treatment, laboratory space and logistic support. The MRC National Malaria Research Programme in Durban provided logistic support and Prof. Wilhelm Becker from Hamburg University provided valuable input during the planning and field work of the study. ES was supported by a PhD scholarship from Evangelisches Studienwerk Villigst/Germany.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health
(2)
Danish Bilharziasis Laboratory
(3)
Child, Youth and Family Development, Human Sciences Research Council
(4)
School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal

References

  1. Stephenson LS: Impact of helminth infections on human nutrition. 1987, London: Taylor & FrancisGoogle Scholar
  2. Olsen A, Magnussen P, Ouma JH, Andreassen J, Friis H: The contribution of hookworm and other parasitic infections to haemoglobin and iron status among children and adults in western Kenya. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1998, 92: 643-9. 10.1016/S0035-9203(98)90795-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Watkins WE, Pollitt E: "Stupidity or worms": do intestinal worms impair mental performance?. Psychol Bull. 1997, 121: 171-91. 10.1037//0033-2909.121.2.171.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Nokes C, Grantham McGregor SM, Sawyer AW, Cooper ES, Robinson BA, Bundy DAP: Moderate to heavy infections of Trichuris trichiura affect cognitive function in Jamaican school children. Parasitology. 1992, 104: 539-547.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kvalsvig JD, Cooppan RM, Connolly KJ: The effects of parasite infections on cognitive processes in children. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1991, 85: 551-568.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. WHO: Prevention and Control of Schistosomiasis and Soil-transmitted Helminthiasis- Report of a WHO Expert Committee. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2002Google Scholar
  7. Kvalsvig JD, Appleton CC, Archer CE, Mthethwa P, Memela C, Mpanza JT, Mweni SL, Ngcoya M, Nkomazi J, Qotyana P: The KwaZulu-Natal parasite control programme, 1998-Report to the Department of Health, KwaZulu-Natal. 2001, 42-Google Scholar
  8. Warren KS, Bundy DAP, Anderson RM, Davis AR, Henderson DA, Jamison DT, Prescott N, Senft A: Helminth infection. In: Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries. Edited by: Jamison DT, Mosley WH, Measham AR, Bobadilla JL. 1993, Oxford: The World Bank/Oxford University Press, 131-160.Google Scholar
  9. Albonico M, Crompton DW, Savioli L: Control strategies for human intestinal nematode infections. Adv Parasitol. 1999, 42: 277-341.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Schutte CHJ, Eriksson IM, Anderson CB, Lamprecht T: Intestinal parasitic infections in black scholars in northern KwaZulu. S Afr Med J. 1981, 60: 137-141.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Montresor A, Crompton DW, Bundy DAP, Hall A, Savioli L: Guidelines for the evaluation of soil-transmitted helminthiasis and schistosomiasis at community level. Geneva: World Health Organization. 1998Google Scholar
  12. Nokes C, Bundy DAP: Compliance and absenteeism in school children: implications for helminth control. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1993, 87: 148-152. 10.1016/0035-9203(93)90464-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. WHO: Basic Laboratory Methods in Medical Parasitology. Geneva: World Health Organization. 1991Google Scholar
  14. Thompson ML, Myers JE, Kriebel D: Prevalence odds ratio or prevalence ratio in the analysis of cross sectional data: what is to be done?. Occup Environ Med. 1998, 55: 272-7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Appleton CC, Gouws E: The distribution of common intestinal nematodes along an altitudinal transect in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1996, 90: 181-188.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Appleton CC, Maurihungirire M, Gouws E: The distribution of helminth infections along the coastal plain of KwaZulu-Natal province, South Africa. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 1999, 93: 859-68. 10.1080/00034989957862.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Maud RR: The climate and geology of Maputaland. In: Studies on the ecology of Maputaland. Edited by: Bruton MN, Cooper KH. 1980, Grahamstown & Durban: Rhodes University & The Natal Branch of the Wildlife Society of Southern Africa, 1-7.Google Scholar
  18. Smith G: The ecology of the free-living stages: a reappraisal. In: Hookworm disease: current status and new directions. Edited by: Schad GA, Warren KS. 1990, London: Taylor & Francis, 89-104.Google Scholar
