Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Difference in overall and age-specific prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus infection in Italy: evidence from NTCC trial

  • Iacopo Baussano1Email author,
  • Silvia Franceschi1,
  • Anna Gillio-Tos2,
  • Francesca Carozzi3,
  • Massimo Confortini3,
  • Paolo Dalla Palma4,
  • Margherita De Lillo5,
  • Annarosa Del Mistro6,
  • Laura De Marco2,
  • Carlo Naldoni7,
  • Paola Pierotti8,
  • Patrizia Schincaglia9,
  • Nereo Segnan10,
  • Manuel Zorzi6,
  • Paolo Giorgi-Rossi11 and
  • Guglielmo Ronco10
BMC Infectious Diseases201313:238

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-13-238

Received: 13 April 2012

Accepted: 16 May 2013

Published: 24 May 2013

Abstract

Background

Although among women a decreasing prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection with increasing age has been consistently observed in high-resource countries, different age profiles have been reported elsewhere.

Methods

We compared the age profile of high-risk (HR)-HPV prevalence in nine different areas of Northern and Central Italy by studying the women recruited in the intervention arm of the New Technologies in Cervical Cancer study and tested by Hybrid Capture 2. Differences in the age-distribution of HPV infection were investigated in each centre by the joinpoint approach in a logistic model. 46,900 women aged 25 to 60 years were included in the analysis.

Results

The HR-HPV age-standardised (on Italian population) prevalence ranged from 5.7% (Trento) to 10.3% (Ravenna). HR-HPV prevalence decreased as a logistic function of increasing age in 6 of 9 centres (Trento, Verona, Florence, Bologna, Imola, and Viterbo). The effect of age on HR-HPV prevalence slopes did not differ significantly among these 6 centres, whereas significant heterogeneity in intercepts (p < 0.001) was found, reflecting different overall HR-HPV prevalence between centres. One significant joinpoint was observed in 2 centres (Padua and Ravenna), indicating that the decrease in HR-HPV prevalence by age was better described using a function composed with two logistic segments. In Padua HR-HPV prevalence decreased only slightly up to 39 years but showed a steep downturn thereafter. In Ravenna HR-HPV prevalence decreased steeply down to 45 years of age and then showed a plateau. Finally, in Turin two significant joinpoints were observed: prevalence decreased only after age 29 and showed a plateau after age 39.

Conclusions

Our results showed substantial differences in overall and age-specific HR-HPV prevalence across Italian areas. These findings may be related to different timing of changes in sexual behaviours across regions. Age-specific HR-HPV prevalence in Italy does not support an influence of age per se.

Keywords

Human papillomavirus Prevalence Age-specific

Background

The prevalence of cervical human papillomavirus (HPV) infection varies across populations and according to a woman’s age. Studies from Europe [14] and North America [57] showed high HPV prevalence in young women with subsequent marked declines after age 25 or so. This pattern was also observed in industrialized countries in South America and Asia, e.g., Argentina [8] and Korea [9]. Some studies in Central [10, 11] and South America [1214] showed a more modest second peak in HPV prevalence in women 45 or 55 years or older. In addition, a few studies found that in some low-resource populations HPV prevalence remains high at any age [1519].

The very steep increase in the cumulative incidence of HPV infection observed among women who had recently become sexually active suggested that a majority of women acquire the infection in the first few years after sexual debut [6, 20]. However, clear evidence emerged from cohort studies suggesting that middle-aged women do not only harbour long-term HPV persistent infections but also new incident infections [21, 22]. The geographic heterogeneity in age-specific HR-HPV prevalence in different populations suggests that population-specific factors, including sexual behaviour at different ages and birth cohort, need to be taken into account along with the natural history to characterize the HR-HPV infection epidemiology [23].

Previous studies were, however, based on samples of a few hundreds or few thousands women overall, limiting the possibility of studying age effect in detail. Therefore, we aimed at assessing HR-HPV prevalence and possible variations in the age-distribution of HPV prevalence in 46,900 women from a large multicentre randomised controlled trial conducted across nine different areas in Italy.

