This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Lymphocyte and monocyte flow cytometry immunophenotyping as a diagnostic tool in uncharacteristic inflammatory disorders
© Janols et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 23 February 2010
Accepted: 13 July 2010
Published: 13 July 2010
Patients with uncharacteristic inflammatory symptoms such as long-standing fatigue or pain, or a prolonged fever, constitute a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The aim of the present study was to determine if an extended immunophenotyping of lymphocytes and monocytes including activation markers can define disease-specific patterns, and thus provide valuable diagnostic information for these patients.
Whole blood from patients with gram-negative bacteraemia, neuroborreliosis, tuberculosis, acute mononucleosis, influenza or a mixed connective tissue disorders, as diagnosed by routine culture and serology techniques was analysed for lymphocyte and monocyte cell surface markers using a no-wash, no-lyse protocol for multi-colour flow cytometry method. The immunophenotyping included the activation markers HLA-DR and CD40. Plasma levels of soluble TNF alpha receptors were analysed by ELISA.
An informative pattern was obtained by combining two of the analysed parameters: (i), the fractions of HLA-DR-expressing CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells, respectively, and (ii), the level of CD40 on CD14+ CD16- monocytes. Patients infected with gram-negative bacteria or EBV showed a marked increase in monocyte CD40, while this effect was less pronounced for tuberculosis, borrelia and influenza. The bacterial agents could be distinguished from the viral agents by the T cell result; CD4+ T cells reacting in bacterial infection, and the CD8+ T cells dominating for the viruses. Patients with mixed connective tissue disorders also showed increased activation, but with similar engagement of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Analysis of soluble TNF alpha receptors was less informative due to a large inter-individual variation.
Immunophenotyping including the combination of the fractions of HLA-DR expressing T cell subpopulations with the level of CD40 on monocytes produces an informative pattern, differentiating between infections of bacterial and viral origin. Furthermore, a quantitative analysis of these parameters revealed the novel finding of characteristic patterns indicating a subacute bacterial infection, such as borreliosis or tuberculosis, or a mixed connective tissue disorder. The employed flow cytometric method is suitable for clinical diagnostic laboratories, and may help in the assessment of patients with uncharacteristic inflammatory symptoms.
A considerable number of patients display uncharacteristic inflammatory symptoms, and constitute a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The clinical history may be dominated by long-standing fatigue or pain, or by a prolonged fever. A number of reports on patients with inconclusive presentation and microbiological test results have shown that many of them will eventually be assigned with a diagnosis of tuberculosis or cytomegalovirus infection [1–4]. These uncharacteristic cases may therefore represent an early stage, or show an atypical presentation, of a mixed connective tissue disorder or an infection.
Blood lymphocyte immunophenotyping by flow cytometry is a routine diagnostic procedure for assessment of lymphoproliferative diseases and HIV patient immunodeficiency. More recently it has become part also of the monitoring of patients taking immune-modifying drugs such as the rituximab (Mabthera) anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. The aim of the present study is to determine if an extended immunophenotyping of lymphocytes and monocytes, including cellular activation markers, can define disease-specific patterns, and thus provide valuable diagnostic information for patients with uncharacteristic inflammatory symptoms.
The immune response during experimental infection with a number of microbial agents has been investigated in great detail. For some prototype bacterial and viral infections data has also been collected from patients. Gram-negative enterobacteriacae strongly stimulate neutrophil phagocytosis and cytokine production by monocytes, in addition to effects on B and CD4+ T lymphocytes . Another strong immunostimulator is Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), with as much as 50% of all peripheral blood T cells being specific for this virus during the acute phase of the infection . The response to EBV has been reported to be much dominated by an increase in number and activation of CD8+ T lymphocytes [7, 8]. However, for many clinically significant microbial agents there is information only on a limited number of cellular immune parameters. For example, the relative frequencies of CD4+ T helper cells and CD8+ T cytotoxic cells is known to become altered by many microbes, for example CD4+ T lymphocytopenia has been documented in some cases of tuberculosis .
