Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

Serovar D and E of serogroup B induce highest serological responses in urogenital Chlamydia trachomatisinfections

  • †1,
  • †2,
  • 3, 4,
  • 5, 6,
  • 7,
  • 3,
  • 1,
  • 8, 9, 10,
  • 11, 12,
  • 1 and
  • 1, 13Email author
†Contributed equally
BMC Infectious Diseases201414:3

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-3

©  Verweij et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

  • Received: 20 September 2013
  • Accepted: 11 December 2013
  • Published:
Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Chlamydia trachomatis is the most prevalent bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) worldwide. A strong link between C. trachomatis serogroup/serovar and serological response has been suggested in a previous preliminary study. The aim of the current study was to confirm and strengthen those findings about serological IgG responses in relation to C. trachomatis serogroups and serovars.

Methods

The study population (n = 718) consisted of two patient groups with similar characteristics of Dutch STI clinic visitors. We performed genotyping of serovars and used titre based and quantitative commercially available ELISA kits (medac Diagnostika) to determine specific serum IgG levels. Optical density (OD) values generated by both tests were used to calculate the IgG titres (cut-off 1:50). Analyses were conducted stratified by gender.

Results

We observed very significant differences when comparing the median IgG titres of three serogroups, B, C and I: in women for B vs. C: p < 0.0001 (median titres B 200 vs. C <50); B vs. I: p < 0.0001 (200 vs. 50), and in men for B vs. C: p = 0.0006 (150 vs. <50); B vs. I: p = 0.0001 (150 vs. <50); C vs. I was not significant for both sexes. Serovars D and E of serogroup B had the highest median IgG titres compared to the other serovars in both men and women: 200 and 200 vs. ≤ 100 for women and 100 and 200 vs. ≤ 75 for men, respectively.

Conclusions

This study shows that B group serovars induce higher serological responses compared to the C and I group serovars in vivo in both men and women.

Keywords

  • Chlamydia trachomatis
  • Serological response
  • Serovar
  • Serogroup
  • IgG
  • Antibodies

Background

Chlamydia trachomatis is the most prevalent bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) worldwide. The clinical course of infection is frequently asymptomatic resulting in patients not seeking treatment. Untreated urogenital C. trachomatis infections may give rise to late complications, including pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, and sub- or infertility [1]. Assessment of serological responses to the bacterium resulted in a classification in serovars [2]. Nowadays, 19 different serovars are known, usually causing conjunctival and urogenital infections. The serovars are subdivided in three serogroups based on phylogenetic comparisons of the ompA gene. Serogroup B contains serovars B, Ba, D, Da, E, L1, L2, L2a; serogroup C contains: A, C, H, I, Ia, J, K, L3; serogroup I contains: F, G, Ga [3, 4]. Identification and typing of serovars is currently done by rapid PCR-based techniques [5–7]. Geographical distribution of the serogroups is very similar worldwide on a national level, but there are variations in distribution within cities [8, 9]. The most prevalent serovars worldwide are D, E, and F [10, 11].

Several studies have shown associations between urogenital serovars and severity of clinical symptoms and the course of C. trachomatis infections [11, 12], although conflicting data have also been reported [13, 14]. It has been shown that serovar K is associated with abnormal vaginal discharge, and serovar Ga is associated with dysuria in men [12]. Van Duynhoven et al.[11] reported that infections with serovars D/D-, H, and K appeared to be associated with inflammation, as shown by the presence of 10 or more leukocytes per microscopic field (magnification, x400). This was determined in first-void urine samples from men and in gram-stained cervical smears from women. However, this was not statistically significant. A comparison study of serovars D and H in a murine model shows that serovar H elementary bodies (EB) are more cytotoxic than EBs of serovar D, but the serovar D EBs have a longer duration of infection [15]. In all studies however, the B group serovars are most prevalent and the C group serovars least common, suggesting different immunological responses by the host to serovars/serogroups. This may be of clinical interest since an association was observed between higher antibody responses and severity of tubal pathology [16].

In a previous study [17] we measured immunoglobulin (Ig) G titres in 235 C. trachomatis infected patients. For these measurements we used a quantitative ELISA kit developed by medac Diagnostika. We observed that the most prevalent serogroup B induced significantly higher serological IgG responses than serogroups C and I [17]. These results suggest a relation between serovars and the serological responses in human and potentially offer a partial explanation of the geographical prevalence of specific serovars. These results, however, have not been verified in different patient populations, nor have they been confirmed using other serological tests.

