The different laboratory methods used in the diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis have variable sensitivity and specificity. There is no evidence to prove that maternal treatment reduces the risk of fetal infection. The purpose of this study was to assess methods for the confirmation of congenital toxoplasmosis after maternal treatment with spiramycin during pregnancy, and to evaluate the effect of this treatment on clinical manifestations of the disease in newborns (NB).
Methods
This was a community-based, cross-sectional study of acute toxoplasmosis in newborns at risk of acquiring congenital infection. Participating newborns were born in the Clinical Hospital Maternity Ward of the Federal University of Goiás. Eligible participants were divided into 2 groups: group 1 consisted of 44 newborns born to mothers treated with spiramycin during pregnancy and group 2 consisted of 24 newborns born to mothers not treated with spiramycin during pregnancy because the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis was not performed. The sensitivity and specifity of PCR for T. gondii DNA in peripheral blood and serological testing for specific anti-T. gondii IgM and IgA, and the effects of maternal spiramycin treatment on these parameters, were determined by associating test results with clinical manifestations of disease.
Results
The sensitivity of the markers (T. gondii DNA detected by PCR, and the presence of specific anti-T. gondii IgM and IgA) for congenital toxoplasmosis was higher in group 2 than in group 1 (31.6, 68.4, 36.8% and 3.7, 25.9, 11.1% respectively). Even with a low PCR sensitivity, the group 2 results indicate the importance of developing new techniques for the diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis in newborns. Within group 1, 70.4% of the infected newborns were asymptomatic and, in group 2, 68.4% showed clinical manifestations of congenital toxoplasmosis.
Conclusions
The higher proportion of infants without clinical symptoms in group 1 (70.4%) suggests the maternal treatment with spiramycin delays fetal infection, reducing the clinical sequelae of the disease in newborns. Given the low sensitivity of the tests used, when there is suspicion of congenital transmission several serological and parasitological tests are required in order to confirm or exclude congenital toxoplasmosis in newborns.
Since the discovery of Toxoplasma gondii (T.gondii) by Alfonso Splendore in 1908, many studies have attempted to explain its mechanisms of transmission and the host immune response to the parasite, to discover drugs to inhibit its proliferation, and to develop excellent diagnostic techniques using highly sensitive and specific immune and bio-molecular methods [1–6]. The rates of transmission and clinical manifestation of congenital toxoplasmosis vary sharply in newborns (NB, and depend on the immune response of the fetus to the parasite, the gestational age when infection took place, the parasite load in the fetal circulation at the time of infection, the genotype of the parasite, and the specific treatment administered to the pregnant patient [1, 2]. Clinical follow-up of cases of suspected congenital transmission is very difficult once the pregnant woman has been treated with spiramycin, which affects the identification of the parasite in the NB [1, 2]. In addition, tests for anti-T.gondii IgM and IgA have poor sensitivity in fetuses and NB [6–9]. Most infected NB (60%) are asymptomatic [1, 2]; however, they may develop severe sequelae such as blindness or mental retardation if not treated [1, 2, 10–12].
It has not yet been conclusively proven that maternal treatment reduces the risk of fetal infection [3, 13–19], although some studies have demonstrated a beneficial effect of treatment [20–27]. Moreover, treatment with a combination of pyrimethamine and sulphadiazine is thought to be more effective than spiramycin treatment for reducing the risk of clinical manifestations in infected children [1, 2, 20–27]. There are conflicting views in the literature regarding the effectiveness of spiramycin treatment when the fetus has already been infected [1, 2]. However, many authors believe that spiramycin is able to reduce the severity of fetal infection by delaying the onset of fetal disease and thus allowing greater maturation of the fetal immune system [28–30].
A number of studies have evaluated the performance of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using amniotic fluid samples for the diagnosis of fetal infection [31–35]. In addition, in some countries cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is the most frequently used diagnostic sample [1], while in others placental samples are used [36]. However, few studies have attempted to evaluate the sensitivity of PCR testing of the peripheral blood of NB congenitally infected with T.gondii[37]. Considering the difficulty of diagnosing congenital toxoplasmosis and the low frequency of clinical manifestations in infected NB and infants, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of prenatal spiramycin treatment on the sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests, and its effects on clinical manifestations of the disease in NB.
Methods
Population
This was a community-based, cross-sectional study of acute toxoplasmosis in NB considered at risk for acquiring congenital infection; all NB participants were born in the Maternity Ward of the Clinical Hospital (HC) of the University Federal of Goiás (UFG) (Brazil) between October 2004 and December 2011. All NBs were selected by the Maternity Protection Service of the state of Goiás and by the Congenital Infection Control Program in the Maternity Ward at HC/UFG based on their mothers having tested positive for specific anti-T.gondii IgM and IgG during the prenatal or postpartum periods.
