Skip to main content
Download PDF

Russian gonococcal antimicrobial susceptibility programme (RU-GASP) – resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae during 2009–2012 and NG-MAST genotypes in 2011 and 2012

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 14, Article number: 342 (2014) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Neisseria gonorrhoeae is a major concern worldwide and gonococcal AMR surveillance globally is imperative for public health purposes. In Eastern Europe, gonococcal AMR surveillance is exceedingly rare. However, in 2004 the Russian gonococcal antimicrobial susceptibility programme (RU-GASP) was initiated. The aims of this study were to describe the prevalence and trends of gonococcal AMR from 2009 to 2012, and molecular epidemiological genotypes in 2011 and 2012 in Russia.

Methods

Gonococcal isolates from 12–46 surveillance sites distributed across Russia, obtained in 2009 (n = 1200), 2010 (n = 407), 2011 (n = 423), and 2012 (n = 106), were examined for antimicrobial susceptibility using agar dilution method. Gonococcal isolates from 2011 and 2012 were investigated with N. gonorrhoeae multi-antigen sequence typing (NG-MAST).

Results

During 2009–2012, the proportions of gonococcal isolates resistant to ciprofloxacin, penicillin G, azithromycin and spectinomycin ranged from 25.5% to 44.4%, 9.6% to 13.2%, 2.3% to 17.0% and 0.9% to 11.6%, respectively. Overall, the resistance level to penicillin G was stable, the resistance level to ciprofloxacin was decreasing, however, the level of resistance to azithromycin increased. All isolates were susceptible to ceftriaxone using the US CLSI breakpoints. However, using the European breakpoints 58 (2.7%) of the isolates were resistant to ceftriaxone. Interestingly, this proportion was decreasing, i.e. from 4.8% in 2009 to 0% in 2012.

Conclusions

In Russia, the diversified gonococcal population showed a high resistance to ciprofloxacin, penicillin G and azithromycin. In general, the MICs of ceftriaxone were relatively high, however, they were decreasing from 2009 to 2012. Ceftriaxone should be the first-line for empiric antimicrobial monotherapy of gonorrhoea in Russia. It is essential to further strengthen the surveillance of gonococcal AMR (ideally also gonorrhoea treatment failures) in Russia.

Peer Review reports

Background

Gonorrhoea is a major public health concern globally [1]. In 2011, 39 179 gonorrhoea cases were reported from 28 European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA) Member States, with an overall incidence of 12.6 cases per 100,000 population [2]. In most of the non-EU/EEA countries of the World Health Organization (WHO) European Region (mostly in the former Soviet Union and Yugoslav Republic), during the last two decades the incidence has rapidly declined. This decline has also been observed in the largest non-EU/EEA country, that is, Russia (>142 million inhabitants). However, in 2011 Russia still reported an incidence of 38 cases per 100,000 population, which was the highest country incidence in the WHO European Region [2,3,http://data.euro.who.int/cisid]. Furthermore, the reported gonorrhoea incidences in Russia are underestimated, which is due to the large heterogeneity in health care settings nationally, differences in access to testing, suboptimal diagnostics, case reporting, e.g. lack of reporting of cases diagnosed in the private sector, and surveillance [3–5].

Unfortunately, the etiological agent of gonorrhoea, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, has developed antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to essentially all antimicrobials introduced as first-line treatment. Currently, ceftriaxone is the only recommended first-line option for antimicrobial monotherapy in many countries globally [6–12]. Most worryingly, rare verified treatment failure of pharyngeal gonorrhoea with ceftriaxone have been reported [13–18] and the first few extensively-drug resistant (XDR) gonococcal strains with high-level resistance to ceftriaxone were described recently [16, 19, 20]. In this era of hard-to-treat and possibly emergence of untreatable gonorrhoea, the WHO [21], European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) [22] and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), USA [23] have published action/response plans to mitigate and control the spread of multidrug-resistant gonorrhoea. One key action emphasized for public health purposes in all these action/response plans is to substantially enhance the quality assured surveillance of gonococcal AMR worldwide [21–23].