The aim of this study was to confirm and expand our previous study concerning serological IgG responses in relation to C. trachomatis serogroups and serovars. We used a study population consisting of two different patient groups and for our experiments we made use of titre-based and quantitative serological ELISA assays. We explored whether or not the most prevalent serovars (D, E, and F) induced the highest serological responses, in addition to analysing at serogroup level only as has been done previously [17].

Methods

Patient populations and C. trachomatisdetection

The study included samples from 718 C. trachomatis infected patients, derived from two different patient groups. The first group (Study 1) was obtained from 357 microbiologically confirmed C. trachomatis patients (as determined by PACE2 assay, Gen Probe) obtained from the STI outpatient clinic (n = 312) and the department of obstetrics and gynaecology (n = 45) in The Hague, the Netherlands. The samples include cervical and/or vaginal swabs, urethral swabs, and urine specimens. Serum samples were collected from all patients. These samples were stored in the period January to October 2008. Reasons for patients visiting either the STI clinic or gynaecology department and the collection of demographic data are described elsewhere [17]. To prevent possible bias in serological responses we excluded patients with a multiple site infection or mixed infection, and patients with an infection other than the urethral tract or cervicovaginal tract (n = 70). A total number of 287 patients (149 women and 138 men) were used for analyses, of which 82 were unique compared to the previous study [17].

The second patient group (Study 2) included 361 C. trachomatis infected women (as determined by COBAS AMPLICOR, Hoffman – La Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Characteristics are described elsewhere [18]. In short, cervical swabs were taken and serum was collected from women attending an STI outpatient clinic in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Demographical and clinical data were available and informed consent was obtained [18]. Ethnicity in both patient groups was self-reported, which has been shown a highly valid and representative marker of ethnicity in this context [19]. Figure 1 shows a flowchart summarising the in- and exclusion criteria and the groups analysed.
Figure 1
Figure 1

The figure shows a flowchart summarising the in- and exclusion criteria and the groups analysed. *: reference [17]. NAAT 1: PACE2 assay. NAAT 2: COBAS AMPLICOR. Typing 1: C. trachomatis-DT assay. Typing 2: sequencing VD2.

Ethical approval

The Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act (WMO, Dutch Law) stating official approval of the study by the Medical Ethical Committee does not apply to our anonymous human material collected (MEC Letter reference: # 10.17.0046).

C. trachomatisgenotyping

Serogroup and serovar determination for Study 1 was performed with the C. trachomatis-DT assay (Labo Biomedical Products BV, Rijswijk, the Netherlands) as described elsewhere [8]. Shortly, DNA was extracted from the swabs and urine samples to detect C. trachomatis for confirmation of the PACE2 assay. After confirmation, genotyping was performed using a reverse hybridization probe line blot with a probe for the cryptic plasmid and a probe for the three serogroups and all serovars.

C. trachomatis genotyping in Study 2 was performed by means of PCR based RFLP analyses as described previously or, for the second half by sequencing the VD2 region of the ompA gene [20].

C. trachomatisserology

Study 1: determination of C. trachomatis IgG levels in serum of all patients was done by pELISA (Chlamydia trachomatis-IgG-ELISA plus kit (medac Diagnostika, Germany)) and was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocols. This is an assay generating quantitative results (Arbitrary Units/ml), based on OD values. These OD values can also be used to calculate the titres. For this study, we calculated the titres to make the results in accordance with the results of Study 2. Cut-off levels for negative, grey zone, and positive C. trachomatis IgG serology were used as described by the manufacturer (cut-off 1:50).

Study 2: determination of IgG levels was done previously by Chlamydia trachomatis-IgG-ELISA (medac Diagnostika, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Titres ≥ 1:50 were considered positive.

Similar titre calculations for both Medac assays were performed as described by the manufacturer’s instructions.

Statistical analyses

Since different antibody levels against C. trachomatis have been described in men and women [21], we analysed men and women separately, except when stated differently. Mann–Whitney U tests were used to compare median titres between the serogroups (B vs. C; B vs. I; C vs. I). Mann–Whitney U tests were used to compare median titres of serovars within serogrous. Analyses were performed using Prof. Avery’s ‘utest’ program [22]. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Characteristics and serovar distribution between the two patient groups (Study 1 and 2) were compared. We compared serological distribution of the serogroups and serovars, and we compared age between the two individual patient groups. We did not observe any significant differences in distribution of serological titres between both patient groups in total, or between ethnic subgroups (general distribution: 57.3% Dutch Caucasian; 8.0% Surinam; 8.5% Dutch Antilles; 3.8% North African; 2.4% western European (non Dutch); 2.0% eastern European; 18.0% other nationalities). We observed no differences in mean age and distribution of the serological titres per serovar and serogroup between both patient groups in total, or between the ethnic subgroups. Therefore we combined both groups and analysed them as one.