Methods

The New Technologies in Cervical Cancer (NTCC) study is a randomized trial of screening methods (conventional cytology versus HPV testing) for which the main endpoint was histologic detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or more. Our report is based only on the HPV testing arm of NTCC. NTCC was conducted within organised cervical cancer screening programmes in nine centres in Northern and Central Italy (Turin, Trento, Padua, Verona, Florence, Bologna, Imola, Ravenna and Viterbo) and was considered in determining HPV prevalence. Figure 1 shows the location of participating centres within Italy. Turin is a large industrial city of about 1 million inhabitants. Padua, Bologna and Florence are middle-sized towns of about 2–300,000 inhabitants. The Verona screening programme targeted a mainly rural area close to the town of Verona. The remaining screening programmes included the populations of small towns (50–100,000 inhabitants) and surrounding rural areas. In particular, the Trento screening programme served a mountain area while Ravenna is close to an important touristic resort area on the Adriatic Sea.
Figure 1

Location of new technologies in cervical cancer study recruitment centres within Italy.

Methods of recruitment and randomisation of NTCC study have been previously described [2426]. Briefly, following an invitation sent to the entire target population, women aged 25–60 years attending a new round of cervical screening were assigned randomly to either conventional cytology or HPV testing arm. Women who were pregnant, reported to be virgin, had undergone hysterectomy, or had been treated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) or cancer in the past 5 years were excluded. Seventy-four percent of eligible women consented to the study and were randomized [27]. All participants provided written informed consent. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the coordinating centre in Turin (Commissione sperimentazioni cliniche della Regione Piemonte - Comitato etico di riferimento regionale, art.7, DM 18 marzo 1998) and by local ethics committees of each participating centre. Baseline characteristics of NTCC participants have been previously described [2427].

In the HPV testing arm, exfoliated cervical cells were collected using a plastic Ayre’s spatula and a cytobrush, and eluted into the PreservCyt buffer (NTCC phase 1) or in the standard transport medium (Qiagen Incorporated) (NTCC phase 2). The Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2) hybridization assay (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) targeting HR-HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59 and 68, was used to determine HR-HPV presence with a cut point of 1 relative light unit (RLU) for HPV positivity, as recommended by the manufacturer. High reproducibility of HPV testing between laboratories was documented [28].

HR-HPV status from the first valid HC2 test was considered. For each centre, HR-HPV prevalence was standardized to the 2004 Italian female population in the same age groups for year 2004 aged 25–60 years [29]. The heterogeneity in age-standardized HPV prevalence across centres was assessed using the inverse-variance method and tested with the Q statistics from the random effects pooling method proposed by DerSimonian and Laird [30].

The age-distribution of HR-HPV prevalence in each recruitment centre was assessed performing a logistic joinpoint regression analysis. This method allows characterizing the age-specific prevalence using joint linear segments with different slopes, where the joinpoints represent the points of change in slope. If no significant joinpoints were identified, we characterized the age-specific HR-HPV prevalence profiles using a standard logistic regression with studied differences between centres and logistic effect of age as suggested by the intercepts and the slopes. For the centres without any significant joinpoint we tested the significance (significance level < 0.05) of differences between centres in intercepts, reflecting different overall HR-HPV prevalence, and age slopes, reflecting different declines of HR-HPV prevalence as a function of age. To test for significant differences in intercepts between centres we performed a log-likelihood ratio test comparing two logistic regression models: one accounting only for age as independent variable, the other for both age and centres. Similarly, to test for different declines of HR-HPV prevalence as a function of age among centres, we tested the statistical significance of the interaction between centres and age performing a log-likelihood ratio test.

To test for the presence of statistically significant (significance level < 0.05) joinpoints and to estimate their value, we used the package “ljr” from the CRAN repository [31]. In particular, the used function tests, based on the likelihood ratio test statistic, the null hypothesis of j joinpoint(s) versus the alternative of j + 1 joinpoint(s). The p-value is determined by a Monte Carlo method [32]. We allowed for up to three possible joinpoints (j max  = 3) and set as significance level < 0.05). All the other statistical analyses were performed using STATA software (StataCorp. 2011. Stata Statistical Software: Release 12. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP).

