Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

AFLP analysis reveals high genetic diversity but low population structure in Coccidioides posadasiiisolates from Mexico and Argentina

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 13, Article number: 411 (2013) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Coccidioides immitis and C. posadasii cause coccidioidomycosis, a disease that is endemic to North and South America, but for Central America, the incidence of coccidioidomycosis has not been clearly established. Several studies suggest genetic variability in these fungi; however, little definitive information has been discovered about the variability of Coccidioides fungi in Mexico (MX) and Argentina (AR). Thus, the goals for this work were to study 32 Coccidioides spp. isolates from MX and AR, identify the species of these Coccidioides spp. isolates, analyse their phenotypic variability, examine their genetic variability and investigate the Coccidioides reproductive system and its level of genetic differentiation.

Methods

Coccidioides spp. isolates from MX and AR were taxonomically identified by phylogenetic inference analysis using partial sequences of the Ag2/PRA gene and their phenotypic characteristics analysed. The genetic variability, reproductive system and level of differentiation were estimated using AFLP markers. The level of genetic variability was assessed measuring the percentage of polymorphic loci, number of effective allele, expected heterocygosity and Index of Association (I A ). The degree of genetic differentiation was determined by AMOVA. Genetic similarities among isolates were estimated using Jaccard index. The UPGMA was used to contsruct the corresponding dendrogram. Finally, a network of haplotypes was built to evaluate the genealogical relationships among AFLP haplotypes.

Results

All isolates of Coccidioides spp. from MX and AR were identified as C. posadasii. No phenotypic variability was observed among the C. posadasii isolates from MX and AR. Analyses of genetic diversity and population structure were conducted using AFLP markers. Different estimators of genetic variability indicated that the C. posadasii isolates from MX and AR had high genetic variability. Furthermore, AMOVA, dendrogram and haplotype network showed a small genetic differentiation among the C. posadasii populations analysed from MX and AR. Additionally, the I A calculated for the isolates suggested that the species has a recombinant reproductive system.

Conclusions

No phenotypic variability was observed among the C. posadasii isolates from MX and AR. The high genetic variability observed in the isolates from MX and AR and the small genetic differentiation observed among the C. posadasii isolates analysed, suggest that this species could be distributed as a single genetic population in Latin America.

Peer Review reports

Background

Species of the genus Coccidioides, primarily Coccidioides immitis and C. posadasii, cause coccidioidomycosis, which is a disease endemic to North and South America [1]. This mycosis is most prevalent in the Southwestern United States (US), Northern Mexico (MX), Central America and the foothills region of South America [2]. The habitat conditions that permit the development of the saprophytic phase of these fungi are sandy soils in arid areas where the annual rainfall is less than 500 mm [3–5].

Coccidioidomycosis infection in humans and other mammals is caused by the inhalation of arthroconidia. The illness begins with acute respiratory symptoms that are typically benign and vanish spontaneously; however, the disease can evolve into progressive clinical forms that spread to the skin and subcutaneous, visceral and skeletal tissues. These severe progressive forms cause high morbimortality and are commonly associated with immunocompromised patients [6].

Coccidioidomycosis is an emerging disease because increased infection rates have been recorded in recent years from MX [7] and Argentina (AR) [8]. In endemic areas in the US, more than 100,000 primary human infections by Coccidioides spp. are estimated each year; a considerable increase in the incidence of this disease has been noted in recent years, particularly in California and Arizona. The increased incidence of the disease has been associated with a rise in the migration of individuals who have not previously been exposed to the fungus into the endemic areas [9].

The current epidemiology for coccidioidomycosis in MX is unknown, because no prevalence studies have been conducted in most Mexican states since 1960. However, according to the information that is available, more than 1,500 cases of primary coccidioidomycosis and 15 cases of disseminated disease are estimated annually. It is important to note that this estimate was based on epidemiological studies prior to 1994; since 1995, there are no records of coccidioidomycosis incidence in MX because this infection was excluded from reports prepared for the national epidemiological registry [10]. This suggests that the disease may have developed much as it has in the US, where prevalence and incidence rates have soared since the early 1990s [11].

Epidemiology in AR is similar to that in MX: there are few existing studies, although in recent years, several epidemiological studies have been performed. These studies include an investigation conducted by Canteros et al. [8] that sought to identify areas of endemic mycoses in 10 rural communities from the Teuco-Bermejito interfluve, which is in the Chaco province. Although results from this study demonstrated that Histoplasma capsulatum was the principal agent of endemic mycoses, the researchers also indicated that the climatic conditions of the area are optimal for Coccidioides development and thus that the potential for Coccidioides infections in the area should not be dismissed. In another recent study conducted by Canteros et al. [12], the authors performed a comprehensive retrospective review of all documented coccidioidomycosis cases in AR between 1892 and 2009. This review demonstrated that between 2006 and 2009, the disease incidence in the Catamarca province increased from a historical rate of less than 0.5 cases per 100,000 inhabitants to 2 cases per 100,000 inhabitants, indicating that coccidioidomycosis is an emerging disease in this region.