Serogroup analyses

The serological titres per serogroup and per serovar are shown in Table 1 and Figure 2 for both men and women. Serogroup B had significantly higher median IgG titres compared to the C and I serogroups analysed in both groups. Female group: B vs. C: p < 0.0001 (p: 2.0×10-6; 200 vs. <50); B vs. I: p < 0.0001 (p: 2.0×10-6; 200 vs. 50); male group: B vs. C: p = 0.0006 (150 vs. <50); B vs. I: p = 0.0001 (150 vs. <50). No significant differences were observed between serogroups C and I. For women C vs. I: p = 0.14 (<50 vs. 50), for men C vs. I: p = 0.65 (<50 vs. <50).
Table 1

Median serological IgG titres in men and women subdivided by serogroup and serovar

Serogroup

n

%

Median titre IgG

Range

Serovar

n

%

Median titre IgG

Range

Women (n = 510)

B

262

51.8

200*

<50 – 3200

D/Da/D-

45

8.8

200

<50 – 3200

     

E

217

42.2

200

<50 – 1600

C

89

17.3

<50

<50 – 800

H

20

3.9

75

<50 – 800

     

I/Ia/I-

36

7.0

<50

<50 – 400

     

J

20

3.9

<50

<50 – 400

     

K

13

2.5

100

<50 – 800

I

159

30.9

50

<50 – 800

F

127

24.7

50

<50 – 800

     

G/Ga

32

6.2

100

<50 – 400

Men (n = 138)

B

66

47.8

150†

<50 – 400

D/Da/D-

11

8.0

100

<50 – 400

     

E

55

39.9

200

<50 – 400

C

23

16.7

<50

<50 – 400

H

0

0.0

n/a

n/a

     

I/Ia/I-

3

2.2

50

<50 – 50

     

J

12

8.7

<50

<50 – 200

     

K

8

5.8

75

<50 – 400

I

49

35.5

<50

<50 – 400

F

30

21.7

50

50 – 400

     

G/Ga

19

13.8

<50

<50 – 400

*: B-group significantly different from C and I group (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001) respectively. †: B-group significantly different from C and I group (p = 0.0006 and p = 0.0001) respectively.

Figure 2
Figure 2

The figure shows the median titres for three serogroups in men and women, depicted as a boxplot. The upper and lower limit of the box represents the first and third quartile. The cross represents the median of the group. The upper and lower limit of the range is presented as horizontal bars on a vertical axis. The large range between upper and lower limits are mostly caused by single samples that might be considered outliers. The distribution of the titres is best represented by the medians, and the first and third quartile limits.

Serovar analyses

Table 1 shows the median IgG titres per serovar for both women and men. At the serovar level in the female group, serovars D and E demonstrated the highest median IgG, followed by serovars K, H, G, and F. Serovars J and I showed the lowest titres. In the Dutch male group serovars D and E induced the highest median IgG titres, followed by serovar G, K, F, J, and I. Serovar H was not present in this group.

In-group analyses

Within the serogroups, no difference was observed between serovars D and E in both men and women. For females, median IgG titres in serovar J infected patients were significantly lower compared to serovar K infected patients (p = 0.029; <50 vs. 100). No differences were observed between the other serovars of group C. In serogroup I (serovars F and G) no significant differences were observed in median IgG titres. No differences in serological responses were observed within the serogroups for the male group.

Discussion

This study shows that the most prevalent urogenital C. trachomatis serogroup B causes the highest serological IgG responses. More specifically, both serovars D and E of the B serogroup show higher IgG serological responses than the other serovars. Within serogroup C of the combined Dutch female patient group, we found a small difference between serovar K and J. The results generated in this study may be of clinical interest since an association was observed between antibody response and severity of tubal pathology in an earlier study [16].