Toxoplasmosis testing was performed at the first prenatal care visit during the first gestational trimester. The pregnant patients were considered to have an acute infection when presence of T. gondii-specific IgM antibodies were confirmed and when the avidity of IgG was low (<30%), as described by Jenum et al. [38]. All tests were performed before 16 weeks of pregnancy. Treatment of acutely infected pregnant women began as soon as the diagnosis was delivered to the physician (15 days after the test). The state program does not provide serological follow-up of seronegative pregnant women, whereas the Maternity Ward at HC routinely conducts thorough toxoplasmosis testing of all NB and their mothers. This postpartum testing detects children with likely congenital infection, but does not indicate the time when the acute infection occurred during the pregnancy. All suspected NB were closely followed for one year, while a longitudinal study with monthly clinical and laboratory evaluations was being conducted. These examinations routinely consisted of laboratory tests for toxoplasma-specific IgG and IgM antibodies, mouse inoculation for parasitological diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis, ocular fundic examinations by indirect ophthalmoscopy, and transfontanellar ultrasonography of all infants at risk of congenital infection. In addition to the detection of IgG and IgM, testing for toxoplasma-specific IgA antibodies and PCR of peripheral blood samples for identification of T. gondii DNA were added to these examinations as part of the study protocol.
There were 247 children born with suspected congenital toxoplasmosis during the study period. The patients were either the children of women with suspected acute infection during pregnancy or children whose mothers had seroconverted (women previously identified as seronegative who did not undergo seroconversion surveillance during pregnancy). Of the 99 patients who underwent the diagnostic testing required by the study protocol (PCR and testing for toxoplasma-specific IgA, IgM, IgG), 31 NB were excluded because the diagnosis of toxoplasmosis was not completed due to lack of clinical and laboratory monitoring. The tests were performed during the neonatal period and the patients underwent clinical and laboratory follow-up for at least one year.
From interviews with the mothers, the presence or the absence of specific treatment with spiramycin during pregnancy was investigated. Forty-four of the mothers had been treated with 3 g of spiramycin daily, administered over 3 doses per day (i.e. 3 × 1 g), from the time of acute toxoplasmosis diagnosis until birth. Twenty-four mothers had not been treated because toxoplasmosis testing was not performed during pregnancy (these mothers served as the control group for the treated ones). The NB were divided into two groups: group 1–44 NB born to mothers treated with spiramycin during pregnancy; and group 2–24 newborns born to mothers who did not receive spiramycin treatment during pregnancy.The study was approved by the Human and Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee of the HC/UFG (protocol n. 092/2001 and protocol n. 024/2010) and the mothers of the NB who agreed to participate in the study gave their informed consent after they had been informed of the importance of the research Figure 1.
Figure 1
Flowchart.
Criteria for the diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis
The Program for Congenital Infection Control at the HC Maternity Ward of UFG performs clinical follow-up from birth until at least 12 months of age of all infected NB and those with suspected congenital toxoplasmosis. A patient is considered infected when:
T. gondii is detected in peripheral blood or CSF by mouse inoculation or T. gondii DNA is detected by PCR;
specific anti-T.gondii IgA and/or IgM is identified in fetal or NB blood;
specific antibodies (IgG and/or IgM) are found in the CSF of the NB;
fetal or NB T. gondii-specific IgG is 4X greater than maternal IgG;
NB specific anti-T. gondii IgG levels increase, or remain positive after 12 months of life;
the patient has clinical symptoms compatible with congenital toxoplasmosis infection and not explained by another diagnosis (such as Chagas disease, syphilis, rubella, cytomegalovirus, HIV, HTLV, hepatitis B and C), and the presence of IgG anti T. gondii until 12 months of children's lives.
The presence of specific anti-T. gondii IgM and IgA was confirmed using a new blood sample collected between the fifth and tenth day of life.
Biological techniques used for the diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis in the neonate
Detection of specific anti-T.gondii IgM and IgA antibodies during serological testing, or detection of T.gondii DNA in peripheral blood by PCR were considered to indicate congenital T.gondii infection.
Immunoassay
Specific anti-T.gondii antibodies were detected using several assay systems according to the manufacturer's instructions. Toxoplasma-specific IgG and IgM were detected by microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) performed using an AXsYM immunoassay system (Abbott Laboratories) and an Architect i4000 (Abbott Laboratories) with Chemi-Flex technology. IgM was also detected by enzyme-linked fluorescent assay (ELFA) performed using a VIDAS immunoanalyzer (Biomérieux). IgA was detected using an antibody-capture enzyme immunoassay.
PCR
Peripheral blood was collected from the NB before treatment with sulfadiazine, pyrimethamine, and folinic acid commenced. A Pure Link Genomic Purification kit (Invitrogen) was used to extract the DNA according to the manufacturer’s specifications. The PCR reactions were performed in a MasterCycler Personal thermocycler. The amplification process consisted of an initial denaturation at 94°C (5 min), 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C (1 min), annealing at 62°C (1 min) and extension at 72°C (1 min), followed by a final extension at 72°C (10 min). The PCR reactions were performed in duplicate, using a sequence of the B1 gene of T.gondii as the target sequence. The following primers were used: Toxo-B5 (5’-TGA AGA GAG GAA ACA GGT GGT CG-3’) and Toxo-B6 (5’-CCG CCT CCT TCG TCC GTC GTA-3’). The PCR products were separated by electrophoresis in a 6% polyacrylamide gel and visualized after staining with silver nitrate [39]. Peritoneal fluid from mice infected with the RH strain of T. gondii was used as a positive control.
Statistical analysis
The data were entered into Microsoft Excel 2007 and univariate analysis was conducted using Epi Info version 3.3.2. The associations between each variable collected were tested and P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant, using confidence intervals of 95%. The Fisher's Exact Test was performed when the frequency was less than 5.