In the WHO European Region, the European Gonococcal Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme (Euro-GASP) is operating in the EU/EEA since 2004. In Euro-GASP, 68% (21/31) of the EU/EEA countries are included in the gonococcal AMR surveillance [3, 12]. However, in the non-EU/EEA countries of the WHO European Region, quality assured gonococcal AMR surveillance only exist in 13% (3/23) of the countries [3] and, in general, the awareness and knowledge regarding gonococcal AMR, which is crucial for informing the empirical treatment guidelines, is limited [3–5]. Nevertheless, in 2004 the national Russian GASP (RU-GASP) was initiated. The RU-GASP has been quality assured in accordance with WHO standards and, for international comparability of AMR data, the 2008 WHO N. gonorrhoeae reference strains are used as quality controls [24–27]. For molecular epidemiological typing of gonococci, the N. gonorrhoeae multiantigen sequence typing (NG-MAST) has been used in many countries worldwide [28]. However, very limited genetic characteristics of gonococcal strains circulating in Russia have been published and only two NG-MAST studies have been performed, examining isolates from 2004–2005 [29, 30].

The aims of the present study were to examine the prevalence and trends of N. gonorrhoeae resistance, to previous and current antimicrobial treatment options, from 2009 to 2012 in Russia and the genotypic distribution of N. gonorrhoeae, by means of NG-MAST, isolated in 2011 and 2012 in Russia.

Methods

Study population

As previously described [24, 25], dermatovenereological dispensaries situated all over Russia are surveyed in RU-GASP. In the present study, mainly consecutive culture positive gonorrhoea patients attending 12–46 dispensaries from January 2009 to December 2012 were included. Urethral and cervical specimens from females and urethral specimens from males were collected. All specimens were cultured on selective gonococcal agar media, and the N. gonorrhoeae isolates were preserved in cryomedium at -70°C and subsequently transported to the SRCDV for complete species verification and centralized AMR testing, as previously described [24, 25]. At the SRDCDV, all isolates were confirmed as N. gonorrhoeae by identification of typical colonies on selective culture agar media, Gram negative diplococci in microscopy, rapid oxidase reaction, and a sugar utilization test [31]. All examined gonococcal isolates were cultured and stored as part of the routine diagnostics (standard care) and no patient identification information is used in RU-GASP.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

At the SRCDV, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC, mg/L) of ceftriaxone (0.002-4 mg/L), spectinomycin (0.125-512 mg/L), azithromycin (0.002-4 mg/L), penicillin G (0.016-16 mg/L), and ciprofloxacin (0.002-128 mg/L) was determined using agar dilution method, according to the recommendations from the US Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [CLSI; 32]. All antimicrobial powder was purchased from Fluka Analytical (Steinheim, Germany). For azithromycin, for which the CLSI does not state any breakpoints, the MIC breakpoints from the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST; http://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints) were used. For quality control, as recommended by the CLSI [32] the N. gonorrhoeae reference strain АТСС 49226 was included in each testing. The 2008 WHO N. gonorrhoeae reference strains [26] were also included in the quality control on a regular basis. β-lactamase production was identified using nitrocefin discs, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Cefinase discs; Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, Md, USA).

Isolation of genomic DNA

DNA was isolated from bacterial suspensions using the DNA express kit (Lytech Ltd, Moscow, Russia), according to the instructions from the manufacturer.

Molecular epidemiological typing

For molecular epidemiological typing, NG-MAST was performed on gonococcal isolates from 2011 (n = 421) and 2012 (n = 100), as previously described [33]. NG-MAST allele numbers of the more variable segments of porB and tbpB, and sequence types (STs) were assigned using the NG-MAST website (http://www.ng-mast.net).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistica software version 9.0 PL (StatSoft Corporation, Cracow, Poland). Z-test for comparison of proportions was used. The level of significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Patient characteristics

N. gonorrhoeae isolates (one isolate per patient) from 1200 patients (959 males and 241 females), 407 patients (324 males and 83 females), 423 patients (295 males and 128 females), and 106 (65 males and 41 females) in 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively, were examined. The mean ages of the males (n = 1643) were 26.8 years (median age: 25 years; range: 15 to 64 years) and the mean ages of the females (n = 493) were 25.3 years (median age: 24 years; range: 16 to 76 years). The age distribution was relatively similar during the four years investigated.

