Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: The clinic-based predictive modeling for prognosis of patients with cryptococcal meningitis

Original Submission
31 Oct 2022 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Dec 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report
25 Dec 2022 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kazuki Nishida
22 Mar 2023 Author responded Author comments - Fafa Tian
Resubmission - Version 2
22 Mar 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Mar 2023 Author responded Author comments - Fafa Tian
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Mar 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 3
30 Mar 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report
6 Apr 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kazuki Nishida
7 Apr 2023 Author responded Author comments - Fafa Tian
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Apr 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 Apr 2023 Author responded Author comments - Fafa Tian
Resubmission - Version 5
9 Apr 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 5
5 May 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kazuki Nishida
8 May 2023 Author responded Author comments - Fafa Tian
Resubmission - Version 6
8 May 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 6
9 May 2023 Author responded Author comments - Fafa Tian
Resubmission - Version 7
9 May 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 7
15 May 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kazuki Nishida
16 May 2023 Author responded Author comments - Fafa Tian
Resubmission - Version 8
16 May 2023 Submitted Manuscript version 8
18 May 2023 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kazuki Nishida
Resubmission - Version 9
Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
18 May 2023 Editorially accepted
25 May 2023 Article published 10.1186/s12879-023-08337-2

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page