A standardized form was used for data collection. The information collected included: maternal data (type of treatment, when the diagnostic testing was performed and the instructions given by the physician to seronegative patients regarding prophylactic measures); NB clinical data (signs of a possible congenital infection); and NB laboratory data (detection of T.gondii DNA by PCR analysis or specific anti-T.gondii IgM and IgA antibodies).
The sensitivity and specificity of the laboratory tests were determined for both groups of infants. Statistical analysis was performed in order to verify the existence of an association between laboratory markers of congenital infection with maternal treatment and with the presence or absence of clinical manifestations of the disease in the NB.
Results
Congenital toxoplasmosis was confirmed in 61.4% (27/44) of the NB in group 1 and 79.2% (19/24) of the NB in group 2. Women from group 1 had received prenatal treatment for toxoplasmosis and almost all of these women had undergone serological testing during the first trimester because of suspicion of acute toxoplasmosis. The women from group 2 who had been seronegative for toxoplasmosis during first trimester screening had probably seroconverted during the 2nd or 3rd trimester. Of the mothers in group 2 who gave birth to infected NB, 89.5% (17/19) had been seronegative for T. gondii during the first 3 months of pregnancy and 10.5% (2/19) had not undergone prenatal toxoplasmosis testing. None of these seronegative pregnant women were screened for seroconversion during pregnancy; and the patients reported that they had not been informed of prophylactic measures to prevent infection by T.gondii.
Laboratory markers of congenital infection (T.gondii DNA or T. gondii-specific IgM and IgA antibodies) were more frequently detected in infected NB from group 2. However, treatment with spiramycin did not interfere significantly with laboratory detection of congenital T.gondii infection (Table 1). The sensitivity of the laboratory tests was higher for infants in group 2, while the specificity was similar for both groups (100%).
Table 1
Positivity of biological markers of congenital toxoplasmosis in infected newborns from mothers treated with spiramycin (Group 1) and from untreated mothers (Group 2)
Group 1
Group 2
pa
Infected (N = 27)
Infected (N = 19)
n% Sensibility (%)
n% Sensibility (%)
PCR
1 (3,70)
3,7
6 (31,58)
31,58
0,053
Positive
Negative
26 (96,30)
13 (68,42)
IgM
7 (25,93)
25,93
13 (68,42)
68,42
0,0662
Positive
Negative
20 (74,07)
6 (31,58)
IgA
3 (11,11)
11,11
7 (36,84)
36,84
0,0969
Positive
Negative
24 (88,89)
12 (63,16)
aFisher’s Exact Test.
(Goiânia-GO, Brazil, 2012).
Examination of infected NB revealed that clinical manifestations of congenital toxoplasmosis occurred in 29.6% of infants in group 1 and 68.4% of infants in group 2 (Table 2). Treatment of pregnant women with spiramycin significantly decreased the occurrence of hydrocephalus, neurological impairment, and retinal lesions.
Table 2
Frequency of clinical manifestations of congenital toxoplasmosis in newborns from mothers treated with spiramycin (Group 1) and from untreated mothers (Group 2)
Any of the following clinical signs
Group 1
Group 2
pa
(N = 27)
(N = 19)
n%
n%
Presence
8 (29,63)
13 (68,42)
0,0963
Cerebral calcification
1 (3,70)
3 (15,79)
0,2190
Hydrocephalus
-
5 (26,32)
0,0181
Microcephaly
-
2 (10,53)
0,1862
Blindness
-
2 (10,53)
0,1862
Chorioretinitis
1 (3,70)
3 (15,79)
0,2190
Corticosubcortical dysfunction
2 (7,40)
3 (15,79)
0,3677
Systemic toxoplasmosis
-
1 (5,26)
0,4255
Optic neuropathy
-
4 (21,05)
0,0384
Hepatosplenomegaly
-
2 (10,53)
0,1862
Hearing dysfunction
4 (14,80)
1 (5,26)
0,3402
Generalized lymphoglandular form
1 (3,70)
-
0,5957
aFisher’s Exact Test.
(Goiânia-GO, Brazil, 2012).
The presence of serological markers for toxoplasmosis was not associated with greater severity of congenital infection.
Discussion
In Goiânia (2003), Avelino et al. [40] found one of the highest rates of toxoplasmosis seroconversion during pregnancy described in the literature (8.6%). This result led to the introduction of a public program to control toxoplasmosis during pregnancy in the state of Goiás. Although the treatment of toxoplasmosis in pregnancy is not followed by a reduction in its transmission to the fetus [13–16], it has been shown that treatment can reduce the severity of fetal infection [17–27] as we found in this study. However, in our study as in others [11, 14, 18], some children born to treated mothers developed ocular or neurological sequelae to congenital infection. However, severe clinical manifestations of congenital infection were found only among children born to untreated women (Table 2).
Our results highlight flaws in the implementation of primary prophylactic measures for seronegative women at risk of becoming infected by T. gondii. Of the mothers in group 2, 89.5% gave birth to infected children. Moreover, they were not informed of possible prophylactic measures. In France, implementation of a prevention program and screening of pregnant women led to a reduction of symptomatic neonates [24]. Preventive measures should be taken throughout prenatal care (by doctors or the healthcare professional team). Additional information on how to prevent the occurrence of acute infection during pregnancy should be provided. Simple measures such as avoiding undercooked meat, eggs and raw vegetables; not drinking untreated water or unpasteurized milk; using hygienic gardening practices; and limiting interaction with cats can help to prevent infection [41]. Failure to provide information on primary prophylaxis measures, and the lack of seroconversion surveillance during prenatal care, were responsible for the high incidence of congenital infection among NB born to the initially seronegative pregnant women of group 2. There is a high possibility of contact between pregnant women and the sources of the parasite in our environment [40]. In addition to failure of primary prophylaxis, the initially seronegative women in this study did not undergo the seroconversion surveillance by monthly serologic screening that is indicated in regions with a high prevalence of toxoplasmosis [1, 2, 42, 43]. Thus, many women were acutely infected but not properly diagnosed and treated.
