Skip to main content

Table 6 Performance characteristics of POCTs for syphilis compared to reference assays by site

From: Independent clinic-based evaluation of dual POCTs for screening for HIV and syphilis in men who have sex with men in Italy, Malta, Peru, and the United Kingdom

Sites

Bioline

Chembio

Chembio (MR)

I

P

N

FP

FN

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

I

P

N

FP

FN

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

I

P

N

FP

FN

Sensitivity (%)

Specificity (%)

4001 – Italy 1

0

74

210

0

20

78.72 (69.07–86.49)

100 (98.08–100)

0

77

207

0

17

81.91 (72.63–89.10)

100 (98.08–100)

0

74

210

0

20

78.72 (69.07–86.49)

100 (98.08–100)

4002 – Italy 2

0

56

152

1

21

72.37 (60.91–82.01)

99.24 (95.85–99.98)

1

61

146

1

16

78.95 (68.08–87.46)

99.24 (95.82–99.98)

1

60

147

1

17

77.63 (66.62–86.40)

99.24 (95.82–99.98)

4005 – Malta

0

81

434

3

45

63.41 (54.25–71.91)

99.23 (97.78–99.84)

0

88

427

6

41

66.67 (57.60–74.91)

98.47 (96.70–99.44)

0

97

418

7

33

73.17 (64.43–80.76)

98.21 (96.36–99.28)

4006 – Peru 1

0

163

210

0

24

87.17 (81.51–91.60)

100 (98.04–100)

0

167

206

0

20

89.30 (83.97–93.34)

100 (98.04–100)

4

167

202

1

18

90.22 (84.98–94.10)

99.46 (97.03–99.99)

4007 – Peru 2

0

179

335

1

48

78.76 (72.85–83.91)

99.65 (98.08–99.99)

0

194

320

1

33

85.40 (80.11–89.73)

99.65 (98.08,99.99)

0

196

318

2

32

85.84 (80.60–90.11)

99.31 (97.51–99.92)

4032 – UK

0

60

425

1

65

47.58 (38.54–56.74)

99.72 (98.47–99.99)

0

71

414

2

55

55.65 (46.45–64.56)

99.45 (98.01–99.93)

0

77

408

3

50

59.68 (50.49–68.39)

99.17 (97.59–99.83)

4034 – Peru 3

0

56

75

1

15

78.57 (67.13–87.48)

98.36 (91.20–99.96)

0

58

73

1

13

81.43 (70.34–89.72)

98.36 (91.20–99.96)

0

63

68

3

10

85.71 (75.29–92.93)

95.08 (86.29–98.97)

Fixed effect model

0

669

1841

7

238

73.56 (70.28–76.59)

99.57 (99.03–99.81)

1

716

1793

11

195

78.33 (75.24–81.13)

99.32 (98.70–99.64)

5

734

1771

17

180

79.93 (76.91–82.65)

98.94 (98.23–99.37)

Meta-analysis (random effects model)

73.79 (63.98–81.70)

99.57 (99.09–99.79)

 

78.60 (69.73–85.41)

99.48 (98.69–99.80)

 

80.10 (72.30–86.13)

99.01 (98.13–99.48)

 

Between sites variability—SD

(p-value)

7.64 (0.0946)

_

Between sites variability—SD

(p-value)

7.64 (0.0967)

7.54 (0.5719)

Between sites variability—SD

(p-value)

7.55 (0.1097)

7.34 (0.7180)

 

DOR

244.05 (268.89–1546.09)

 

DOR

401.59 (185.03–871.63)

 

DOR

704.14 (216.28–2292.50)

LR + 

169.72 (80.18–359.25)

LR + 

80.72 (42.48–153.37)

LR + 

151.47 (57.41–399.65)

LR-

0.26 (0.19–0.37)

LR-

0.20 (0.14–0.28)

LR-

0.22 (0.15–0.31)

  1. I invalid, P Positive, N Negative, FP False Positive, FN False Negative, DOR Diagnostic Odds Ratio, LR Likelihood Ratio