Results

A total of 47,369 women were randomly assigned to the HPV testing arm. After the exclusion of 469 women who did not have any valid HPV test, 46,900 women could be included in the present analysis.

Table 1 shows the number of women found to be positive for HR-HPV types by centre and age group. The overall HR-HPV unadjusted prevalence was 8.4%; the overall age-specific prevalence steadily decreased as a function of age, from 15.1% at age 24–29 to 4.0% at age 55–60. Additional file 1: Figure S1 section, shows the HR-HPV prevalence (%) as a function of age for each recruitment centre. Age-standardized prevalence varied significantly, as assessed using the inverse-variance method and tested with the Q statistics (p-value <0.001), by centre with the lowest values in Trento (5.7%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.9-6.5) and Viterbo (7.4%; 95% CI: 6.4-8.4) and the highest value in Ravenna (10.3%; 95% CI: 9.0-11.6) (Figure 2). All the remaining centres had values between 8.2% and 9.4%.
Table 1

Prevalence of hybrid capture 2 positive-women by age and recruitment centre

HPV+/Tested women (prevalence%)

Age groups

25-29

30-34

35-39

40-44

45-49

50-54

55-60

Total

Verona

69/587 (11.8%)

104/736 (14.1%)

62/632 (9.8%)

43/533 (8.1%)

28/322 (8.7%)

37/476 (7.8%)

20/449 (4.5%)

363/3735 (9.7%)

Padua

142/994 (14.3%)

124/1013 (12.2%)

134/948 (14.1%)

59/799 (7.4%)

33/551 (6.0%)

10/262 (3.8%)

13/723 (1.8%)

515/5290 (9.7%)

Ravenna

65/340 (19.1%)

67/521 (12.9%)

68/591 (11.5%)

43/628 (6.8%)

36/582 (6.2%)

31/548 (5.7%)

38/541 (7.0%)

348/3751 (9.3%)

Florence

150/926 (16.2%)

141/1045 (13.5%)

138/1277 (10.8%)

103/1306 (7.9%)

90/1227 (7.3%)

58/1204 (4.8%)

48/1129 (4.3%)

728/8114 (9.0%)

Imola

58/325 (17.8%)

50/415 (12.0%)

48/528 (9.1%)

41/510 (8.0%)

28/373 (7.5%)

17/406 (4.2%)

17/357 (4.8%)

259/2914 (8.9%)

Turin

274/1761 (15.6%)

252/1909 (13.2%)

166/2219 (7.5%)

132/2142 (6.2%)

99/1860 (5.3%)

99/1904 (5.2%)

84/2015 (4.2%)

1106/13810 (8.0%)

Bologna

28/137 (20.4%)

29/262 (11.1%)

43/418 (10.3%)

35/480 (7.3%)

24/413 (5.8%)

22/432 (5.1%)

16/428 (3.7%)

197/2570 (7.7%)

Viterbo

71/507 (14.0%)

35/390 (9.0%)

36/501 (7.2%)

27/460 (5.9%)

34/440 (7.7%)

17/376 (4.5%)

14/415 (3.4%)

234/3089 (7.6%)

Trento

43/400 (10.8%)

41/572 (7.2%)

39/634 (6.2%)

34/632 (5.4%)

22/501 (4.4%)

16/459 (3.5%)

12/429 (2.8%)

207/3627 (5.7%)

Total

900/5977 (15.1%)

843/6863 (12.3%)

734/7748 (9.5%)

517/7490 (6.9%)

394/6269 (6.3%)

307/6067 (5.1%)

262/6486 (4.0%)

3957/46900 (8.4%)

Figure 2

The age-standardised prevalence, by recruitment centre. CI: confidence interval; HR: high-risk; HPV: human papillomavirus.