Of the children in group 2 (untreated mothers), 68.4% (13/19) were born with severe clinical conditions (Table 2). In contrast, only 29.6% of the NB in group 1 were symptomatic and none had severe clinical disease. Thirteen children required tertiary prophylactic measures as their mothers had been untreated. They needed to be followed by a multidisciplinary team and the cost was estimated to be exorbitant for the government program. According to Remington et al. [1], such costs could reach a million US dollars during the lifetime of a patient. This could have been alleviated if those women had followed prophylactic measures against T.gondii and had also undergone seroconversion surveillance. Only 10.5% (2/19) of the untreated women had not undergone prenatal care.
The higher percentage of infants without clinical symptoms in group 1 (70.3%) compared to group 2 (31.5%) suggests that maternal treatment with spiramycin reduced the fetal load of T.gondii, thus minimizing the sequelae of congenital toxoplasmosis infection [28–30]. Research conducted by Andrade et al. [44] showed that 60% of infants born to treated mothers were asymptomatic, which is similar to our results. However, NB outcomes after maternal spiramycin treatment are variable within the literature, with results ranging from no benefit [13–15] to reduced severity of congenital infection [17–27]. A European multicenter study [14] concluded that spiramycin was of no benefit in reducing the severity of fetal infection. However, recent studies have shown that early treatment can interfere with the transmission of infection, and decrease the severity of congenitally acquired toxoplasmosis [23–25]. A review by Wallon et al. [3] reported conflicting results within the literature; five studies showed that maternal treatment reduced the severity of vertical transmission, but this was not confirmed in another four studies. Still other studies, such as that by Foulon et al. [13], have shown that early treatment was able to reduce the severity of the clinical consequences of congenital infection, but not vertical transmission to the fetus. Hohlfeld et al. [12] demonstrated that treatment slightly reduced the severity of congenital infection.
For the infected children whose mothers were not treated it was not possible to determine when maternal infection took place. Severe neurological lesions were observed only among the children of untreated mothers, suggesting that maternal treatment contributed to a decrease in the development of severe neurological lesions. The same result was shown by the European Multicenter Study [45]. However, Cortina-Borja et al. [46], found no reduction in the severe neurological sequelae affecting children of acutely infected mothers, regardless of whether maternal treatment consisted of spiramycin or the combination of pyrimethamine and sulfadiazine. Those authors report that 31% of the children born to mothers acutely infected by T. gondii during pregnancy had severe neurological sequelae. This is a higher percentage than reported in regions that do not have preventive government programs, indicating a more aggressive strain of toxoplasmosis circulating in this environment [46].
The severity of the infection was greatest in NB from group 2; 68.4% were symptomatic at birth and developed severe manifestations of congenital toxoplasmosis: 4 (30.8%) had neuro-optical lesions, 2 (15.4%) blindness, 5 (38.5%) hydrocephalus, 2 (15.4%) microcephaly, and 1 (7.7%) systemic toxoplasmosis. Gilbert et al. [26], showed that the risk of being born with clinical signs of congenital infection, or developing signs until the age of three years, is lower in countries in which intensive treatment of pregnant women is performed, such as in Austria.
Olariu et al. [47] reported a clinical picture as severe as that found in Goiania for untreated children. One or more severe clinical manifestations of congenital toxoplasmosis were reported in 84% of the affected infants. These manifestations included eye lesions (92.2%), brain calcifications (79.6%), and hydrocephalus (67.7%). In 61.6% of the infants, eye lesions, brain calcifications, and hydrocephalus were present simultaneously. Soares et al. [48] found that 72.4% of patients appeared asymptomatic at birth, but 34.5% had chorioretinitis, 32.3% had intracranial calcification, and 42.9% had neuromotor delay.
Hearing dysfunction was observed in five NB in our study, 4 (14.8%) from group 1 and one (5.3%) from group 2 (Table 2). Andrade et al. [44] found auditory dysfunction in six children with congenital toxoplasmosis, two of whom were born to mothers who were properly treated for toxoplasmosis during pregnancy. These data suggest that congenital toxoplasmosis, even in the absence of other clinical manifestations, should be considered in the evaluation of children with hearing loss, and that maternal treatment does not exclude the possibility of developing this dysfunction. Brown et al. [49] reported hearing impairment in 28% of children born to untreated mothers; however, in our study there was a higher incidence of hearing loss in the treated group.
