Skip to main content

Table 1 Summary of characteristics of studies reporting findings of IMMY CrAg® lateral flow assay on serum and comparator test(s)

From: Diagnostic performance of the IMMY cryptococcal antigen lateral flow assay on serum and cerebrospinal fluid for diagnosis of cryptococcosis in HIV-negative patients: a systematic review

 

Author, date of publication

Setting

n

Study population

Immunosuppressed n (%)

Cryptococcal disease phenotype

Samples tested (n)

Comparator test(s)

Reported sensitivity (95% CI)

Reported specificity

1

Dubbels 2017

USA

37

Not reported

15 (40.5%)

Cryptococcal meningitis, pulmonary cryptococcosis, other

36

Culture, histology, LA, compositec

Not calculated

66%

2

Harrington 2021

USA

96

Asymptomatic inpatients and outpatients

43 (45%)

No disease

35

LA

Not calculated

Not calculated

3

Hevey 2020

USA

34

Symptomatic inpatients

Not reported

Pulmonary cryptococcosis, otherb

34

Composite clinical and laboratory end pointd

Overall 85.3%, localised pulmonary 90.9% (58.7–99.8%), disseminated 82.6% (61.2–95.1%)

Not calculated

4

Jitmuang 2015

USA

31

Symptomatic inpatients

17 (55%)

Cryptococcal antigenemia,a Cryptococcal meningitis, pulmonary cryptococcosis, otherb

53

LA, EIA

100% (92–100%)

Not calculated

5

Min 2020

China

78

Symptomatic inpatients

17 (22%)

Pulmonary cryptococcosis

78

Lung biopsy (histopathology)

69.2% overall, immunocompetent 80.3%, immunocompromised 29.4%

Not calculated

6

Tintelnot 2015

Germany

8

Not reportedg

0

Cryptococcal antigenemia,a cryptococcal meningitis

9

LA

Not calculated

Not calculated

7

Wang 2020

China

149

Symptomatic inpatients

55 (37%)

Cryptococcal antigenemia,a cryptococcal meningitis, pulmonary cryptococcosis

136

Composite clinical and laboratory end pointe

Titre 1:10 39.6% (29.7–50.1%), Titre 1:5 72.9% (62.9–81.5%)

Titre 1:10 100%(69.2–100%), Titre 1:5 70.0% (34.8–93.3%)

8

Wu 2020

China

37

Symptomatic and asymptomatic inpatients

15 (41%)

Pulmonary cryptococcosis

25

Composite clinical and laboratory end pointf

Not calculated

Not calculated

  1. Cryptococcal disease phenotypes
  2. aCryptococcal antigenaemia: isolated cryptococcal antigenaemia without evidence of disease
  3. bOther: any other cryptococcal disease including disseminated disease
  4. Definition of composites used as comparators
  5. c(i) a Cryptococcus species was recovered in culture from any specimen source, (ii) a Cryptococcus species was histopathologically identified in any specimen, or (iii) the patient responded to targeted antifungal therapy with concomitant decreases in serial CrAg LFA titers [28]
  6. dPositive serum or CSF CrAg, isolation of Cryptococcus neoformans in culture, or identification by the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9th (117.5, 321.0) or 10th (B45.1-B45.9) editions [34]
  7. eCryptococcal infections defined as: either “proven”, “probable”, “possible” or “non-crypto- coccosis”, as described for other invasive fungal diseases, with some modifications in patients with low CrAg LFA titers as per De Pauw et al. [36]
  8. fProven pulmonary cryptococcosis based on the following criteria: histopathological, cytopathological or direct microscopic examination of a specimen obtained by a needle aspiration or biopsy from a normally sterile site (other than mucous membranes) showing encapsulated budding yeasts; or probable PC if each of the three elements of host factor, clinical features and mycological evidence were present [33]
  9. gTesting of stored laboratory samples