Skip to main content
Download PDF

Serum cortisol predicts death and critical disease independently of CRB-65 score in community-acquired pneumonia: a prospective observational cohort study

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 12, Article number: 90 (2012) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Several biomarkers and prognostic scores have been evaluated to predict prognosis in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Optimal risk stratification remains to be evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate serum cortisol as biomarker for the prediction of adverse outcomes independently of the CRB-65 score und inflammatory biomarkers in a large cohort of hospitalised patients with CAP.

Methods

984 hospitalised CAP-patients were included. Serum cortisol was measured and its prognostic accuracy compared to the CRB-65 score, leucocyte count and C-reactive protein. Predefined endpoints were 30-day mortality and the combined endpoint critical pneumonia, defined as presence of death occurring during antibiotic treatment, mechanical ventilation, catecholamine treatment or ICU admission.

Results

64 patients died (6.5%) and 85 developed critical pneumonia (8.6%). Cortisol levels were significantly elevated in both adverse outcomes (p < 0.001) and predicted mortality (AUC 0.70, cut-off 795 nmol/L) and critical pneumonia (AUC 0.71) independently of all other measured variables after logistic regression analysis (p = 0.005 and 0.001, respectively). Prognostic accuracy of CRB-65 was significantly improved by adding cortisol levels (combined AUC 0.81 for both endpoints). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, cortisol predicted survival within different CRB-65 strata (p = 0.003). In subgroup analyses, cortisol independently predicted critical pneumonia when compared to procalcitonin, the CURB65 score and minor criteria for severe pneumonia according to the 2007 ATS/IDSA-guideline.

Conclusion

Cortisol predicts mortality and critical disease in hospitalised CAP-patients independently of clinical scores and inflammatory biomarkers. It should be incorporated into trials assessing optimal combinations of clinical criteria and biomarkers to improve initial high risk prediction in CAP.

Peer Review reports

Background

A disease severity based approach with initial risk stratification is required to guide management and treatment decisions in CAP. International guidelines recommend prognostic scores to support clinical decision on management as outpatient, inpatient or admission to ICU. The most established score systems are the PSI-score and the CURB or CRB-65 scores, which perform comparably for mortality prediction and identification of low risk patients suitable for an outpatient management strategy [1–3]. Amongst them, the CRB-65 score is the most easily to calculate and widely used in Europe [4, 5].

Additionally, biomarkers have been found to improve risk stratification and management decisions in CAP. Procalcitonin (PCT) has been demonstrated to provide additional information by identifying low risk patients [6], as parameter to judge treatment response when sequentially measured during treatment [7] and as a tool to guide antibiotic treatment duration [8]. Other biomarkers like pro-ADM, pro-ANP, pro-BNP, pro-vasopressin and d-dimer have been associated with mortality in CAP [9–13].

However, accurate mortality prediction does not automatically lead to accurate identification of patients developing critical disease in need for intensive care treatment [14]. Both the CRB-65 and PSI scores lack accuracy for the prediction of high risk situations resulting in ICU admission [14]. Other scoring systems have been proposed to identify patients requiring admission to ICU like the modified American Thoracic Society (ATS)-rule [15] and more recently the new ATS/Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)-recommended score [16]. However, both scores still fail to identify a significant proportion of patients with early deterioration and have poor positive predictive values for ICU-admission [17–19]. Thus, identifying patients with a high benefit from initial intensive management strategies in CAP remains an important task to be done [20].

Recently, serum cortisol concentration was shown to be associated with severity and mortality in CAP in three small trials [21–23]. Additionally, we demonstrated that cortisol predicts persistent clinical instability, making it a potential parameter to improve the identification of patients with high risk for a complicated disease course [21].

The aim of this trial was, to evaluate serum cortisol as biomarker for the development of severe disease requiring more intensive monitoring and management strategies as well as 30-day mortality in a large cohort of hospitalised CAP-patients. Additionally, we studied the independent contribution of serum cortisol to the prognostic properties of the CRB-65 score and inflammatory biomarkers.

Methods

Patients

Hospitalised CAP patients were recruited from a multicentre national CAP-study in Germany, the German Competence network for the study of CAP (CAPNETZ). Detailed description of the CAPNETZ methodology is given elsewhere [24]. Inclusion criteria for entering the study are: age ≥ 18 years, pulmonary infiltrate diagnosed by chest x-ray, clinical symptoms consisting of cough or purulent sputum or positive auscultation or fever. Among the exclusion criteria is systemic steroid medication of ≥ 20 mg prednisolone equivalent per day for more than 14 days. Patients for this study were recruited in 12 clinical CAPNETZ centers between 10/2002 and 12/2008. All clinical parameters are stored in an electronic database. Written informed consent was obtained from every patient prior to inclusion in the study. The study was approved by the ethical review board of the University of Magdeburg, Germany (#104/01).