The sensitivity of serological diagnostic markers of congenital toxoplasmosis in NB (T. gondii-specific IgM and IgA antibodies and PCR evidence of T. gondii DNA) reported in the literature is low, with independent studies reporting different results (1,2,6–9,32–36). Diagnosis seems to be adversely affected by maternal treatment as reported by Gilbert et al. [9]. In our study, Toxoplasma gondii was not detected by PCR in 96.3% (26/27) of samples from NB born to treated mothers, indicating that spiramycin treatment reduced the sensitivity of this technique. A similar phenomenon was reported by Rodrigues et al. [50], Fricker Hidalgo et al. [51] and Bessières et al. [8]. There was also low PCR sensitivity (31.6%) in group 2 NB, suggesting that peripheral blood may not be the best biological sample to use for the diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis. Sterkers et al. found an even lower percentage (21.2%) of PCR-positive congenitally infected NB in 2012 [31], and in 2001 Bessières et al. reported levels similar to those we found in this study [8]. The identification of the parasite in the amniotic fluid is easier than its detection in the NB, thus the sensitivity of the diagnostic technique (either PCR or mouse inoculation) is greater when there is intrauterine parasitemia. Spalding et al. [52] suggest that the low sensitivity of PCR for the diagnosis of NB with congenital T. gondii infection relative to its high sensitivity when used to test amniotic fluid is due to the transient persistence of T.gondii in peripheral blood [9, 33–35]. However, according to Okay et al. [53], the amniotic fluid from only 40.47% of congenitally infected NB was PCR-positive [53]. However, despite these difficulties, PCR can be highly sensitivity (around 90%) if it is used to test amniotic fluid collected close to the time that the pregnant woman seroconverted, which is the time of acute fetal infection [1, 2, 9, 32–35]. Bessières et al. [8] found a PCR sensitivity of 43% when using umbilical cord blood, which is higher than the sensitivity that we report for peripheral blood.
The sensitivity of specific anti-T.gondii IgM and IgA antibodies in NB of both groups (43.5 and 21.7%, respectively) was similar to that observed in other studies. Pinon et al. [7] found the sensitivity of anti-T.gondii IgM and IgA in NB samples to be approximately 25%. Naessens et al. [54] reported a sensitivity of 40% for IgM. Bessières et al. [8] found greater sensitivities for IgA (60%) and IgM levels (50%) than those found in this study. Foulon et al. [13] found positive results for IgA (58%) and IgM (54%) using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ISAGA). In a study involving 14 laboratories supported by the European Community Biomed 2 program, Pinon et al. [55] evaluated immunologic methods for the postnatal diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis and compared ELFA with a commercial enzyme immunoassay (EIA) or in-house immunosorbent agglutination assay (ISAGA) for the detection of IgM or IgA. The results were highly sensitive when the techniques were combined.
Treatment of pregnant women with spiramycin did not interfere, from a statistical viewpoint, with the sensitivity of specific anti-T.gondii IgM and IgA antibodies in NB within the 2 groups (Table 1). This is similar to the findings of other studies [8]. However, the sensitivity was higher (68.4% for IgM and 36.8% for IgA) in infants from group 2, similar to the findings of Lebech et al. [56]. It is likely that maternal treatment reduced the parasite load transmitted to the fetus, consequently reducing antigenic stimulation and the fetal humoral immune response. This, along with delayed fetal disease, may be one of the reasons for the reduced incidence of neuro-optical lesions and hydrocephalus in babies born to treated mothers.
Detection of specific anti-T.gondii IgA did not improve early diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis in the study group, because in 90% (9/10) of the infants with anti-T. gondii IgA, IgM was also present. However, IgA seemed to be the marker with the poorest prognosis for the congenital infection, as it was present in all NB who developed the neuro-optical form of toxoplasmosis (8.7% or 4/46). The presence of other serological markers for toxoplasmosis was not associated with greater severity of congenital infection.
The high specificity of the laboratory markers for congenital toxoplasmosis (PCR, specific IgM and IgA) observed in this study reinforces the need for such procedures to be performed in the routine diagnosis of congenital infection. They add parameters to confirm the diagnosis and need for subsequent treatment, which uses toxic drugs in patients suspected of congenital infection.
The effectiveness of treating pregnant women in order to prevent fetal infection is highly controversial [12–27]; however, our results suggest that treatment of the mother reduces the severity of fetal infection. The poor prognosis observed in infected group 2 NB suggests that the guidelines of the Program for Congenital Infection Control from France [57, 58] should be followed, including monthly serologic testing throughout pregnancy for seronegative patients and a focus on earlier medical treatment using sulfadiazine, pyrimethamine and folinic acid instead of spiramycin [1, 2, 12, 18–27] in case of proven fetal infection. Earlier diagnosis and treatment may prevent vertical transmission and the treatment of pregnant women identified as having recent toxoplasmosis can reduce the severity of the fetal infection [24, 25].
Limitations of the study
Randomized controlled trials on pregnant women, which could provide higher statistical weight to this research, were not performed due to ethic reasons. Not with standing, the scientific knowledge still holds very conflicting opinions toward the effectiveness of various treatments. We hope this work demonstrates that spiramicin can also be useful in reducing the seriousness of the fetal infection, as previously indicated by previous work that have been recently very criticized.
Conclusions
Spiramycin treatment of women with acute toxoplasmosis did not interfere significantly with the detection of laboratory markers of congenital toxoplasmosis. Treatment did reduce the frequency of the clinical manifestations in the NB, minimizing the severity of the congenital infection.
The detection of laboratory markers for congenital infection was positively correlated with the clinical diagnosis of toxoplasmosis in NB from both groups. However, due to the low sensitivity of the laboratory markers, negative results do not exclude the possibility of congenital infection. These results emphasize the importance of clinical follow-up of NB suspected to have congenital toxoplasmosis until at least 12 months of age.