No significant joinpoints were observed in six of the nine centres (Verona, Trento, Bologna, Imola, Florence and Viterbo). HR-HPV prevalence in these centres decreased as a logistic function of increasing age. Significant heterogeneity in intercepts (p < 0.001), as assessed performing a log-likelihood ratio test, was found between centres, reflecting different overall HR-HPV prevalence (Figure 3). While HR-HPV prevalence showed a steeper decline with age in Bologna, Florence and Imola than in Trento, Verona and Viterbo, the test for heterogeneity of age slopes did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.08).
Figure 3

Model-based age-specific prevalence for centres without significant joinpoint (i.e. (Verona, Trento, Bologna, Imola, Florence and Viterbo). The thick solid curve shows the age-specific prevalence pooled across recruitment centres.

Figure 4 shows age-specific prevalence and the joinpoints regression for the three centres where at least one statistically significant (p < 0.05) joinpoint was found. In Turin two significant joinpoints were observed: HR-HPV prevalence remained high up to age 30 years, decreased steeply between age 30 and 38 and maintained a very slow decline after age 38. In Ravenna HR-HPV prevalence decreased until 45 years of age and reached a plateau thereafter, with a slightly higher prevalence observed in the oldest women. In Padua, HR-HPV prevalence showed a very slow decline between age 25 and 39, with a higher prevalence for women aged 35–39 than in any other centre (14.1% vs. 9.5% on average), and subsequently had a steep downturn with the lowest prevalence observed in the oldest age groups.
Figure 4

Age-specific prevalence and the fitted regression according to the joinpoint logistic regression analysis for centres with significant joinpoint (i.e. Turin –Panel A, Ravenna – Panel B, and Padua – Panel C). HC2: Hybrid Capture 2.

Discussion

We observed geographical variation in age-standardized and age-specific prevalence of HR- HPV infection in the Italian centres participating in the NTCC study; with the highest age-standardized prevalence in Ravenna (close to a touristic sea resort area) almost twice that of Trento (a mainly rural mountain area), the lowest prevalence. Given that relevant differences in biological features of HR-HPV infections across Italian regions are implausible, the observed geographical variations are likely to reflect differences in sexual behaviour across Italian areas.

In addition, although in all study centres HR-HPV prevalence followed the general pattern of decrease with increasing age typical of industrialised countries, qualitative differences were found (Ravenna, Turin and Padua) in the shape of age specific prevalence. In the majority of NTCC centres HR-HPV prevalence decreased as a logistic function of increasing age, i.e., a logistic function described HR-HPV prevalence reduction within the considered 25-to-60-year-old age range. In Turin and Padua, however, women showed higher HR-HPV infection prevalence up to about age 30 and 40 years, respectively. The same age-distribution of HR-HPV prevalence in Turin had been found in a previous smaller study [4]. Consistent high prevalence of HR-HPV infection in 25-to-30 and 25-to-39-year-old women in Turin and Padua, respectively, the two largest Northern Italian towns included in the NTCC study, could reflect the increasing delay in age at first marriage [33]. In turn, this may result in more sexual promiscuity before marriage, and thus increased HPV exposures. Also, high prevalence of HR-HPV infection in Turin and Padua could derive from birth cohort effects mainly due to sexual behavioural changes in younger birth cohorts, leading to earlier initiation of sexual activity compared to elsewhere in Italy. A similar delay in the decline in HR-HPV prevalence was reported in Poland [34]. Ravenna was the centre that had the highest overall HR-HPV prevalence with a second peak in prevalence detected above age 45, possibly reflecting substantial HR-HPV exposures among middle-aged women or their partners in an area where tourism has been flourishing for at least five decades.

Of notice, a steeper decrease in HR-HPV prevalence with age than that found in the NTCC study was observed in a study conducted in Central and Southern Italy [35]. This finding suggests that age-specific sexual patterns across Italy differ, with a more pronounced reduction of sexual activity or promiscuity with aging in Southern Italy. Geographical differences in sexually related behaviours across Italy have also been reported from a nation-wide survey on sexual activities [36] and contraceptive use [37]. Unfortunately, surveys of sexual behaviour in Italy are sparse and do not allow clear comparisons between birth cohorts.

Differences in sexual habits and birth cohort effects may herald different future changes in the incidence of precancerous and cancerous lesions of the cervix in different parts of Italy. Increases in both incidence [38] of and mortality [39] from cervical cancer in younger cohorts have been observed in many European countries and in others, like England, were plausibly masked by screening efficiency [40].

