Skip to main content

Table 3 Outcomes of testing and treatment

From: Point-of-care testing in private pharmacy and drug retail settings: a narrative review

Ref no

First author

Year published

Sample size

Intended treatment for the Targeted Disease

Description of intervention arm(s)

POCT uptake

POCT positivity (% of patients receiving an POCT who tested positive)

Treatment provision: proportions of all study participants receiving treatment(s) intended for those testing positive

[23]

Ansah

2015

4603 clients attending 24 clusters of shops (each containing 1 to 5 shops)

Artemisinin combination therapy: amodiaquine-artesunate, arthemeter-lumefantrine, or dihydroartemisinine-piperaquine

Shops were trained to carry out a malaria POCT before dispensing medication

100%

49.70%

Based on POCT results: 78.8% (2142/2719, based on POCTs)

65.3% (3005/4603, based on research slides)

[35]

Audu

2016

1200 at 6 private retail pharmacies

Artemether-lumefantrine

Shops were trained on the use of malaria POCT before dispensing medication

NA

43%

Control arm: 98.2%

Intervention arm: 78.3% (100% of those of tested positive and 62% of those who tested negative)

[36]

Aung

2015

832 fever cases at 631 POCT outlets

Antimalarials

Arm 1: price subsidy for POCT resupply and monthly check-in visit. Arm 2: price subsidy for POCT and financial/product-related incentives. Arm 3: price subsidy for POCT and monthly intensive support visits by health officers

Arm 1: from 3.0% to 6.4%

Arm 2: from 2.7% to 11.9%, Arm 3: from 5.4% to 13.0%

NA

NA

[24]

Awor

2014

Intervention: 487 children with fever at across 44 shops

Control: 275 children with fever across 40 shops

Antimalarials for malaria or amoxicillin, oral rehydration solution and zinc sulfte tablets for pneumonia

Shops were trained and provided with subsidised diagnostics and drugs and a community awareness campaign, following “integrated community case management”-style intervention

From 0% to 87.7% of children with fever (427/487)

75% (44/47, based on direct observation)

70.4% (343/487, based on exit interviews)

70.2% (33/47, based on direct observation)

[37]

Awor

2015

6140 children with fever across 44 shops

Antimalarials, oral rehydration solution and zinc sulfte tablets for pneumonia

Shops were trained and provided with subsidised diagnostics and drugs and a community awareness campaign, following “integrated community case management”-style intervention

97.5% of children with fever (5986/6140)

85.1% (5096/5986)

85% (5218/6140)

[38]

Cohen

2012

58 villages offering POCTs (87% of total number of villages)

Artemisinin-based combination therapy or other antimalarials

Shops were trained on tests and told to proceed as they would normally based on whether they thought the client had malaria or not after the test

16% of those with fever

89%

ACT

32% of those testing positive

9% of those testing negative

26.4% of those not tested at all

Other antimalarials

66.4% of those testing positive

33.3% of those testing negative

35% of those not tested at all

[26]

Hansen

2017

7522 in intervention, 5797 in control arm

Artemisinin combination therapy

Drug shops trained on how to perform and interpret malaria POCT and prescribe subsidised ACT based on POCT results

100%

43.50%

Intervention: 61%

Control: 100%

[39]

Hutchinson

2015

21 focus group discussions (no info on how many people per focus group) 12 months after implementation

Artemisinin combination therapy

Drug shops were trained on POCT usage and decided to treat based on results of POCT

   

[40]

Hutchinson

2017

Staff from 59 drug shops, divided into 21 focus groups (each having btw 5 to 13 participants)

Artemisinin combination therapy

Pharmacies were trained to recognise malaria based on POCTs and decide to treat based on the POCT outcome

97.60%

57.50%

52.70%

[41]

Ikwuobe

2013

619 patients in intervention, 607 in contorl, btw 2 pharmacies; total of 1226 participants

Antimalarials

Pharmacists were trained on and provided with POCTs and tested those with anti-malarial prescription or wanting to self-medicate with them, then allowed to proceed with dispensing of drugs following discussion between pharmacist and patient

NA

13.6% (84/619)

58.2% (360/619)

[42]

