Cardiac device-related endocarditis is a very rare clinical manifestation of S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis disease. This pathogen is a common cause of cellulitis. We here report two cases of cardiac device-related endocarditis due to Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis. Blood cultures yielded this pathogen and both patients had recurrent bacteremia. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography revealed lead vegetations. This is a new description of this pathogen to cause cardiac device-related endocarditis.
Case presentation
The first case is a 79-year-old finnish woman who received a dual-chamber pacemaker for intermittent complete heart block in April 2011. She had three episodes of S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis bacteremia. During first episode she had arthritis of glenohumeral joint. Focus was unknown in the second and third bacteremic episodes. During third bacteremic episode transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) revealed lead vegetation. Patient underwent successful complete system removal. She was treated with benzylpenicillin four million IU six times a day for four weeks intravenously. The second case is a 92-year-old finnish man. A dual-chamber pacemaker was implanted on June 2012 due to total heart block. He had recurrent S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis bacteremia with cellulitis. During the second bacteremic episode transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed because of persistent fever. Echocardiography revealed lead vegetation. Abdominal CT revealed also an abscess in the psoas region. This elderly patient was very fragile, and the pacemaker system was not extracted. Therapy was continued with benzylpenicillin four million IU six times a day for six weeks intravenously and thereafter suppressive treatment with amoksisillin 500 mg three times a day was initiated.
Conclusion
Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis (group C and G streptococci) seldom cause cardiac device endocarditis. Both patients had recurrent bacteremia of S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis and echocardiography revealed cardiac device-related endocarditis. These cases emphasize the importance of considering endocarditis in elderly persons having cardiac devices together with the presence of unexplained bacteremia, fever without focus or persistent fever.
Keywords
Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilisGroup G streptococciCardiac deviceEndocarditisLead extraction
Background
According the current taxonomy, the beta-hemolytic streptococci are divided into Lancefield group A streptococcus (S. pyogenes), Lancefield group B streptococcus (S. agalactiae) and Lancefield group C and G streptococci (S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis). The spectrum of S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis diseases ranges from pharyngitis, tonsillitis and skin and soft-tissue infections such as wound infections, erysipelas and cellulitis to life-threatening necrotizing fasciitis and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome [1]. It can also cause pneumonia, septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, meningitis, endocarditis, puerperal sepsis and bacteremia without focus [1]. Pharyngitis and tonsillitis are the most frequent non-invasive manifestations of S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis disease. Cellulitis is the most common clinical manifestation in S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis bacteremia [1]. This pathogen constitutes a major cause of illness in elderly patients with underlying diseases and skin breakdown [1, 2].
During the past twenty years the use of implantable cardiac devices has increased in the United States [3]. TEE and blood culture are the most important diagnostic tools in cardiac device-related endocarditis. This condition remains a rare but potentially lethal complication of device implantation [4]. Here we describe two cases of cardiac device-related endocarditis due to S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis hospitalized in Tampere University Hospital. Both patients had recurrent bacteremia of S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis origin and echocardiography revealed cardiac device-related endocarditis. These two cases emphasize the importance of considering endocarditis in adults having cardiac devices together with the presence of unexplained bacteremia or fever without focus.
Case presentation
Case 1
A 79-year-old woman received a dual-chamber pacemaker for intermittent complete heart block in April 2011. She was on nifedipin 30 mg daily dose for hypertension. She was admitted to the district hospital in Vammala on January 2013 and diagnosed with S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis septicemia. The focus of bacteremia was unknown. On examination she was feverish and presented rubor and swelling in her tender glenohumeral joint. The arthritis was considered to be reactive, and no aspiration of joint fluid was made. She completed a 13-day course of cefuroxime.