Antimicrobial susceptibility of N. gonorrhoeaeisolates in 2009–2012 (n = 2136) in Russia

The results of the antimicrobial susceptibility testing of all isolates are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Antimicrobial resistance and β-lactamase production in Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates (n = 2136) from Russia in 2009–2012
Full size table

Briefly, in 2012 the proportion of isolates with in vitro resistance was 25.5%, 17.0%, 11.3%, 0.9%, and 0% for ciprofloxacin, azithromycin, penicillin G, spectinomycin, and ceftriaxone, respectively. During 2009–2012, the proportions of N. gonorrhoeae isolates resistant to ciprofloxacin, penicillin G, azithromycin and spectinomycin ranged from 25.5% to 44.4%, 9.6% to 13.2%, 2.3% to 17.0% and 0.9% to 11.6%, respectively. The overall number of β-lactamase producing N. gonorrhoeae isolates was 6 (0.3%). In general, the resistance level to penicillin G was stable, the resistance level to ciprofloxacin was declining, however, the level of resistance to azithromycin was increasing significantly (P < 0.05) (Table 1). However, the highest MIC of azithromycin detected was 8 mg/L and no isolates with high-level resistance to azithromycin (MIC ≥ 256 mg/L) have yet been found in Russia. Worryingly, gonococcal isolates with low-level resistance to spectinomycin were identified in all the surveyed years. Nevertheless, no isolates with high-level resistance to spectinomycin (MIC ≥ 1024 mg/L) have yet been identified in Russia and the spectinomycin MICs of the identified isolates only ranged from 128 to 256 mg/L. All isolates from 2009 to 2012 were susceptible to ceftriaxone (Table 1). Nevertheless, using the European EUCAST breakpoint (http://www.eucast.org; R > 0.125 mg/L), in total 58 (2.7%) of the isolates during 2009–2012 were resistant to ceftriaxone. Interestingly, the prevalence of the isolates resistant to ceftriaxone according to the EUCAST breakpoint decreased significantly (P < 0.05), i.e. 48 (4.0%), 8 (2.0%), 2 (0.5%) and 0 (0%) isolates were found in 2009, 2010, 2011 and 2012, respectively. Furthermore, in general the annual MIC distribution for ceftriaxone appeared to shift to lower MICs during the study period 2009–2012 (Figure 1).

Figure 1
figure 1

The distribution of ceftriaxone MICs for Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates (n = 2136) cultured in Russia from 2009 to 2012.

Full size image

Neisseria gonorrhoeaemultiantigen sequence typing (NG-MAST)

The examined gonococcal isolates from 2011 (n = 421) and 2012 (n = 100) were assigned to 183 NG-MAST STs. Hundred twenty-two (66.7%) of these STs were not previously described. The most prevalent STs were ST807 (n = 41, 7.9% of isolates), ST5714 (n = 32, 6.1%), ST228 (n = 14, 2.7%), ST5042 (n = 11, 2.1%), ST1152 (n = 10, 1.9%), ST5825 (n = 10, 1.9%), ST5937 (n = 10, 1.9%), and ST5718 (n = 9, 1.9%). Five STs were represented by eight isolates, two STs by seven isolates, eight STs by six isolates, seven STs by five isolates, eight STs by four isolates, 18 STs by three isolates, 33 STs two isolates and remaining 98 STs were represented by single isolates.

In general, the most prevalent STs such as ST807, ST5714, ST228, ST5042, ST1152, ST5825, ST5937, and ST5718 had relatively low MICs of ceftriaxone, ranging from ≤0.016 mg/L to 0.064 mg/L. Notable, the two gonococcal isolates obtained in 2011 with a ceftriaxone MIC of 0.25 mg/L (resistant according to the European EUCAST breakpoint) were assigned as ST2861 and ST5929. One isolate assigned as ST1407, which is an internationally spread multidrug resistant gonococcal clone [8, 12, 15, 19, 20, 34, 35], was also identified in 2012 (in Ryazan, Central Federal District). This isolate was resistant to ciprofloxacin and, with exception of ceftriaxone, had similar antimicrobial resistance profile as ST1407 isolates described internationally. Surprisingly, the MIC of ceftriaxone was only 0.008 mg/L. Furthermore, the spectinomycin resistant isolates in 2011 and 2012 (n = 50) belonged to 32 different STs and were isolated in four of the seven Federal Districts of Russia. The most prevalent STs among the spectinomycin resistant isolates were ST5714 (n = 5), ST807 (n = 4), ST21 (n = 3), and ST5825 (n = 3).

Discussion

The present study describes the antimicrobial resistance in N. gonorrhoeae isolates cultured from 2009 to 2012, and molecular epidemiological characteristics (NG-MAST) of N. gonorrhoeae isolates, obtained in 2011–2012, in Russia. Previously, only two minor NG-MAST studies examining Russian gonococcal isolates have been performed. Both these studies examined isolates cultured in 2004–2005 [29, 30] and, accordingly, no knowledge of the NG-MAST STs of gonococcal strains currently circulating in Russia is available.