Comorbidities in the present study were defined as presence of one or more of the following: congestive heart failure, COPD, chronic renal disease, chronic liver disease, cerebrovascular disease, malignancy, or diabetes mellitus.

The CRB-65 score was determined in all patients as described previously [25].

All patients were followed up according to a standardized data sheet for at least 180 days.

Laboratory values

Venous blood samples were collected within 24 h after first presentation and inclusion in the CAPNETZ study and stored centrally at -70°C. Leucocyte (WBC) count and urea were determined by the local hospital laboratories. Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) was centrally measured by nephelometry with a commercially available assay (Behring Diagnostics, Marburg, Germany). Serum PCT was centrally determined by an immunofluorescent assay (sensitive KRYPTOR, B.R.A.H.M.S AG, Henningsdorf, Germany). Serum cortisol was centrally analysed by a commercially available chemiluminescence immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). This assay has a measurement range of 0.5-1750 nmol/L, higher concentrations were analysed by dilution of the serum sample according to the manufacturers protocol.

Outcome parameter

Predefined outcome variables were survival within 30 days after first contact and the combined endpoint critical pneumonia, defined as the presence of one of the following: death occurring during antibiotic treatment, mechanical ventilation, catecholamine treatment or ICU admission.

Statistics

Two group comparisons were calculated by the Mann-Whitney U-test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to predict the binary endpoints by including the CRB-65-score, the measured laboratory parameters WBC, CRP, cortisol, and all documented comorbid conditions and demographic factors given in Table 1. For multivariate analyses a logistic regression model with stepwise forward variable selection was employed.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of patients
Full size table

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to determine the diagnostic properties of predictive parameters, optimal cut-off values were determined by Youden's index. To compare the predictive value of cortisol and the CRB-65 score, a binary logistic regression model of both parameters was used and the predicted probability derived from that model was included into the ROC-curve analysis. Odds ratios were calculated by using the Mantel-Haenszel estimate.

To assess the influence of cortisol concentrations on mortality, we produced Kaplan-Meier survival curves according to cortisol quartiles or cut-off value and stratified by CRB-65 score. Comparison between the groups was performed by log-rank test. A p-value of ≤ 0.05 (two-sided) was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS for Windows, version 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

984 patients were included in the study, their baseline characteristics are summarised in Table 1.

A causative microbiological pathogen was detected in 195 patients (20%). Of these, typical bacteria were found in 84 patients (43%), atypical bacteria in 64 (33%), viruses in 29 (15%) and mixed infection in 18 (9%). Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most frequently isolated pathogen (n = 71, 36%)

There were 64 (6.5%) non-survivors at day 30 after the first contact; their characteristics are shown in Table 1. Mortality rates within the different CRB-65 score groups were 0.7% (0 points), 7.7% (1 point), 18.2% (2 points), 21.1% (3 points) and 100% (4 points). The predefined criteria for the combined endpoint of critical pneumonia occurred in 85 patients (8.6%): Death during antimicrobial treatment (N = 37), ICU-admission (N = 19, 2 died during antimicrobial treatment), mechanical ventilation (N = 44, 11 of them on ICU, 2 more died during antimicrobial treatment) or catecholamine treatment (N = 5, all on ICU).

Serum cortisol levels on admission were significantly higher in non-survivors when compared to survivors (median 870 [IQR 624-1359] vs. 602 [407-843] nmol/l, p < 0.001) and in patients with critical pneumonia versus noncritical pneumonia (median 972 [626-1520] vs. 598 [406-837] nmol/l, p < 0.001, Table 1), and increased with increasing CRB-65 score (Figure 1). Cortisol values for the different criteria of critical pneumonia are shown in Table 2.

Figure 1
figure1

Boxplots of cortisol levels by severity of CAP according to CRB-65 score. * 1 case (cortisol 4509 nmol/l) not shown; # 3 cases (cortisol 3894-7817 nmol/l) not shown; § 2 cases (cortisol 4116, 9558 nmol/l) not shown; & 2 cases (cortisol 3858, 3924 nmol/l) not shown.

Full size image
Table 2 Cortisol values for the different criteria of critical pneumonia
Full size table

In multivariate analysis including all variables given in Table 1, only cortisol level (p = 0.005 and 0.001 per IQR-increase, respectively), CRB-65 score, pre-existing congestive heart failure and male sex independently predicted both endpoints (Table 3).