Because of the increased incidence of this disease in North and South America, several studies in recent decades have sought to apply molecular techniques to better understand the taxonomy and population biology of Coccidioides. Numerous studies, principally in the US, have focused on the genetic variability of C. immitis isolates and concluded that this fungus has high genetic recombination and no genetic structure among fungal isolates; however, the recombination process has never been observed [13–17]. A recent study that supports the presence of recombination was conducted by Jewell et al. [18], who used microsatellites to determine that outbreaks of coccidioidomycosis in Arizona, US, were caused by a single fungal clone that was likely hypervirulent, possessed a high level of genetic variation and showed no dominant subtypes among its isolates. The absence of genetic structure among C. immitis isolates and the presence of cryptic sex in both species of this fungus led to an investigation of whether isolates of C. posadasii, which is the dominant species in Latin American countries, have the same behavior as isolates of C. immitis, which is the dominant species in the Southwestern US. To find evidence that would indicate whether there is an expansion of the fungus in MX and AR, this study aimed to determine the pheno- and genotypic variability and the population structure of two populations (MX and AR).

Methods

Isolates

Thirty two clinical isolates of Coccidioides spp. were used, 21 isolates from MX: one isolate (M0104) provided by Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía; 6 isolates (M1204, M1404, M1505, M2305, M2805 and M3005) provided by UMAE Hospital de Especialidades No. 71, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social; one isolate (M3905) provided by Instituto de Diagnóstico y Referencia Epidemiológicos, Secretaría de Salud; one isolate (M5406) provided by Clínica Derma Care; one isolate (M5708) provided by Hospital Central “Dr. Ignacio Morones Prieto”; 6 isolates (HU2, HU11, HU12, HU18, HU19 and HU24) and one reference strain (HU1) provided by Hospital Universitario, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León; three isolates (37.3, 5256 and SiFe) provided by Departamento de Infectología, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición “Salvador Zubirán” and one isolate (MA) provided by Instituto Nacional de Pediatría; and 11 isolates from AR (972579, 073089, 073094, 073129, 073130, 073131, 083376, 083377, 083380, 083381 and 083382), provided by the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas, ANLIS “Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán” (Additional file 1). The isolates and strains were preserved at 4°C in flasks with sterile water and in tubes with mycobiotic agar (Bioxón, Mexico, MX) both with and without mineral oil. The isolates and reference strain studied were deposited in the Coccidioides spp. Collection of the Laboratorio de Micología Molecular, Departamento de Microbiología y Parasitología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM).

Biosafety

The culture and DNA extraction procedures for the isolates used in the present study were conducted in accordance with Biosafety Level 3 (BSL3) conditions.

Monospore cultures

From each isolate grown on mycobiotic agar for 1–2 weeks at 30°C, a conidial suspension was prepared using 1 mL of phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and 0.05% Tween 20 (PBST). This suspension was diluted (1:1000) and 50 µL of the dilution was grown on mycobiotic agar. The Petri dishes were incubated at 30°C and observed for colony growth. One colony was selected from each plate and grown on mycobiotic agar slants at 30°C. The monospore cultures were then preserved in sterile water at 4°C.

Identification of the species of the Coccidioidesspp. isolates

The DNA of each isolate was obtained following the procedure by Williams et al. [19] and Calderón et al. [20]. It was extracted and purified using the DNeasy Plant Mini kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, GE). The mycelium was lysed using a FastPrep-24 instrument (MP Biomedicals, Solon, OH, US) by homogenisation through a pattern with four periods of 40 s each at a speed of 6 m/s and placement of the tube on ice for 5 min between each period. The DNA concentration was determined by spectrophotometry and confirmed by gel electrophoresis on a 1.0% agarose gel with ethidium bromide (10 μg/ml), using different concentrations of λ phage (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, US). The DNA was stored at 4°C.

The oligonucleotides designed by Bialek et al. [21] were used for PCR. For the first PCR reaction, the reaction mixture comprised 10 ng of DNA in a 25 µL reaction volume containing 1X buffer, 200 μM dNTPs (Applied Biosystems, Inc., Foster City, CA, US), 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1.0 U of Taq polymerase (Applied Biosystems) and 100 pmol of each oligonucleotide, CoI (5′-GTACTATTAGGGAGGATAATCGTT-3′) and CoII (5′-GGTCTGAATGATCTGACGCA-3′). The following program was used for the PCR: one cycle at 94°C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 50°C for 30 s and 72°C for 1 min with a final extension step at 72°C for 5 min. A second PCR reaction was then conducted. The reaction mixture for this second reaction comprised 2 μL of the product from the first PCR in a total reaction volume of 25 μL that was composed of buffer, 200 μM dNTPs (Applied Biosystems), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 U of Taq polymerase (Applied Biosystems) and 100 pmol of each oligonucleotide, CoIII (5′-ATCCCACCTTGCGCTGTATGTTCGA-3′) and CoIV (5′-GGAGACGGCTGGATTTTTTAACATG-3′). For the second PCR, the following program was used: one cycle at 94°C for 5 min followed by 40 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s and 72°C for 1 min with a final extension step at 72°C for 5 min. The amplifications were conducted in an Esco Swift® Maxi™ thermocycler (ESCO, Hatboro, PA, US). The amplified products were then separated on 1.5% agarose gels in 0.5X TBE buffer at 100 V for 60 min. A 100-bp DNA ladder (Invitrogen) was used to determine the molecular sizes of the products. The gel was visualised using a Gel Doc XR (Bio-Rad, CA, US) image documentation system.

To confirm the identity of all isolates as C. posadasii, the 526-bp amplicons obtained from the first PCR were purified using the QIAquick PCR kit (Qiagen) and sequenced at the Unidad de Biología Molecular, Instituto de Fisiología Celular, UNAM using an automated ABI Prism 3100 (Applied Biosystems) sequencer. The sequences were edited using Chromas Lite 2.3 software (http://www.technelysium.com.au/chromas.html) and the sequence alignments were analised by the BLAST algorithm [22] to check similarities among all fungal sequences deposited in the GenBank database.

Phenotypic variation

Macromorphology

The 32 C. posadasii isolates grown on mycobiotic agar at 30°C for 10 days were observed to identify the morphological characteristics of each culture (colony colour and texture).

Growth rates

To determine the growth rates of the isolates, each isolate was grown on Petri dishes containing YEG-agar (1% yeast extract, 1% glucose and 1.5% agar) (Bioxón) for 10 days. Circles 7 mm in diameter were cut from the colony margins in each plate. Each circle was placed in the centre of a Petri dish with YEG-agar containing one of the following different NaCl concentrations: 0 M (0%), 0.034 M (2%), 0.068 M (4%), and 0.102 M (6%). The Petri dishes were then immediately incubated at 30°C. Growth was determined by measuring the diameters of the colonies (cm) after 4, 8, 10 and 15 days of incubation. Each experiment was repeated four times. Subsequently, the growth rate for each isolate was determined using the following formula: growth rate = [(diameter of the colony – diameter of inoculum)/15 days of incubation].

Conidial size

The diameters of 40 conidia from each isolate grown on mycobiotic agar (Bioxón) and incubated at 37°C for 10 days were measured using a calibrated ocular micrometre (Olympus America Inc., Melville, NY, US).

Phenotypic data analysis

The MATLAB ver. 6.1 software package (Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA, US) was used to analyse the phenotypic data for the growth rates. A two-way factorial design with repeated measurements was used to evaluate the incubation times (in days) and the different NaCl concentrations in the growth media to determine whether the isolate growth rates differed. In addition, the isolates were analysed by comparing their various growth rates and classifying the samples by their countries of origin. To analyse the conidial size, means were compared using the Tukey test.

Genotypic variability

Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) assessments

The AFLP analyses were performed with DNA from the monospore cultures in accordance with Vos et al. [23] and Duarte-Escalante et al. [24]. The DNA was restriction digested with the endonucleases EcoRI and MseI. After digestion, adaptors were ligated to the resulting fragments. The fragments were then preamplified using primers E (5′-GACTGCGTACCAATTC-3′) and M (5′-GACGATGAGTCCTGGTAA-3′). Following this preamplification, selective PCR was performed in which the selective primers were nearly identical to primer E or M but were extended by specific two- or three-nucleotide combinations at their 3′ terminus. Six primer combinations were used: E+AA:M+CAC, E+AA:M+CAT, E+AA:M+CTG, E+AA:M+CTC, E+AC:M+CAT, and E+AC:M+CTC. Primer labeling was performed by phosphorylating the 5′ end of the Eco RI primers with [γ -32P] ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase and the amplified materials were analysed on 5% polyacrylamide slab gels. A 50-bp DNA ladder (Invitrogen) was used as a reference.

Statistical analyses of AFLP results

Bands on different gels between 100 and 400 bp were analysed. The AFLP markers were visually recorded, compared with the 50-bp DNA marker ladder, manually coded and translated into binary data that indicated either their presence (1) or absence (0) (Additional file 2). From this AFLP marker data, estimates of the genetic diversity of the MX and AR isolates were calculated using the Shannon Index (S), assuming that each genotypic marker represented a distinct locus [25], and Nei’s measure of genetic diversity (h), calculated using allelic frequencies [26]. Additionally, an expected heterozygosity by population (H) and an average heterozygosis (Hw) were calculated using allele frequencies in accordance with the Bayesian method employed by Zhivotovsky [27]. An AMOVA analysis using FMAD v1.1β software [28] was used to calculate the partitioning of the molecular variance of the C. posadasii isolates from MX and AR at one hierarchical level (geographic origin).

The statistical significance of Fst and the partitioned molecular variance were evaluated by performing 10,000 random data permutations [29]. The genetic similarity between isolates was calculated with the Jaccard index. The genetic relationships among isolates were assessed by mean of the Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Mean (UPGMA) using the Jaccard matrix. Distortion of the inferred tree was assessed with the cophenetic correlation coefficient (CCCr) which was calculated using the Mantel test [30]. Multivariate statistical methods were carried out using the NTSYS-PC program (version 2.0, Exeter software) [31]. In addition, a haplotype network was performed to evaluate the genealogical relationships among the AFLP haplotypes using the median-joining method [32] implemented in NETWORK 4.2.0.1 (http://www.fluxus-engineering.com/sharenet.htm) [33], where branches with different lengths represent levels of evolutionary change. The parameters used were ϵ = 0, 1:1 weight for transitions-transversions and connection criteria. To distinguish clonal and recombinant structures in C. posadasii, the Index of Association (I A ), was used, which is a statistical test that measures the degree of non-random association between alleles at different loci (linkage disequilibrium) [34]. Therefore, I A is zero in strictly recombining populations and 1 in strictly clonal populations. I A was calculated using the LIAN 3.5 software [35].

Results

Identification of the species of the Coccidioidesspp. isolates

All the sequences obtained (accession no. JQ919960-JQ919967; JQ919969-JQ919977; JQ919979-JQ919994) were located between positions 902 and 1304 of Ag2/PRA gene in the C. posadasii genome (accession no. AF013256). The 32 isolates of Coccidioides spp. from MX and AR were identified as C. posadasii with a nucleotide identity > 99%, trough of the phylogenetic inference analysis (Additional file 3).

Phenotypic variation

Macromorphology

The isolates presented the macromorphology typically described for the C. posadasii. The texture of the colonies was generally fuzzy with smooth edges; several colonies had a powdery appearance. For the majority of the isolates, the colour of the front was white with buff components. The reverse side for most of the isolates was buff; however, isolates 073089, HU12 and 083378 exhibited a brown pigmentation (data not shown).

Growth rates

The C. posadasii isolates grown in YEG-agar medium containing 4 and 6% NaCl had lower growth rates compared with controls (no NaCl) by a statistically significant margin (p < 0.01), whereas the isolates grown in medium containing 2% NaCl did not show statistically significant differences in growth rates compared to the controls. No statistically significant differences were observed after conducting analyses by country of origin (Table 1).

Table 1 Growth rates of the C. posadasii isolates in different NaCl concentrations
Full size table

Conidial size

The arthroconidial sizes for the C. posadasii isolates ranged from 2.54 to 3.37 μm in width and 4.35 to 8.80 μm in length. Isolate HU12 had the largest arthroconidial size, with arthroconidia measuring 2.56 × 8.80 μm; however, statistically significant differences in arthroconidial size between HU12 and the other samples tested were not observed (p < 0.05).

Genotypic variability and population structure

AFLP data analyses

Six primer combinations yielded 170 amplified AFLP markers. The levels of genetic variation of C. posadasii from the MX and AR populations are shown in Table 2. In general, the MX and AR isolates had high genetic variability, as demonstrated by the calculated values for the different genetic diversity estimators (the effective number of alleles, the average heterogeneity and the Shannon Index (I), which is insensitive to the number of isolates analysed). The AMOVA showed that 95.21% of the molecular variance was distributed within the C. posadasii populations from MX and AR. Our results showed a small genetic differentiation between C. posadasii isolates of both countries (Fst = 0.048, p = 0.0001).

Table 2 Polymorphism, effective number of alleles, genetic diversity and expected heterozygosity of C. posadasii isolates from MX and AR
Full size table

Furthermore, the dendrogram for the C. posadasii isolates yielded 10 clusters (Figure 1). The first cluster included two isolates from MX, with 56% similarity. Group II included 17 isolates from MX and AR with 70% similarity and showed two subgroups. Subgroup IIa included 9 isolates from AR and one clinical isolate from MX (isolate M1204) with 74% similarity, and subgroup IIb included 7 isolates from MX, with 73% similarity. Group III contained three isolates from MX with 73% intragroup similarity. Group IV consisted of one isolate from MX with 62% intragroup similarity. Group V consisted of two isolates from MX with 71% similarity. Group VI consisted of two isolates, one from MX and another from AR, with 70% similarity. Group VII included only one isolate (isolate 083381) from AR, with 63% similarity to group VI. Group VIII included two isolates from MX, with 65% similarity. Group IX consisted of only one isolate from MX, with 36% similarity with the above. Finally, group X included only one isolate from MX, with 35% similarity. The cophenetic correlation coefficient (CCCr = 0.948, p = 0.0004) suggested that the dendrogram accurately represented the original genetic similarities among the isolates.

Figure 1
figure 1

Dendrogram generated of the C. posadasii isolates from MX and AR constructed using the paired genetic distances algorithm of UPGMA.

Full size image

The network of haplotypes demonstrated a large number of crosslinks among C. posadasii isolates and showed a small differentiation between the isolates from MX and AR.

Additionally, the number of mutations between each node (1–30) in the haplotype network demonstrated broad genetic variability (Figure 2).

Figure 2
figure 2

Analyses of haplotype networks for C. posadasii isolates using the median-joining method. The red circles correspond to isolates from MX, the blue circles correspond to isolates from AR.

Full size image

Finally, the I A (0.0287) calculated for the isolates in this study suggested that these isolates have a recombinant reproductive system.

Discussion

The spread of coccidioidomycosis over recent years in endemic areas of MX and AR is sufficient to warrant attention given that there are so few studies of the disease. Therefore, it is important to be well informed about the different aspects of Coccidioides spp. to carefully manage the disease. In this study, we estimated the genetic variability among C. posadasii isolates from MX and AR. Our results indicate that the partial Ag2/PRA Coccidioides spp. sequences obtained by Bialek et al. [21] method are useful for identify C. posadasii from different geographical origins. This fragment can also be used to identify C. immitis because this species presents in this region a deletion of 12 bases [36]. Thus, this fragment is not suitable to diversity or genetic structure studies, because it presents scarce variation. On the other hand, the results of phenotypic characterisation parameters (growth rates using different NaCl concentrations and arthroconidial size) showed no differences among the C. posadasii isolates.

The genetic diversity of the C. posadasii isolates from MX and AR showed high genetic variability using polymorphic AFLP. However, AMOVA indicated that this variation was not geographically structured. The results from this study suggested high rates of gene flow between isolates in MX and AR, which explains the scarce differentiation found among them. A probable explanation about these findings may be the constant flow of genes between these populations favoring the air-borne dissemination of the fungus since the hyphae that constitute the saprobe or infectious stage fragment even with the lightest air currents, freeing the arthroconidia and easily travelling large distances in the wind [37, 38]. The viability of the conidia in the environment is favored by the tolerability of the fungi to high temperatures (50°C) and their resistance to UV light (due to their melanine content) benefiting survival and longevity. Another possible explanation maybe high gene flow is a consequence of the constant movement of people across the continent or due to the migration of mammals [39], among these specific bat species which are long-distance migratory. This hypothesis is supported by the recent findings by Cordeiro et al. [40] who demonstrated the infection by Coccidioides spp. in these mammals.

The no-association among the C. posadasii isolates from MX and AR with their geographical origin, was supported by the dendrogram and haplotype network, confirm the scarce genetic differentiation observed between them. These findings partially concur with Fisher et al. [39], who found low variability among Coccidioides spp. isolates and little genetic differentiation among isolates from South America and the US. Notwithstanding, the technique used in this study was the AFLP. This is a useful tool for establishing the changes in the genome of the fungi isolates allowing for simultaneously analysing many loci and detecting a greater number of polymorphic DNA markers than any other method based on PCR. However, a limiting factor in this study was the impossibility of comparing results with other studies on the structure of Coccidioides spp. populations due to the use of different methodologies. It is recommended that future studies use markers that have been validated and employed by other authors in studies of genetic variability of Coccidioides spp. in order to compare the results obtained with isolates from different geographic regions.

On the other hand, the high genetic variability found among the isolates studied maybe explained by a recombinant sexual reproductive system (I A = 0.0287), as was suggested by other authors [1, 13–17, 41, 42]. This mode of reproduction was also supported by the presence of the potentially functional MAT idiomorph loci, MAT1-2 (HMG) and MAT1–1 (alpha-box) [41, 42]. Thus, even though this species’ sexual phase remains undescribed, studies indicate that, based on high variability, these fungi recombine, gaining advantages such as adaption to new environments; thus, virulent or resistant strains could emerge, which may also explain the numerous recent epidemic outbreaks.