In February 2013 she developed recurrent S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis septicemia and was treated in the district hospital in Vammala. The focus of bacteremia was still unknown. The only symptom was the articular pain in the right glenohumeralis joint, this time without redness or swelling. The electrocardiogram showed sinus rhythm, and there were normal auscultatory findings. Full-body CT showed pericardial and pleural effusion. TTE revealed no vegetation. She received a treatment course of ceftriaxone intravenously for 10 days.
On the 5th of May 2013 she was admitted to Tampere University Hospital with fever and paresis of the right radialis nerve. There was a new systolic murmur heard on the apex. CT of the brain was normal. Two cultures of blood taken on admission yielded S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis. Laboratory test results revealed normal hemoglobin level of 129 g/liter, an elevated leucocyte count of 14× 109 /liter, and an elevated C-reactive protein level of 140 mg/liter. TEE revealed a 15 mm long mass attached to the pacemaker lead on the right atrium (Figure 1). There was a good cardiac function with ejection fraction over 60 per cent, and no signs of valvular vegetations. She was treated with benzylpenicillin at four million IU six times a day. On 16th of May the patient underwent successful complete pacemaker removal. A temporary pacemaker system was implanted due to intermittent total heart block. Samples from the leads extracted yielded no growth. She completed a four-week course of intravenous antibiotics and has subsequently remained well. A new permanent pacemaker was implanted uneventfully on the right side in June 2013.
Figure 1
Transesophageal echocardiography examination of the first patient. The bold arrow points to the two-tailed vegetation in the right atrium. The vegetation was attached to the pacemaker lead.
Case 2
On 30th of July 2013 a 92-year-old man was admitted to Hatanpää City Hospital with fever and cellulitis of the arm. He had a prior history of hypertension, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, polymyalgia rheumatica and a prosthetic knee joint on right side inserted in the year 2008. A dual-chamber pacemaker was implanted in June 2012 due to total heart block. His regular treatment consisted of prednisolon 2.5 mg, furosemid 20 mg, nilvadipin 8 mg, aspirin 100 mg, pantopratsol 40 mg, calcium and vitamin D supplement, magnesium supplement 250 mg, and gabapentin 900 mg daily doses. Blood culture revealed S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis bacteremia and he suffered from cellulitis of the arm. He was treated at Hatanpää City Hospital.
On 30th of September 2013 he was again admitted to Hatanpää City Hospital. On admission his temperature was 38.3°C. The serum blood test revealed reduced hemoglobin level of 91 g/liter, an increased leucocyte count of 20 × 10 109 /l, and an increased C-reactive protein level of 302 mg/liter. Two blood cultures taken on admission were positive for S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis. He was diagnosed a recurrent septicemia and cellulitis in the right leg. There were no skin lesions. Initial treatment with cefuroxime 1.5 g intravenously three times a day was changed to benzylpenicillin at two million IU six times a day (total 12 million IU a day) after two days.
On 5th of October he was transferred to Tampere University Hospital, because he had persistent fever. He suffered from severe pain in his right foot. He was afebrile but disorientated at arrival, and could not lift his right leg. Blood pressure on admission was 127/64 mmHg. On auscultation there were normal heart sounds. An abdominal CT revealed an abscess in the psoas region on the left side with maximal diameter of 5.8 cm. The aspiration fluid culture was negative for bacteria. A chest X-ray showed pericardium effusion. An echocardiography was performed. The patient appeared quite ill, and was considered not to be eligible for TEE. TTE revealed a large vegetation on the ventricular pacemaker lead. This fluttering mass had diameters of 14 × six mm (Figure 2), and was attached to the pacemaker leads distal end. Pulmonary artery pressure was estimated to 70–75 mmHg, otherwise echocardiograpy results were normal with good biventricular function and no signs of valvular lesions. The patient was treated with benzylpenicillin at four million IU six times a day (total 24 million IU a day) and a 500 mg daily dose of oral levofloxacin.
Figure 2
Transthoracic echocardiography examintion of the second patient. The slender arrow points to the ventricular pacemaker lead. The bold arrow points to the fluttering vegetation mass.