Level of interest
This article in the field of immunology shows the effectiveness of maternal treatment in reducing the clinical manifestations of congenital toxoplasmosis.
Abbreviations
NB:
Newborn
T. gond:
Toxoplasma gondii
IgG:
Immunoglobulin G
IgM:
Immunoglobulin M
IgA:
Immunoglobulin A
HC:
Clinical hospital
UFG:
Federal University of Goiás
CSF:
Cerebrospinal fluid
PCR:
Polymerase chain reaction
HIV:
Human immunodeficiency virus
HTLV:
Human cell lymphotropic virus
LAERPH:
Laboratory studies of the host-parasite relationship
IPTSP:
Institute of Tropical Pathology and Public Health
MEIA:
Microparticle enzyme immunoassay
ELFA:
Enzyme-linked fluorescent assay
ELISA:
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
ISAGA:
Immunosorbent agglutination assay.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
Thank to the SMSGO (Municipal Secretary of Health in Goiânia); FAPEG (Foundation for Support on Scientific Research of the State of Goiás) for the financial support; Clinical Hospital of UFG for allowing this research.
Authors’ Affiliations
(1)
Laboratory studies of the host-parasite relationship (LAERPH) of Institute for Tropical Pathology and Public Health (IPTSP) of the Federal University of Goiás (UFG)
(2)
Clinical Laboratory of the University Hospital of the Federal University of Goiás (UFG)
(3)
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics of the Faculty of Medicine - FM/UFG
(4)
Department of Pediatrics and Puericulture in the Medical School (MS) of Federal University of Goiás (UFG)
References
Remigton JS, McLeod R, Tulliez P: Toxoplasmosis. Infectious Diseases of the Fetus and Newborn Infant. Edited by: Remington JS, Klein JO, Wilson CB, Baker CJ. 2006, press in United States of America: Saunders Elsevier, 31: 947-1091. 6View ArticleGoogle Scholar
McAuley JB, Boyer K, Remington JS, McLeod R: Textbook of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. 2009, United States of America: Saunders Elsevier, press, 2954-2971. Toxoplasmosis, 6, 235.Google Scholar
Wallon M, Liou C, Garne P, Peyron F: Congenital toxoplasmosis: systematic review of evidence of efficacy of treatment in pregnancy. BMJ. 1999, 318 (7197): 1511-1514. 5View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Mack DG, Johnson JJ, Roberts F, Roberts CW, Estes RG, David C, Grumet FC, Mcleod R: HLA-class II genes modify outcome of Toxoplasma gondii infection. Inter J Parasitol. 1999, 29: 1351-1358.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Guo Z-G, Gross U, Johnson AM: Toxoplasma gondii virulence markers identified by random amplified polymorphic DNA polymerase chain reaction. Parasitol Res. 1997, 83: 458-463.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Pinon JM, Chemla C, Villena I, Foudrinier F, Aubert D, Puygauthier-Toubas D, Leroux B, Dupouy D, Quereux C, Talmud M, Trenque T, Potron G, Pluot M, Remy G, Bonhomme A: Early neonatal diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis: Value of comparative enzyme linked immunofiltration assay, immunological profiles and anti-Toxoplasma gondii immunoglobulin M (IgM) or IgA immunocapture and implications for postnatal therapeutics strategies. J Clin Microbiol. 1996, 34 (3): 579-583.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Bessières MH, Berrebi A, Rolland M, Bloom MC, Roques C, Cassaing S, Courjault C, Séguéla JP: Neonatal screening for CT in a cohort of 165 women infected during pregnancy and influence of in utero treatment on the results of neonatal tests. EurJ Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001, 94: 37-45.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Gilbert RE, Thalib L, Tan HK, Paul M, Wallon M, Petersen E, [The European Multicentre Study on Congenital Toxoplasmosis- EMSCOT]: Screening for congenital toxoplasmosis: accuracy of immunoglobulin M and immunoglobulin A tests after birth. J Med Screen. 2007, 14 (1): 8-13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Bessieres MH, Berrebi A, Cassaing S, Fillaux J, Cambus JP, Berry A, Assouline C, Ayoubi JM, Magnaval JF: Diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis: prenatal and neonatal evaluation of methods used in Toulouse University Hospital and incidence of congenital toxoplasmosis. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009, 104 (2): 389-392.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Wilson CB, Remington JS: Development of adverse sequelae in born with subclinical congenital toxoplasmosis infection. Pediatrics. 1980, 66 (5): 767-774.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Hohlfeld P, Daffos F, Thulliez P, Aufrant C, Couvreur J, Mac Aleese J, Descombey MD, Forestier F: Fetal toxoplasmosis: outcome of pregnancy and infant follow-up after in utero treatment. J Pediatrics. 1989, 115: 765-769.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Foulon W, Villena I, Stray-Pedersen B, Decoster A, Lappalainem M, Pinon JM, Jenum PA, Hedman K, Naessens A: Treatment of toxoplasmosis during pregnancy: a multicenter study of impact on fetal transmission and childrens sequelae at age 1 year. Amer J Obstet Gynecol. 1999, 180 (2): 410-415.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Thiebaut R, Leroy V, Alioum A, Binquet C, Poizat G, Salmi LR, Gras L, Salamon R, Gilbert R, Chêne G: Biases in observational studies of the effect of prenatal treatment for congenital toxoplasmosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006, 124: 3-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Thiebaut R, Leproust S, Chene G, Gilbert R, [The Systematic Review on Congenital Toxoplasmosis Study Group]: Effectiveness of treatment for congenital toxoplasmosis: a meta-analysis of individual patients data. Lancet. 2007, 369: 115-22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Peyron F, Wallon M, Liou C, Garner P: Treatments for toxoplasmosis in pregnancy. The Cochrane Library Rev. 2009, http://doi:10.1002/14651858.CD00168.Google Scholar
