Skip to main content

Table 2 Trend and comparison of the mean (± SD) surface area of the lesion in two arms during the course of treatment

From: Comparing the efficacy of fluconazole and cryotherapy Versus cryotherapy alone on treating cutaneous leishmaniasis: a triple-blind randomized clinical trial

Arms

Week

1

2

3

4

5

6

Post-treatment

P 1

Cryotherapy and fluconazole

14.83 ± 10.76

16.64 ± 10.86

15.51 ± 11.34

15.11 ± 11.80

11.68 ± 9.31

7.57 ± 7.66

4.27 ± 5.84

< 0.001

Cryotherapy and placebo

12.07 ± 8.92

14.84 ± 11.95

14.72 ± 10.56

14.73 ± 11.39

13.73 ± 13.15

9.35 ± 9.02

6.23 ± 8.62

< 0.001

P 2

0.164

0.433

0.721

0.870

0.371

0.291

0.188

0.133 3

Mean difference with baseline, cm2

 Value

 95% confidence interval

 Standard error

 P 4

-0.076

-1.019, 0.867

0.475

0.874

2.263

0.631, 3.895

0.822

0.007

1.645

0.108, 3.183

0.775

0.036

1.454

-0.195, 3.104

0.831

0.083

-0.781

-3.028, 1.466

1.132

0.492

-5.066

-7.238, -2.894

1.094

< 0.001

-8.302

-10.852, -5.751

1.285

< 0.001

-

  1. 1 Repeated Measures Greenhouse-Geisser to assess the trend in the outcome for each arm
  2. 2 Independent sample T-test to compare two arms in each time point
  3. 3 GLM to compare the arms for the trend in the outcome
  4. 4 Independent sample T-test to compare with baseline