This elderly patient was very fragile, and the pacemaker system was not extracted. He suffered from back pain and persistent pain in his right buttock. Abdominal CT revealed spondylodiscitis at the level of L4/5. Therapy was continued with benzylpenicillin at four million IU six times a day for six weeks intravenously followed by suppressive treatment with amoksisillin a 500 mg three times a day.
Conclusion
Cardiac device-related endocarditis is a very rare clinical manifestation of S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis disease [1, 4]. A thorough search of the literature identified no published cases of cardiac device-related endocarditis involving S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis as causative agents. Staphylococcus aureus is the major infective agent responsible for 47% of cardiac device-related endocarditis, followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci (35%), other gram positive (11%) and gram negative (11%) organisms [5]. Endocarditis caused by S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis is uncommon, accounting for fewer than 1% of total cases [6].
The use of pacemakers has increased in the last 15 years [7, 8]. Likewise the number of elderly persons with chronic illness is growing. Both case patients were elderly and S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis bacteremia usually occurs at high age [9]. In the Pirkanmaa area in Finland the incidence of S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis bacteremia has increased [10]. These factors might contribute to the occurrence of rare and serious infections caused by this bacterium, such as endocarditis. The second patient was treated with immunosuppressive therapy for his rheumatology disease and that could make him prone to rare pathogen. Recurrent bacteremia is common in S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis bacteremia [11]. Cellulitis is the most common clinical manifestation in recurrence [11]. S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis isolates can aggregate human platelets and can internalize into human endothelial cells and they may both promote persistence within the vascular system [12]. Rohde and co-workers have identified a fibronecting-binding protein, GfbA, from group G streptococci, which functions as an adhesin and invasin and the invasion mechanism differ from group A streptococci [13].
A cardiac device -related infection is a life-threatening complication [5, 14]. Blood cultures have an important role in the diagnostic process of suspected infective endocarditis. During 2013 the BacT/ALERT 3D (bioMérieux SA, Marcy-L’Etoile, France) blood culture system with standard culture media was used. In the current cases, the Lancefield serogroups were defined by latex agglutination using the Streptex latex test system (Remel Europe Ltd, Dartford, UK). All isolates were also strain identified by a commercial test (Rapid ID 32 STREP, bioMérieux SA, Marcy-1’Etoile, France). Previous studies of permanent pacemaker lead endocarditis have confirmed the superiority of TEE over TTE [4, 15]. Management should consist in complete device extraction and long-term administration of antibiotics which cover the pathogen cultured from blood or samples from leads extracted. Cardiac device-related endocarditis is associated with a mortality rate of 66% if the device is not extracted [14]. In the case of complete device extraction combined with antimicrobial therapy the mortality rate is 13-21% [4, 14]. The optimal timing of re-implantation remains unknown. Re-implantation should be conducted at a new site. Most authors think that re-implantation can take place when the patients are no longer bacteremic [16]. The duration of antibiotic therapy has varied widely in the published literature [16–18]. Some authors have suggested that four weeks of therapy should be sufficient [16]. Several guidelines recommend the addition of aminoglycoside to penicillin therapy of streptococcal endocarditis during the first two weeks [19]. Because of high nephrotoxicity risk for elderly, a narrow-spectrum monotherapy treatment with benzylpenicillin was preferred for these patients instead of combination of benzylpenicillin and gentamicin.
In conclusion, S. dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis is a pathogen which very rarely causes cardiac device endocarditis. The two cases reported here emphasize the importance of considering endocarditis in elderly persons having cardiac devices together with the presence of unexplained bacteremia.
Consent statement
Written informed consent was obtained from both of the patients for publication of this case report and accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal.
Declarations
Acknowledgements
M.A. Robert MacGilleon is thanked for revising the English text.
