Skip to main content
Download PDF

Retrospective study of necrotizing fasciitis and characterization of its associated Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusin Taiwan

BMC Infectious Diseases volume 11, Article number: 297 (2011) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has emerged as a prevalent pathogen of necrotizing fasciitis (NF) in Taiwan. A four-year NF cases and clinical and genetic differences between hospital acquired (HA)- and community-acquired (CA)-MRSA infection and isolates were investigated.

Methods

A retrospective study of 247 NF cases in 2004-2008 and antimicrobial susceptibilities, staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec (SCCmec) types, pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns, virulence factors, and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) of 16 NF-associated MRSA in 2008 were also evaluated.

Results

In 247 cases, 42 microbial species were identified. S. aureus was the major prevalent pathogen and MRSA accounted for 19.8% of NF cases. Most patients had many coexisting medical conditions, including diabetes mellitus, followed by hypertension, chronic azotemia and chronic hepatic disease in order of decreasing prevalence. Patients with MRSA infection tended to have more severe clinical outcomes in terms of amputation rate (p < 0.05) and reconstruction rate (p = 0.001) than those with methicillin-sensitive S. aureus or non-S. aureus infection. NF patients infected by HA-MRSA had a significantly higher amputation rate, comorbidity, C-reactive protein level, and involvement of lower extremity than those infected by CA-MRSA. In addition to over 90% of MRSA resistant to erythromycin and clindamycin, HA-MRSA was more resistant than CA-MRSA to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (45.8% vs. 4%). ST59/pulsotype C/SCCmec IV and ST239/pulsotype A/SCCmec III isolates were the most prevalent CA- and HA-MRSA, respectively in 16 isolates obtained in 2008. In contrast to the gene for γ-hemolysin found in all MRSA, the gene for Panton-Valentine leukocidin was only identified in ST59 MRSA isolates. Other three virulence factors TSST-1, ETA, and ETB were occasionally identified in MRSA isolates tested.

Conclusion

NF patients with MRSA infection, especially HA-MRSA infection, had more severe clinical outcomes than those infected by other microbial. The prevalent NF-associated MRSA clones in Taiwan differed distinctly from the most predominant NF-associated USA300 CA-MRSA clone in the USA. Initial empiric antimicrobials with a broad coverage for MRSA should be considered in the treatment of NF patients in an endemic area.

Peer Review reports

Background

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rare and life-threatening infection that involves deep soft tissue and is characterized by widespread fascial necrosis, with a mortality of 25.3-73% [1–3]. Necrotizing fasciitis typically is polymicrobial infection caused by aerobic and anaerobic organism that participate in synergistic infection; whereas Group A Streptococcus, Clostridium spp., Vibrio spp. and Klebsiella spp. have been the cause of monomicrobial infection. Although Staphylococcus aureus is the most prevalent pathogen in both hospitals and communities and MRSA has become a common isolate associated with skin and soft tissue infections globally over the past few years, monomicrobial MRSA necrotizing fasciitis has been reported only in a few studies [4–6]. In Taiwan, MRSA accounts for 53-83% of S. aureus isolates in most major hospitals [7, 8]. Community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) has become increasingly endemic, accounting for 74% and 28% of all MRSA in two studies that were performed in northern and central Taiwan, respectively [9]. Recently, MRSA has been identified as an important cause of necrotizing fasciitis in Taiwan [10].

Several virulence factors are reportedly associated with the pathogenicity of skin and soft tissue infections. Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), a pore-forming exotoxin, and γ-hemolysin (Hlg) are associated with pus-forming diseases. CA-MRSA isolates with the PVL genes generally cause skin and soft tissue infections and necrotizing fasciitis [4, 11]. Toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 (TSST-1) can cause in part a desquamative skin rash and toxemic syndrome [12]. Exfoliatin A (ETA) and exfoliatin B (ETB) are associated with numerous blistering skin diseases and staphylococcal scalded-skin syndrome [13]. The variable clinical presentations of S. aureus skin and soft tissue infections are believed to be associated with the particular combinations of virulence factors and regulatory genes given an appropriate genetic background [14].

In staphylococcal species, low-affinity penicillin-binding protein 2a, which is responsible for methicillin resistance, is produced by the mecA gene in an exogenous mobile staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec (SCCmec) [15, 16]. Hence a methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) isolate may acquire the SCCmec elements and thereby become an MRSA isolate [17]. Based on variations in the ccr operon and mec complexes of the SCCmec, at least seven SCCmec types have been identified as having some clinical implications [18]. The SCCmec IV element (~24 kb) is most commonly identified in CA-MRSA isolates, whereas the SCCmec II and III elements are often found in HA-MRSA isolates [19, 20].

The management of NF absolutely depends on the prompt administering of suitable antibiotics and adequate surgical debridement. Increasing prevalence of MRSA, the choice of appropriate antibiotics for NF patients in the community must now take into account the increasing global prevalence of MRSA and the patterns of antimicrobial susceptibility [21]. Therefore, a study population of 247 NF cases in 2004-2008 and their associated MRSA isolates were investigated to understand the epidemiological or clinical effects of MRSA on NF cases and clinical and genetic differences between CA- and HA-MRSA. Further, antimicrobial susceptibility, SCCmec types, pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns, virulence factors, and MLST types of MRSA strains that were isolated from 16 NF patients in 2008 were examined.

Methods

Study population

A total of 247 NF patients were consecutively hospitalized and surgically treated at the 1000-bed Chiayi Christian Hospital in southern Taiwan from December 2004 to November 2008. A patient was included in the study if the postoperative diagnosis in his or her surgical report was of necrotizing fasciitis that this diagnosis was verified by pathological examination, as determined by an electronic search and a discharge diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis. Necrotizing fasciitis is defined by the followings; the presence of grayish necrotic fascia; a demonstrated lack of resistance of muscular fascia that was freely dissected using a blunt instrument along the normal adherent tissue planes; the presence of foul-smelling "dish-water" pus; and/or, extensive necrosis of the skin and subcutaneous tissues [3]. Electronic and paper medical records were reviewed for clinical variables that included age, gender, infection site, and underlying chronic conditions such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic liver disease, coronary artery disease, chronic renal insufficiency, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and malignancy. Empiric antibiotics that were used in initial treatment, the number of surgical debridements and reconstructions undergone, amputation, period of hospitalization, in-hospital mortality rate, laboratory findings at the time of admission, and clinical outcomes in each NF case were also evaluated. A surgeon and a nurse practitioner of plastic surgery collected the data. These data were then compared across four distinct groups with different etiologic pathogens (non-S. aureus, MSSA, CA-MRSA, and HA-MRSA) to determine whether the clinical variables were associated in any way with MRSA necrotizing fasciitis.

Antimicrobial susceptibility test

The susceptibility of S. aureus isolates to antimicrobials clindamycin, erythromycin, fucidin, linezolid, oxacillin, teicoplanin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin was performed by using disc diffusion and the guideline of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) [22]. Isolates with zones of inhibition that fell into the category of intermediate susceptibility to a given antibiotic were regarded as susceptible isolates.

Characterization of NF-associated MRSA isolates

A total of 16 specimens were obtained from wound cultures of NF patients upon initial surgical debridement or from blood cultures of NF patients who had visited hospital between January 2008 and November 2008. Blood cultures were processed in a VITEK 2 GP system (BioMerieux) in the hospital laboratory. Bacteria were firstly analyzed by coagulase testing and Gram staining. S. aureus was identified by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of S. aureus-specific clfA, 16S rDNA, and nuc genes [23, 24]. The S. aureus isolates BCRC 10781 and BCRC 15211 were used as methicillin-susceptible and resistant reference strains, respectively. MRSA isolates were separated into HA- or CA-MRSA using the following definition. HA-MRSA is an MRSA isolate that is obtained from patients who stay more than 48 hours after admission to hospital, or who have established risk factors, such as a history of HA-MRSA isolation, hospitalization, surgery, dialysis or admission to a nursing home, skilled nursing facility or hospice in the past year or who have a permanent indwelling catheter or medical device that passes through the skin into the body [21]. In contrast, a CA-MRSA isolate is an MRSA isolate that is obtained from a patient within 48 hours of admission to the hospital and without the above conditions for HA-MRSA.

Genetic analysis by pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and MLST

The genotype of each isolate was identified by SmaI-digested PFGE analysis using a method described elsewhere [25]. Briefly, whole-cell embedding agarose plugs were digested using restriction endonuclease SmaI. The DNA fragments were resolved using a CHEF DR-III apparatus (Bio-Rad). The standard size marker was the MRSA isolate BCRC 15211. Isolates are regarded as closely related if they differ by no more than three fragments; as possibly related if they differ by four to six fragments, and unrelated if they differ by at least seven fragments [26]. MLST types of 16 CA- and HA-MRSA isolates were identified using the method that was described by Enright [27] and by analysis of MLST databases (http://saureus.mlst.net/).

PCR identification of SCCmectypes and genes for virulence factors PVL, Hlg, TSST-1, ETA, and ETB

SCCmec types I-IV were identified by multiplex PCR amplification of SCCmec regions [16, 28]. If not groupable into types I-IV, isolates were grouped into SCCmec type V or VT (or VII) by the PCR detection of ccrC (ccr5) homologues [29–31]. Genes for virulence factors PVL, Hlg, TSST-1, ETA, and ETB were identified by simplex and multiplex PCR amplifications using primers described elsewhere [14, 32].

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages, and continuous variables were presented as means and standard deviations. The chi-square test or Fisher's exact test were adopted to compare categorical data, as appropriate. Continuous data were obtained by analysis of variance to evaluate the differences between the groups, and a post hoc comparison was conducted using the Tukey honestly-significant difference test. All reported P values were two-tailed, and a P value of 0.05 indicated statistical significance. All analyses were performed using SPSS software.

Results

Demographics and clinical variables

The dataset from the specified four-year period included a total of 247 cases of necrotizing fasciitis, with a 19.8% prevalence of MRSA as the causative organism of the infection. The mean age, gender, mean number of surgeries and mortality rate of the NF patients did not vary much with the cause of the infection by non-S. aureus, MSSA, CA-MRSA, or HA-MRSA (Table 1). Most patients in this investigation had multiple coexisting medical conditions, including diabetes mellitus (62.8%), hypertension (30.1%), chronic azotemia (28.2%) and chronic hepatic disease (14.6%). The incidence of peripheral artery occlusive disease and malignancy was extremely low in all four groups, which did not discernibly differ in this respect. Patients who were infected by HA-MRSA exhibited significantly more comorbidity and a higher incidence of chronic azotemia than the other three groups (p < 0.05). Regardless of infecting species, the lower extremities were the most common infection sites (p < 0.05). NF patients of two Vibrio monomicrobial, three non-S. aureus polymicrobial, and one HA-MRSA died. No death occurred in the MSSA and CA-MRSA groups. Two CA-MRSA, one HA-MRSA, and four non-S. aureus NF patients presented a systolic blood pressure of <90 mm Hg when they arrived in the emergency room. As determined by univariate analysis, patients who were infected by CA-MRSA had a lower C-reactive protein level than those infected by HA-MRSA, MSSA, or non-S. aureus. Body temperature, leukocyte count and platelet count at the time of admission to hospital were similar among the four groups of NF patients. Patients who were infected with MRSA tended to have more severe clinical outcomes in terms of amputation rate (p < 0.05) and reconstruction rate (p = 0.001) than those with MSSA or non-S. aureus infection. Moreover, NF patients with HA-MRSA infection had a higher rate of amputation on admission (29.2%) than those with CA-MRSA infection (8%) (p < 0.05).

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of 247 NF cases and antimicrobial resistance of CA- and HA-MRSA isolates
Full size table

Microbial associated with NF

From the initial wounds of the 247 NF patients or from blood culture, 34 aerobic bacterial species, seven anaerobic bacterial species and one fungal species were identified (Table 2). The prevalence of polymicrobial and monomicrobial infections was 55.5 and 44.5, respectively. An average of 2.77 microbial species was identified in a polymicrobial infection. The major bacterial species were Staphylococcus spp., followed by Streptococcus spp., Enterococcus spp., Peptostrep spp., Bacteroides spp., Prevotella spp., Klebsiella spp., and E. coli. Generally, most NF cases were polymicrobial infections. However, the most monomicrobial infections for NF cases were caused by Staphylococcus spp. (57.2%) and Vibrio spp. (9%). The prevalence of both MRSA and MSSA necrotizing fasciitis increased gradually from 2006 to 2008, and MRSA was the major pathogenic cause of necrotizing fasciitis in 2008 (Figure 1).

Table 2 The number of microbial species associated with NF
Full size table
Figure 1
figure 1

Prevalence of MRSA and MSSA associated with 247 NF cases in 2005 to 2008.

Full size image

Management and antimicrobial susceptibility of 49 MRSA infections

All patients were urgently treated with surgical debridement or amputation of the infected part. Generally, the wounds were repaired with delayed closure, split-thickness skin grafts, or flap reconstructive surgery; the remaining small skin defects were allowed to close by secondary intention. Within 24 h after admission, most patients with MRSA infections (41/49, 83.7%) were prescribed empiric antibiotic therapy with β-lactam antimicrobials and gentamicin. No patient with MRSA necrotizing fasciitis was prescribed empiric antibiotic therapy with vancomycin. Vancomycin was subsequently administered to 23 (46.9%) patients after the susceptibility test had been completed. All MRSA isolates were susceptible to linezolid, teicoplanin, and vancomycin, but highly resistant to erythromycin and clindamycin (>90%) and mildly resistant to tetracycline (>65%) and fucidin (12%). Interestingly, resistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole differed significantly between CA- and HA-MRSA groups (4% vs. 45.8%).

