Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Infectious Diseases

  • Hypothesis
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Possible impact of rising sea levels on vector-borne infectious diseases

BMC Infectious Diseases201111:18

https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-11-18

©  Ramasamy and Surendran; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

Received: 29 September 2010

Accepted: 18 January 2011

Published: 18 January 2011

Open Peer Review reports

Abstract

Background

Vector-borne infectious diseases are a significant cause of human and animal mortality and morbidity. Modeling studies predict that changes in climate that accompany global warming will alter the transmission risk of many vector-borne infectious diseases in different parts of the world. Global warming will also raise sea levels, which will lead to an increase in saline and brackish water bodies in coastal areas. The potential impact of rising sea levels, as opposed to climate change, on the prevalence of vector-borne infectious diseases has hitherto been unrecognised.

Presentation of the hypothesis

Mosquito species possessing salinity-tolerant larvae and pupae, and capable of transmitting arboviruses and parasites are found in many parts of the world. An expansion of brackish and saline water bodies in coastal areas, associated with rising sea levels, can increase densities of salinity-tolerant vector mosquitoes and lead to the adaptation of freshwater vectors to breed in brackish and saline waters. The breeding of non-mosquito vectors may also be influenced by salinity changes in coastal habitats. Higher vector densities can increase transmission of vector-borne infectious diseases in coastal localities, which can then spread to other areas.

Testing the hypothesis

The demonstration of increases in vector populations and disease prevalence that is related to an expansion of brackish/saline water bodies in coastal areas will provide the necessary supportive evidence. However the implementation of specific vector and disease control measures to counter the threat will confound the expected findings.

Implications of the hypothesis

Rising sea levels can act synergistically with climate change and then interact in a complex manner with other environmental and socio-economic factors to generate a greater potential for the transmission of vector-borne infectious diseases. The resulting health impacts are likely to be particularly significant in resource-poor countries in the tropics and semi-tropics. Some measures to meet this threat are outlined.

Keywords

  • Malaria
  • West Nile Virus
  • Brackish Water
  • Schistosomiasis
  • Mosquito Vector

Background

Vector-borne infectious diseases (VBD) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in humans and animals. Important vectors of human VBD are closely associated with water bodies. They include mosquitoes that lay eggs in water to produce larvae, which feed and transform into pupae in water. Mosquitoes transmit many VBD including malaria, lymphatic filariasis and dengue with recently estimated prevalence of 247, 120 and 50 million cases worldwide respectively [1–3]. Schistosomiasis transmitted by snail vectors accounts for 207 million cases worldwide [4]. Snails become infected by miracidia produced from schistosome eggs in water and subsequently release cercariae that infect humans in water. The reduction of vector breeding and survival, and human-vector contact are important components in worldwide efforts to reduce the incidence of VBD.

Climate change due to global warming [5] can adversely affect human health [6–8]. Possible changes in the prevalence of mosquito VBD such as malaria and dengue as a result of global climate change have attracted particular attention [6–12]. Models forecast a generally increased risk of malaria transmission at greater latitudes in the present temperate zones and higher altitudes in tropical countries, although there is debate about the extent of the spread, and reduced transmission may occur in some areas [10–12]. Such predictions are based on the effects of changing temperature, rainfall and humidity on mosquito breeding and survival, and the more rapid development of ingested gametocytes to infective sporozoites in mosquitoes at moderately higher ambient temperatures. The predicted spread of mosquito vectors is supported by a discernible trend in the distribution of animals and plants attributed to global warming [13].

Global warming is expected to raise sea levels by 18 to 59 cm by the end of the 21st century through the melting of glaciers and polar ice plus the thermal expansion of seawater [5, 14]. Rising sea levels will affect the extent of saline (>30 parts per thousand or ppt salt) or brackish (0.5-30 ppt salt) water bodies in coastal areas. These include coastal estuaries, lagoons, marshes and mangroves [14]. Models suggest that the salinity of estuarine systems will rise and their boundaries move further inland with more pronounced tidal water flows into rivers [14]. A proportion of coastal wetlands such as salt marshes and mangroves will become inundated but additional saline wetlands will be formed further inland [14]. Rising sea levels, and higher water withdrawal rates from freshwater aquifers near the coast by expanding populations will increase saltwater intrusion in the aquifers [15]. These changes in turn will cause ponds, lakes and wells in coastal areas to become more brackish. Expansion of estuaries and lagoons heightens the risk of cholera transmission since Vibrio cholerae is associated with plankton in such waters [16]. However the possible impact of rising sea levels, as opposed to climate change, on the prevalence of VBD has hitherto been unrecognised [6–12]. This article proposes that an expansion of brackish and saline water bodies in coastal areas caused by rising sea levels can increase transmission of important VBD.

Presentation of the hypothesis

Some mosquito vectors possess physiological and structural adaptation to breed in brackish and saline waters

While most mosquito vectors breed in freshwater, some species that breed in brackish/saline waters are important vectors of human disease [[17], Additional file 1]. Their larvae possess cuticles that are less permeable to water than freshwater forms, and their pupae have thickened and sclerotized cuticles that are impermeable to water and ions [18]. Salinity-tolerant mosquito larvae possess varying osmoregulatory mechanisms e.g. Aedes taeniorhyncus drink surrounding fluid and excrete Na+ and Cl- from the posterior rectum to produce a hyperosmotic urine [18], Culex tarsalis larvae accumulate proline and trehalose in haemolymph to maintain iso-osmolarity in brackish waters [19], and Anopheles albimanus larvae differentially localize Na+K+ ATPase in rectal cells in fresh or saline water for osmoregulation through ion excretion [20].

Expansion of brackish and saline water bodies can lead to increased breeding of salinity-tolerant mosquitoes and greater disease transmission risk

The Asian tsunami of December 2004 provided relevant examples. Anopheles sundaicus s.l., a widespread malaria vector along Asian coasts [21, 22] increased in density in the Andaman and Nicobar islands following the intrusion of sea water inland, concomitant with a rise in Plasmodium falciparum infections [23]. Increased densities of Culex sitiens, an established vector of arboviruses [17], and An. sundaicus s.l. were also observed in an area of Thailand affected by the tsunami [24].

The consequences of human-induced ecological changes provide another set of examples. Large-scale shrimp farming in the Mekong delta of Vietnam locally increased the density of An. sundaicus s.l. [25]. Aquaculture is an expanding economic activity along tropical Asian coasts. Also, higher densities of Aedes (Ochlerotatus) camptorhynchus, a vector of Ross River virus (RRV), have been associated with increasing salinisation of freshwater bodies due to intensive agriculture in Western Australia [[26–29], Additional file 2].

Conversely, a reduction in the habitat of a brackish water vector has historically been associated with a decrease in malaria in Western Europe. Anopheles atroparvus of the An. maculipennis complex was primarily responsible for transmitting malaria until the early 1900s in marshland areas of England [30] and low lying areas of Western Europe like the river deltas of the Netherlands [31]. The draining of coastal marshes, and the attendant reduction in breeding sites for An. atroparvus, contributed significantly towards eliminating malaria in these areas [30, 31].

Freshwater-breeding mosquito vectors can adapt to increased salinity with greater availability of brackish and saline water breeding sites

Increasing salinity in water bodies can reduce populations of mosquito vectors that are unable to tolerate salinity, thereby tending to reduce disease transmission. However, the greater availability of brackish water bodies can also lead to freshwater breeding mosquitoes adapting to breed in them e.g. typically freshwater mosquitoes An. stephensi and An. culicifacies, were found breeding in brackish water bodies immediately after the 2004 tsunami in India [32] and five years later in eastern Sri Lanka [33]. It is unclear whether the egg laying and larval development in brackish water seen in these instances involved reversible physiological adaptations [18–20] or genetic changes. Genetic selection for greater salinity tolerance in larvae has been observed in Ae. taeniorhynchus in the laboratory [18], and Ae. camptorhynchus in the field in Western Australia [28]. Cases of recent genetic selection for salinity tolerance have not been reported for anopheline vectors of malaria but the existence of sibling species that differ in salinity tolerance within anopheline species complexes such as Subpictus [34], Sundaicus [21, 22], Gambiae [35] and Farauti [36] shows that this is clearly possible over a period of time.