High prevalences of resistance to ciprofloxacin and penicillin G were observed. Similar high levels of resistance to these antimicrobials have been described from basically worldwide [3, 6–12, 21]. Accordingly, ciprofloxacin and penicillin G should not be recommended for empiric first-line antimicrobial monotherapy of gonorrhoea in Russia or in most other countries worldwide. Nevertheless, interestingly β-lactamase producing N. gonorrhoeae strains have remained rare in Russia [24, 25, 29] as well as in other independent countries of the former Soviet Union, e.g. Belarus [36]. This may indicate that penicillins have not been widely used for treatment of gonorrhoea in many years and/or that no imported β-lactamase producing gonococcal strains have been established and resulted in an endemic spread in Russia during several years. The prevalence of resistance to azithromycin was also high, particularly during the latest years, that is, 16-17% in 2011–2012. However, no isolates with high-level resistance to azithromycin (MIC ≥ 256 mg/L), which have been described from several other countries [37–42], have yet been identified in Russia. Worryingly, gonococcal isolates with resistance to spectinomycin, which are exceedingly rare internationally [3, 6–9, 12], were identified in all the surveyed years and in four of the seven Federal Districts of Russia. In earlier Russian studies [24, 25], spectinomycin resistant gonococcal isolates have also been found in all the seven Federal Districts of Russia. In the present study, the spectinomycin resistant isolates (n = 50) belonged to 32 different STs. Accordingly, they did not represent any clonal spread and spectinomycin resistance has been selected in many different gonococcal strains. Spectinomycin remains also available and used for treatment of gonorrhoea in Russia, that is, despite that the level of use has decreased substantially during the last two decades. Fortunately, the resistant isolates had a spectinomycin MIC of maximum 128–256 mg/L and no isolates with high-level resistance to spectinomycin (MIC ≥ 1024 mg/L) [43–45] have yet been found in Russia. The molecular mechanisms for this low-level resistance to spectinomycin are commonly specific amino acid alterations in the ribosomal protein S5 [45, 46], which has been selected by frequent use of spectinomycin. Using the CLSI breakpoints [32], all isolates from 2009 to 2012 were susceptible to ceftriaxone (MIC ≤ 0.25 mg/L). However, using the European EUCAST breakpoint (http://www.eucast.org), in total 58 (2.7%) of the isolates during 2009–2012 were resistant to ceftriaxone (MIC > 0.125 mg/L). Interestingly, the prevalence of these ceftriaxone resistant isolates decreased significantly (P < 0.05), i.e. from 4.0% in 2009 to 0% in 2012. Still no treatment failure of gonorrhoea with ceftriaxone has been verified in Russia, however, isolates with a ceftriaxone MIC of ≤0.25 mg/L have resulted in failures to treat pharyngeal gonorrhoea with ceftriaxone in other countries [13–15, 17, 18]. Similar increases in the susceptibility to extended-spectrum cephalosporins such as cefixime and ceftriaxone have recently been reported from the United Kingdom [47], Slovenia [48] and India [49]. The reasons for this remain unknown, however, this might indicate that mostly appropriate treatment with ceftriaxone (in adequately high dose and quality) with or without additional azithromycin (in dual therapy regimens) are used for treatment of gonorrhoea internationally. Accordingly, the use of less potent antimicrobials for treatment might have decreased. It is essential to continuously monitor, using MIC determination, the spread of gonococcal strains with multidrug resistance and resistance to particularly ceftriaxone, spectinomycin and azithromycin and, ideally, also the antimicrobial use/misuse in Russia as well as internationally. Most worryingly, the number of isolates examined in the RU-GASP has substantially decreased the latest years, which is due to both the increased use of genetic detection of N. gonorrhoeae for diagnosis of gonorrhoea as well as lack of sufficient financial and political commitments. A national surveillance, including representative gonococcal isolates from all the seven Russian Federal Districts, of gonococcal AMR (ideally also treatment failures) is imperative in Russia. Essential actions aiming to implement the recently published international action/response plans [21, 22], and strengthen the culture capacity and surveillance of AMR and test-of-cure in Russia have been initiated. It is also crucial to establish and quality assure regional and national GASPs in the additional independent countries of the former Soviet Union and, for this purpose, national and international support, including political and financial commitment, is essential [3–5].