Table 3 Factors predictive for the tested endpoints in multivariate logistic regression analysis, including all variables given in Table 1
Full size table

This was confirmed by ROC-curve-analysis, showing that serum cortisol was associated with both predefined endpoints (AUC = 0.70 for 30-day mortality, AUC = 0.71 for critical pneumonia). The optimal cut-off value was calculated with 795 nmol/l with a sensitivity of 66% and specificity of 71% (OR 4.7 [95%-CI: 2.8-8.1], p < 0.001) for 30-day mortality. Sensitivity and specificity for critical pneumonia were 64% and 72% (OR 4.5 [95%-CI: 2.8-7.1], p < 0.001).

As shown in binary logistic regression analysis, the combined use of CRB-65 and cortisol significantly improved the prediction of 30-day mortality (AUC = 0.81, p = 0.001) and critical pneumonia (AUC = 0.81, p = 0.002) when compared to the CRB-65 score alone (AUC = 0.76 and 0.77, respectively, Figures 2 and 3). This result remained significant, when CRP and WBC were added in the binary regression analysis (p = 0.006 and p = 0.018 for cortisol). WBC did not add significantly to the CRB-65 score for both endpoints, CRP improved prediction of critical pneumonia (combined CRP + CRB-65 AUC = 0.81, p = 0.004), but not 30-day mortality (p = 0.49).

Figure 2
figure2

ROC-Plot for 30-day mortality, comparing CRB-65 score, cortisol and CRB65-score plus cortisol (p = 0.001 versus CRB65 score alone).

Full size image
Figure 3
figure3

ROC-Plots for 30-day critical pneumonia, comparing CRB-65 score, cortisol and CRB65-score plus cortisol (p = 0.002 versus CRB65 score alone).

Full size image

Independent prediction of survival by cortisol could also be demonstrated by Kaplan-Meyer survival analysis. Survival was significantly different within cortisol-quartiles (p < 0.001, Figure 4), and this prediction persisted within the CRB-65 classes (p = 0.002-0.003, Figures 5, 6, 7).

Figure 4
figure4

Kaplan-Meyer analysis for 30-day mortality according to cortisol quartiles (2/984 cases censored before day 30).

Full size image
Figure 5
figure5

Kaplan-Meyer analysis for 30-day mortality within CRB-65 score class 0 (2/984 cases censored before day 30).

Full size image
Figure 6
figure6

Kaplan-Meyer analysis for 30-day mortality within CRB-65 score class 1 (2/984 cases censored before day 30).

Full size image
Figure 7
figure7

Kaplan-Meyer analysis for 30-day mortality within CRB-65 score class 2-4 (2/984 cases censored before day 30).

Full size image

Urea was available from 889 patients (90%), and in this subgroup a post-hoc analysis of the CURB- and CURB65-scores was performed. The CURB-score predicted 30-day mortality and critical pneumonia equally to the CRB-65 score with an AUC of 0.77 and 0.78, respectively. The corresponding values for the CURB-65 score were 0.81 and 0.79, which was a superior to the CRB65 score (p = 0.001). If cortisol was added, further significant improvement of prediction resulted for both scores and endpoints (cortisol + CURB: AUC 0.81 and 0.82; p = 0.009 and < 0.001; cortisol + CURB65: AUC 0.84 and 0.82; p = 0.02 and < 0.001, respectively).

PCT was not routinely measured in this trial. However, in 643 patients (65.3%) initial PCT levels were available and post-hoc analysis of these patients was performed. Median PCT-concentration was 0.11 ng/ml (IQR 0.06-0.33), with significantly higher values in non-survivors (0.40 ng/ml [0.15-2.06]) vs. survivors (0.10 ng/ml [0.06-0.30], p < 0.001). PCT predicted 30-day mortality (AUC = 0.73) and critical pneumonia (AUC = 0.74) by ROC-curve-analysis. In that subgroup, both PCT and cortisol tended to improve the predictive potential of CRB-65 score for 30-day-mortality, however in binary logistic regression analysis including all three variables, the added predictive value was not significant (p = 0.27 for PCT, p = 0.057 for cortisol). If critical pneumonia was used as dependent variable, only cortisol added significantly and independently of PCT to the prognostic accuracy of CRB-65 (CRB-65 AUC = 0.77; CRB-65 + cortisol AUC = 0.82, p < 0.001). The combined addition of both biomarkers to CRB-65 showed no further improvement.