We observed higher serological responses in women compared to men for all serovars, but this did not reach statistical significance. Eighty-two samples from Study 1 were unique compared to the previous study after exclusion. These samples showed similar results as compared to the earlier samples [17]. Compared to our previous study [17] of 235 patients, we increased our total study group to 648 patients and differentiated between men and women and confirmed our preliminary results. Both of our studies were performed with the medac ELISA assays. Interestingly, we observed similar results in a group of C. trachomatis infected Danish women (n = 91) using a different C. trachomatis-specific serological IgG test (SeroCT IgG ELISA; Savyon Diagnostics Ltd., Ashdod, Israel) [23]; serogroup B serovars induced the highest serological response compared to the other serovars (unpublished data).

In general, serological C. trachomatis IgG assays perform equally in sensitivity and specificity for these STI cohorts as we have previously shown [23]. Recently a potentially new target for C. trachomatis serology has been evaluated, but this assay is not yet commercially available [24]. This pgp3 assay showed highest relevance for titre positivity over time as compared to other commercially available tests. In our study population no follow-up samples were obtained. It would be of interest to compare the pgp3 assay with the used medac assay since about 30% of the samples had C. trachomatis DNA present without a detectable serological response.

Current detection methods for C. trachomatis are based on PCR techniques for DNA or RNA amplification. We used two different methods for C. trachomatis detection in this study and combined the results. However, the sensitivities and specificities of the current detection methods are very comparable, so no potential bias was introduced [25]. We also used two different serovar determination techniques. Quint et al. compared the C. trachomatis-DT assay to sequencing of the VD2 region for C. trachomatis genotyping. They found equal performances for both methods, so no potential bias was introduced in this study by making use of two different genotyping methods [26].

To gain more knowledge about differences in serological IgG responses between serovars in humans, studies in murine models and at cellular level may give more insight in this biological mechanism. Ito et al.[27] suggested in an earlier study that high serological responses in mice induced by the B serogroup (D and E) may be caused by longer antigenic stimulation, implicating that these high responses just reflect duration of infection. Lyons et al.[15] compared the cytotoxicity between the serovars D and H. They found that serovar H is much more cytotoxic than serovar D. Results of these studies suggested that serovars D and E (of the B serogroup) induce higher serological IgG responses in mice and have a longer duration than the C and I serogroup serovars. In contrast, serovar H is more cytotoxic than serovar D, but induces a lower IgG titre in the murine model. Eckert et al.[28] studied median IFU counts, a measure for virulence, in McCoy cells inoculated with C. trachomatis infected human urethral and cervical specimens. They observed that serovars B, D, and E induced the highest amount of IFU, and serovars I and J induced the smallest amount of IFU. This is a similar trend to what we find with regard to the serological responses in our study population.

By using a large group of patients, this study confirmed our previous results regarding serological responses and based on the size of the study population we were also able to link back to the serovar level [17]. Our results bring us one step closer to understanding the immunological response against a C. trachomatis infection at both serogroup and serovar level, and the variation in serological responses between women and men. From a clinical point of view it would be interesting to identify a relation between serological responses and C. trachomatis serovars/serogroups. However, none of the limited human studies performed on C. trachomatis serovars and the clinical course of infection included serological responses, making it currently impossible to translate our finding into a direct application for the clinic [29–31]. The knowledge generated in this study may aid in the development of a vaccine against C. trachomatis infection for which immunological responses to specific serovars linked to the natural duration of infection might be useful.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study shows that serogroup B induces the highest serological responses compared to the other serogroups. More specifically, serovars D and E show higher serological responses than the other serovars.

Notes

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This work was in line with the European Commission within the Sixth Framework Programme through the EpiGenChlamydia project (contract no. LSHG-CT-2007-037637). See http://www.EpiGenChlamydia.eu for more details.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratory of Immunogenetics, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, VU University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
(2)
Department of Dermatology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
(3)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, MC Haaglanden Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
(4)
Department of Obstetrics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
(5)
DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, The Netherlands
(6)
Department of Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
(7)
Department of Medical Microbiology, MC Haaglanden Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
(8)
STI outpatient clinic, Cluster Infectious Diseases, Public Health Service Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
(9)
Department of Dermatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
(10)
Centre for Infection and Immunity Amsterdam (CINIMA), Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
(11)
The Hague Municipal Health Service, The Hague, The Netherlands
(12)
Anova Health Institute, Khutšo Kurhula Offices, Tzaneen, South Africa
(13)
Institute of Public Health Genomics, Department of Genetics and Cell Biology, Research Institute GROW, Faculty of Health, Medicine & Life Sciences, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands

References

  1. Morré SA, Spaargaren J, Ossewaarde JM, Land JA, Bax CJ, Dorr PJ, Oostvogel PM, Vanrompay D, Savelkoul PH, Pannekoek Y, et al: Description of the ICTI consortium: an integrated approach to the study of Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Drugs Today (Barc ). 2006, 42 (Suppl A): 107-114.Google Scholar
  2. Brunelle BW, Sensabaugh GF: The ompA gene in Chlamydia trachomatis differs in phylogeny and rate of evolution from other regions of the genome. Infect Immun. 2006, 74: 578-585. 10.1128/IAI.74.1.578-585.2006.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Dean D, Millman K: Molecular and mutation trends analyses of omp1 alleles for serovar E of Chlamydia trachomatis. Implications for the immunopathogenesis of disease. J Clin Invest. 1997, 99: 475-483. 10.1172/JCI119182.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Morré SA, Ossewaarde JM, Lan J, van Doornum GJ, Walboomers JM, MacLaren DM, Meijer CJ, van den Brule AJ: Serotyping and genotyping of genital Chlamydia trachomatis isolates reveal variants of serovars Ba, G, and J as confirmed by omp1 nucleotide sequence analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 1998, 36: 345-351.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Meijer A, Morré SA, van den Brule AJ, Savelkoul PH, Ossewaarde JM: Genomic relatedness of Chlamydia isolates determined by amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis. J Bacteriol. 1999, 181: 4469-4475.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Morré SA, Moes R, van Valkengoed IG, Boeke JP, van Eijk JT, Meijer CJ, van den Brule AJ: Genotyping of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens will facilitate large epidemiological studies. J Clin Microbiol. 1998, 36: 3077-3078.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Molano M, Meijer CJ, Morré SA, Pol R, van den Brule AJ: Combination of PCR targeting the VD2 of omp1 and reverse line blot analysis for typing of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis serovars in cervical scrape specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 2935-2939. 10.1128/JCM.42.7.2935-2939.2004.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Quint KD, van Doorn LJ, Kleter B, de Koning MN, van den Munckhof HA, Morré SA, ter Harmsel B, Weiderpass E, Harbers G, Melchers WJ, et al: A highly sensitive, multiplex broad-spectrum PCR-DNA-enzyme immunoassay and reverse hybridization assay for rapid detection and identification of Chlamydia trachomatis serovars. J Mol Diagn. 2007, 9: 631-638. 10.2353/jmoldx.2007.070011.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. White JA: Manifestations and management of lymphogranuloma venereum. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2009, 22: 57-66. 10.1097/QCO.0b013e328320a8ae.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Byrne GI: Chlamydia trachomatis strains and virulence: rethinking links to infection prevalence and disease severity. J Infect Dis. 2010, 201 (Suppl 2): S126-S133.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. van Duynhoven YT, Ossewaarde JM, Derksen-Nawrocki RP, van der Meijden WI, van de Laar MJ: Chlamydia trachomatis genotypes: correlation with clinical manifestations of infection and patients’ characteristics. Clin Infect Dis. 1998, 26: 314-322. 10.1086/516291.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Morré SA, Rozendaal L, van Valkengoed IG, Boeke AJ, van Voorst Vader PC, Schirm J, de Blok S, van den Hoek JA, van Doornum GJ, Meijer CJ, et al: Urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis serovars in men and women with a symptomatic or asymptomatic infection: an association with clinical manifestations?. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38: 2292-2296.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Lampe MF, Wong KG, Stamm WE: Sequence conservation in the major outer membrane protein gene among Chlamydia trachomatis strains isolated from the upper and lower urogenital tract. J Infect Dis. 1995, 172: 589-592. 10.1093/infdis/172.2.589.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Workowski KA, Stevens CE, Suchland RJ, Holmes KK, Eschenbach DA, Pettinger MB, Stamm WE: Clinical manifestations of genital infection due to Chlamydia trachomatis in women: differences related to serovar. Clin Infect Dis. 1994, 19: 756-760. 10.1093/clinids/19.4.756.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lyons JM, Ito JI, Pena AS, Morré SA: Differences in growth characteristics and elementary body associated cytotoxicity between Chlamydia trachomatis oculogenital serovars D and H and Chlamydia muridarum. J Clin Pathol. 2005, 58: 397-401. 10.1136/jcp.2004.021543.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Akande VA, Hunt LP, Cahill DJ, Caul EO, Ford WC, Jenkins JM: Tubal damage in infertile women: prediction using chlamydia serology. Hum Reprod. 2003, 18: 1841-1847. 10.1093/humrep/deg347.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Verweij SP, Bax CJ, Quint KD, Quint WG, van Leeuwen AP, Peters RP, Oostvogel PM, Mutsaers JA, Dorr PJ, Pleijster J, et al: Significantly higher serologic responses of Chlamydia trachomatis B group serovars versus C and I serogroups. Drugs Today (Barc ). 2009, 45 (Suppl B): 135-140.Google Scholar