The samples from patients with an infectious disease diagnosis were obtained at their first consultation. Their history was then less than two weeks for the cases with gram-negative septicemia/pyelonephritis (Gr-) (n = 10, 7 females, 3 males), EBV (n = 4, all females) or influenza (Inf) (n = 5, all males), but longer for some of the patients with tuberculosis (Tb) (n = 8, 4 females, 4 males) or neuroborreliosis (Bo) (n = 7, 4 females, 3 males). The disease duration of the mixed connective tissue disorder (MCT) (n = 5, 4 females, 1 male) cases was not determined. The final diagnosis was based on a combination of clinical symptoms and conventional testing using Swedish national QC approved culture, PCR and serology.
Ethical permit was obtained from the local ethical committee at Lund University (Dnr 288/2007) and an informed consent was given by the participating patients.
Leukocyte concentration was determined using an LH750 machine (BeckmanCoulter, Hialeah, FL, USA), and plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) with an automated immunoturbidimetric assay system (IMMAGE immunochemistry system, Beckman Coulter, Bromma, Sweden) with a minimum detectable dose of 0.2 mg/L, both using Swedish national QC approved clinical diagnostic methodology. Soluble TNF alpha receptors (sTNFR) were assessed by a quantitative ELISA according to the instructions provided by the manufacturer (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN USA). The mean minimum detectable dose were for sTNFRI 0.77 pg/ml and for sTNFRII 0.6 pg/ml, with an inter-assay variation of < 10%.
Whole blood (50 μl) was incubated at room temperature with antibodies conjugated with the fluorochromes fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), phycoerythrin (PE), PE-Texas Red and PE-cyanine5 (PE-Cy5) to permit 4-colour analysis. The following four antibodies were added to each cell tube: CD8-FITC/CD4-PE/CD3-PE-Texas Red/HLA-DR-PE-Cy5, CD20-FITC/CD27-PE/CD19-PE-Texas Red/CD5-PE-Cy5, CD14-FITC/CD40-PE/CD3-PE-Texas Red/CD16-PE-Cy5, CD8-FITC/CD27-PE/CD45R0-PE-Texas Red/HLA-DR-PE-Cy5, CD2-FITC/CD14-FITC/CD15-FITC/CD20-FITC/CD11c-PE/CD45-PE-Texas Red/HLA-DR-PE-Cy5 (this tube was for determination of CD11c- HLA-DR+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells, and contained multiple FITC-labelled monoclonals in order to define lineage-negative cells), CD19-FITC/CD34-PE/CD45-PE-Texas Red/HLA-DR-PE-Cy5, respectively. Background autoflourescence was monitored with 4-colour isotypic non-specific mouse Ig, separately for lymphocytes and monocytes, and this PE-labelled mouse Ig was used also for setting the cut-off for HLA-DR-positive reaction. Antibody conjugates were from BeckmanCoulter and DAKO-Cytomation (Glostrup, Denmark). A no-wash no-lyse protocol was used. In-house solutions for lysis and fixation were used. At least 1,000 events were analysed in a FC500 BeckmanCoulter flow cytometer. Acquisition and analysis was made using the CXP software (BeckmanCoulter).
The non-parametric Wilcoxon's two-sample rank test (the Mann-Whitney test) was used .
A p-value of < 0.05 was regarded as significant.
Leucocyte counts and plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and soluble TNF alpha receptors
The present study was set up in order to determine whether multi-colour flow cytometry, now performed in many clinical diagnostic laboratories, can help us in the clinical assessment of patients with uncharacteristic inflammatory symptoms. Can it assist us by identifying lymphocyte and monocyte immunophenotypes suggesting an autoimmune disorder, or an on-going bacterial or viral infection?