To assess the prognostic relevance of cortisol in comparison to the suggested minor criteria to identify patients in need of ICU-admission by the ATS/IDSA 2007 guideline [16], we additionally performed a post-hoc analysis on the 425 patients (43%) with all 8 minor criteria (except multilobar infiltrates: no data) available. By including these factors and serum cortisol into a logistic multivariate regression analysis, significant independent prediction of critical pneumonia was seen only for cortisol (OR 1.78 per IQR-increase, p = 0.001) and the three CRB-factors (confusion: OR 5.7, p < 0.001; respiratory rate: OR 1.1, p < 0.001; blood pressure OR 1.02, p = 0.026). After calculating the minor criteria as suggested by the ATS/IDSA-guideline (with a PaO2 < 52 mmHg instead of PaO2/FiO2 < 250 and without multilobar infiltrate), the resulting AUC after ROC curve analysis for predicting critical pneumonia was 0.71 with an optimal cut-off of ≥2 criteria (sensitivity 49%, specificity 88%). Cortisol added significantly to the predictive accuracy of this model in binary regression analysis (combined AUC 0.74, p = 0.003).

Discussion

The main study result is that increased serum cortisol level is associated with the development of critical disease and increased 30-day-mortality in hospitalised CAP-patients and adds prognostic information independently of the CRB-65 score and the inflammatory biomarkers WBC and CRP. Serum cortisol level improves the predictive power of the CRB-65 score and shows independent prognostic significance within different CRB-65 strata. Its additional predictive value persisted, when cortisol was analysed in combination with urea within the CURB-65 score, PCT or minor criteria suggested by the recently revised ATS/IDSA-guideline [16] to predict ICU-admission.

Our study confirms and expands previous data from three smaller studies, including a total of 401 patients, suggesting cortisol as biomarker for predicting mortality in CAP patients [21–23]. The optimal cut-off for mortality from our data (795 nmol/l) resembles that proposed by these studies (734 nmol/l in [21], 960 nmol/l in [22] and 820 nmol/l in [23]). The main strength of our study is the high number of patients included and the rigorous follow up (only 2/984 missing cases after 30 days), allowing a more accurate evaluation of mortality and critical pneumonia development with a significant number of patients meeting these endpoints.

In univariate analysis, we found the known risk factors age, male sex, nursing home residence, chronic comorbidities, CRB-65 score and the measured inflammatory biomarkers to be associated with both endpoints [26, 27]. In concordance with previous studies, severe pneumonia seemed to be less likely to develop in patients with antibiotic pre-treatment [28–30]. In multivariate analysis, only comorbidities, male sex, the CRB-65 score and serum cortisol predicted both outcomes. The addition of urea to the CRB-65 score (CURB65-score) in a large subgroup analysis resulted in improvement of the CRB-65 score, whereas the substitution of age by urea (CURB-score) did not. If cortisol subsequently was added to either score, further prognostic improvement of the same magnitude resulted, suggesting that the prognostic value of cortisol complements that of urea.

The CAPNETZ study also records the cause of death as judged by the treating physician. This subjective statement certainly has a lower value than measured parameters. But, of the 22 patients who died within 30 days despite having an initial cortisol level below the cut-off of 795 nmol/l, only three died from pneumonia as judged by the treating physicians, and two of these three suffered from concomitant bronchial carcinoma.

Mortality prediction might not be optimal to identify patients at risk for critical disease manifestations such as respiratory insufficiency or septic shock. These carry a high demand on and benefit of intensified management strategies, which makes their early detection crucial. On the other hand, CAP frequently occurs in elderly and multimorbid patients. Here mortality does not always reflect "dying from pneumonia" but rather "dying with pneumonia", and treatment restrictions might bias this endpoint further. By the inclusion of the predefined composite endpoint of critical pneumonia, our study provides even more accurate pneumonia-specific risk prediction than by mortality prediction alone. This dichotomy of endpoints is reflected by our data: Whereas mortality was predicted by concomitant malignancy, chronic renal failure and high age, critical pneumonia was predicted by higher CRP levels indicating systemic inflammation. CRB-65-score, congestive heart failure, male sex and serum cortisol as only biomarker independently predicted both endpoints, confirming the prognostic relevance of cortisol for CAP-related outcomes.

Rapid and accurate identification of hospitalised CAP patients at risk of a critical disease course is a yet unmet need in CAP management. Several scores have been evaluated for predicting ICU-admission. The "classical" risk prediction tools, the CRB-65- and PSI-scores perform well in identifying patients with a low mortality risk, but are poor in predicting ICU-admission [14, 20]. Recommended tools for this purpose are the modified ATS-rule [15], consisting of two major criteria (requirement of mechanical ventilation, presence of septic shock) and three minor criteria (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg, multilobar involvement, PaO2/FiO2 < 250), and the newer ATS/IDSA-rule [16], which added 6 more minor criteria (respiratory rate > 30/min; confusion; blood urea nitrogen > 20 mg/dl; leukopenia; thrombocytopenia; hypothermia), thus incorporating all "CRB"-criteria. If these factors were included in a multivariate analysis with serum cortisol in our study, only cortisol and the three CRB-criteria provided independent predictive power for critical pneumonia, suggesting potential improvement of this score by complementing or substituting some of these criteria by cortisol.