  19. Mabaso ML, Appleton CC, Hughes JC, Gouws E: The effect of soil type and climate on hookworm (Necator americanus) distribution in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Trop Med Int Health. 2003, 8: 722-7. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01086.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Crompton DW: Prevalence of Ascariasis. In: Ascariasis and its prevention and control. Edited by: Crompton DW, Nesheim MC, Pawlowski ZS. 1989, London: Taylor & Francis, 45-69.Google Scholar
  21. Saathoff E, Olsen A, Kvalsvig JD, Geissler PW: Geophagy and its association with geohelminth infection in rural schoolchildren from northern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2002, 96: 485-90. 10.1016/S0035-9203(02)90413-X.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Bennett A, Guyatt H: Reducing intestinal nematode infection: efficacy of albendazole and mebendazole. Parasitol Today. 2000, 16: 71-4. 10.1016/S0169-4758(99)01544-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jackson TF, Epstein SR, Gouws E, Cheetham RF: A comparison of mebendazole and albendazole in treating children with Trichuris trichiura infection in Durban, South Africa. S Afr Med J. 1998, 88: 880-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Taylor M, Jinabhai CC, Couper I, Kleinschmidt I, Jogessar VB: The effect of different anthelmintic treatment regimens combined with iron supplementation on the nutritional status of schoolchildren in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: a randomized controlled trial. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2001, 95: 211-6. 10.1016/S0035-9203(01)90171-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Davis A: Clinical trials in parasitic diseases. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2004, 98: 139-41. 10.1016/S0035-9203(03)00036-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Horton J: Albendazole: a review of anthelmintic efficacy and safety in humans. Parasitology. 2000, 121: S113-32. 10.1017/S0031182000007290.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Albonico M, Smith PG, Hall A, Chwaya HM, Alawi KS, Savioli L: A randomized controlled trial comparing mebendazole and albendazole against Ascaris, Trichuris and hookworm infections. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1994, 88: 585-589. 10.1016/0035-9203(94)90174-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Olsen A, Nawiri J, Friis H: The impact of iron supplementation on reinfection with intestinal helminths and Schistosoma mansoni in western Kenya. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2000, 94: 493-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hall A, Nahar Q: Albendazole and infections with Ascaris lumbricoides and Trichuris trichiura in children in Bangladesh. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1994, 88: 110-2. 10.1016/0035-9203(94)90525-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Montresor A, Gyorkos TW, Crompton DWT, Bundy DAP, Savioli L: Monitoring helminth control programmes. Geneva: World Health Organization. 1999Google Scholar
  31. Chandiwana SK: Hookworm population ecology in Zimbabwe. In: Hookworm disease : current status and new directions. Edited by: Schad GA, Warren KS. 1990, London: Taylor & Francis, 165-176.Google Scholar
  32. Brooker S, Donnelly CA, Guyatt HL: Estimating the number of helminthic infections in the Republic of Cameroon from data on infection prevalence in schoolchildren. Bull World Health Organ. 2000, 78: 1456-65.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Montresor A, Stoltzfus RJ, Albonico M, Tielsch JM, Rice AL, Chwaya HM, Savioli L: Is the exclusion of children under 24 months from anthelmintic treatment justifiable?. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2002, 96: 197-9. 10.1016/S0035-9203(02)90303-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Allen HE, Crompton DW, de Silva N, LoVerde PT, Olds GR: New policies for using anthelmintics in high risk groups. Trends Parasitol. 2002, 18: 381-2. 10.1016/S1471-4922(02)02386-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Climatological Information Section: Long term climatological data for Makathini weather station. Pretoria: South African Weather Service. 2000Google Scholar
  36. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/4/27/prepub

Copyright

© Saathoff et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2004

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement