This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Prevention and treatment of surgical site infection in HIV-infected patients
- Lei Zhang†1,
- Bao-Chi Liu1Email author,
- Xiao-Yan Zhang†2,
- Lei Li†1,
- Xian-Jun Xia†1 and
- Rui-Zhang Guo†1
© zhang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 20 December 2011
Accepted: 14 May 2012
Published: 14 May 2012
Surgical site infection (SSI) are the third most frequently reported nosocomial infection, and the most common on surgical wards. HIV-infected patients may increase the possibility of developing SSI after surgery. There are few reported date on incidence and the preventive measures of SSI in HIV-infected patients. This study was to determine the incidence and the associated risk factors for SSI in HIV-infected patients. And we also explored the preventive measures.
A retrospective study of SSI was conducted in 242 HIV-infected patients including 17 patients who combined with hemophilia from October 2008 to September 2011 in Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center. SSI were classified according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria and identified by bedside surveillance and post-discharge follow-up. Data were analyzed using SPSS 16.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
The SSI incidence rate was 47.5% (115 of 242); 38.4% incisional SSIs, 5.4% deep incisional SSIs and 3.7% organ/space SSIs. The SSI incidence rate was 37.9% in HIV-infected patients undergoing abdominal operation. Patients undergoing abdominal surgery with lower preoperative CD4 counts were more likely to develop SSIs. The incidence increased from 2.6% in clean wounds to 100% in dirty wounds. In the HIV-infected patients combined with hemophilia, the mean preoperative albumin and postoperative hemoglobin were found significantly lower than those in no-SSIs group (P<0.05).
SSI is frequent in HIV-infected patients. And suitable perioperative management may decrease the SSIs incidence rate of HIV-infected patients.
Surgical site infection (SSI) are the third most frequently reported nosocomial infection, and the most common on surgical wards . The Centers for Disease and Prevention (CDC) estimates that 22% of all the health-care-associated infections are SSI, with an increasing percentage over the last decennium [1, 2]. SSI increase morbidity as well as mortality, double the length of hospital stay [3–6] and increase the cost of surgery two-fivefold . Kirkland et al. showed that 60% of the patients who develop an SSI are more likely to be admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU), or to be hospitalized for another 5 days and more than five times more likely to be re-admitted. Therefore, SSI rates are increasingly seen as a performance indicator for the quality of health care . In 2009, the World Health Organization issued guidelines on how to prevent SSI in developed as well as in developing countries .
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) is a worldwide pandemic. In recent years, the number of HIV-infected patients is progressively increasing. The introduction of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has significantly improved the life expectancy of patients infected with HIV and those diagnosed with AIDS [10–15]. The demand for surgical treatment in HIV-infected patients combined with surgical disease is on the rise [16, 17]. The progressive failure of the immune system in patients caused by HIV can increase the possibility of developing surgical site infections after surgery. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and the associated risk factors for SSI in HIV-infected patients. And we also explored the preventive measures.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definition for wound class and classification of SSI were used. Surgical site infection (SSI) was defined as an infection occurring within 30 days of the operative procedure, with the patient having one or more of the followings: (i) purulent drainage from the surgical incision; (ii) organisms isolated from an aseptically obtained culture of fluid or tissue from the surgical incision; (iii) at least one of the following: pain or tenderness, localized swelling, redness, or heat. SSIs were classified as being incisional, deep incisional or organ/space. A surgical procedure was defined as the single surgery that was performed in the operating theatre. If more than two surgical procedures were performed in a single patient, the characteristics of the first surgical procedure were described.
Clinical data on HIV-infected patients undergoing surgery from October 2008 to September 2011 were retrieved using our computerized patient record system. Inclusion criteria: HIV-infected patients were identified and diagnosed by local Centers for the Disease Prevention and Control in different places. HIV test was done using ELISA and Western blot. Upon admission, all selected patients had records containing information on thorough disease histories, physical examinations, preoperative and postoperative routine examination, and immune function tests.
Patient group and study methods
A retrospective study of SSI was conducted in 242 HIV-infected patients including 17 patients who combined with hemophilia from October 2008 to September 2011 in Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center. SSI were classified according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria and identified by bedside surveillance and post-discharge follow-up. We stratified and compared the incidence of SSIs according to preoperative CD4 counts with breakpoint values of 200 and wound class. Patients combined with hemophilia were divided into SSIs group (A) and no-SSIs group (B). Demographic and clinical information was entered into a database that included: type of surgical procedure, age, peripheral blood cells, plasma albumin, CD4 counts, and CD4/CD8 ratios.
Our study was a retrospective study conformed to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. It had been approved by Institutional Ethics Review Board of Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center (International index IORG0006364).
Data were analyzed using SPSS 16.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). Results of all continuous data are presented here as mean ± standard deviation. Continuous variables were compared with independent t-test. Univariate analysis of the categorical outcome was carried out using Chi-squared tests. P<0.05 indicates statistical significance.
The types of surgical operations and SSI in each procedures
Deep incisional SSI
Skin Tumor Removal
Incidence of SSIs in patients undergoing abdominal surgery stratified by preoperative CD4 counts
SSI(total = 25), N(%)
no-SSI(total = 41), N(%)
Comparisons of the Incidence of SSIs in all patients
Surgical procedures were classified as clean (N = 77; 31.8%), contaminated (N = 154; 63.6%) and dirty (N = 11; 4.5%). The incidence of SSI differed significantly depending on wound class, and increased from 2.6% in patients with clean wounds to 100% in patients with dirty wound(Table 3). Our data show that SSIs were frequent and differed widely by wound class.
Comparison of Clinical Data between Group A and Group B
CD4 (cell/μ l)
382.1 ± 184.1
382.0 ± 111.3
CD8 (cell/μ l)
609.4 ± 362.9
743.0 ± 318.9
0.7476 ± 0.361
0.6012 ± 0.295
6.51 ± 2.79
4.72 ± 1.53
123.7 ± 25.5
142.7 ± 31.1
176.5 ± 120.1
267 ± 131.7
39.9 ± 5.2
46.7 ± 1.3
382.6 ± 186.1
388.4 ± 91.4
498.6 ± 67.3
723 ± 358.4
0.766 ± 0.355
0.652 ± 0.329
7.895 ± 4.668
5.84 ± 1.92
103.4 ± 24.5
134.8 ± 27.2
169.1 ± 48.5
226.3 ± 133.7
40.0 ± 5.5
43.9 ± 3.3
The progressive failure of the immune system in patients caused by HIV can increase the possibility of developing surgical site infections after surgery. Our study demonstrated an incidence of 47.5% SSIs in HIV-infected patients. This number is above the average SSI rate of 2.61% by the NNIS review . Drapeau CM et al. showed the SSI rate of HIV-infected patients was twofold than that reported in Italian and European studies for general population . In abdominal operations, patients’ mean preoperative CD4 counts in the SSIs group were found significantly lower than those in no-SSIs group, suggesting it may be associated with SSIs. Mawalla et al. also observed the rate of SSI among HIV patients was significantly higher with CD4 count below 200 cell/μ L. It is universally accepted that the CD4 counts is a valuable marker of disease progression in HIV and AIDS. Generally, when CD4 counts >350cells/μ L, there is no obvious damage to the immune function, patients’ treatment and range of indications for surgery can be same as normal surgical patients without HIV infected; when CD4 counts is between 200–350 cells/μ L, patients need to examine body completely to find whether merge other complications and start highly active anti-retrovirus therapy (HAART). And for those patients whose preoperative CD4 counts ≤ 200 cells/μ L, the antibiotic and antifungal medications (sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SMZ/TMP) and fluconazole) are started preoperatively as prophylaxis against Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) and fungal infection.
In our opinion, the evaluation of the risk of developing SSIs for HIV-infected patients should be an integral part of the perioperative management. Although the optimum time for surgery still needs clarification in further studies, it may be better to delay elective surgery until the preoperative CD4 count>200cells/μ L. However, in patients with typically surgical problems, e.g., appendicitis and gastrointestinal perforation, early surgery allows for rapid recovery similar to normal surgical patients irrespective of CD4 count.
Our data show that SSIs were frequent and differed widely by wound class. Wound care efore operations for contaminated and dirty wounds should be done with more caution. Further strengthening of basic infection control in the hospital to improve the hospital environment is also required. Another important intervention will be required to encourage surgeons to use appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis. Petrosillo N et al. found that antibiotic prophylaxis was also associated with postdischarge SSI .
In the HIV-infected patients combined with hemophilia, there was a clinically significant decrease of postoperative hemoglobin count in the SSIs group compared with the no-SSIs group, which is mainly associated with SSIs. Bleeding is the major risk of intraoperation and postoperation for hemophilia . Infusing 2000 units of factor VII 2 times one day before surgery, 2000 units of factor VII 2 hours before operation, 2000–4000 units during operation, can improve patients’ coagulation to normal levels.
One of the limitations of the study was information biases due to the retrospective nature of the design study. The other was that it did not control for possible confounders other than those investigated.
Postoperative SSIs are frequent in HIV-infected patients. It appears necessary to establish a reliable and efficient national monitoring programme for the implementation of preventive measures.
The authors would like to acknowledge the technical support provided by the members of the Department of Surgery. We also thank Dr.Douglas for his excellent technical assistance.
- Mangram AT, Horan M: Pearson:Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection,1999. Infect Control Hosp Epidemio. 1999, 20: 247-278.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Evans R, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Patient Safety Committee: Surgical site infection prevention and control: an emerging paradigm. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009, 91: 2-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kirkland K, Briggs J, Trivette S, Wilkinson W, Sexton D: The impact of surgical site infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of hospitalization, and extra costs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999, 20: 725-730. 10.1086/501572.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- McGarry S, Engemann J, Schmader K, Sexton D, Kaye K: Surgical site infection due to Staphylococcus aureus among elderly patients: mortality, duration of hospitalization, and cost. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004, 25: 461-467. 10.1086/502422.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Palmer S, Parker M, Hollingworth W: The cost and implications of reoperation after surgery for fracture of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000, 82: 864-866. 10.1302/0301-620X.82B6.9974.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pollard T, Newman J, Barlow N, Price J, Willett K: Deep wound infection after proximal femoral fracture: consequences and costs. J Hosp Infect. 2006, 63: 133-139. 10.1016/j.jhin.2006.01.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Edwards P, Lipp A, Holmes A: Preoperative skin antisepsis for preventing surgical wound infections after clean surgery (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004, 3: CD003949-PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Humphreys H: Preventing surgical site infection. Where now?. J Hosp Infect. 2009, 73: 316-322. 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.03.028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- World Health Organization: WHO’s patient-safety checklist for surgery. 2009, http://www.who.int/patientsafety/information_centre/documents/en/index.html [13.12.09]Google Scholar
- Ruiz-Perez I, Olry de Labry-Lima A, López-Ruz MA: Clinical status, adherence to HAART and quality of life in HIV-infected patients receiving antiretroviral treatment. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2005, 23: 581-585. 10.1157/13081565.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mocroft A, Vellaa S, Benfield TL, Chiesi A, Miller V, Garqalianos P: Changing patterns of mortality across Europe in patients infected with HIV-1. EuroSIDA Study Group. Lancet. 1998, 352: 1725-1730. 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)03201-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Palella FJ, Delaney KM, Moorman AC: Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection HIV Outpatient Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1998, 338: 853-860. 10.1056/NEJM199803263381301.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Needham DM, Hogg RS, Yip B: The impact of antiretroviral therapy on AIDS survival observed in a province-wide drug treatment program. Int J STD AIDS. 1998, 9: 370-372.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Teng T, Shao Y: Scientific approaches to AIDS prevention and control in china. Adv Dent Res. 2011, 23: 10-12. 10.1177/0022034511398871.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Broder S: The development of antiretroviral therapy and its impact on the HIV-1/AIDS pandemic. Antiviral Res. 2010, 85: 1-18. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2009.10.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Grulich AE, van Leeuwen MT, Falster MO: Incidence of cancers in people with HIV/AIDS compared with immunosuppressed transplant recipients: A meta-analysis. Lancet. 2007, 370: 59-67. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61050-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Slaven EM, Lopez F, Weintraub SL: The AIDS patient with abdominal pain: A new challenge for the emergency physician. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2003, 21: 987-1015. 10.1016/S0733-8627(03)00070-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gaynes RP, Culver DH, Horan TC: Surgical site infection (SSI) rates in the United States, 1992–98: the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System basic SSI risk index. Clin Infect Dis. 2001, 33: S69-S77. 10.1086/321860.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Drapeau CM, Pan A, Bellacosa C: Surgical site infections in HIV-infected patients: results from an Italian prospective multicenter observational study. Infection. 2009, 37: 455-460. 10.1007/s15010-009-8225-1.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Brian Mawalla, Mshana Stephen E, Chalya Philipo L, Imirzalioqlu C, Mahalu W: Predictors of surgical site infections among patients undergoing major surgery at Bugando Medical Centre in Northwestern Tanzania. BMC Surg. 2011, 11: 21-10.1186/1471-2482-11-21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Petrosillo N, Drapeau CM, Nicastri E, Martini L, Lppolito G, Moro ML: Surgical site infections in Italian Hospitals: a prospective multicenter study. BMC Infect Dis. 2008, 8: 34-10.1186/1471-2334-8-34.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/12/115/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.