To account for the heterogeneous causes for deterioration in CAP, optimal risk prediction probably should incorporate clinical criteria plus biomarkers reflecting inflammatory, cardiovascular and other mechanisms of disease progression. Accordingly, although inflammatory markers like CRP [13] and PCT [6, 31] are associated with mortality in CAP, their predictive accuracy does not allow high risk prediction by themselves. Cardiovascular biomarkers like NT-proBNP [11], copeptin, pro-endothelin and MRpro-ANP [9, 32] and others like d-dimer [12] and proADM [10, 33] also predict poor prognosis in CAP.

Cortisol is a biomarker reflecting additional mechanisms involved in critical disease development like stress response and immunomodulatory regulation of inflammatory processes [34]. Physiologically, acute stress like severe illness leads to an activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis which protects the organism against excessive inflammatory responses [35]. In severe sepsis and septic shock, the increase of serum cortisol levels parallels the severity of infection and prognosis of patients [36]. This makes cortisol an attractive biomarker reflecting acute patterns of critical disease and disease progression. Recently, three small studies showed that cortisol correlates to CAP severity and predicts mortality in CAP-patients. Data from our group additionally demonstrated, that clinical instability after 72 h, reflecting course and treatment response in CAP, was predicted by admission cortisol levels [21]. Our present study data add to that evidence by demonstrating prediction of critical pneumonia development independently of known clinical risk factors and inflammatory biomarkers. However, before cortisol measurement can be recommended for clinical routine use as biomarker in CAP, a prospective interventional trial is necessary to prove its accuracy and cost-effectiveness in comparison to evaluated clinical scores and competitive biomarkers for predicting patients benefiting from intensified treatment and monitoring strategies.

Recently there have been conflicting reports on benefits and risks of steroid treatment in CAP [37, 38]. Given the accumulating evidence of the association of high cortisol levels with worse outcome in CAP, which is confirmed by the present data, the rationale of steroid treatment for this condition should be questioned. Whether the association of high cortisol and poor prognosis reflects adrenal regulation because of more severe CAP or adrenal dysregulation resulting in a complicated disease course cannot be concluded from our data and deserves further study.

Several limitations of our study have to be mentioned:

First, we were not able to correct for concomitant steroid medication, as this data were not documented. Systemic steroid medication of ≥ 20 mg prednisolone equivalent per day for more than 14 days excludes participation in CAPNETZ. In order to control for potential effects of steroid co-medication, which probably affect patients with chronic respiratory disease in particular, analysis after exclusion of all patients with chronic respiratory disease was performed and no relevant change of the diagnostic properties of cortisol could be detected.

Second, as blood samples were taken at time of first contact, controlling for the time point of blood sampling could not be done. Cortisol exhibits diurnal concentration changes; however, during infectious diseases the circadian pattern is often lost [39].

Third, we did not test for adrenal insufficiency based on the response to injection of synthetic adrenocorticotropin. However previous data show a very low rate of adrenal insufficiency in patients with CAP in the absence of septic shock [21], and the association of mortality with high cortisol levels seems to contradict any major prognostic influence.

Thus, deviation of our study results by concomitant steroid medication, adrenal insufficiency or different blood sampling time points cannot be ruled out. These limitations also might account for the slightly lower predictive performance of cortisol shown in our study when compared to some of the previous data (AUC for mortality in our data 0.70; 0.76 in [22], 0.65 in [23], 0.83 in [21]). Standardised blood collection at the same daytime in all patients and rigorous exclusion of oral steroid co-medication would most probably have resulted in a higher accuracy but does not reflect daily clinical practice. Therefore, this lack of standardisation might also be interpreted in favour of the robustness of the association between serum cortisol and CAP outcomes.

Finally, a comparison with other non-inflammatory biomarkers of CAP prognosis or new risk scores recently evaluated to predict ICU admission in CAP like the SMART-COP score [40] is not available from our data; and comparison with urea, PCT and the ATS/IDSA-minor criteria have been calculated in post-hoc analyses with data not complete for all patients.

Conclusions

In conclusion, cortisol predicts mortality and critical disease in hospitalised CAP-patients independently of clinical factors and inflammatory biomarkers. Recognizing the need for early identification of patients requiring intensive management strategies and the complex mechanisms involved in critical disease development in CAP, cortisol represents a promising biomarker for high risk prediction. In order to implement its use into clinical practice, the optimal combination of clinical factors and biomarkers for high risk prediction in hospitalised CAP should be evaluated in a large prospective trial. Ideally, this would include an interventional design, assessing the guidance of more intensive monitoring and management strategies based on a combined risk stratification tool consisting of clinical factors and biomarkers like cortisol.

References

  1. 1.

    Loke YK, Kwok CS, Niruban A, Myint PK: Value of severity scales in predicting mortality from community-acquired pneumonia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax. 2010, 65: 884-890. 10.1136/thx.2009.134072.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Chalmers JD, Singanayagam A, Akram AR, Mandal P, Short PM, Choudhury G, Wood V, Hill AT: Severity assessment tools for predicting mortality in hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax. 2010, 65: 878-883. 10.1136/thx.2009.133280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bauer TT, Ewig S, Marre R, Suttorp N, Welte T: CRB-65 predicts death from community-acquired pneumonia. J Intern Med. 2006, 260: 93-101. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01657.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ewig S, Welte T: CRB-65 for the assessment of pneumonia severity: who could ask for more?. Thorax. 2008, 63: 665-666. 10.1136/thx.2008.099028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Höffken G, Lorenz J, Kern W, Welte T, Bauer T, Dalhoff K, Dietrich E, Ewig S, Gastmeier P, Grabein B, Halle E, Kolditz M, Marre R, Sitter H: Epidemiology, diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy and management of community-acquired pneumonia and lower respiratory tract infections in adults. Guidelines of the Paul-Ehrlich-Society for Chemotherapy, the German Respiratory Society, the German Society for Infectiology and the Competence Network CAPNETZ Germany. Pneumologie. 2009, 63: e1-e68. 10.1055/s-0029-1215037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Krüger S, Ewig S, Marre R, Papassotiriou J, Richter K, von Baum H, Suttorp N, Welte T: Procalcitonin predicts patients at low risk of death from community-acquired pneumonia across all CRB-65 classes. Eur Respir J. 2008, 31: 349-355. 10.1183/09031936.00054507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Charles PE, Tinel C, Barbar S, Aho S, Prin S, Doise JM, Olsson NO, Blettery B, Quenot JP: Procalcitonin kinetics within the first days of sepsis: relationship with the appropriateness of antibiotic therapy and the outcome. Crit Care. 2009, 13: R38-10.1186/cc7751.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Christ-Crain M, Stolz D, Bingisser R, Muller C, Miedinger D, Huber PR, Zimmerli W, Harbarth S, Tamm M, Muller B: Procalcitonin guidance of antibiotic therapy in community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006, 174: 84-93. 10.1164/rccm.200512-1922OC.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Krüger S, Ewig S, Kunde J, Hartmann O, Suttorp N, Welte T: Pro-atrial natriuretic peptide and pro-vasopressin for predicting short-term and long-term survival in community-acquired pneumonia: results from the German Competence Network CAPNETZ. Thorax. 2010, 65: 208-214. 10.1136/thx.2009.121178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Krüger S, Ewig S, Giersdorf S, Hartmann O, Suttorp N, Welte : Cardiovascular and inflammatory biomarkers to predict short- and long-term survival in community-acquired pneumonia: Results from the German Competence Network, CAPNETZ. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010, 182: 1426-1434. 10.1164/rccm.201003-0415OC.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Jeong KY, Kim K, Kim TY, Lee CC, Jo SO, Rhee JE, Jo YH, Suh GJ, Singer AJ: Prognostic value of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide in hospitalised patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Emerg Med J. 2011, 28: 122-127. 10.1136/emj.2009.089383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Querol-Ribelles JM, Tenias JM, Grau E, Querol-Borras JM, Climent JL, Gomez E, Martinez I: Plasma d-Dimer Levels Correlate With Outcomes in Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia. Chest. 2004, 126: 1087-1092. 10.1378/chest.126.4.1087.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Menendez R, Martinez R, Reyes S, Mensa J, Filella X, Marcos MA, Martinez A, Esquinas C, Ramirez P, Torres A: Biomarkers improve mortality prediction by prognostic scales in community-acquired pneumonia. Thorax. 2009, 64: 587-591. 10.1136/thx.2008.105312.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Chalmers JD, Mandal P, Singanayagam A, Akram AR, Choudhury G, Short PM, Hill AT: Severity assessment tools to guide ICU admission in community-acquired pneumonia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2011, 37: 1409-1420. 10.1007/s00134-011-2261-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ewig S, Ruiz M, Mensa J, Marcos MA, Martinez JA, Arancibia F, Niederman MS, Torres A: Severe community-acquired pneumonia: Assessment of severity criteria. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998, 158: 1102-1108.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, Bartlett JG, Campbell GD, Dean NC, Dowell SF, File TM, Musher DM, Niederman MS, Torres A, Whitney CG: Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2007, 44: S27-S72. 10.1086/511159.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Liapikou A, Ferrer M, Polverino E, Balasso V, Esperatti M, Piner R, Mensa J, Luque N, Ewig S, Menendez R, Niederman MS, Torres A: Severe community-acquired pneumonia: validation of the Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society guidelines to predict an intensive care unit admission. Clin Infect Dis. 2009, 48: 377-385. 10.1086/596307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Restrepo MI, Mortensen EM, Rello J, Brody J, Anzueto A: Late admission to the ICU in patients with community-acquired pneumonia is associated with higher mortality. Chest. 2010, 137: 552-557. 10.1378/chest.09-1547.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Renaud B, Santin A, Coma E, Camus N, Van Pelt D, Hayon J, Gurgui M, Roupie E, Herve J, Fine MJ, Brun-Buisson C, Labarere J: Association between timing of intensive care unit admission and outcomes for emergency department patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Crit Care Med. 2009, 37: 2867-2874. 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b02dbb.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Ewig S, Woodhead M, Torres A: Towards a sensible comprehension of severe community-acquired pneumonia. Intensive Care Med. 2011, 37: 214-223. 