In Russia, for first-line empiric treatment of uncomplicated urogenital or extragenital gonorrhoea ceftriaxone (250 mg, intramuscularly), cefixime (400 mg, orally) or spectinomycin (2 g, intramuscularly) is recommended [27]. In practice, also fluoroquinolones, azithromycin, and other cephalosporins can be used in the treatment, and antimicrobials are easily available “over-the-counter”, which needs to be abandoned. Based on the present RU-GASP data and resistance emergence and spread worldwide [3, 6–20, 24, 25, 47, 48], ceftriaxone should be the only option for first-line empiric antimicrobial monotherapy of gonorrhoea and it should be considered to increase the dose to 500 mg and/or add azithromycin (1–2 g) in the recommended first-line treatment, which is in line with the US CDC [50] and European [51] treatment guidelines. Furthermore, spectinomycin should be the alternative treatment option and only used when ceftriaxone is not available or the patient suffers from a severe β-lactam allergy. However, if pharyngeal gonorrhoea has not been excluded azithromycin is recommended to be added to the spectinomycin regimen. Cefixime, which is less potent compared to ceftriaxone and for which no data exist in Russia, should be excluded from the recommended first-line empiric treatment. This antimicrobial should only be used when injection therapy is refused by patient and should then ideally be used together with azithromycin, which is in line with the recently revised US CDC [50] and European [51] treatment guidelines. The dual antimicrobial regimens will also effectively eradicate any concomitant Chlamydia trachomatis infection.

NG-MAST analysis showed a diversified population of N. gonorrhoeae in Russia during 2011–2012, with 183 different NG-MAST STs identified among the examined 521 isolates. The high number of unique STs (n = 98) and STs that have not been previously described (n = 122) may be associated with the low number of cultured gonococcal isolates from each surveillance site, suboptimal diagnostics (only random gonorrhoea patients and/or isolates are identified), contact tracing (sexual contacts are not traced) and epidemiological surveillance (sexual transmission chains spreading an identical ST are not identified or followed-up), STs evolved locally in Russia (STs are not previously described because only two minor NG-MAST studies examining isolates from 2004–2005 [29, 30] have been previously performed in Russia) or imported from abroad. Nevertheless, some main ST clusters of, e.g., ST807 (n = 41, 7.9% of isolates), ST5714 (n = 30), ST228 (n = 14), ST5042 (n = 11), ST1152 (n = 10), ST5825 (n = 10), and ST5937 (n = 10) were identified, which indicate some larger sexual transmission chains.

Conclusions

In Russia, during 2009–2012 the diversified gonococcal population showed a high resistance to ciprofloxacin, penicillin G and azithromycin. Isolates with low-level resistance to spectinomycin were also identified each year. In general, the MICs of ceftriaxone were relatively high, however, they were decreasing significantly (P < 0.05) from 2009 to 2012. Ceftriaxone should be the only recommended first-line antimicrobial for empiric monotherapy of gonorrhoea in Russia. It should also be considered to increase the dose of ceftriaxone to 500 mg and/or add azithromycin (1–2 g) in the recommended first-line treatment, that is, use a dual antimicrobial therapy regimen [50, 51]. Spectinomycin should be the second-line and only used when ceftriaxone is not available or the patient suffers from a severe β-lactam allergy. Regular, quality assured national and international surveillance of AMR (ideally also treatment failures) in N. gonorrhoeae is crucial and it is essential to further strengthen the RU-GASP in Russia.