Gilbert RE, Gras L, Wallon M, Peyron F, Ades AE, Dunn DT: Effect of prenatal treatment on mother to child transmission of Toxoplasma gondii: retrospective study of 554 mother-child pairs in Lyon, France. Int J Epidemiol. 2001, 30: 1303-08.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Gilbert R, Gras L, European Multicentre Study on Congenital Toxoplasmosis: Effect of timing and type of treatment on the risk of mother to child transmission of Toxoplasma gondii. BJOG. 2003, 110: 112-20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Gras L, Gilbert RE, Ades AE, Dunn DT: Effect of prenatal treatment on the risk of intracranial and ocular lesions in children with congenital toxoplasmosis. Inter J Epidemiol. 2001, 30: 1309-1313.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Couvreur J, Thulliez P, Daffos F, Aufrant C, Bompard Y, Gesquiere A, Desmonts G: Foetopathie toxoplasmique: Traitement in utero par l'association pyrimethamine-sulfamides. Arch Franc Pediatr. 1991, 48: 397-403.Google Scholar
Paquet C, Yudin MH, Allen VM, Bouchard C, Boucher M, Caddy S, Castillo E, Money DM, Murphy KE, Ogilvie G, van Schalkwyk S: Toxoplasmosis in pregnancy, prevention, screening, and treatment. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013, 35 (1 e Suppl A): S1-S7.Google Scholar
Wallon M, Peyron F, Cornu C, Vinault S, Abrahamowicz M,C, BonithonKopp C, Binquet C: Congenital toxoplasma infection: monthly prenatal screening decreases transmission rate and improves clinical outcome at age 3 years. Clin Infect Dis. 2013, 56 (9): 1223-1231.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Hotop A, Hlobil H, Gross U: Efficacy of rapid treatment initiation following primary Toxoplasma gondii infection during pregnancy. Clin Infect Dis. 2012, 54 (11): 1545-1552.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Gilbert R, Dunn D, Wallon M, Hayde M, Prusa A, Lebech M, Kortbeek T, Peyron F, Pollak A, Petersen E: Ecological comparison of the risks of mother-to-child transmission and clinical manifestations of congenital toxoplasmosis. according to prenatal treatment protocol. Epidemiol Infect. 2001, 127: 113-120.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Galanakis E, Manoura A, Antoniou M, Sifakis S, Korakaki E, Hatzidaki E, Lambraki D, Tselentis Y, Giannakopoulou C: Outcome of toxoplasmosis acquired during pregnancy following treatment in both pregnancy and early infancy. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2007, 22: 444-448.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Couvreur J, Desmonts G, Thulliez P: Prophilaxis of congenital toxoplasmosis. Effects of spiramicin on placental infection. J Antimicr Chemother. 1988, 22 (Suppl B): 193-200.Google Scholar
van de Schoondermark Ven E, Camps W, Eskes T, Meuwissen J, Galama J: Effectiveness of spiramycin for treatment of congenital Toxoplasma gondii infection in rhesus monkeys. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994, 38: 1930-1936.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
van de Schoondermark Ven E, Melchers W, Galama J, Camps W, Eskes T, Meuwissen J: Congenital toxoplasmosis: an experimental study in rhesus monkeys for transmission and prenatal diagnosis. Exp Parasitol. 1993, 77: 200-211.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Sterkers Y, Pratlong F, Albaba S, Loubersac J, Picot M-C, Pretet V, Issert E, Boulot P, Bastien P: Novel interpretation of molecular diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis according to gestational age at the time of maternal infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2012, 50 (12): 3944-3951.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Romand S, Wallon M, Franck J, Thulliez P, Peyron F, Dumon H: Prenatal diagnosis using polymerase chain reaction on amniotic fluid for congenital toxoplasmosis. Obstet Gynecol. 2001, 97 (2): 296-300.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Grover CM, Thulliez P, Remington JS, Boothroyd JC: Rapid prenatal diagnosis of congenital Toxoplasma infection by using polymerase chain reaction and amniotic fluid. J Clin Microbiol. 1990, 28: 2297-2301.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Thalib L, Gras L, Romand S, Prusa A, Bessieres MH, Petersen E, Gilbert RE: Prediction of congenital toxoplasmosis by polymerase chain reaction analysis of amniotic fluid. BJOG. 2005, 112 (5): 567-74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Robert-Gangneux F, Gavinet MF, Ancelle T, Raymond J, Tourte-Schaefer C, Dupouy-Camet J: Value of prenatal diagnosis and early postnatal diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis: retrospective study of 110 cases. J Clin Microbiol. 1999, 37 (9): 2893-2898.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Robert-Gangneux F, Murat JB, Fricker-Hidalgo H, Brenier-Pinchart MP, Gangneux JP, Pelloux H: The placenta: a main role in congenital toxoplasmosis?. Trends Parasitol. 2011, 27 (12): 530-536.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Sterkers Y, Ribot J, Albaba S, Issert E, Bastien P, Pratlong F: Diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis by polymerase chain reaction on neonatal peripheral blood. Diag Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011, 71: 174-176.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Jenun PA, Stray PB, Gundersen AG: Improved diagnosis of primary Toxoplasma gondii infection in early pregnancy by determination of antitoxoplasma immunoglobulin G avidity. J Clin Microbiol. 1997, 35 (8): 1972-1977.Google Scholar
