Question | Mean Percent Agreement (95% CI) | Fleiss Kappa (95% CI) |
---|---|---|
Computational Environment | ||
1.1) Is the operating system documented? | 0.94 (0.87, 1.00) | 0.90 (0.81, 0.97) |
1.2) Is the operating system version documented? | 0.94 (0.87, 1.00) | 0.90 (0.79, 0.98) |
Analytical Software | ||
2.1) Is the name of the analytical software documented (e.g., the programming language name)? | 0.88 (0.79, 0.97) | 0.82 (0.71, 0.92) |
2.2) Is the analytical software accessible for free? | 0.82 (0.71, 0.93) | 0.68 (0.54, 0.81) |
2.3) Is the version of the analytical software documented? | 0.79 (0.67, 0.90) | 0.75 (0.64, 0.85) |
2.4) Do the authors include a specific identifier (DOI, URL, citation) that points to the analytical software that was used? | 0.76 (0.64, 0.89) | 0.72 (0.61, 0.81) |
2.5) Is the analytical software installation guide accessible online? | 0.89 (0.80, 0.98) | 0.75 (0.60, 0.89) |
Model Description 3.1) Is the complete, structured model description provided in the publication, supplement, or referenced publication? | 0.53 (0.38, 0.67) | 0.58 (0.51, 0.66) |
3.2) Is the model specified in the publication or supplement (contrary to being referenced in other papers)? | 0.91 (0.83, 0.99) | 0.84 (0.70, 0.94) |
Model Implementation (“Code”) 4.1) Is the model implementation (e.g., code, workflow) openly accessible online? | 0.86 (0.75, 0.96) | 0.86 (0.77, 0.94) |
4.2) Does the model implementation (e.g., code, workflow) have a version or modification date? | 0.84 (0.73, 0.94) | 0.69 (0.55, 0.84) |
4.3) Does the model implementation (e.g., code, workflow) have an identifier? | 0.79 (0.67, 0.90) | 0.74 (0.62, 0.85) |
4.4) Is the computer language of the model implementation (e.g., code, workflow) documented? | 0.62 (0.48, 0.76) | 0.39 (0.22, 0.54) |
4.5) Are all model implementation (e.g., code, workflow) dependencies clearly specified in either the publication or supplemental files? | 0.69 (0.56, 0.83) | 0.63 (0.50, 0.75) |
4.6) Are the model implementations (e.g., code, workflow) annotated with comments? | 0.94 (0.87, 1.00) | 0.80 (0.66, 0.92) |
Data 5.1) Does the model in the publication use input data? | 0.75 (0.62, 0.87) | 0.59 (0.47, 0.70) |
5.2) Has the source and content of the input data been described in the publication or supplement? | 0.59 (0.45, 0.74) | 0.36 (0.20, 0.52) |
5.3) Does the paper cite a specific, unique, and persistent identifier to refer to each input dataset? | 0.54 (0.39, 0.68) | 0.36 (0.20, 0.52) |
5.4) Is the input data openly accessible? | 0.66 (0.52, 0.80) | 0.34 (0.16, 0.52) |
5.5) Is the data in a format that can be easily re-formatted (or “parsable”) to meet the input specifications of the model implementation? | 0.55 (0.41, 0.69) | 0.23 (0.10, 0.40) |
Experimental Protocol 6.1) Are all the mentioned parameter values for the model implementation (e.g., code, workflow) documented in a single location (e.g., table or list in the publication or supplement)? | 0.65 (0.51, 0.79) | 0.69 (0.60, 0.77) |
6.2) Is there an explanation of how the described/mentioned categories (computational environment, analytical software, model implementation, and data) were used together to create the results (e.g., figures and/ or tables)? | 0.50 (0.36, 0.64) | 0.58 (0.52, 0.64) |