The variation in the shape of age-specific HR-HPV prevalence observed between centres in the NTCC study could also derive from different population mixing. On account of important migratory waves, for instance, less than half of the population living in Turin in 2011 was born in the city. As for many other large towns across industrialized countries, Turin is constantly subject to rural-to-urban migrations. Main reasons for immigration from both other Italian areas and abroad are studying and working purposes. We speculate that the constant inflow of relatively young immigrants may have an impact on sexual promiscuity and transmission chain of HPV infections. The consequences of immigration on older birth-cohorts are of less straightforward interpretation. Demographically relevant migrations to Turin, initially from Southern and North-eastern Italy, started in the 1960s. Almost half the women migrated to Turin from Southern Italy arrived during such period and would have not fallen in the age range eligible for the NTCC study [41].

Our study has strengths and weaknesses. Study population is large and can be considered well representative of women aged between 25 and 60 years who participate in screening in the study areas. In a previous study of the determinants of screening attendance in Turin [42], we found no significant effect of age, education, marital status or place of birth on response to invitation to screening. Given the standardization and quality control assurance of organized screening programmes across Italy, any selection bias is unlikely to have applied differently to different study centres or age groups thus reassuring on the validity of the present comparisons. The use of a well-validated HPV testing method is another asset of the present study. A few weaknesses should also be mentioned. Despite the large size of the present study, the power to detect significant joinpoints in age-specific HR-HPV prevalence was limited in the smaller centres. Lack of inclusion of certain geographic areas, in particular from southern Italy, makes our current estimate of HR-HPV prevalence not equivalent to a national average. Another weakness is lack of individual information on place of birth, marital history, and sexual habits that could have helped elucidating some of the determinants of variations in HR-HPV prevalence.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we observed substantial differences in overall and age-specific HPV prevalence across Italian areas. These findings may be related to differences in sexual behaviour of women in different age groups and birth cohorts and in population mixing across study areas. Awareness of the existence of age or cohort effects may be useful in predicting trends in precancerous and cancerous lesions of the cervix and modelling the future impact of screening or HR-HPV vaccination in different Italian areas. In any case, the heterogeneity we observed does not support an influence of age per se in HR-HPV prevalence.

Abbreviations

CI: 

Confidence interval

CIN: 

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

HR: 

High-risk

HPV: 

Human papillomavirus

HC2: 

Hybrid capture 2

NTCC: 

New technologies in cervical cancer

RLU: 

Relative light unit.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The work reported was partly undertaken while Dr Ronco was hosted as Visiting Scientist by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. Dr Baussano is on leave from the University of Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.

The research leading to these results has received funding from the Italian Ministry of Health (L138/2004 project “NTCC Nuove tecnologie per lo screening del cervicocarcinoma”) and from the European Community’s Seventh Framework programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement No. 242061 (acronym PREHDICT). The NTCC study was also financially supported by the Regional Administrations of Piemonte, Toscana, Veneto and Emilia Romagna and by the Agenzia di Sanità Pubblica of Lazio. The funding sources did not have any role in the writing process of this manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
International Agency for Research on Cancer
(2)
University of Turin
(3)
ISPO
(4)
S.Chiara Hospital
(5)
Imola Hospital
(6)
Istituto Oncologico Veneto
(7)
Emilia-Romagna Region
(8)
Maggiore Hospital
(9)
Centro di Prevenzione Oncologica
(10)
Centro per la Prevenzione Oncologica (CPO)
(11)
ASP Lazio

References

  1. de Sanjose S, Almirall R, Lloveras B, Font R, Diaz M, Muñoz N, Catala I, Meijer CJ, Snijders PJ, Herrero R: Cervical human papillomavirus infection in the female population in Barcelona, Spain. Sex Transm Dis. 2003, 30 (10): 788-793. 10.1097/01.OLQ.0000080177.82204.E0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kjaer SK, van den Brule AJ, Bock JE, Poll PA, Engholm G, Sherman ME, Walboomers JM, Meijer CJ: Determinants for genital human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in 1000 randomly chosen young Danish women with normal Pap smear: are there different risk profiles for oncogenic and nononcogenic HPV types?. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1997, 6 (10): 799-805.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Peto J, Gilham C, Deacon J, Taylor C, Evans C, Binns W, Haywood M, Elanko N, Coleman D, Yule R: Cervical HPV infection and neoplasia in a large population-based prospective study: the Manchester cohort. Br J Cancer. 2004, 91 (5): 942-953.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Ronco G, Ghisetti V, Segnan N, Snijders PJ, Gillio-Tos A, Meijer CJ, Merletti F, Franceschi S: Prevalence of human papillomavirus infection in women in Turin, Italy. Eur J Cancer. 2005, 41 (2): 297-305. 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.07.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauer HM, Hildesheim A, Schiffman MH, Glass AG, Rush BB, Scott DR, Cadell DM, Kurman RJ, Manos MM: Determinants of genital human papillomavirus infection in low-risk women in Portland, Oregon. Sex Transm Dis. 1993, 20 (5): 274-278. 10.1097/00007435-199309000-00007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Burk RD, Kelly P, Feldman J, Bromberg J, Vermund SH, DeHovitz JA, Landesman SH: Declining prevalence of cervicovaginal human papillomavirus infection with age is independent of other risk factors. Sex Transm Dis. 1996, 23 (4): 333-341. 10.1097/00007435-199607000-00013.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Giuliano AR, Papenfuss M, Abrahamsen M, Denman C, de Zapien JG, Henze JL, Ortega L, de Galaz EM B, Stephan J, Feng J: Human papillomavirus infection at the United States-Mexico border: implications for cervical cancer prevention and control. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001, 10 (11): 1129-1136.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Matos E, Loria D, Amestoy GM, Herrera L, Prince MA, Moreno J, Krunfly C, van den Brule AJ, Meijer CJ, Muñoz N: Prevalence of human papillomavirus infection among women in Concordia, Argentina: a population-based study. Sex Transm Dis. 2003, 30 (8): 593-599. 10.1097/01.OLQ.0000085181.25063.6C.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Shin HR, Lee DH, Herrero R, Smith JS, Vaccarella S, Hong SH, Jung KY, Kim HH, Park UD, Cha HS: Prevalence of human papillomavirus infection in women in Busan, South Korea. Int J Cancer. 2003, 103 (3): 413-421. 10.1002/ijc.10825.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Herrero R, Castle PE, Schiffman M, Bratti MC, Hildesheim A, Morales J, Alfaro M, Sherman ME, Wacholder S, Chen S: Epidemiologic profile of type-specific human papillomavirus infection and cervical neoplasia in Guanacaste, Costa Rica. J Infect Dis. 2005, 191 (11): 1796-1807. 10.1086/428850.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Herrero R, Hildesheim A, Bratti C, Sherman ME, Hutchinson M, Morales J, Balmaceda I, Greenberg MD, Alfaro M, Burk RD: Population-based study of human papillomavirus infection and cervical neoplasia in rural Costa Rica. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000, 92 (6): 464-474. 10.1093/jnci/92.6.464.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferreccio C, Prado RB, Luzoro AV, Ampuero SL, Snijders PJ, Meijer CJ, Vaccarella SV, Jara AT, Puschel KI, Robles SC: Population-based prevalence and age distribution of human papillomavirus among women in Santiago, Chile. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2004, 13 (12): 2271-2276.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lazcano-Ponce E, Herrero R, Muñoz N, Cruz A, Shah KV, Alonso P, Hernandez P, Salmeron J, Hernandez M: Epidemiology of HPV infection among Mexican women with normal cervical cytology. Int J Cancer. 2001, 91 (3): 412-420. 10.1002/1097-0215(20010201)91:3<412::AID-IJC1071>3.0.CO;2-M.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Molano M, Posso H, Weiderpass E, van den Brule AJ, Ronderos M, Franceschi S, Meijer CJ, Arslan A, Muñoz N: Prevalence and determinants of HPV infection among Colombian women with normal cytology. Br J Cancer. 2002, 87 (3): 324-333. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600442.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Dai M, Bao YP, Li N, Clifford GM, Vaccarella S, Snijders PJ, Huang RD, Sun LX, Meijer CJ, Qiao YL: Human papillomavirus infection in Shanxi Province, People’s Republic of China: a population-based study. Br J Cancer. 2006, 95 (1): 96-101. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603208.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Franceschi S, Rajkumar R, Snijders PJ, Arslan A, Mahe C, Plummer M, Sankaranarayanan R, Cherian J, Meijer CJ, Weiderpass E: Papillomavirus infection in rural women in southern India. Br J Cancer. 2005, 92 (3): 601-606.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Gage JC, Ajenifuja KO, Wentzensen NA, Adepiti AC, Eklund C, Reilly M, Hutchinson M, Wacholder S, Harford J, Soliman AS: The age-specific prevalence of human papillomavirus and risk of cytologic abnormalities in rural Nigeria: Implications for screen-and-treat strategies. Int J Cancer. 2012, 130 (9): 2111-2117. 10.1002/ijc.26211.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Thomas JO, Herrero R, Omigbodun AA, Ojemakinde K, Ajayi IO, Fawole A, Oladepo O, Smith JS, Arslan A, Muñoz N: Prevalence of papillomavirus infection in women in Ibadan, Nigeria: a population-based study. Br J Cancer. 2004, 90 (3): 638-645. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601515.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Keita N, Clifford GM, Koulibaly M, Douno K, Kabba I, Haba M, Sylla BS, van Kemenade FJ, Snijders PJ, Meijer CJ: HPV infection in women with and without cervical cancer in Conakry, Guinea. Br J Cancer. 2009, 101 (1): 202-208. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605140.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Hildesheim A, Schiffman MH, Gravitt PE, Glass AG, Greer CE, Zhang T, Scott DR, Rush BB, Lawler P, Sherman ME: Persistence of type-specific human papillomavirus infection among cytologically normal women. J Infect Dis. 1994, 169 (2): 235-240. 10.1093/infdis/169.2.235.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Goodman MT, Shvetsov YB, McDuffie K, Wilkens LR, Zhu X, Thompson PJ, Ning L, Killeen J, Kamemoto L, Hernandez BY: Prevalence, acquisition, and clearance of cervical human papillomavirus infection among women with normal cytology: Hawaii Human Papillomavirus Cohort Study. Cancer Res. 2008, 68 (21): 8813-8824. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1380.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Muñoz N, Mendez F, Posso H, Molano M, van den Brule AJ, Ronderos M, Meijer C, Muñoz A: Incidence, duration, and determinants of cervical human papillomavirus infection in a cohort of Colombian women with normal cytological results. J Infect Dis. 2004, 190 (12): 2077-2087. 10.1086/425907.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Franceschi S, Herrero R, Clifford GM, Snijders PJ, Arslan A, Anh PT, Bosch FX, Ferreccio C, Hieu NT, Lazcano-Ponce E: Variations in the age-specific curves of human papillomavirus prevalence in women worldwide. Int J Cancer. 2006, 119 (11): 2677-2684. 10.1002/ijc.22241.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ronco G, Giorgi-Rossi P, Carozzi F, Confortini M, Dalla Palma P, Del Mistro A, Gillio-Tos A, Minucci D, Naldoni C, Rizzolo R: Results at recruitment from a randomized controlled trial comparing human papillomavirus testing alone with conventional cytology as the primary cervical cancer screening test. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008, 100 (7): 492-501. 10.1093/jnci/djn065.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ronco G, Giorgi-Rossi P, Carozzi F, Dalla Palma P, Del Mistro A, De Marco L, De Lillo M, Naldoni C, Pierotti P, Rizzolo R: Human papillomavirus testing and liquid-based cytology in primary screening of women younger than 35 years: results at recruitment for a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006, 7 (7): 547-555. 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70731-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ronco G, Segnan N, Giorgi-Rossi P, Zappa M, Casadei GP, Carozzi F, Dalla Palma P, Del Mistro A, Folicaldi S, Gillio-Tos A: Human papillomavirus testing and liquid-based cytology: results at recruitment from the new technologies for cervical cancer randomized controlled trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006, 98 (11): 765-774. 