Table 4 Score results of the providers’ feasibility subdomains
Site 1 | Site 2 | Site 3 | Site 4 | TOTAL | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEARNABILITY SUBDOMAINa | |||||
Ease of performing dual test | |||||
Median score | Neither easy nor difficult | Quite easy | Quite easy | Quite easy | Quite easy |
Ease of reading and interpreting dual test results | |||||
Median score | Quite easy | Very easy | Quite easy | Very easy | Quite easy |
Ease of interpreting weak positive test result | |||||
Median score | Quite easy | Very easy | Quite easy | Quite easy/ Neither easy nor difficult | Quite easy |
The training was enough | |||||
Median score | Agree | Strongly agree | Agree | Agree | Agree |
Subdomain median score | 2.13 | 1.50 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.88 |
Subdomain mean score | 1.92 | 1.42 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 1.84 |
WILLINGNESS SUBDOMAINa | |||||
Willingness to perform dual test | |||||
Median score | Neither agree nor disagree | Strongly agree | Neither agree nor disagree | Agree | Agree |
Current supporting components of the study are sufficient to integrate dual test | |||||
Median score | Agree | Strongly agree | Agree/ Neither agree nor disagree | Agree | Agree |
Subdomain median score | 2.00 | 1.00 | 3.25 | 2.00 | 2.00 |
Subdomain mean score | 2.25 | 1.17 | 3.25 | 2.00 | 2.11 |
SUITABILITY SUBDOMAINb | |||||
Confidence in the results of dual tests | |||||
Median score | Agree | Strongly agree | Agree | Agree | Agree |
Routine dual test should continue in my CBO | |||||
Median score | Agree | Strongly agree | Disagree | Agree | Agree |
Dual tests could be successfully integrated in my CBO | |||||
Median score | Agree | Agree | Disagree | Agree | Agree |
Subdomain median score | 2.00 | 1.33 | 3.33 | 2.17 | 2.00 |
Subdomain mean score | 2.07 | 1.33 | 3.22 | 2.17 | 2.18 |
SATISFACCION SUBDOMAINc | |||||
How do new users feel about dual test | |||||
Median score | Quite positive/ Neither negative nor positive | Quite positive | Neither negative nor positive | Quite positive | Quite positive |
Use of dual tests reduces the workload | |||||
Median score | Disagree | Strongly agree | Strongly disagree | Neither agree nor disagree | Disagree |
Dual tests are more acceptable to users than separate tests | |||||
Median score | Neither agree nor disagree/ Disagree | Strongly agree | Disagree | Neither agree nor disagree | Neither agree nor disagree |
Dual tests will decrease users’ waiting time | |||||
Median score | Neither agree nor disagree | Strongly agree | Disagree | Disagree | Neither agree nor disagree |
Subdomain median score | 3.25 | 1.25 | 3.75 | 3.25 | 3.25 |
Subdomain mean score | 3.14 | 1.58 | 3.08 | 3.08 | 2.94 |
EFFECTIVENESS SUBDOMAINd | |||||
Current supplier will be able to provide dual tests | |||||
Median score | Neither agree nor disagree | Strongly agree | Disagree | Disagree | Neither agree nor disagree |
Dual tests can be easily integrated into national/regional guidelines | |||||
Median score | Agree | Agree | Agree/ Neither agree nor disagree | Neither agree nor disagree | Agree/ Neither agree nor disagree |
Subdomain median score | 3.25 | Ɨ | 3.5 | 2.00 | 2.75 |
Subdomain mean score | 3.12 | Ɨ | 3.5 | 2.00 | 2.94 |