An informative pattern was indeed obtained, by combining some of the analysed markers: the level of CD40 on monocytes with the fractions of HLA-DR-expressing CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells. For example, the obtained evidence suggests that an intermediate CD40 elevation in monocytes plus a large fraction of activated cells among the CD4+ T helper cells is indicative of subacute bacterial tuberculosis and borrelia infections. A similar pattern was seen among the mixed connective tissue disorder patients, however, with same levels of activation in the CD4+ T cells as in the CD8+ T cells. Statistical significance was reached for only some of the observed differences, and future studies on larger number of patients are needed in order to assess the full discriminatory power of these assays. Analysis of antinuclear antibodies and rheumatoid factor may therefore help to discriminate between infection and mixed connective tissue disorder in patients presenting with this type of pattern. Also NK cells provide valuable information since a marked increase was evident only in the influenza group (but not in the case of EBV, despite a clear virus pattern as determined by monocyte CD40 plus CD8+ T cells). We believe that activation markers (such as the informative CD40 and HLA-DR) for a principal reason are able to provide more reliable and easy-to-evaluate information than values expressed as percentage of all lymphocytes or leukocytes. This can be exemplified by the very strong increase in the number of CD8+ T cells in the EBV patients, causing the fractions of all other lymphocytes to be correspondingly decreased; thus, the low percentages of NK cells and of mucosal T and B cells cannot be assumed to reflect any influence by EBV on these cell types. In this context, it is interesting to turn the attention to the enterobacteriacae Gr- group: here the low values of NK cell fraction and T cell activation (both for CD4+ T and CD8+ T) cannot be considered to be secondary to lymphocytosis or any other of the assayed parameters. Instead, it suggests a direct effect on these cell types and, consequently, that less-needed immune functions can become down-regulated, in analogy with a study finding bacterial superinfections and a decreased granulocyte reactivity during a viral interferon-gamma response .
Our preliminary results from patients with uncharacteristic inflammatory disorders (n = 11, 8 females and 3 males), as defined by for example long-standing fatigue or pain, and no more specific diagnosis, show an elevated monocyte CD40 expression in most, but not all, cases (mean value 6 times higher than normal controls); an increased fraction of the CD14+ CD16+ monocyte subset (15% of all monocytes); and a most diverse T lymphocyte pattern. These patients have as yet not been followed-up with regard to additional tests or treatments.
Our study also shows that a number of potentially informative markers do not provide any discrimination. The fractions of B cells, CD5+ B cells and gamma/delta TCR+ CD3 + CD4- CD8- T cells (Figure 2B-D) did not show values different from the normal control persons; the latter two parameters are usually considered to play a role for mucosal immunity . The CD14 and CD16 double-positive monocyte subpopulation showed much the same result as CD40 expression on classical CD14 + 16- monocytes, but with a large inter-individual variation limiting their value for clinical use. We assayed some additional cell types which did not provide any discrimination, without presenting the results; CD34 + CD45 low hematopoietic progenitor cells, present in peripheral blood at a fraction of 0.1% of all leukocytes and reported to become dramatically increased during an infection ; plasmacytoid dendritic cells , reported to increase during viral infections and in mixed connective tissue disorders; CD27 and CD45R0 memory and effector subtypes of CD8 + T cells, reported to be affected during persistent virus infections . Likewise, CD69, CD71, as markers for T cell activation, as well as CD152 (CTLA-4) were found to be expressed only at low levels, and with no difference between patients and controls. No additional monocyte markers were investigated. It is known that activation antigen expression by T cells in vivo is determined by many factors such as body site, length of time of stimulation, and type of antigen . We considered HLA-DR to be a suitable activation marker for the present study, not only because of its fluorescence intensity, but also with regard to its in vivo expression (whereas e.g. CD25, i.e. the IL2R, is more easily detected in vitro), and to its kinetics, peaking relatively late (whereas e.g. CD69 appears already 2 h after stimulation, to disappear at day 5).
We also assayed CD4 + T regulatory cells, but were not able to obtain high enough mean fluorescent intensities for CD25 and FoxP3 for a meaningful evaluation. Interestingly, we could not document any increase in CD154 (the CD40 ligand) on T cells, and therefore decided not to include CD154 in our standard panel. This finding may seem unexpected, since this surface marker on CD4 + T cells is known to interact with CD40 on antigen-presenting cells, found by us to become strongly up-regulated on monocytes . Nevertheless, it is well-known that functional ligation by macrophages/monocytes with T cell CD40 ligand is important for their CD40 expression and effector functions such as TNF alpha and nitric oxide production . Moreover, genetic studies have recently documented an important association between rheumatoid arthritis and CD40 variants, supporting the relevance of CD40 for inflammatory disease development . Analysis of sTNFRs was also less informative due to a large variation, which may indicate that cellular activation markers in general have higher discrimination power than soluble cytokine and chemokine analytes, however, this remains for future studies to determine.
We have some evidence that the immunophenotype patterns found by us really provide superior information as compared with commonly used and more simple-to-assay parameters. In clinical practice a CRP value of 100 mg/l is often used as a crude cut-off, with a higher figure suggesting a bacterial rather than a viral origin of an infection. However, plasma-CRP was > 100 mg/L in some of the influenza patients, and < 100 mg/l for 14 of the 15 subacute bacterial tuberculosis and borreliosis patients, thus showing no reliable discrimination between viruses and bacteria. In addition, the range of CRP was wide within several patient groups, including some EBV, tuberculosis and neuroborreliosis patients presenting with a CRP of < 2 mg/l or 2 mg/l and thus giving no obvious indication of on-going infection. Other serum markers reported to be of use for rapid diagnosis of an infection were not assayed, such as procalcitonin in severe bacterial infections, neopterin and levels of cytokines or soluble cytokine receptors. The data obtained in the present study cannot exclude the possibility that the phase of the disease, i.e. acute versus chronic, rather than the type of disease, is the main determinant of the observed patterns. Future studies on a larger patient material may be helpful to clarify this issue. Interestingly, there was a normal monocyte count in all the EBV patients indicating that there is no simple relation between immune parameters assessed in peripheral blood and disease stage. However, there was a more than 3-fold increase in monocyte activation in all of the EBV patients, as compared with the highest CD40 level encountered among all of the control individuals. Likewise, although the tuberculosis group had an elevated mean number of monocytes, there was a large variation with only 2 of these 8 patients falling outside the normal range of monocyte count; in contrast the monocyte activation was increased in each patient.
Immunophenotyping of lymphocytes and monocytes including quantities of the fractions of HLA-DR expressing T cells and the level of CD40 expression on monocytes can differentiate between acute bacterial and viral infections. Novel findings are presented, suggesting that it also provides some indication of a subacute bacterial infection, such as neuroborreliosis or tuberculosis; as well as of a mixed connective tissue disorder, respectively. The employed flow cytometric method is suitable for clinical diagnostic laboratories, and promises to be a source of valuable clinical information for patients with uncharacteristic inflammatory symptoms, guiding further diagnostic testing and providing a rationale for ex juvantibus therapy. Further studies involving a larger number of patients are warranted, in order to determine the full clinical discriminatory power of this diagnostic tool.
We thank Eva Johansson for performing the flow cytometry analysis with great care and skill. This study was supported by grants from the Swedish Society of Medicine and the UMAS Hospital Funds.
- Persson L, Dahl H, Linde A, Engervall P, Vikerfors T, Tidefelt U: Human cytomegalovirus, human herpesvirus-6 and human herpesvirus-7 in neutropenic patients with fever of unknown origin. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003, 9: 640-644. 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00578.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ergonul O, Willke A, Azap A, Tekeli E: Revised definition of 'fever of unknown origin': limitations and opportunities. J Inf. 2004, 50: 1-5. 10.1016/j.jinf.2004.06.007.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chin C, Chen YS, Lee SJ, Wann SR, Lin HH, Huang CK, Tsai HC, Kao CH, Yen MY, Liu YC: Fever of unknown origin in Taiwan. Infection. 2006, 34: 75-80. 10.1007/s15010-006-5010-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Manfredi R, Calza L, Chiodo F: Primary cytomegalovirus infection in otherwise healthy adults with fever of unknown origin: a 3-year prospective survey. Infection. 2006, 34: 87-90. 10.1007/s15010-006-5012-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abbas AK, Lichtman AH: Cellular and Molecular Immunology. 2003, Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders, 5Google Scholar
- Thorley-Lawson DA: Epstein-Barr virus: exploiting the immune system. Nature Rev Immunol. 2001, 1: 75-82. 10.1038/35095584.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Roos MTL, van Lier RAW, Hamann D, Knol GJ, Verhoofstad I, van Baarle D, Miedema F, Schellekans PTA: Changes in the composition of circulating CD8+ T cells during acute Epstein-Barr and immunodeficiency virus infections in humans. J Inf Dis. 2000, 182: 451-458. 10.1086/315737.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lima M, dos Angos Texeira M, Queiros ML, Santos AH, Goncalves C, Correia J, Farinha F, Mendonca F, Soares JMN, Almeida J, Orfao A, Justica B: Immunophenotype and TCR-Vbeta repertoire of peripheral blood T-cells in acute infectious mononucleosis. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2003, 30: 1-12. 10.1016/S1079-9796(03)00014-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Uppal SS, Tewari SC, Verma S, Dhot PS: Comparison ofCD4 and CD8 lymphocyte counts in HIV-negative pulmonary TB patients with those in normal blood donors and the effect of antitubercular treatment: hospital-based flow cytometric study. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2004, 61: 20-26. 10.1002/cyto.b.20018.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Altman DG: Practical statistics for medical research. 1990, Chapman and Hall. LondonGoogle Scholar
- Strowig T, Brilot F, Munz C: Noncytotoxic functions of NK cells: direct pathogen restriction and assistance to adaptive immunity. J Immunol. 2008, 180: 7785-7791.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Grip O, Bredberg A, Lindgren S, Henriksson G: Increased subpopulations of CD16(+) and CD56(+) blood monocytes in patients with active Crohn's disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2007, 13: 566-72. 10.1002/ibd.20025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Auffray C, Sieweke MH, Geissman F: Blood monocytes: development, heterogeneity, and relationship with dendritic cells. Ann Rev Immunol. 2009, 27: 669-692. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132557.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Navarini AA, Lang KS, Verschoor A, Recher M, Zinkernagel AS, Nizet V, Odermatt B, Hengartner H, Zinkernagel RM: Innate immune-induced depletion of bone marrow neutrophils aggravates bacterial infections. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA). 2009, 106: 7107-12. 10.1073/pnas.0901162106.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ruiz P, Geraldina N: Peripheral gamma delta T-cell populations in HIV-infected individuals with mycobacterial infection. Cytometry. 1995, 22: 211-216. 10.1002/cyto.990220308.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Massberg S, Schaerli P, Knezevic-Maramica I, Kollnberger M, Tubo N, Moseman EA, Huff IV, Junt T, Wagers AJ, Mazo IB, von Andrian UH: Immunosurveillance by hematopoietic progenitor cells trafficking through blood, lymph and peripheral tissues. Cell. 2007, 131: 994-1008. 10.1016/j.cell.2007.09.047.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Appay V, Dunbar PR, Callan M, Klenerman P, Gillespie GMA, Papagno L, Ogg GS, King A, Lechner F, Spina CA, Little S, Havlir DV, Richman DD, Gruener N, Pape G, Waters A, Easterbrook P, Salio M, Cerundolo V, McMichael AJ, Rowland-Jones SL: Memory CD8+ T cells vary in differentiation phenotype in different persistent virus infections. Nat Med. 2002, 8: 379-385. 10.1038/nm0402-379.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Amlot PL, Tahami F, Chinn D, Rawlings E: Analysis by two-colour flow cytometry of umbilical cord blood, Activation antigen expression on human T cells. I. adult blood and lymphoid tissue. Clin Exp Imunol. 1996, 105: 176-182. 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1996.d01-722.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Elgueta R, Benson MJ, de Vries VC, Wasiuk A, Guo Y, Noelle RJ: Molecular mechanism and function of CD40/CD154 engagement in the immune system. Immunol Rev. 2009, 229: 152-172. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2009.00782.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suttles J, Stout RD: Macrophage CD40 signaling: a pivotal regulator of disease protection and pathogenesis. Semin Immunol. 2009, 21: 257-264. 10.1016/j.smim.2009.05.011.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Criswell LA: Gene discovery in rheumatoid arthritis highlights the CD40⁄ NF-jB signaling pathway in disease pathogenesis. Immunol Rev. 2010, 233: 55-61. 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2009.00862.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2334/10/205/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.