The observed high variability may also be explained by the possibility that the different genotypes could adapt to other environments under inappropriate developmental conditions, which is true for the isolate “MA”, found in a patient originally from the state of Campeche, located in the Southeast region of MX, who claimed to have never left the state. This region has climatic conditions different from the preferred fungal growth conditions. Similarly, adaptation to new environments facilitates the appearance of hypervirulent strains, as suggested by Fisher et al. [1] and Jewell et al. [18].

It is important to understand variability among these fungi, which has also been investigated in recent publications, to determine genotype distributions among populations, monitor outbreaks, assess variations in virulence and predict disease progression [18, 43, 44]. Several lines of research that pertain to this issue are in progress that will further our understanding of the underlying biology of these pathogens and their interactions with other living species.

Conclusions

Phenotypic characterisation indicated no differences among the C. posadasii isolates studied. The different estimators of genetic variability employed indicated that the isolates from MX and AR had high genetic variability. The AMOVA showed a small genetic differentiation among the C. posadasii populations analysed from MX and AR; thus, these populations were genetically similar. Furthermore, the I A calculated for the isolates suggested that the C. posadasii isolates had recombinant reproductive systems, which would contribute to the high variability found among the isolates.

References

  1. Fisher MC, Koenig GL, Taylor JW: Molecular and phenotypic description of Coccidioides posadasii sp. Nov., previously recognized as the non-California population of Coccidioides immitis. Mycologia. 2002, 94: 73-84. 10.2307/3761847.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hector RF, Laniado-Laborín R: Coccidioidomycosis A fungal disease of the Americas. PloS Med. 2005, 2: e2-10.1371/journal.pmed.0020002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Fisher FS, Bultman MW, Johnson SM, Pappagianis D, Zaborsky E: Coccidioides niches and habitat parameters in the Southwestern United States. A matter of scale. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2007, 1111: 47-72. 10.1196/annals.1406.031.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kolivras KN, Johnson PS, Comrie AC, Yool AR: Environmental variability and coccidioidomycosis (valley fever). Aerobiologia. 2001, 17: 31-42. 10.1023/A:1007619813435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kolivras KN, Comrie AC: Modeling valley fever (coccidioidomycosis) incidence on the basis of climate conditions. Int J Biometeorol. 2003, 47: 87-101.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Laniado-Laborín R, Alcantar-Schramm JM, Cazares-Adame R: Coccidioidomycosis: an update. Curr Fungal Infect Rep. 2012, 6: 113-120. 10.1007/s12281-012-0084-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Laniado-Laborín R: Expanding understanding of epidemiology of coccidioidomycosis in the western hemisphere. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2007, 1111: 19-34. 10.1196/annals.1406.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Canteros CE, Madariaga MJ, Lee W, Rivas MC, Davel G, Iachini R: Agentes de micosis endémicas en un área rural de Argentina: estudio seroepidemiológico en perros. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2010, 27: 14-19. 10.1016/j.riam.2009.11.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hector RF, Rutherford GW, Tsang CA, Erhart LM, McCotter O, Anderson SM, Komatsu K, Tabnak F, Vugia DJ, Yang Y, Galgiani JN: The public health impact of coccidioidomycosis in Arizona and California. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011, 8: 1150-1173. 10.3390/ijerph8041150.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Laniado-Laborín R: Coccidioidomycosis and other endemic mycoses in Mexico. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2007, 24: 249-258. 10.1016/S1130-1406(07)70051-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Baptista Rosas RC, Riquelme M: Epidemiología de la coccidioidomicosis en México. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2007, 24: 100-105. 10.1016/S1130-1406(07)70022-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Canteros CE, Toranzo A, Ibarra-Camou B, David V, Carrizo SG, Santillán-Iturres A, Serrano J, Fernández N, Capece P, Gorostiaga J, Chacón YA, Tonelli R, Boscaro G, Abiega C, Mendieta S, Fernández C, Fernández A, Vitale R, Santos P, Pizarro MR, López-Joffre MC, Lee W, Mazza M, Posse G, Tiraboschi IN, Negroni R, Davel G: La coccidioidomicosis en Argentina, 1892–2009. Rev Arg Microbiol. 2010, 42: 261-268.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Burt A, Carter DA, Koenig GL, Whites TJ, Taylor JW: Molecular markers reveal cryptic sex in the human pathogen Coccidioides immitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996, 93: 770-773. 10.1073/pnas.93.2.770.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Burt A, Dechairo BM, Koening GL, Carter DA, White TJ, Taylor JW: Molecular markers reveal differentiation among isolates of Coccidioides immitis from California, Arizona and Texas. Mol Ecol. 1997, 6: 781-786. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.1997.00245.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Koufopanou V, Burt A, Taylor JW: Concordance of gene genealogies reveals reproductive isolation in the pathogenic fungus Coccidioides immitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1997, 94: 5478-5482. 10.1073/pnas.94.10.5478.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Koufopanou V, Burt A, Taylor JW: Concordance of gene genealogies reveals reproductive isolation in the pathogenic fungus Coccidioides immitis [correction]. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 1998, 95: 8414-

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fisher MC, Koening GL, White TJ, Taylor JW: Pathogenic clones versus environmentally driven population increase: analysis of an epidemic of the human fungal pathogen Coccidioides immitis. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38: 807-813.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Jewell K, Cheshier R, Cage GD: Genetic diversity among clinical Coccidioides spp. isolates in Arizona. Med Mycol. 2008, 46: 449-455. 10.1080/13693780801961337.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Williams RH, Ward E, McCartney HA: Methods for integrated air sampling and DNA analysis for the detection of airborne fungal spores. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001, 67: 2453-2459. 10.1128/AEM.67.6.2453-2459.2001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Calderón C, Ward E, Freeman J, McCartney A: Detection of airborne fungal spores sampled by rotating-arm and Hirst-type spore traps using polymerase chain reaction assays. J Aerosol Sci. 2002, 3: 283-296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bialek R, Kern J, Herrmann T, Tijerina R, Cecenas L, Reischl U, Gonzalez GM: PCR assays for identification of Coccidioides posadasii based on the nucleotide sequence of the antigen 2/proline-rich antigen. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 778-783. 10.1128/JCM.42.2.778-783.2004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Altschul S, Madden T, Shäffer A, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman A: Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997, 25: 3389-3402. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Vos P, Hogers R, Bleeker M, Reijans M, Van de Lee T, Hornes M, Frijters A, Pot J, Peleman J, Kuiper M, Zabeau M: AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995, 23: 4407-4414. 10.1093/nar/23.21.4407.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Duarte-Escalante E, Zúñiga G, Nava-Ramírez O, Córdoba S, Refojo N, Arenas R, Delhaes L, Reyes-Montes MR: Population structure and diversity in the pathogenic fungus Aspergillus fumigatus isolates from different sources and geographic origins. Mem I Oswaldo Cruz. 2009, 104: 427-433. 10.1590/S0074-02762009000300005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Allnut TR, Newton AC, Lara A, Premoli A, Armesto JJ, Vergara R, Gardner M: Genetic variation in Fitzroya cupressoides (alerce), a threatened South American conifer. Mol Ecol. 1999, 8: 975-987. 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00650.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nei M: Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 1973, 70: 3321-3323. 10.1073/pnas.70.12.3321.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhivotovsky LA: Estimating population structure in diploids with multilocus dominant DNA markers. Mol Ecol. 1999, 8: 907-913. 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00620.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schlüter PM, Harris SA: Analysis of multilocus fingerprinting data sets containing missing data. Mol Ecol Notes. 2006, 6: 569-572. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01225.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM: Analysis of molecular variant inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics. 1992, 131: 479-491.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Manly BFJ: Randomization, Bootstrap, and Montecarlo Methods in Biology. 1997, London: Chapman and Hall

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rohlf FJ: Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. 1998, New York: Exeter Software Inc

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Röhl A: Median-Joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 1999, 16: 37-48. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026036.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Polzin T, Daneschmand SV: On Steiner trees and minimum spanning trees in hypergraphs. Oper Res Lett. 2003, 31: 12-20. 10.1016/S0167-6377(02)00185-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Maynard-Smith J, Smith NH, O’Rourke M, Spratt BG: How clonal are bacteria?. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993, 90: 4384-4388. 10.1073/pnas.90.10.4384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Haubold B, Hudson RR: LIAN 3.0: detecting linkage disequilibrium in multilocus data. Bioinformatics. 2000, 16: 847-848. 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.9.847.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Canteros CE, Toranzo A, Suárez-Alvarez R, Davel G, Castañón-Olivares LR, Napoli J: Identidad genética del hongo causante del primer caso de coccidioidomicosis descripto por Alejandro Posadas en 1892. Medicina (Buenos Aires). 2009, 69: 215-220.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pappagianis D, Einstein H: Tempest from Tehachapi takes toll or Coccidioides conveyed aloft and afar (Medical Information). West J Med. 1978, 129: 527-530.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Laniado-Laborín R: Coccidioidomicosis. Más que una enfermedad regional. Rev Inst Nal Enf Resp Mex. 2006, 19: 301-308.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Fisher MC, Koenig GL, White TJ, San-Blas G, Negroni R, Gutiérrez-Álvarez I, Wanke B, Taylor JW: Biogeographic range expansion into South America by Coccidioides immitis mirrors New World patterns of human migration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001, 98: 4558-4562. 10.1073/pnas.071406098.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Cordeiro RA, Silva KRC, Brilhante RSN, Moura FBP FBP, Duarte NFH, Marques FJF FJF, Cordeiro RA, Moreira Filho RE, Araújo RWB, Bandeira TJPG, Rocha MFG, Sidrim JJC: Coccidioides posadasii Infection in bats, Brazil. Emerg Infect Diseases. 2012, 18: 668-670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Fraser JA, Stajich JE, Tarcha EJ, Cole GT, Inglis DO, Sil A, Heitman J: Evolution of the mating type locus: insights gained from the dimorphic primary fungal pathogens Histoplasma capsulatum, Coccidioides immitis, and Coccidioides posadasii. Eukaryot Cell. 2007, 6: 622-629. 10.1128/EC.00018-07.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Mandel MA, Barker BM, Kroken S, Rounsley SD, Orbach MJ: Genomic and population analyses of the mating type loci in Coccidioides species reveal evidence for sexual reproduction and gene acquisition. Eukaryot Cell. 2007, 6: 1189-1199. 10.1128/EC.00117-07.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Neafsey DE, Barker BM, Sharpton TJ, Stajich JE, Park DJ, Whiston E, Hung C, McMahan C, White J, Sykes S, Heiman D, Young S, Zeng Q, Abouelleil A, Aftuck L, Bessette D, Brown A, FitzGerald M, Lui A, Macdonald JP, Priest M, Orbach MJ, Galgiani JN, Kirkland TN, Cole GT, Birren BW, Henn MR, Taylor JW, Rounsley SD: Population genomic sequencing of Coccidioides fungi reveals recent hybridization and transposon control. Genome Res. 2010, 20: 938-946. 10.1101/gr.103911.109.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Sharpton TJ, Stajich JE, Rounsley SD, Gardner MJ, Wortman JR, Jordar VS, Maiti R, Kodira CD, Neafsey DE, Zeng Q, Hung C, McMahan C, Muszewska A, Grynberg M, Mandel MA, Kellner EM, Barker BM, Galgiani JN, Marc J, Orbach MJ, Kirkland TN, Cole GT, Henn MR, Birren BW, Taylor JW: Comparative genomic analyses of the human fungal pathogens Coccidioides and their relatives. Genome Res. 2009, 19: 1722-1731. 10.1101/gr.087551.108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is a partial fulfilment for the graduate Program in Biological Sciences of the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM). E. Duarte-Escalante acknowledges support from the Program in Biological Sciences.

This project was funded by PAPIIT-DGAPA (IN215509-3).

The authors would like to thank to Actuary Dolores Hernández who provided statistical analysis support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Microbiología y Parasitología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Ciudad Universitaria No. 3000, México, D. F., 04510, Mexico

    Esperanza Duarte-Escalante, Laura Rosio Castañón-Olivares & María Rocío del Reyes-Montes

  2. Departamento de Zoología, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Prol. de Carpio y Plan de Ayala. Col. Sto. Tomás, 11340, México, D. F., Mexico

    Gerardo Zúñiga

  3. División de Investigación, Hospital Juárez de México, Edificio E. Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional 5160, Col. Magdalena de las Salinas, 07760, México, D. F., Mexico

    María Guadalupe Frías-De-León

  4. Departamento de Micología, INEI ANLIS “Dr. Carlos G. Malbrán”, Av. Velez Sarsfield 563, 1281, Buenos Aires, Argentina

    Cristina Canteros

Authors
  1. Esperanza Duarte-Escalante
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gerardo Zúñiga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. María Guadalupe Frías-De-León
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Cristina Canteros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Laura Rosio Castañón-Olivares
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. María Rocío del Reyes-Montes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María Rocío del Reyes-Montes.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

MRRM, EDE were involved in the study design, analised and interpreted the results and drafted the manuscript. EDE and MGFDL performed the experiments. GZ conducted data analysis and participated in drafting the manuscript and provided a critical review of the manuscript. CC participated in the study design and provided a critical review of the manuscript. RCO performed microscopic fungal identification. MRRM conceptualized and coordinated the project. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Additional file 1: Source and geographic origin of Coccidioides posadasii isolates.(PDF 30 KB)

12879_2013_2648_MOESM2_ESM.pdf

Additional file 2: Binary data matrix. Each AFLP band was treated as a separate character and scored 1 (present) or 0 (absent). (PDF 151 KB)

12879_2013_2648_MOESM3_ESM.pdf

Additional file 3: The 32 isolates of Coccidioides spp. from MX and AR were identified as C. posadasii trough of the phylogenetic inference analysis.(PDF 199 KB)

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Duarte-Escalante, E., Zúñiga, G., Frías-De-León, M.G. et al. AFLP analysis reveals high genetic diversity but low population structure in Coccidioides posadasiiisolates from Mexico and Argentina. BMC Infect Dis 13, 411 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-411

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-411

Keywords

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us