10.1007/s00134-010-2077-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kolditz M, Halank M, Schulte-Hubbert B, Höffken G: Adrenal function is related to prognosis in moderate community-acquired pneumonia. Eur Respir J. 2010, 36: 615-621. 10.1183/09031936.00191709.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Christ-Crain M, Stolz D, Jutla S, Couppis O, Muller C, Bingisser R, Schuetz P, Tamm M, Edwards R, Muller B, Grossman AB: Free and Total Cortisol Levels as Predictors of Severity and Outcome in Community-acquired Pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007, 176: 913-920. 10.1164/rccm.200702-307OC.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Gotoh S, Nishimura N, Takahashi O, Shiratsuka H, Horinouchi H, Ono H, Uchiyama N, Chohnabayashi N: Adrenal function in patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Eur Respir J. 2008, 31: 1268-1273. 10.1183/09031936.00135607.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Welte T, Suttorp N, Marre R: CAPNETZ-community-acquired pneumonia competence network. Infection. 2004, 32: 234-238.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Lim WS, van der Eerden MM, Laing R, Boersma WG, Karalus N, Town GI, Lewis SA, Macfarlane JT: Defining community acquired pneumonia severity on presentation to hospital: an international derivation and validation study. Thorax. 2003, 58: 377-382. 10.1136/thorax.58.5.377.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, Hanusa BH, Weissfeld LA, Singer DE, Coley CM, Marrie TJ, Kapoor WN: A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 1997, 336: 243-250. 10.1056/NEJM199701233360402.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kothe H, Bauer T, Marre R, Suttorp N, Welte T, Dalhoff K: Outcome of community-acquired pneumonia: influence of age, residence status and antimicrobial treatment. Eur Respir J. 2008, 32: 139-146. 10.1183/09031936.00092507.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Schaaf B, Kruse J, Rupp J, Reinert RR, Droemann D, Zabel P, Ewig S, Dalhoff K: Sepsis severity predicts outcome in community-acquired pneumococcal pneumonia. Eur Respir J. 2007, 30: 517-524. 10.1183/09031936.00021007.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Krüger S, Ewig S, Kunde J, Hartmann O, Marre R, Suttorp N, Welte T: Assessment of inflammatory markers in patients with community-acquired pneumonia-influence of antimicrobial pre-treatment: results from the German competence network CAPNETZ. Clin Chim Acta. 2010, 411: 1929-1934. 10.1016/j.cca.2010.08.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Krüger S, Ewig S, Kunde J, Hanschmann A, Marre R, Suttorp N, Welte T: C-terminal provasopressin (copeptin) in patients with community-acquired pneumonia-influence of antibiotic pre-treatment: results from the German competence network CAPNETZ. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009, 64: 159-162. 10.1093/jac/dkp148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Huang D, Huang DT, Weissfeld LA, Kellum JA, Yealy DM, Kong L, Martino M, Angus DC: Risk prediction with procalcitonin and clinical rules in community-acquired pneumonia. Ann Emerg Med. 2008, 52: 48-58. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.01.003.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Schuetz P, Christ-Crain M, Zimmerli W, Mueller B: Repeated measurements of endothelin-1 precursor peptides predict the outcome in community-acquired pneumonia. Intensive Care Med. 2011, 37: 970-980. 10.1007/s00134-011-2208-2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Schuetz P, Wolbers M, Christ-Crain M, Thomann R, Falconnier C, Widmer I, Neidert S, Fricker T, Blum C, Schild U, Morgenthaler NG, Schoenenberger R, Henzen C, Bregenzer T, Hoess C, Krause M, Bucher HC, Zimmerli W, Mueller B: Prohormones for prediction of adverse medical outcome in community-acquired pneumonia and lower respiratory tract infections. Crit Care. 2010, 14: R106-10.1186/cc9055.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Chrousos GP: The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and immune-mediated inflammation. N Engl J Med. 1995, 332: 1351-1362. 10.1056/NEJM199505183322008.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Cooper MS, Stewart PM: Corticosteroid Insufficiency in Acutely Ill Patients. N Engl J Med. 2003, 348: 727-734. 10.1056/NEJMra020529.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Arafah BM: Hypothalamic Pituitary Adrenal Function during Critical Illness: Limitations of Current Assessment Methods. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006, 91: 3725-3745. 10.1210/jc.2006-0674.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Meijvis SC, Hardeman H, Remmelts HH, Heijligenberg R, Rijkers GT, van Velzen-Blad H, Voorn GP, van de Garde EM, Endeman H, Grutters JC, Bos WJ, Biesma DH: Dexamethasone and length of hospital stay in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2011, 377: 2023-2030. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60607-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Snijders D, Daniels JM, de Graaff CS, van der Werf TS, Boersma WG: Efficacy of corticosteroids in community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized double-blinded clinical trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010, 181: 975-982. 10.1164/rccm.200905-0808OC.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Van den Berghe G, de Zegher F, Bouillon R: Clinical review 95: Acute and prolonged critical illness as different neuroendocrine paradigms. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998, 83: 1827-1834. 10.1210/jc.83.6.1827.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Charles PG, Wolfe R, Whitby M, Fine MJ, Fuller AJ, Stirling R, Wright AA, Ramirez JA, Christiansen KJ, Waterer GW, Pierce RJ, Armstrong JG, Korman TM, Holmes P, Obrosky DS, Peyrani P, Johnson B, Hooy M, Australian Community-Acquired Pneumonia Study Collaboration, Grayson ML: SMART-COP: a tool for predicting the need for intensive respiratory or vasopressor support in community-acquired pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 2008, 47: 375-384. 10.1086/589754.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/12/90/prepub