Prevalence of SCCmectypes and genes for PVL, Hlg, TSST-1, ETA, and ETB

PCR amplification identified five SCCmec types, which were SCCmec III, IV, V, VT (or VII) and the nontypeable type. The most prevalent SCCmec types were SCCmec IV in CA-MRSA and SCCmec III in HA-MRSA. Isolates that contained the SCCmec III element were multi-drug resistant to β-lactams, erythromycin, clindamycin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Unlike a single HA-MRSA isolate that contained the pulsotype C/SCCmec IV element, isolates that contained SCCmec IV, V, or VII elements were susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; however, all isolates were resistant to β-lactams, erythromycin, and clindamycin. Among the genes for five virulence factors, those for Hlg were present in all isolates and those for ETA, TSST-1, and PVL were present in a few isolates. Notably, the PVL genes were identified in two CA-MRSA isolates and one HA-MRSA isolate. The ETB gene was not detected in any sample (Table 3).

Table 3 Characteristics of 16 CA- and HA-MRSA and their clinical association
Full size table

PFGE patterns and MLST types

Analysis of SmaI-digested PFGE identified 16 MRSA isolates associated with seven pulsotypes (Figure 2). In comparison with the resolutions of PFGE patterns described by Huang [7], genotype A, C, and D, the major clones in that report, consisted of 81.3% of the isolates in the present study (Table 3). The pulsotypes were associated with the SCCmec types as pulsotype A/SCCmec III and pulsotype C/SCCmec IV. In the pulsotype D, SCCmec types IV, V, and VII were identified and three out of four pulsotype D isolates had the genes for PVL. MLST analysis identified six MLST types in that 75% (12/16) of the isolates were ST59 and ST 239. Additionally, other four types were ST9, ST30, ST1279-like, ST238- and 585-like types (Table 3).

Figure 2
figure 2

PFGE patterns of Sma I-digested genomic DNA of MRSA isolates collected from the patients with necrotizing fasciitis. M: lambda DNA. ND1 and ND2 mean new pulsotypes.

Full size image

Discussion

The mainstay treatments of necrotizing fasciitis are urgent operation for decompression and drainage, subsequently repeated debridement, and appropriate antibiotics. The selection of appropriate antimicrobial agents for any suspected necrotizing fasciitis must take into account the nature of patient's exposure and local epidemiologic data. However, there are no reliable epidemiological or clinical risk factors that could distinguish patients infected with MRSA from those infected with MSSA or non-S. aureus [33]. With the explosion of MRSA infections, recent reports have established that MRSA is responsible for 3.6% to 39% of NF disease [1, 4–6]. In this study, the prevalence of MRSA in 247 NF cases over a four-year period was 19.8% (Table 1 and Figure 1). The variation in the prevalence of MRSA necrotizing fasciitis around the world may reflect variations in genetic background and local epidemiology. MRSA is gradually becoming the main monomicrobial pathogen to cause NF in Taiwan, reflecting changes in the microbial flora in this area. In this investigation, the observed mortality rate did not significantly vary among the four groups, even though NF patients with HA-MRSA infection had a higher incidence of comorbidity on admission than those infected by CA-MRSA, MSSA or non-S. aureus group. However, the amputation rate and reconstruction rate for NF patients with MRSA infection were 18.4% and 30.6% respectively - significantly higher than those infected by non-S. aureus. These analytical findings further highlight the role of MRSA as an important pathogen in causing a destructive and deep-seated infection.

Recent reports have demonstrated that the CA-MRSA strains with specific virulence factors have a shorter doubling time than HA-MRSA strains and tend to be more virulent [34]. PVL has been associated with epidemic CA-MRSA strains causing lethal necrotizing fasciitis [35]. Contrary to these findings, in the present investigation, all of the patients who were infected by CA-MRSA survived. Miller [4] reported no deaths in their series, hypothesizing that necrotizing fasciitis that is caused by CA-MRSA may be less virulent than similar infections that are caused by other organisms. According to the findings herein, patients who were infected by CA-MRSA tended to have less severe clinical characteristics in terms of comorbidity, amputation rate and the involvement of lower extremities than those with HA-MRSA infections, suggesting that it may be associated with limited elevation of C-reactive protein in patients as well as lower virulence of CA-MRSA strains which differed distinctly from the highly virulent PVL-positive CA-MRSA strains spreading elsewhere.

In the present study, the PVL genes were only identified in two CA- and one HA-MRSA isolates. Genes for the virulence factors TSST-1 and ETA were present only in a few MRSA isolates. However, patients who were infected by pulsotype C isolates with the ETA gene all underwent amputation (Table 3). Unlike the Hlg genes, which were present in all isolates, the ETB gene was absent from all isolates. Other series has also reported a lower frequency of toxin genes carriage. Miller reported that no TSST-1, ETA and ETB genes were identified in any of the CA-MRSA strains [4]. The severity of PVL-specific pathology remains controversial. The PVL genes have been detected in approximately 50% of S. aureus isolates that are responsible for subcutaneous abscesses and cellulitis, but not in isolates that are associated with deep-seated infections [36]. A study of isogenic PVL strains of pulsotypes USA300 and USA400 also found that PVL was not the major virulence factor for necrotizing fasciitis [37]. Conversely, the PVL gene has been detected in five NF-associated ST8/pulsotype USA 300/SCCmec IV CA-MRSA isolates [4]. A recent investigation stated that PVL tends to damage the muscle rather than skin in young mice [38]. These results are consistent with the clinical characteristics of necrotizing fasciitis, which typically damages deep tissues but may spare skin. Thromboangiitis obliterans followed by the occlusion of cutaneous perforators may be the leading cause of NF cases with extensive skin necrosis - rather than direct cutaneous invasion.

In Taiwan, ST239/pulsotype A type is the most prevalent clone of HA-MRSA and the ST59/pulsotype C and D isolates are the dominant clones of CA-MRSA [30, 39–41]. Moreover, SCCmec VII and multi-drug resistant CA-MRSA isolates have been identified in pediatric patients with skin and soft tissue infections in northern Taiwan [29]. This investigation identified various NF-associated MRSA strains, which have been the prevalent clones in Taiwan. These strains differ distinctly from the particular ST8/pulsotype USA300 CA-MRSA clone, which has been identified as a dominant cause of necrotizing fasciitis in the USA [4, 6]. The results herein verified that the SCCmec III type was found only in HA-MRSA and the SCCmec IV element was present in both CA- and HA-MRSA isolates with ST59/pulsotype C and pulsotype D (Table 3), suggesting transmission of the community strain of MRSA into the hospital setting, and that the community strain had became a hospital-associated pathogen in Taiwan [9].

Empiric antibiotic therapy for NF patients must be modified for the broad coverage of the regional MRSA strains. Earlier, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns could be used to differentiate CA-MRSA from HA-MRSA isolates; however, this approach is no longer reliable because CA-MRSA may also develop resistance to non-β-lactam antibiotics [34]. Clindamycin has been a common prescribed medication for MRSA infection. In this investigation, both CA- and HA-MRSA isolates exhibited extremely high resistance (>90%) to erythromycin and clindamycin (Table 1), which were contradicting findings obtained from different countries, but supporting other findings from Taiwan [5, 7, 42]. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was the only drug associated with different susceptibility between CA- and HA-MRSA strains, to which CA-MRSA isolates were significantly more susceptible than HA-MRSA isolates [9]. For complex skin and soft tissue infections associated with considerable comorbidities, treatment with appropriate antimicrobials is required to reduce clinical failures. Delayed treatments are associated with the morbidity and mortality of MRSA infection [43]. The most common antibiotic prescribing error in this investigation was inadequate coverage of the pathogen MRSA. Even though vancomycin was administered to 46.9% of MRSA patients after the susceptibility test, 83.7% of the patients with MRSA infections herein underwent empiric therapy with antibiotics that were not active against the MRSA strains at the time of hospital admission. This fact may explain the higher amputation and reconstruction rates of patients who were infected by MRSA than those of patients who were infected by MSSA or non-S. aureus. An effective empiric antimicrobial therapy may be critical to ensure a favorable surgical outcome for NF patients with MRSA infection. The empiric use of vancomycin should be considered for NF patients based on epidemiologic data and nature of patient's exposure in an area where high prevalence of methicillin resistance was noted such as Taiwan. Additionally, to prevent the emergence of the resistant strains and prolong the effectiveness of currently available antimicrobials, empiric therapy using agents such as vancomycin should not be prescribed for immuno-competent patients with mild skin and soft-tissue infections [44].

Conclusion

MRSA has emerged as an important cause of necrotizing fasciitis in Taiwan. In this investigation, the prevalence of MRSA in 247 NF cases over a four-year period was 19.8%. NF patients with MRSA infection presented more severe clinical outcomes in terms of amputation rate and reconstruction rate than those with MSSA or non-S. aureus infection. In contrast to CA-MRSA infection, NF patients with HA-MRSA infection had a significantly higher amputation rate, comorbidity, C-reactive protein level, and involvement of lower extremity. Further, HA-MRSA isolates were more resistant to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. The ST239/pulsotype A, ST59/pulsotype C and D MRSA are the major pathogenic clones to cause necrotizing fasciitis. The ST59/pulsotype D/SCCmec V/PVL MRSA isolates were found in both CA- and HA-MRSA; the ETA gene was found in ST59/pulsotype C/SCCmec type IV CA- and HA-MRSA. As well as surgical debridement, initial empiric antimicrobials with a broad coverage for MRSA should be considered in the treatment of NF patients in an endemic area.

Abbreviations

CA-MRSA:

community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

CLSI:

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute

ETA:

exfoliatin A

ETB:

exfoliatin B

HA-MRSA:

hospital-acquired MRSA

Hlg:

γ-hemolysin

MLST:

multilocus sequence typing

MSSA:

methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus

NF:

necrotizing fasciitis

PFGE:

pulsed field gel electrophoresis

PVL:

Panton-Valentine leukocidin

RA:

rifampicin

SCCmec :

staphylococcal chromosomal cassette mec

TSST-1:

toxic shock syndrome toxin 1.

References

  1. David E, Joseph AK, Roy AMM: The microbiology of necrotizing soft tissue infections. Amer J Surg. 2000, 179: 361-366. 10.1016/S0002-9610(00)00360-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fontes RA, Ogilvie CM, Miclau T: Necrotizing soft-tissue infections. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000, 8: 151-158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wong CH, Chang HC, Pasupathy S, Khin LW, Tan JL, Low CO: Necrotizing fasciitis: clinical presentation, microbiology, and determinants of mortality. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003, 85-A: 1454-1460.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Miller LG, Perdreau-Remington F, Rieg G, Mehdi S, Perlroth J, Bayer AS, Tang AW, Phung TO, Spellberg B: Necrotizing fasciitis caused by community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Los Angeles. N Engl J Med. 2005, 352: 1445-1453. 10.1056/NEJMoa042683.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Timothy CL, Matthew MC, Bradford GS, Joseph CH, Hoang QP: Incidence and clinical characteristics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus necrotizing fasciitis in a large urban hospital. Amer J Surg. 2007, 194: 809-813. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Young LM, Price CS: Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus emerging as an important cause of necrotizing fasciitis. Surgical Infections. 2008, 9: 469-474. 10.1089/sur.2007.052.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang YC, Su LH, Wu TL, Liu CE, Young TG, Chen PY, Hseuh PR, Lin TY: Molecular epidemiology of clinical isolates of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Taiwan. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 307-310. 10.1128/JCM.42.1.307-310.2004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang JT, Chen YC, Yang TL, Chang SC: Molecular epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Taiwan. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002, 42: 199-203. 10.1016/S0732-8893(01)00351-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen CJ, Huang YC: Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2005, 38: 376-382.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee YT, Lin JC, Wang NC, Peng MY, Chang FY: Necrotizing fasciitis in a medical center in northern Taiwan: emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the community. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2007, 40: 335-341.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Diep BA, Sensabaugh GF, Somboona NS, Carleton HA, Perdreau-Remington F: Widespread skin and soft-tissue infections due to two methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains harboring the genes for Panton-Valentine leucocidin. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 2080-2084. 10.1128/JCM.42.5.2080-2084.2004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Warner JE, Onderdonk AB: Diversity of toxic shock syndrome toxin 1-positive Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004, 70: 6931-6935. 10.1128/AEM.70.11.6931-6935.2004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hanakawa Y, Schechter NM, Lin C, Garza L, Li H, Yamaguchi T, Fudaba Y, Nishifuji K, Sugai M, Amagai M, Stanley JR: Molecular mechanisms of blister formation in bullous impetigo and staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2002, 110: 53-60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Jarraud S, Mougel C, Thioulouse J, Lina G, Meugnier H, Forey F, Nesme X, Etienne J, Vandenesch F: Relationships between Staphylococcus aureus genetic background, virulence factors, agr groups (alleles), and human disease. Infect Immun. 2002, 70: 631-641. 10.1128/IAI.70.2.631-641.2002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Reynolds PE, Brown DFJ: Penicillin-binding proteins of [beta]-lactam-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus: effect of growth conditions. FEBS Letters. 1985, 192: 28-32. 10.1016/0014-5793(85)80036-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Oliveira DC, Lencastre HD: Multiplex PCR strategy for rapid identification of structural types and variants of the mec element in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002, 46: 2155-2161. 10.1128/AAC.46.7.2155-2161.2002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Katayama Y, Ito T, Hiramatsu K: A new class of genetic element, staphylococcus cassette chromosome mec, encodes methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000, 44: 1549-1555. 10.1128/AAC.44.6.1549-1555.2000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hiramatsu K, Cui L, Kuroda M, Ito T: The emergence and evolution of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Trends Microbiol. 2001, 9: 486-493. 10.1016/S0966-842X(01)02175-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Davis SL, Rybak MJ, Amjad M, Kaatz GW, McKinnon PS: Characteristics of patients with healthcare-associated infection due to SCCmec type IV methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006, 27: 1025-1031. 10.1086/507918.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ito T, Katayama Y, Asada K, Mori N, Tsutsumimoto K, Tiensasitorn C, Hiramatsu K: Structural comparison of three types of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec integrated in the chromosome in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001, 45: 1323-1336. 10.1128/AAC.45.5.1323-1336.2001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Fridkin SK, Hageman JC, Morrison M, Sanza LT, Como-Sabetti K, Jernigan JA, Harriman K, Harrison LH, Lynfield R, Farley MM: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus disease in three communities. N Engl J Med. 2005, 352: 1436-1444. 10.1056/NEJMoa043252.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. CLSI: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests; approved standard. 2006, M2-A9. 9

    Google Scholar 

  23. Louie L, Goodfellow J, Mathieu P, Glatt A, Louie M, Simor AE: Rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococci from blood culture bottles by using a multiplex PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2002, 40: 2786-2790. 10.1128/JCM.40.8.2786-2790.2002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Mason WJ, Blevins JS, Beenken K, Wibowo N, Ojha N, Smeltzer MS: Multiplex PCR protocol for the diagnosis of staphylococcal infection. J Clin Microbiol. 2001, 39: 3332-3338. 10.1128/JCM.39.9.3332-3338.2001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Bannerman T, Hancock G, Tenover F, Miller J: Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis as a replacement for bacteriophage typing of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 1995, 33: 551-555.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Tenover FC AR, Goering RV, Mickelsen PA, Murray BE, Persing DH, Swaminathan B: Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol. 1995, 33: 2233-2239.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Enright MC, Day NPJ, Davies CE, Peacock SJ, Spratt BG: Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2000, 38: 1008-1015.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Oliveira DC, Milheirico C, de Lencastre H: Redefining a structural variant of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec, SCCmec type VI. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006, 50: 3457-3459. 10.1128/AAC.00629-06.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Boyle-Vavra S, Ereshefsky B, Wang CC, Daum RS: Successful multiresistant community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus lineage from Taipei, Taiwan, that carries either the novel staphylococcal chromosome cassette mec (SCCmec) type VT or SCCmec type IV. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 4719-4730. 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4719-4730.2005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Huang YC, Hwang KP, Chen PY, Chen CJ, Lin TY: Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization among Taiwanese children in 2005 and 2006. J Clin Microbiol. 2007, 45: 3992-3995. 10.1128/JCM.01202-07.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Ito T, Ma XX, Takeuchi F, Okuma K, Yuzawa H, Hiramatsu K: Novel type V staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec driven by a novel cassette chromosome recombinase, ccrC. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004, 48: 2637-2651. 10.1128/AAC.48.7.2637-2651.2004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Labandeira-Rey M, Couzon F, Boisset S, Brown EL, Bes M, Benito Y, Barbu EM, Vazquez V, Hook M, Etienne J, Vandenesch F, Bowden MG: Staphylococcus aureus Panton-Valentine leukocidin causes necrotizing pneumonia. Science. 2007, 315: 1130-1133. 10.1126/science.1137165.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Miller LG, Perdreau-Remington F, Bayer AS, Diep B, Tan N, Bharadwa K, Tsui J, Perlroth J, Shay A, Tagudar G, Ibebuogu U, Spellberg B: Clinical and epidemiologic characteristics cannot distinguish community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection from methicillin-susceptible S. aureus infection: a prospective investigation. Clin Infect Dis. 2007, 44: 471-482. 10.1086/511033.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Okuma K, Iwakawa K, Turnidge JD, Grubb WB, Bell JM, O'Brien FG, Coombs GW, Pearman JW, Tenover FC, Kapi M, Tiensasitorn C, Ito T, Hiramatsu K: Dissemination of new methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones in the community. J Clin Microbiol. 2002, 40: 4289-4294. 10.1128/JCM.40.11.4289-4294.2002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Boyle-Vavra S, Daum RS: Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: the role of Panton-Valentine leukocidin. Lab Invest. 2007, 87: 3-9. 10.1038/labinvest.3700501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lina G, Piemont Y, Godail-Gamot F, Bes M, Peter Md, Gauduchon V, Vandenesch F, Etienne J: Involvement of Panton-Valentine leukocidin producing Staphylococcus aureus in primary skin infections and pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis. 1999, 29: 1128-1132. 10.1086/313461.