Santos FR, Pena SDJ, Epplen JT: Genetic and population study of a y-linked tetranucleotide repect DNA polymorphism with a simple non-isotopic technique. Hum Genetics. 1993, 90: 655-656.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Avelino MM, Campos D, Barbosa JCP, Castro AM: Pregnancy as a risk factor to acute toxoplasmosis seroconversion. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003, 108: 19-24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Dubey JP, Lago EG, Gennari SM, Su C, Jones JL: Toxoplasmosis in humans and animals in Brazil: high prevalence, high burden of disease, and epidemiology. Parasitology. 2012, 139 (11): 1375-1424.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 24/7: Content source: Global Health - Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria. Usa.gov. 2013, 330: 20-Google Scholar
Wallon M, Franck J, Romand S, Peyron F, Dumon H, Thulliez P: Value of Toxoplasma serology at delivery in women seronegative during pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001, 30 (7pt1): 697-699.Google Scholar
Andrade GMQ, Resende LM, Goulart EMA, Siqueira AL, Vitor RWA, Januario JN: Hearing loss in congenital toxoplasmosis detected by newborn screening. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol. 2008, 74: 21-28.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Gilbert R, Gras L, European Multicentre Study on Congenital Toxoplasmosis: Association between prenatal treatment and clinical manifestations of congenital toxoplasmosis in infancy: a cohort study in 13 European centers. Acta Paediat. 2005, 94: 1721-1723.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Cortina Borja M, Tan HK, Wallon M, Paul M, Prusa A, Buffolano W, Malm GG, Salt A, Freeman K, Petersen E: Prenatal treatment for serious neurological sequelae of congenital toxoplasmosis an observational prospective cohort study. PloS Med. 2010, 7 (10): ID: 20967235-View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Olariu TR, Remington JS, McLeod R, Ambereen A, Montoya JG: Severe congenital toxoplasmosis in the United States: clinical and serologic findings in untreated infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2011, 30: 1056-1061.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Brown ED, Chau JK, Ateshbabd S, Westerberg BD, Kozek FK: A systematic review of neonatal toxoplasmosis exposure and sensorineural hearing loss. Intern J Ped Otorhinol. 2009, 73 (5): 707-711.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues IMX, Castro AM, Gomes MBF, Amaral WN, Avelino MM: Toxoplasmosis: Evaluation of serological methods to detect anti- Toxoplasma gondii IgM and IgA antibodies. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2009, 104 (2): 434-440.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Fricker-Hidalgo H, Brenier-Pinchart MP, Schaal JP, Equy V, Bost-Bru C, Pelloux H: Value of T. gondii detection in one hundred thirty-three placentas for the diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis. Ped Infect Dis J. 2007, 26: 845-846.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
Spalding SM, Amendoeira MRR, Ribeiro LC, Silveira C, Garcia AP, Camilo-Coura L: Prospective study of pregnant women and their babies with risk for congenital toxoplasmosis in municipal district of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2003, 36 (4): 483-491.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Okay TS, Yamamoto LO, Campos L, Manuli ER, Andrade-Junior HF, Negro GMB: Significant performance variation among PCR systems in diagnosing congenital toxoplasmosis in São Paulo, Brazil: analysis of 467 amniotic fluid samples. Clinics. 2009, 64 (3): 171-176.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Naessens A, Jenum P, Pollak A, Lappalainen A, Villena I, Lebech M, Stray-Pedersen B, Hayde M, Pinon JM, Petersen E, Foulon W: Diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis in the neonatal period: multicenter evaluation. J Pediatr. 1999, 135 (6): 714-719.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Pinon JM, Dumon H, Chemla C, Franck J, Petersen E, Lebech M, Zufferey J, Bessieres MH, Marty P, Holliman R, Johnson J, Luyasu V, Lecolier B, Guy E, Joynson DHM, Decoster A, Enders G, Pelloux H, Candolfi E: Strategy for diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis: evaluation of methods comparing mothers and newborns and standard methods for postnatal detection of immunoglobulin G, M, and A antibodies. J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39: 2267-2271.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Lebech M, Andersen O, Christensen NC, Hertel J, Nielsen HE, Petersen B, Rechnitzer C, Larsen SO, Norgard-Pedersen B, Petersen E: Feasibility of neonatal screening for Toxoplasma infection in the absence of prenatal treatment. Danish Congenital Toxoplasmosis Study Group. Lancet. 1999, 353 (9167): 1834-1837.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Thulliez P: Screening programme for congenital toxoplasmosis in France. Scand J Infect Dis. 1992, Suppl 84: 43-45.Google Scholar
Garcia-Méric P, Franck J, Dumon H, Piarroux R: Management of congenital toxoplasmosis in France: current data. Presse Med. 2010, 39 (5): 530-538.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
Comments
View archived comments (1)