  18. Ouburg S, Spaargaren J, den Hartog JE, Land JA, Fennema JS, Pleijster J, Pena AS, Morré SA: The CD14 functional gene polymorphism -260C > T is not involved in either the susceptibility to Chlamydia trachomatis infection or the development of tubal pathology. BMC Infect Dis. 2005, 5: 114-10.1186/1471-2334-5-114.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Haasnoot A, Koedijk FD, Op de Coul ELM, Gotz HM, van der Sande MA, van den Broek IV: Comparing two definitions of ethnicity for identifying young persons at risk for chlamydia. Epidemiol Infect. 2012, 140: 951-958. 10.1017/S0950268811001336.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Spaargaren J, Verhaest I, Mooij S, Smit C, Fennema HS, Coutinho RA, Peña AS, Morré SA: Analysis of Chlamydia trachomatis serovar distribution changes in the Netherlands (1986–2002). Sex Transm Infect. 2004, 80: 151-152. 10.1136/sti.2003.006395.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Mardh P-A, Paavonen J, Puolakkainen M: Chlamydia. 1989, New York: Plenum Medical Book CompanyView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Mann–Whitney U Test. http://elegans.swmed.edu/~leon/stats/utest.html,
  23. Morré SA, Munk C, Persson K, Kruger-Kjaer S, van Dijk R, Meijer CJ, van den Brule AJ: Comparison of three commercially available peptide-based immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA assays to microimmunofluorescence assay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antibodies. J Clin Microbiol. 2002, 40: 584-587. 10.1128/JCM.40.2.584-587.2002.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Horner PJ, Wills GS, Reynolds R, Johnson AM, Muir DA, Winston A, Broadbent AJ, Parker D, McClure MO: Effect of time since exposure to Chlamydia trachomatis on chlamydia antibody detection in women: a cross-sectional study. Sex Transm Infect. 2013, 89: 398-403. 10.1136/sextrans-2011-050386.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Land JA, van Bergen JE, Morré SA, Postma MJ: Epidemiology of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women and the cost-effectiveness of screening. Hum Reprod Update. 2010, 16: 189-204. 10.1093/humupd/dmp035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Quint KD, Bom RJ, Bruisten SM, van Doorn LJ, Nassir HN, Melchers WJ, de Vries HJ, Morré SA, Quint WG: Comparison of three genotyping methods to identify Chlamydia trachomatis genotypes in positive men and women. Mol Cell Probes. 2010, 24: 266-270. 10.1016/j.mcp.2010.04.007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ito JI, Lyons JM, Airo-Brown LP: Variation in virulence among oculogenital serovars of Chlamydia trachomatis in experimental genital tract infection. Infect Immun. 1990, 58: 2021-2023.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Eckert LO, Suchland RJ, Hawes SE, Stamm WE: Quantitative Chlamydia trachomatis cultures: correlation of chlamydial inclusion-forming units with serovar, age, sex, and race. J Infect Dis. 2000, 182: 540-544. 10.1086/315738.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Morré SA, van den Brule AJ, Rozendaal L, Boeke AJ, Voorhorst FJ, de Blok S, Meijer CJ: The natural course of asymptomatic Chlamydia trachomatis infections: 45% clearance and no development of clinical PID after one-year follow-up. Int J STD AIDS. 2002, 13 (Suppl 2): 12-18.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Molano M, Meijer CJ, Weiderpass E, Arslan A, Posso H, Franceschi S, Ronderos M, Munoz N, van den Brule AJ: The natural course of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic Colombian women: a 5-year follow-up study. J Infect Dis. 2005, 191: 907-916. 10.1086/428287.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Dean D, Suchland RJ, Stamm WE: Evidence for long-term cervical persistence of Chlamydia trachomatis by omp1 genotyping. J Infect Dis. 2000, 182: 909-916. 10.1086/315778.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

    32. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/14/3/prepub

Copyright

© Verweij et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us