Kitutu

2017

3738 child fever cases across 61 drug shops in intervention arm

Artemisinin for malaria, amoxicilllin for pneumonia, zinc sulfate solution for non-bloody diarrhoea

Drug shops were trained in integrated community case management to provide POCT testing for children with malaria, consisting of training of drug sellers, provision of information, education and communication, supplying diagnostics and medicines, and monthly supportive supervision

97% (3628/3738)

47% (1957/4190)

NA

[43]

Kwarteng

2019

1973 clients across 42 licensed chemical shops

Antimalarials

Pharmacies and licensed chemical shops were trained on use of malaria POCTs and treated based on national malaria treatment guidelines

NA

60.2% (1081/1797)

60.2% (1082/1797)

[44]

Maloney

2017

1214 patients across 262 drug dispensing outlets

Antimalarials

Arm 1: training, access to and supervision on use of POCTs to treat clients

Arm 2: same as Arm 1 but also received subsidised POCTs and sold at subsidized price

Intervention: increased from 19 to 74%, cntrol: increased from 3 to 18%

41%

NA

[34]

Mbonye

2015

15517 patients (8672 intervention and 6845 control) across 59 drug shops

Artemisinin combination therapy

Drug shops were additionally trained on use of malaria POCT, and asked to manage patients based on POCT results using subsidized ACT

97.8

58.50%

Intervention: 62.5%

Control: 99.8%

[33]

Mboyne

2015

Policy implications of Mboyne et al. (2015)

     

[45]

Onwunduba

2023

      

[46]

O' Meara

2016

444 participants across 11 shops

Artemisinin combination therapy

Arm 1: Free POCT and conditional ACT subsidy

Arm 2: Free POCT but no ACT subsidy

Arm 3: No POCT subsidy but conditional ACT subsidy

Arm 4: No POCT or ACT subsidy

Arm 1: 73.7%

Arm 2: 73.8%

Arm 3: 49.6%

Arm 4: 51.0%

Arm 1: 39.3%

Arm 2: 27.6%

Arm 3: 44.6%

Arm 4: 47.1%

Arm 1: 43.9%

Arm 2: 25.9%

Arm 3: 32.8%

Arm 4: 29%

[47]

Poyer

2018

633 clients in second round at 120 outlets, but high rates of dropout

Antimalarials

Private health facilities (PHF) and pharmacies (P) were trained in use of malaria POCTs and offered them to febrile patients

PHF: from 30.4% to 52.6%

P: from 52.1% to 56.3%

PHF: from 52.3% to 45.1%

P: from 47.2% to 52.8%

PHF; from 42.5% to 41.8%

P: from 31% to 29.4%

[48]

Shelus

2023

934 clients of drug shops

Antimalarial

Drug shops offered malarial POCTs to febrile clients or clients seeking antimalarials for themselves or for others and recorded the medication purchased by these clients

36%

43%

79.40%

[49]

Simmalavong

2017

2,301,676 tests across 317 pharmacies

Artemether/lumefantrine

Private pharmacies were trained on and supplied with POCTs and antimalarials to diagnose and treat malaria as part of a public–private scheme to increase diagnostics in private clinics, which was then scaled up over time

NA

  

[50]

Soniran

2022

637 caregivers of febrile children under 10 yo and 48 mystery cleint visits

ACT

Over-the-counter medicine selllers were trained to sight patients suspected of malaria and conduct a test on thembefore prescribing antimalarials to patients testing positive

30.8% (intervention; household survey) or 38.1% (intervention; mystery client); 10.5% (control; household survey) or 23.3% (control; mystery client)

25.0% (intervention, mystery client) vs 42.9% (control, mystery client)

33.3% (intervention, mystery client) vs 53.3% (control, mystery client)

[51]

Sudhinaraset

2015

30 informal providers of POCTs

Antimalarials

Arm 1: subsidised POCTs

Arm 2: subsidised POCTs and free POCT for every 5 purchased by providers

Arm 3: subsidised POCTs and information, education and counselling

NA

  

[52]

Thet

2021

80 malaria drug shops for quantitative and 65 of these for qualitative interviews

"Effective and quality" antimalarial drugs

Drug shops participated in nationwide project to replace widespread use of artemisinin monotherapy with combination therapy, and were trained to perform malaria POCT to guide management of clients