References

  1. World Health Organization: Global incidence and prevalence of selected curable sexually transmitted infections - 2008. 2012, Geneva: World Health Organization, Available at: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/rtis/2008_STI_estimates.pdf (Accessed: June 3, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control: Sexually Transmitted Infections in Europe 2011. 2013, Stockholm: ECDC, Available at: http://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/publications/sexually-transmitted-infections-europe-2011.pdf (Accessed: June 3, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Unemo M, Ison CA, Cole M, Spiteri G, van de Laar M, Khotenashvili L: Gonorrhoea and gonococcal antimicrobial resistance surveillance networks in the WHO European Region, including the independent countries of the former Soviet Union. Sex Transm Infect. 2013, 89 (Suppl 4): iv42-iv46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Unemo M, Shipitsyna E, Domeika M: Recommended antimicrobial treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhoea in 2009 in 11 East European countries: implementation of a Neisseria gonorrhoeae antimicrobial susceptibility programme in this region is crucial. Sex Transm Infect. 2010, 86: 442-444.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Unemo M, Shipitsyna E, Domeika M: Gonorrhoea surveillance, laboratory diagnosis and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in 11 countries of the eastern part of the WHO European region. APMIS. 2011, 119: 643-649.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tapsall JW, Ndowa F, Lewis DA, Unemo M: Meeting the public health challenge of multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2009, 7: 821-834.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lewis DA: The gonococcus fights back: is this time a knock out?. Sex Transm Infect. 2010, 86: 415-421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Unemo M, Nicholas RA: Emergence of multi-drug resistant, extensively drug-resistant and untreatable gonorrhea. Future Microbiol. 2012, 7: 1401-1422.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Tapsall J: Antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. WHO/CDS/DRS/2001.3:16. 2001, Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Whiley DM, Goire N, Lahra MM, Donovan B, Limnios AE, Nissen MD, Sloots TP: The ticking time bomb: escalating antibiotic resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae is a public health disaster in waiting. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012, 67: 2059-2061.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bolan GA, Sparling PF, Wasserheit JN: The emerging threat of untreatable gonococcal infection. N Engl J Med. 2012, 366: 485-487.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Spiteri G, Cole M, Unemo M, Hoffmann S, Ison C, van de Laar M: The European Gonococcal Antimicrobial Surveillance Programme (Euro-GASP)--a sentinel approach in the European Union (EU)/European Economic Area (EEA). Sex Transm Infect. 2013, 89 (Suppl 4): iv16-iv18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tapsall J, Read P, Carmody C, Bourne C, Ray S, Limnios A, Sloots T, Whiley D: Two cases of failed ceftriaxone treatment in pharyngeal gonorrhoea verified by molecular microbiological methods. J Med Microbiol. 2009, 58: 683-687.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Unemo M, Golparian D, Hestner A: Ceftriaxone treatment failure of pharyngeal gonorrhoea verified by international recommendations, Sweden, July 2010. Euro Surveill. 2011, 16 (6): 19792-

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Unemo M, Golparian D, Potocnik M, Jeverica S: Treatment failure of pharyngeal gonorrhoea with internationally recommended first-line ceftriaxone verified in Slovenia, September 2011. Euro Surveill. 2012, 17 (25): 20200-

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ohnishi M, Golparian D, Shimuta K, Saika T, Hoshina S, Iwasaku K, Nakayama S, Kitawaki J, Unemo M: Is Neisseria gonorrhoeae initiating a future era of untreatable gonorrhea?: detailed characterization of the first strain with high-level resistance to ceftriaxone. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011, 55: 3538-3545.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen YM, Stevens K, Tideman R, Zaia A, Tomita T, Fairley CK, Lahra M, Whiley D, Hogg G: Failure of ceftriaxone 500 mg to eradicate pharyngeal gonorrhoea, Australia. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013, 68: 1445-1447.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Read PJ, Limnios EA, McNulty A, Whiley D, Lahra LM: One confirmed and one suspected case of pharyngeal gonorrhoea treatment failure following 500 mg ceftriaxone in Sydney, Australia. Sex Health. 2013, 10: 460-462.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Unemo M, Golparian D, Nicholas R, Ohnishi M, Gallay A, Sednaoui P: High-level cefixime- and ceftriaxone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae in France: novel penA mosaic allele in a successful international clone causes treatment failure. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012, 56: 1273-1280.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Cámara J, Serra J, Ayats J, Bastida T, Carnicer-Pont D, Andreu A, Ardanuy C: Molecular characterization of two high-level ceftriaxone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates detected in Catalonia, Spain. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012, 67: 1858-1860.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. World Health Organization (WHO), Department of Reproductive Health and Research: Global action plan to control the spread and impact of antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. 2012, Geneva: WHO, 1-36. Available at: http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/rtis/9789241503501 (Accessed: June 3, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC): Response plan to control and manage the threat of multidrug-resistant gonorrhoea in Europe. 2012, Stockholm: ECDC, 1-23. Available at: http://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/1206-ECDC-MDR-gonorrhoea-response-plan.pdf (Accessed: June 3, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Cephalosporin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae public health response plan. 2012, 1-43. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment/ceph-r-responseplanjuly30-2012.pdf (Accessed: June 3, 2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kubanova A, Kubanov A, Frigo N, Sidorenko S, Priputnevich T, Vachnina T, Al-Khafaji N, Polevshikova S, Solomka V, Domeika M, Unemo M: National surveillance of antimicrobial susceptibility in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in 2005–2006 and recommendations of first-line antimicrobial drugs for gonorrhoea treatment in Russia. Sex Transm Infect. 2008, 84: 285-289.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kubanova A, Frigo N, Kubanov A, Sidorenko S, Lesnaya I, Polevshikova S, Solomka V, Bukanov N, Domeika M, Unemo M: The Russian gonococcal antimicrobial susceptibility programme (RU-GASP) – national resistance prevalence in 2007 and 2008, and trends during 2005–2008. Euro Surveill. 2010, 15 (14): 19533-