10.1093/jnci/djj209.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ronco G, Giorgi-Rossi P, Carozzi F, Confortini M, Dalla Palma P, Del Mistro A, Ghiringhello B, Girlando S, Gillio-Tos A, De Marco L: Efficacy of human papillomavirus testing for the detection of invasive cervical cancers and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010, 11 (3): 249-257. 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70360-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Carozzi FM, Del Mistro A, Confortini M, Sani C, Puliti D, Trevisan R, De Marco L, Tos AG, Girlando S, Palma PD: Reproducibility of HPV DNA Testing by Hybrid Capture 2 in a Screening Setting. Am J Clin Pathol. 2005, 124 (5): 716-721. 10.1309/84E5WHJQHK83BGQD.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. DemoIstat. http://demo.istat.it (last accessed 26.04.11)
  30. DerSimonian R, Laird N: Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials. 1986, 7 (3): 177-188. 10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2012, ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org,Google Scholar
  32. Czajkowski M, Gill R, Rempala G: Model selection in logistic joinpoint regression with applications to analyzing cohort mortality patterns. Stat Med. 2008, 27 (9): 1508-1526. 10.1002/sim.3017.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Gualtieri G, Guarneri A, Iaccarino C: [Marriage in Italy]. 2010, Rome, Italy: Istituto Nazionale di Staitstica (ISTAT)Google Scholar
  34. Bardin A, Vaccarella S, Clifford GM, Lissowska J, Rekosz M, Bobkiewicz P, Kupryjanczyk J, Krynicki R, Jonska-Gmyrek J, Danska-Bidzinska A: Human papillomavirus infection in women with and without cervical cancer in Warsaw, Poland. Eur J Cancer. 2008, 44 (4): 557-564. 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.12.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Giorgi Rossi P, Bisanzi S, Paganini I, Di Iasi A, Angeloni C, Scalisi A, Macis R, Pini MT, Chini F, Carozzi FM: Prevalence of HPV high and low risk types in cervical samples from the Italian general population: a population based study. BMC Infect Dis. 2010, 10: 214-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Signorelli C, Pasquarella C, Limina RM, Colzani E, Fanti M, Cielo A, Greco M, de’ Somenzi CP, Chironna M, Quarto M: Third Italian national survey on knowledge, attitudes, and sexual behaviour in relation to HIV/AIDS risk and the role of health education campaigns. Eur J Public Health. 2006, 16 (5): 498-504.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Spinelli A, Talamanca IF, Lauria L: Patterns of contraceptive use in 5 European countries. European Study Group on Infertility and Subfecundity. Am J Public Health. 2000, 90 (9): 1403-1408.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Bray F, Loos AH, McCarron P, Weiderpass E, Arbyn M, Moller H, Hakama M, Parkin DM: Trends in cervical squamous cell carcinoma incidence in 13 European countries: changing risk and the effects of screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005, 14 (3): 677-686. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0569.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Arbyn M, Raifu AO, Weiderpass E, Bray F, Anttila A: Trends of cervical cancer mortality in the member states of the European Union. Eur J Cancer. 2009, 45 (15): 2640-2648. 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.07.018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Peto J, Gilham C, Fletcher O, Matthews FE: The cervical cancer epidemic that screening has prevented in the UK. Lancet. 2004, 364 (9430): 249-256. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16674-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Direzione Servizi Civici Settore statistica e Toponomastica - Città di Torino: I numeri dell’immigrazione italiana a Torino 1910–2011. 2011, Città di TorinoGoogle Scholar
  42. Ronco G, Segnan N, Giordano L, Pilutti S, Senore C, Ponti A, Volante R: Interaction of spontaneous and organised screening for cervical cancer in Turin, Italy. Eur J Cancer. 1997, 33 (8): 1262-1267. 10.1016/S0959-8049(97)00076-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/13/238/prepub

Copyright

© Baussano et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.