NA

NA

NA

Ref no

Treatment provision: % of patients not tested receiving the intended treatment for the study's targeted diseases

Adherence: % of patients with a negative POCT result not receiving the intended treatment for the study's targeted diseases

Adherence: % of patients with a positive POCT result receiving the intended treatment for the study's targeted diseases

% of patients tested positive referred elsewhere by the provider for further care

Safety & Accuracy of administration of testing (% of providers who could accurately perform an POCT, read its result and dispose of waste)

Accuracy of POCT (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value or other quality measures)

Retail price (USD)

[23]

Control: 93% (slide-positive), 88% (slide-negative)

97%

99.50%

0.52% (7/1351)

87.2% to 100% of different safety indicators

Sensitivity: 98–100% by shop

Specificity: 73% to 98%, some 30%, 31%, 52%

0

[35]

98.20%

38%

100%

NA

NA

Sensitivity: 97.3%

Specificity: 98.5%

Positive predictive value: 98.0%

NA

[36]

NA

NA

NA

NA

94%

NA

0.18

[24]

NA

90.9% (10/11, based on direct observation)

100% (33/33, based on direct observation)

NA

94%

NA

0

[37]

NA

NA

93.5% (4961/5307)

NA

NA

NA

NA

[38]

61.40%

57.70%

98.40%

NA

 > 95% for POCT administration and procedure adherence

Lot-testing: 100% passed

0.40 (ranged between 0–2)

[26]

100%

98.60%

99.10%

NA

NA

Sensitivity: 91.75%

Specificity: 62.92%

0.2

[39]

       

[40]

99.20%

70.30%

94.30%

NA

NA

 

2 (between 0.08–13.20 USD in mPOCT negative); 1.62 (between 0.12–12.80 USD in mPOCT positive); 1.32 (between 0.32–18.00 USD in control arm)

[41]

Control: 100% (607/607)

48.4% (259/535)

100% (84/84)

NA

NA

Sensitivity: 100%

Specificity: 100%

0

[42]

NA

NA

73.9% (based on exit interviews)

88.7% (based on pharmacist record)

63.3% (based on direct observation)

NA

NA

NA

0

[43]

NA

73.9% (529/716)

82.79% (895/1081)

NA

94.9% (1873/1973)

NA

NA

[44]

Intervention: 35%

Control: 41%l

93%

90%

NA

NA

NA

0.32 (subsidised) and 0.67 (not subsidised)

[34]

Intervention: 51.4%-73.7%

Control: 99.6%-100.0%

98.5% (3117/3166)

99% (4858/4907)

NA

95% of POCTs read correctly

Sensitivity: 91.7%

Specificity: 63.1%

0.2

[33]

       

[45]

       

[46]

Arm 1: 30%, Arm 2: 29.6%, Arm 3: 21.1%, Arm 4: 26.5%

Arm 1: 72.5%, Arm 2: 80.0%, Arm 3: 87.1%, Arm 4: 92.6%

Arm 1: 81.8%, Arm 2: 71.4%, Arm 3: 84%, Arm 4: 58.3%

NA

NA

NA

0 or 0.50

[47]

PHF: from 8.4% to 19.8%

P: from 40.8% to 22.2%

PHF: from 93.3% to 96.1%

P: from 86.1% to 100%

PHF: from 84.6% to 91.6%

P: from 86.8% to 92.6%

0%

PHF: from 25.3–97.8% to 14.7–100%

P: from 33.3–100% to 20.7–97.7%

 

0.8 or 1 for hospital or single pack POCT respectively (suggested prices)

[48]

87.30%

63.70%

93.60%

NA

NA

NA

0.57

[49]

       

[50]

From 47.1% to 66.7% (before and after intervention, household survey)

34.6% (Intervention, mystery client) vs 52.2% (Control, mystery client)

83.3% (Intervention, mystery client) vs 75.0% (Control, mystery client)

75.0% (Intervention, mystery client) vs 100% (Control, mystery client)

NA

66.7% (intervention, mystery client) vs 40% (control, mystery client)

NA

0.44

[51]

       

[52]

NA

73.90% of drug shops

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA