From: Optimal resource allocation model for COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Field | Frequency | Proportion of total (%) | References |
---|---|---|---|
Total number of articles reviewed | 22 | 100 | [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41] |
Region of focus | |||
Africa | 3 | 13.64% | |
North America | 6 | 27.27% | |
Asia | 7 | 31.82% | |
Europe | 6 | 27.27% | |
South America | 1 | 4.55% | [25] |
Numerical simulation | 4 | 18.18% | |
Number of resources | |||
1 | 18 | 81.82% | [20,21,22,23,24, 26, 28, 29, 31,32,33,34,35,36, 38,39,40,41] |
2 | 1 | 4.55% | [37] |
3 or more | 3 | 13.64% | |
Types of resources | |||
Tests | 4 | 18.18% | |
Vaccines | 6 | 27.27% | |
Beds | 8 | 36.36% | |
Apparatus and Instruments | 3 | 13.64% | |
PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) | 2 | 9.09% | |
Health specialists | 3 | 13.64% | |
Therapeutic Drug | 3 | 13.64% | |
Lockdown | 1 | 4.55% | [22] |
Decision variables | |||
confirmed cases/Infection rate | 14 | 63.64% | |
Deaths/the mortality rate | 9 | 40.91% | |
the recovery rate | 4 | 18.18% | |
cost-effectiveness | 4 | 18.18% | |
the duration of the epidemic | 1 | 4.55% | [21] |
Method for modeling | Â | Â | Â |
differential equation (SEIR) | 13 | 59.09% | |
optimization function | 8 | 36.36% | |
machine learning algorithm | 7 | 31.82% |