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to F. Bühling, Cottbus, Germany, for the analyses of cortisol levels.

The study was funded by an award of the ARGUS foundation, Berlin, Germany.

CAPNETZ is a multidisciplinary approach to better understand and treat patients with community-acquired pneumonia. The network is funded by the German Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung), grant number 01KI07145.

Members of the CAPNETZ study group except the authors:

T. Bauer, F. Kunitz (Berlin), B. Hauptmeier, S. Ewig (Bochum), C. Schumann (Ulm), T. Schaberg, I. Hering (Rotenburg/Wümme), K. Dalhoff, P. Heyer (Lübeck), M. Prediger, K. Kaube (Cottbus), T. Welte, J. Rademacher (Hannover), B. Drewelow, J. Majcher-Peszynska (Rostock), N. Suttorp, A. Tessmer (Berlin, Charité), O. Burghuber, G. Rainer (Wien), W. Petermann, H. Buschmann, R. Kröning, Y. Aydin (Paderborn), S. Krüger (Aachen), W. Pankow, A. Lies (Neukölln), R. Marre (Ulm), G. Barten, L. Gosman (Hannover), H. von Baum (Ulm, Med. Microbiology), T. Illmann, M. Wallner (Ulm) and all study nurses.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Division of Pulmonology, Medical Department 1, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany

    Martin Kolditz & Gert Höffken

  2. Department of Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Berlin, Germany

    Peter Martus

  3. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands

    Gernot Rohde

  4. Department of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Pulmonary Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Hartwig Schütte & Norbert Suttorp

  5. Department of Internal Medicine V - Pulmonology, Allergology, Respiratory Intensive Care Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg, Germany

    Robert Bals

  6. Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine II, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany

    Mathias W Pletz

Authors
  1. Martin Kolditz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gert Höffken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter Martus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gernot Rohde
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hartwig Schütte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Robert Bals
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Norbert Suttorp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mathias W Pletz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

the CAPNETZ study group

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Kolditz.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

Author contributions: conception, hypothesis and design of the study (MK, MWP, GH); acquisition of data (MK, MWP, GR, HS, RB, NS); analysis and interpretation (MK, PM); substantial involvement in the writing and/or revision of the article (MK, MWP, PM, GR, HS, RB, GH, NS). All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kolditz, M., Höffken, G., Martus, P. et al. Serum cortisol predicts death and critical disease independently of CRB-65 score in community-acquired pneumonia: a prospective observational cohort study. BMC Infect Dis 12, 90 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-12-90

Download citation

Keywords

  • Risk stratification
  • Prognosis
  • Biomarker
  • Mortality
  • CRB-65 score

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us