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Unemo M, Fasth O, Fredlund H, Limnios A, Tapsall JW: Phenotypic and genetic characterization of the 2008 WHO Neisseria gonorrhoeae reference strain panel intended for global quality assurance and quality control of gonococcal antimicrobial resistance surveillance for public health purposes. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009, 63: 1142-1151.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Expert counsil of the Russian society of dermatovenereologists and cosmetologists: Clinical recommendations on the management of patients with sexually transmitted infections and urogenital infections//Moscow, Russia. 2012, In Russian: Izdatel'skiy dom Delovoy ekspress. - 112 S

    Google Scholar 

  28. Unemo M, Dillon JA: Review and international recommendation of methods for typing Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates and their implications for improved knowledge of gonococcal epidemiology, treatment, and biology. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011, 24: 447-458.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Unemo M, Vorobieva V, Firsova N, Ababkova T, Leniv I, Haldorsen BC, Fredlund H, Skogen V: The Neisseria gonorrhoeae population transmitted in Arkhangelsk, Russia in 2004 – phenotypic and genotypic heterogeneity. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007, 13: 873-878.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ilina EN, Oparina NY, Shitikov EA, Borovskaya AD, Govorun VM: Molecular surveillance of clinical Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates in Russia. J Clin Microbiol. 2010, 48: 3681-3689.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Tapsall JW, Cheng JK: Rapid identification of pathogenic species of Neisseria by carbohydrate degradation tests: importance of glucose in media used for preparation of inocula. Br J Ven Dis. 1981, 14: 249-252.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 24th informational supplement, CLSI document M100-S24. 2014, Wayne, PA: CLSI

    Google Scholar 

  33. Martin IM, Ison CA, Aanensen DM, Fenton KA, Spratt BG: Rapid sequence-based identification of gonococcal transmission clusters in a large metropolitan area. J Infect Dis. 2004, 189: 1497-1505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chisholm SA, Unemo M, Quaye N, Johansson E, Cole MJ, Ison CA, Van de Laar MJ: Molecular epidemiological typing within the European gonococcal antimicrobial resistance surveillance programme reveals predominance of a multidrug-resistant clone. Euro Surveill. 2013, 18 (3): 20358-

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Grad YH, Kirkcaldy RD, Trees D, Dordel J, Harris SR, Goldstein E, Weinstock H, Parkhill J, Hanage WP, Bentley S, Lipsitch M: Genomic epidemiology of Neisseria gonorrhoeae with reduced susceptibility to cefixime in the USA: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2014, 14: 220-226.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Glazkova S, Golparian D, Titov L, Pankratova N, Suhabokava N, Shimanskaya I, Domeika M, Unemo M: Antimicrobial susceptibility/resistance and molecular epidemiological characteristics of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in 2009 in Belarus. APMIS. 2011, 119: 537-542.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Palmer HM, Young H, Winter A, Dave J: Emergence and spread of azithromycin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Scotland. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008, 62: 490-494.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chisholm SA, Dave J, Ison CA: High-level azithromycin resistance occurs in Neisseria gonorrhoeae as a result of a single point mutation in the 23S rRNA genes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012, 54: 3812-3816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Starnino S, Stefanelli P, Neisseria gonorrhoeae Italian Study Group I: Azithromycin-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains recently isolated in Italy. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009, 63: 1200-1204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Galarza PG, Abad R, Canigia LF, Buscemi L, Pagano I, Oviedo C, Vázquez JA: New mutation in 23S rRNA gene associated with high level of azithromycin resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010, 54: 1652-1653.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Katz AR, Komeya AY, Soge OO, Kiaha MI, Lee MV, Wasserman GM, Maningas EV, Whelen AC, Kirkcaldy RD, Shapiro SJ, Bolan GA, Holmes KK: Neisseria gonorrhoeae with high-level resistance to azithromycin: case report of the first isolate identified in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2012, 54: 841-843.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Unemo M, Golparian D, Hellmark B: First three Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates with high-level resistance to azithromycin in Sweden: a threat to currently available dual-antimicrobial regimens for treatment of gonorrhea?. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013, 58: 624-625.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Boslego JW, Tramont EC, Takafuji ET, Diniega BM, Mitchell BS, Small JW, Khan WN, Stein DC: Effect of spectinomycin use on the prevalence of spectinomycin-resistant and penicillinase-producing Neisseria gonorrhoeae. N Engl J Med. 1987, 317: 272-278.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Galimand M, Gerbaud G, Courvalin P: Spectinomycin resistance in Neisseria spp. due to mutations in 16S rRNA. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000, 44: 1365-1366.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Unemo M, Golparian D, Skogen V, Olsen AO, Moi H, Syversen G, Hjelmevoll SO: Neisseria gonorrhoeae strain with high-level resistance to spectinomycin due to a novel resistance mechanism (mutated ribosomal protein S5) verified in Norway. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013, 57: 1057-1061.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Ilina EN, Malakhova MV, Bodoev IN, Oparina NY, Filimonova AV, Govorun VM: Mutation in ribosomal protein S5 leads to spectinomycin resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Front Microbiol. 2013, 4: 186-

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Ison CA, Town K, Obi C, Chisholm S, Hughes G, Livermore DM, Lowndes CM, and GRASP collaborative group: Decreased susceptibility to cephalosporins among gonococci: data from the Gonococcal Resistance to Antimicrobials Surveillance Programme (GRASP) in England and Wales, 2007–2011. Lancet Infect Dis. 2013, 13: 762-768.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Jeverica S, Golparian D, Maticic M, Potočnik M, Mlakar B, Unemo M: Phenotypic and molecular characterization of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates from Slovenia, 2006-12: rise and fall of the multidrug-resistant NG-MAST genogroup 1407 clone?. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014, 69: 1517-1525.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Bala M, Kakran M, Singh V, Sood S, Ramesh V, Members of WHO GASP SEAR Network: Monitoring antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in selected countries of the WHO South-East Asia Region between 2009 and 2012: a retrospective analysis. Sex Transm Infect. 2013, 89 (Suppl 4): iv28-iv35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Update to CDC's sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010: Oral cephalosporins no longer recommended for treatment of gonococcal infections. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012, 61: 590-594.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Bignell C, Unemo M, on behalf of the European STI Guidelines Editorial Board: European guideline on the diagnosis and treatment of gonorrhoea in adults. Int J STD AIDS. 2013, 24: 85-92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present work was supported by the Federal target program of Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation "Prevention and Control of Social Diseases (2007–2012 years)", subprogram "Sexually transmitted infections". We are grateful for the collaboration of the heads and staff of all the involved surveillance sites. Special thanks to M Tarasova, A Belikov, L Kiseleva, T Smirnova, A Amozov, K Baryschkov, N Kirpicheva, M Zemzov, M Glusmin, V Dumchenko, V Temnikov, S Ribalkin, I Shakurov, I Minullin, V Merzlyakov, N Krasnova, V Karyanov, O Sharisheva, N Dolgenitsina, Y Novikov, L Berdizkaya, V Onipchenko, M Arshynsky, G Katzina, E Krug, I Letunova, S Rumjanzev, D Schnaider, I Klemenova, G Jakovenko.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Тhe State Research Center of Dermatology, Venereology and Сosmetology of The Russian Ministry of Health (SRCDVC), Moscow, Russia

    Anna Kubanova, Alexey Kubanov, Nataliya Frigo, Viktoria Solomka, Vera Semina, Denis Vorobyev & Rafil Khairullin

  2. WHO Collaborating Centre for Gonorrhoea and Other STIs, National Reference Laboratory for Pathogenic Neisseria, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology, Örebro University Hospital, SE-701 85, Örebro, Sweden

    Magnus Unemo

Authors
  1. Anna Kubanova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexey Kubanov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nataliya Frigo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Viktoria Solomka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Vera Semina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Denis Vorobyev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Rafil Khairullin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Magnus Unemo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magnus Unemo.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

AK, AK, NF, and MU designed and initiated the study. NF, RK, DV, VSe, and VSo coordinated and performed all the laboratory analyses. AK, NF and MU analysed and interpreted all the data, and wrote a first draft of the paper. All authors read, commented on and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access  This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kubanova, A., Kubanov, A., Frigo, N. et al. Russian gonococcal antimicrobial susceptibility programme (RU-GASP) – resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae during 2009–2012 and NG-MAST genotypes in 2011 and 2012. BMC Infect Dis 14, 342 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-342

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-342

Keywords

  • Neisseria gonorrhoeae
  • Gonorrhoea
  • Antimicrobial resistance
  • National surveillance
  • Russian gonococcal antimicrobial susceptibility programme (RU-GASP)
  • Extended-spectrum cephalosporins (ESCs)
  • Ceftriaxone
  • Treatment
  • N. gonorrhoeae multiantigen sequence typing (NG-MAST)
  • Russia

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us