Authors’ Affiliations
(1)
Department of Internal Medicine, Tampere University Hospital
(2)
Heart Center Co., Tampere University Hospital and School of Medicine, University of Tampere
References
Broyles LN, Van Beneden C, Beall B, Facklam R, Shewmaker PL, Malpiedi P, Daily P, Reingold A, Farley MM: Population-based study of invasive disease Due to beta-hemolytic streptococci of groups other than A and B. Clin Infect Dis. 2009, 48 (6): 706-712. 10.1086/597035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Ekelund K, Skinhoj P, Madsen J, Konradsen HB: Invasive group A, B, C and G streptococcal infections in Denmark 1999–2002: epidemiological and clinical aspects. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005, 11 (7): 569-576. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01169.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Rodriguez Y, Garisto J, Carrillo RG: Management of cardiac device-related infections: a review of protocol-driven care. Int J Cardiol. 2013, 166 (1): 55-60. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.09.071.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Auckenthaler R, Hermans PE, Washington JA: Group G streptococcal bacteremia: clinical study and review of the literature. Rev Infect Dis. 1983, 5 (2): 196-204. 10.1093/clinids/5.2.196.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Greenspon AJ, Patel JD, Lau E, Ochoa JA, Frisch DR, Ho RT, Pavri BB, Kurtz SM: 16-year trends in the infection burden for pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in the United States 1993 to 2008. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011, 58 (10): 1001-1006. 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.04.033.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Voigt A, Shalaby A, Saba S: Continued rise in rates of cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections in the United States: temporal trends and causative insights. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2010, 33 (4): 414-419. 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02569.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Takahashi T, Sunaoshi K, Sunakawa K, Fujishima S, Watanabe H, Ubukata K: Clinical aspects of invasive infections with Streptococcus dysgalactiae ssp. equisimilis in Japan: differences with respect to Streptococcus pyogenes and Streptococcus agalactiae infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010, 16 (8): 1097-1103.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Rohde M, Graham RM, Branitzki-Heinemann K, Borchers P, Preuss C, Schleicher I, Zahner D, Talay SR, Fulde M, Dinkla K, Chhatwal GS: Differences in the aromatic domain of homologous streptococcal fibronectin-binding proteins trigger different cell invasion mechanisms and survival rates. Cell Microbiol. 2011, 13 (3): 450-468. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01547.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Sohail MR, Uslan DZ, Khan AH, Friedman PA, Hayes DL, Wilson WR, Steckelberg JM, Jenkins SM, Baddour LM: Infective endocarditis complicating permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator infection. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008, 83 (1): 46-53. 10.4065/83.1.46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Victor F, De Place C, Camus C, Le Breton H, Leclercq C, Pavin D, Mabo P, Daubert C: Pacemaker lead infection: echocardiographic features, management, and outcome. Heart. 1999, 81 (1): 82-87.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Sohail MR, Uslan DZ, Khan AH, Friedman PA, Hayes DL, Wilson WR, Steckelberg JM, Stoner S, Baddour LM: Management and outcome of permanent pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator infections. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007, 49 (18): 1851-1859. 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.072.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Johansen JB, Jorgensen OD, Moller M, Arnsbo P, Mortensen PT, Nielsen JC: Infection after pacemaker implantation: infection rates and risk factors associated with infection in a population-based cohort study of 46299 consecutive patients. Eur Heart J. 2011, 32 (8): 991-998. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq497.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
Margey R, McCann H, Blake G, Keelan E, Galvin J, Lynch M, Mahon N, Sugrue D, O’Neill J: Contemporary management of and outcomes from cardiac device related infections. Europace. 2010, 12 (1): 64-70. 10.1093/europace/eup362.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
Gould FK, Denning DW, Elliott TS, Foweraker J, Perry JD, Prendergast BD, Sandoe JA, Spry MJ, Watkin RW, Working Party of the British Society for Antimicrobial C: Guidelines for the diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of endocarditis in adults: a report of the Working Party of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012, 67 (2): 269-289. 10.1093/jac/dkr450.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