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Voyich JM, Otto M, Mathema B, Braughton KR, Whitney AR, Welty D, Long RD, Dorward DW, Gardner DJ, Lina G, Kreiswirth BN, DeLeo FR: Is Panton-Valentine leukocidin the major virulence determinant in community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus disease?. J Infec Dis. 2006, 194: 1761-1770. 10.1086/509506.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Tseng CW, Kyme P, Low J, Rocha MA, Alsabeh R, Miller LG, Otto M, Arditi M, Diep BA, Nizet V, Doherty TM, Beenhouwer DO, Liu GY: Staphylococcus aureus Panton-Valentine leukocidin contributes to inflammation and muscle tissue injury. PLoS ONE. 2009, 4: e6387-10.1371/journal.pone.0006387.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Aires de Sousa M, Crisostomo MI, Santos Sanches I, Wu JS, Fuzhong J, Tomasz A, de Lencastre H: Frequent recovery of a single clonal type of multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from patients in two hospitals in Taiwan and China. J Clin Microbiol. 2003, 41: 159-163. 10.1128/JCM.41.1.159-163.2003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen CJ, Huang YC, Chiu CH, Su LH, Lin TY: Clinical features and genotyping analysis of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in Taiwanese children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2005, 24: 40-45. 10.1097/01.inf.0000148926.11227.1c.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen FJ, Lauderdale TL, Huang IW, Lo HJ, Lai JF, Wang HY, Shiau YR, Chen PC, Ito T, Hiramatsu K: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Taiwan. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005, 11: 1760-1763.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Moran GJ, Amii RN, Abrahamian FM, Talan DA: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in community-acquired skin infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005, 11: 928-930.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Blot SI, Vandewoude KH, Hoste EA, Colardyn FA: Outcome and attributable mortality in critically Ill patients with bacteremia involving methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Arch Intern Med. 2002, 162: 2229-2235. 10.1001/archinte.162.19.2229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Daum RS: Skin and soft-tissue infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. N Engl J Med. 2007, 357: 380-390. 10.1056/NEJMcp070747.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pre-publication history

Download references

Acknowledgements and funding

The authors would like to thank the Chiayi Christian Hospital for financially supporting this research under Contract No. R97-3. None of the authors have potential conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Biopharmaceuticals, National Chiayi University, No 300, University Road, Chiayi, 60004, ROC, Taiwan

    Chih-Hsuan Changchien & Chishih Chu

  2. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chiayi Christian Hospital, 539 Jhongsiao Rd, Chiayi City, 60002, ROC, Taiwan

    Chih-Hsuan Changchien, Ying-Ying Chen, Shu-Wun Chen & Wan-Lin Chen

  3. Department of Nutrition and Health Science, Toko University, No.51, Sec. 2, Syuefu Rd., Puzih City, Chiayi County, 61363, ROC, Taiwan

    Jwu-Guh Tsay

Authors
  1. Chih-Hsuan Changchien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ying-Ying Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shu-Wun Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Wan-Lin Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jwu-Guh Tsay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Chishih Chu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chishih Chu.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors' contributions

CHC and CC took initiative in developing the research project and manuscript preparation. YYC, SWC, WLC, and JGT participated in the design, laboratory work, and data analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Below are the links to the authors’ original submitted files for images.

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Changchien, CH., Chen, YY., Chen, SW. et al. Retrospective study of necrotizing fasciitis and characterization of its associated Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusin Taiwan. BMC Infect Dis 11, 297 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-297

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-297

Keywords

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us