Skip to main content

Table 2 Geographical representation in the original studies supporting the 2021 Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines based on the World Bank classification for income

From: Patient diversity and author representation in clinical studies supporting the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021: a systematic review of citations

Recommendation

Studies

(n)

High

n (%)

Upper Middle

n (%)

Lower-Middle

n (%)

Low

n (%)

Screening & Early Treatment

30*

23

(77)

5

(17)

3

(10)

4

(13)

Infection

126*

114

(90)

16

(13)

10

(8)

8

(6)

Hemodynamic Management

47*

42

(89)

3

(6)

4

(9)

2

(4)

Ventilation

41*

39

(95)

9

(22)

0

(0)

0

(0)

Additional Therapies

36*

33

(92)

3

(8)

2

(6)

0

(0)

Long Term Outcomes/

Goals of Care

83

82

(99)

1

(1)

0

(0)

0

(0)

  1. *Total number of studies is higher than that of the total number of studies from each classification group since some studies were conducted in more than one country with different income classifications