There are no reports to date of Aedes aegypti or Ae. albopictus, the major vectors of dengue and other arboviruses, adapting to breed in brackish water. Ae. aegypti larvae possess the necessary physiological mechanisms to withstand a limited, short-term increase in salinity [37]. It is therefore possible that instances of its field adaptation to brackish/saline waters have gone unnoticed. Cx. tarsalis, the most important vector of arboviruses along the west coast of North America, however breeds in both fresh and brackish waters [38].

Other human disease vectors may tolerate brackish waters or soil salinity

Biomphalaria and Bulinus species snails are intermediate hosts that transmit human schistosomiasis in freshwater. Other diseases caused by trematode flukes for which freshwater snails serve as intermediate hosts include fascioliasis, pragonimiasis and clonorchiasis. The impact of climate change, but not a rise in sea levels, on trematode VBD has recently been reviewed [39]. Construction of the Diama dam in the Senegal River basin in West Africa reduced tidal inflows and led to an increase in the prevalence of intestinal and urinary schistosomiasis that was at least partly ascribed to increased breeding of snail vectors after a reduction in water salinity [40, 41]. On the other hand, observations in South America suggest that Biomphalaria glabrata and Biomphalaria straminea snail vectors can survive in water with 5 ppt salinity in coastal areas [42, 43]. Schistosoma mansoni eggs have been reported to hatch in water with up to 6 ppt salinity [42]. Non-human, particularly bird-infective, schistosomes can however be transmitted in brackish water and are responsible for causing cercarial dermatitis or swimmer's itch.

Tsetse fly (Glossina spp) vectors of African trypanosomiasis are widespread in inland Africa. However Glossina palpalis gambiensis has also been reported to breed and transmit human trypanosomiasis in coastal locations in Guinea that are rich in mangrove swamps and where larval and pupal development takes place in soil [44]. Phlebotomine sandfly vectors of leishmaniasis that develop in a terrestrial habitat are found in coastal areas [45] but the ability of their eggs and larval stages to tolerate saline soils remains poorly studied. Their spread to increasing areas of brackish soils near coastal communities is a possibility.

Increasing density of coastal vectors heightens the risk of disease transmission

An increased risk of disease transmission has been mathematically related to higher vector densities and other vector characteristics that can be influenced by climate change such as increased survival of vectors and a reduction in the extrinsic incubation period for pathogens [46].

Greater disease transmission in coastal areas can initially generate local foci of high transmission that can subsequently spread VBD to wider areas. The possible role of locally high densities of An. annularis, a minor freshwater vector, in initiating malaria epidemics in Sri Lanka is illustrative in this regard [[47], Additional file 2]. Efficient vectors that are able to breed or adapt to breed in both fresh and brackish waters, e.g. An. culicifacies [32, 33] and An. sundaicus in Asia [21, 22], and Cx. tarsalis in North America [38], can be particularly potent in disseminating VBD in this context.

It is difficult to predict a time-scale for the projected increased transmission risk of VBD since it will vary with the vector, pathogen and locality concerned. It will however probably parallel the expansion of coastal brackish/saline water bodies and be additionally influenced by changes in factors such as climate, agricultural practice, animal reservoirs of disease and human populations.

Testing the hypothesis

Monitoring changes in relevant vector populations and disease incidence and prevalence near coastal brackish/saline water bodies in different parts of the world are needed to provide more substantial evidence. Since sea level rise and consequent expansion brackish and saline water bodies are gradual processes, the changes in vectors and disease patterns are also likely to be gradual, and require monitoring over a long period. However, additional measures undertaken to reduce vector populations and disease prevalence in coastal areas in light of the present hypothesis will diminish the predicted increased transmission of VBD.

Demonstrations of the ability of important mosquito vectors to tolerate and adapt to brackish/saline waters in the laboratory and in field situations will also help support the hypothesis. More research too on the ability of human schistosome eggs to hatch, miracidia to survive and infect snail vectors, longevity of snail hosts, and infectivity of cercariae released by snails in brackish water, and also the possibility of trematode parasites and their snail hosts adapting to brackish water in the long term is required. Relevant studies on the bionomics of non-mosquito vectors of African trypanosomiasis and other VBD are additionally needed. Also, little is presently known on how physiological changes associated with adapting to salinity might affect the vectorial capacity of mosquitoes and other vectors.

Implications of the hypothesis

Modeling of the expected climate change in England predicts a greater potential for endogenous transmission of malaria [48]. However, this model did not consider the likely increased breeding of An. atroparvus in England resulting from rising sea levels causing an expansion of coastal marshland. Although an increased risk of malaria has to be planned for in the UK, it is unlikely that the disease will re-establish itself in the UK or other developed countries for a variety of reasons. These include good health services and socio-economic conditions, and a low and more seasonal transmission capacity due to the climate. However, the situation is different in many resource-poor countries in tropical and semi-tropical parts of the world. Because of a climate that is more conducive to the transmission of VBD and weaker health and social infrastructures, greater transmission in coastal areas can be expected to significantly increase the burden of malaria and other mosquito-borne diseases in such countries.

Licensed vaccines are presently available for only two arboviral diseases viz. yellow fever and Japanese encephalitis. Development of a vaccine against dengue is hampered by the existence of four virus serotypes and because a sub-optimal primary immune response can exacerbate disease caused by a subsequent infection [49, 50]. Only drugs that provide symptomatic relief are presently available to treat arboviral diseases. The currently observed spread of arboviral diseases is therefore of increasing international concern [51, 52]. This is particularly so, because unlike with P. falciparum and P. vivax malaria, domestic and wild animals and birds commonly serve as zoonotic reservoirs for many arboviruses that are transmitted by mosquitoes. The spread of West Nile virus (WNV) for example is associated with wild birds and Culex mosquitoes in Europe [53]. Hence the increased breeding of salinity-tolerant arboviral vectors, e.g. Cx tarsalis [38], or the adaptation of freshwater arboviral vectors of high vectorial capacity, e.g. Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus, to breed in brackish and saline water bodies in coastal areas can have serious health consequences worldwide.

More than half the world's population live within 60 km of a shoreline. Population density in coastal areas is expected to increase from 87 persons per km2 in the year 2000 to 134 persons per km2 in 2050 [54], and this trend is likely to be particularly pronounced in tropical countries where many VBD are endemic. Therefore growing numbers of people will be placed at risk by an increase in vector populations in coastal areas. Greater host density, by increasing vector-host contact, will also increase disease transmission rates. Other factors such as changing agricultural practices, irrigation development, socio-economic conditions, changes in wild and domestic animal reservoirs, and health and habitation patterns are likely to interact in a complex way with the bionomics of salinity-tolerant vectors in influencing disease transmission in coastal areas. The plethora of factors that can be involved is illustrated by a malaria outbreak in the Demerara river estuary of Guyana in the last century [[55], Additional file 2].

Brackish/saline water bodies are frequently neglected in vector control programs. For example, malaria in Sri Lanka has traditionally been endemic in the extensive coastal areas of the dry zone where large lagoons are present and inland brackish water bodies are common [33, 34]. Recent evidence suggests an important role for salinity-tolerant An. sundaicus s.l. in transmitting coastal malaria [22]. However, larval vector control measures in the country have until now focused on inland freshwater bodies that are the preferred breeding sites for the principal vector, An. culicifacies species E [34]. Attention has also been drawn to the need for treating brackish water breeding sites of Verrallina funerea, a mosquito vector of arboviruses, in eastern Australia [56].

Effective countermeasures can mitigate the effect of rising sea levels on increasing the transmission of vector-borne infectious diseases

Effective malaria control measures employed over the past few decades in many countries has amply compensated for any tendency to increase disease transmission due to climate change over this period [57]. Similarly, appropriate control measures can prevent increased transmission of VBD due to the effects of rising sea levels. Low-resolution maps of the global distribution of the dominant anopheline vectors of malaria, including salinity-tolerant mosquito species, are now available [58]. Similar maps need to be developed for other disease vectors. Large projects are also underway to map the impact of rising sea levels on coasts [14]. The findings can be used in conjunction with studies modelling the effects of climate change to arrive at an overall risk map for VBD. This information together with advances in understanding the biology of the relevant vectors and pathogens will be useful for developing effective counter measures. Examples of engineering measures that can be applied include steps to reduce the development of new coastal swamps and other potential brackish/saline water breeding sites, and tidal flows in estuaries. Greater funding for the relevant biological research, detailed surveillance of disease transmission and vector densities and the application of vector control measures to brackish/saline water habitats are other measures that can be readily initiated at national and international levels. It is also important that all national agencies responsible for the different concerned sectors e.g. health, agriculture, coastal planning, environment, irrigation, livestock development, etc. are made aware of the increased risk of VBD in coastal areas in order to incorporate it into their strategic plans.

Authors' information

RR (MA, PhD Cantab) is a Professor in the Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam and a Visiting Researcher in the University of Cambridge with interests in Malaria, Vector-borne Diseases and Sustainable Development. SNS (BSc, PhD Colombo) is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Zoology, University of Jaffna with an interest in Medical Entomology.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Professors D. Dunne and M.C. Field of the Parasitology Division, Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, UK for valuable comments.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
PAPSRB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong, Brunei Darussalam
(2)
Department of Zoology, University of Jaffna, Jaffna, Sri Lanka

References

  1. World Health Organisation: Fact sheet No 94 Malaria. 2010, GenèveGoogle Scholar
  2. World Health Organisation: Fact sheet No 102 Lymphatic filariasis. 2010, GeneveGoogle Scholar
  3. World Health Organisation: Fact sheet No 117 Dengue and dengue haemorrhagic fever. 2009, GeneveGoogle Scholar
  4. World Health Organisation: Fact sheet No 115 Schistosomiasis. 2010, GeneveGoogle Scholar
  5. United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Fourth Assessment Report Climate Change 2007. 2007, GenevaView ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. McMichael AJ, Woodruff RE, Hales S: Climate change and human health: present and future risks. Lancet. 2006, 367: 859-869. 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68079-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Confalonieri U, Menne B, Akhtar R, Ebi KL, Hauengue M, Kovats RS, Revich B, Woodward A: Human health. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Edited by: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE. 2007, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 391-431.Google Scholar
  8. Hunter PR: Climate change and waterborne and vector-borne disease. J App Microbiol. 2003, 94: 37S-46S. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.94.s1.5.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Githeko AK, Lindsay SW, Confalonieri UE, Patz JA: Climate change and vector-borne diseases: a regional analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2000, 78 (9): 1136-1147.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Lindsay SW, Martens WJM: Malaria in the African highlands: past, present and future. Bull World Health Organ. 1998, 76 (1): 33-45.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Rogers DJ, Randolph SE: The global spread of malaria in a future warmer world. Science. 2000, 289: 1763-1766. 10.1126/science.289.5478.391b.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Paaijmans KP, Read AF, Thomas MB: Understanding the link between malaria risk and climate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009, 106: 13844-13849. 10.1073/pnas.0903423106.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Root TL, Price JT, Hall KR, Schneider SH, Rosenzweig C, Pounds JA: Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature. 2003, 421: 57-60. 10.1038/nature01333.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Nicholls RJ, Wong PP, Burkett VR, Codignotto JO, Hay JE, McLean RF, Ragoonaden S, Woodroffe CD: Coastal systems and low-lying areas. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Edited by: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE. 2007, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 315-356.Google Scholar
  15. Food and Agricultural Organisation: Seawater intrusion in coastal aquifers - Guidelines for study, monitoring and control. 2007, RomeGoogle Scholar
  16. de Magny CG, Murtugudde R, Sapiano MR, Nizam A, Brown CW, Busalacchi AJ, Yunus M, Nair GB, Gil AI, Lanata CF, Calkins J, Manna B, Rajendran K, Bhattacharya MK, Huq A, Sack RB, Colwell RR: Environmental signatures associated with cholera epidemics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008, 105 (46): 17676-17681. 10.1073/pnas.0809654105.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. Walter Reed Biosystematics Unit: Keys to medically important mosquito species. 2010, Silver Spring, MA, USA. Smithsonian Institution, accessed 28 Sep 2010, [http://wrbu.org/command_aors_MQ.html]Google Scholar
  18. Bradley TJ: Physiology of osmoregulation in mosquitoes. Annu Rev Entomol. 1987, 32: 439-462.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Garrett MA, Bradley TJ: Extracellular accumulation of proline, serine and trehalose in the haemolymph of osmoconforming brackish-water mosquitoes. J Exp Biol. 1987, 129: 231-238.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Smith KE, Van Ekeris LA, Okech BA, Harvey WR, Linser PJ: Larval anopheline mosquito recta exhibit a dramatic change in localization patterns of ion transport proteins in response to shifting salinity: a comparison between anopheline and culicine larvae. J Exp Biol. 2008, 211 (19): 3067-3076. 10.1242/jeb.019299.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Manguin S, Garros C, Dusfour I, Harbach RE, Coosemans M: Bionomics, taxonomy, and distribution of the major malaria vector taxa of Anopheles genus subgenus Cellia in Southeast Asia: an updated review. Infect Gen Evol. 2008, 8: 489-503. 10.1016/j.meegid.2007.11.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Surendran SN, Singh OP, Jude PJ, Ramasamy R: Genetic evidence for malaria vectors of the Anopheles sundaicus complex in Sri Lanka with morphological characteristics attributed to Anopheles subpictus species B. Malar J. 2010, 9: 343-10.1186/1475-2875-9-343.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Krishnamoorthy K, Jambulingam P, Natarajan R, Shriram AN, Das PK, Sehgal SC: Altered environment and risk of malaria outbreak in South Andaman, Andaman & Nicobar islands, India affected by the tsunami disaster. Malar J. 2005, 4: 32-10.1186/1475-2875-4-32.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Komalamisra N, Trongtokit Y, Palakul K, Prummongkol S, Samung Y, Apiwathnasorn C, Phanpoowong T, Asavanich A, Leemingsawat S: Insecticide susceptibility of mosquitoes invading tsunami-affected areas of Thailand. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2006, 37 (Suppl 3): 118-22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Trung HD, Van Bortel W, Sochantha T, Keokenchanh K, Quang NT, Cong LD, Coosemans M: Malaria transmission and major malaria vectors in different geographical areas of Southeast Asia. Trop Med Int Health. 2004, 9: 230-237. 10.1046/j.1365-3156.2003.01179.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Jardine A, Lindsay MD, Johansen CA, Cook A, Weinstein P: Impact of dryland salinity on population dynamics of vector mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) of Ross River virus in inland areas of southwestern Western Australia. J Med Entomol. 2008, 45 (6): 1011-1022. 10.1603/0022-2585(2008)45[1011:IODSOP]2.0.CO;2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Carver S, Spafford H, Storey A, Weinstein P: Colonisation of ephemeral water bodies in the Wheatbelt of Western Australia by assemblages of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae): role of environmental factors, habitat and disturbance. Environ Entomol. 2009, 38 (6): 1585-1594. 10.1603/022.038.0609.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. van Schie C, Spafford H, Carver S, Weinstein P: Salinity tolerance of Aedes camptorhynchus (Diptera: Culicidae) from two regions in southwestern Australia. Aust J Entomol. 2009, 48 (4): 293-299. 10.1111/j.1440-6055.2009.00719.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Carver S, Spafford H, Storey A, Weinstein P: The roles of predators, competitors and secondary salinisation in structuring mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) assemblages in ephemeral water bodies in the Wheatbelt of Western Australia. Environ Entomol. 2010, 39 (3): 798-810. 10.1603/EN09235.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Dobson MJ: Malaria in England: a geographical and historical perspective. Parassitologia. 1994, 36 (1-2): 35-60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Takken W, Geene R, Adam W, Jetten TH, van der Velden JA: Distribution and dynamics of larval populations of Anopheles messae and A. atroparvus in the delta of the rivers Rhine and Meuse, The Netherlands. Ambio. 2002, 31: 212-218.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Gunasekaran K, Jambulingam P, Srinivasan R, Sadanandane C, Doss PB, Sabesan S, Balaraman K, Das P: Malaria receptivity in the tsunami-hit coastal villages of southern India. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005, 5: 531-532. 10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70198-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Jude PJ, Dharshini S, Vinobaba M, Surendran SN, Ramasamy R: Anopheles culicifacies breeding in brackish waters in Sri Lanka and implications for malaria control. Malar J. 2010, 9: 106-10.1186/1475-2875-9-106.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Surendran SN, Ramasamy R: The Anopheles culicifacies and Anopheles subpictus species complexes in Sri Lanka and their implications for malaria control in the country. Trop Med Health. 2010, 38: 1-11. 10.2149/tmh.2009-12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Coluzzi M, Sabatini A: Cytogenetic observations on the salt water species, Anopheles merus and Anopheles melas of the Gambiae complex. Parasitologia. 1969, 11: 177-187.Google Scholar
  36. Sweeney AW: Larval salinity tolerance of the sibling species of Anopheles farauti. J Am Mosq Cont Assoc. 1987, 3 (4): 589-592.Google Scholar
  37. Edwards HA: Ion concentration and activity in the haemolymph of Aedes aegypti larvae. J Exp Biol. 1982, 101: 143-151.Google Scholar
  38. Goddard LB, Roth AE, Reisen WK, Scott TW: Vector competence of California mosquitoes for West Nile virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002, 8 (12): 1385-1391.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Mas-Coma S, Valero MA, Bargues MD: Climate change effects on trematodiases with emphasis on zoonotic fascioliasis and schistosomiasis. Vet Parasitol. 2009, 163: 264-280. 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.03.024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Vercruysse J, Southgate VR, Rollinson D, De Clercq D, Sacko M, De Bont J, Mungomba LM: Studies on transmission and schistosome interactions in Senegal, Mali and Zambia. Trop Geog Med. 1994, 46 (4 Spec No): 220-226.Google Scholar
  41. Talla I, Kongs A, Verle P, Belot J, Sarr S, Coll AM: Outbreak of intestinal schistosomiasis in the Senegal River Basin. Ann Soc Belg Med Trop. 1990, 70: 173-180.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Muirhead-Thompson RC: The ecology of vector snail habitats and mosquito breeding places. The experimental approach to basic problems. Bull World Health Organ. 1958, 19: 637-659.Google Scholar
  43. Paraense WL: The schistosome vectors in the Americas. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro. 2001, 96 (suppl): 7-16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Solano P, Ravel S, Bouyer J, Camara M, Kagbadouno MS, Dyer N, Gardes L, Herault D, Donnelly MJ, De Meeûs T: The population structure of Glossina palpalis gambiensis from island and continental locations in coastal Guinea. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009, 3 (3): e392-10.1371/journal.pntd.0000392.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Surendran SN, Kajatheepan A, Hawkes NJ, Ramasamy R: First report on the presence of morphospecies A and B of Phlebotomus argentipes sensu lato (Diptera: Psychodidae) in Sri Lanka- implications for leishmaniasis transmission. J Vect Borne Dis. 2005, 42 (4): 155-158.Google Scholar
  46. Macdonald G: The Epidemiology and control of malaria. 1957, London, New York, Toronto: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  47. Ramasamy R, de Alwis R, Wijesundere A, Ramasamy MS: Malaria transmission at a new irrigation project in Sri Lanka: the emergence of Anopheles annularis as a major vector. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1992, 47 (5): 547-553.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Lindsay SW, Hole DG, Hutchinson RA, Richards SA, Willis SG: Assessing the future threat from vivax malaria in the United Kingdom using two markedly different modelling approaches. Malar J. 2010, 9: 70-10.1186/1475-2875-9-70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Pang T, Cardosa MJ, Guzman MG: Of cascades and perfect storms: the immunopathogenesis of dengue haemorrhagic fever-dengue shock syndrome (DHF/DSS). Immunol Cell Biol. 2007, 85: 43-45. 10.1038/sj.icb.7100008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Chun L, Telisinghe LD, Hossain MM, Ramasamy R: Vaccine development against dengue and shigellosis and implications for control of the two diseases in Brunei Darussalam. Brunei Darussalam J Health. 2007, 2: 60-71.Google Scholar
  51. Weaver SC, Reisen WK: Present and future arboviral threats. Antiviral Res. 2010, 85 (2): 328-345. 10.1016/j.antiviral.2009.10.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Schwartz O, Albert ML: Biology and pathogenesis of chikungunya virus. Nature Revs Microbiol. 2010, 8: 491-500. 10.1038/nrmicro2368.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  53. Pfeffer M, Dobler G: Emergence of zoonotic arboviruses by animal trade and migration. Parasites and Vectors. 2010, 3 (1): 35-10.1186/1756-3305-3-35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. United Nations Environment Programme - Global Programme of Action for the Protection of the Marine Environment from Land-based Activities: Physical alteration and destruction of habitats. 2007, UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya, accessed 15 June 2010, [http://gpa.unep.org/content.html?id=199&ln=6]Google Scholar
  55. Giglioli G: Ecological change as a factor in renewed malaria transmission in an eradicated area. Bull World Health Organ. 1963, 29: 131-145.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Jeffery JA, Kay BH, Ryan PA: Role of Verrallina funerea (Diptera: Culicidae) in transmission of Barmah Forest virus and Ross River virus in coastal areas of eastern Australia. J Med Entomol. 2006, 43: 1239-47. 10.1603/0022-2585(2006)43[1239:ROVFDC]2.0.CO;2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Gething PW, Smith DL, Patil AP, Tatem AJ, Snow RW, Hay SI: Climate change and global malaria recession. Nature. 2010, 465: 10.1038/nature09098.Google Scholar
  58. Hay SI, Sinka ME, Okara RM, Kabaria CW, Mbithi PM, Tago CC, Benz D, Gething PW, Howes RE, Patil AP, Temperley WH, Bangs MJ, Chareonviriyaphap T, Elyazar IR, Harbach RE, Hemingway J, Manguin S, Mbogo CM, Rubio-Palis Y, Godfray HC: Developing global maps of the dominant Anopheles vectors of human malaria. PLoS Med. 2010, 7 (2): e1000209-10.1371/journal.pmed.1000209.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

    59. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/11/18/prepub

Copyright

© Ramasamy and Surendran; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement

BMC Infectious Diseases

ISSN: 1471-2334

Contact us