Skip to main content

Table 3 The characteristics of the included studies (N = 39)

From: Why do men who have sex with men practice condomless sex? A systematic review and meta-synthesis

Number

Author and year

Country

Study design

Data collection

N, Samples

1

Li et al., 2010

China

Ethnographic study

In-depth semi-structured interviews

17, MSM from diverse background

2

Moen et al., 2013

Tanzania

Ethnographic study

Participant observation and dialogical interviews

105, diverse same-sex-attracted men

3

Peterson et al., 2003

USA

Phenomenological research

Semi-structured interviews

75, African-American MSM

4

Taggart et al., 2017

USA

Phenomenological research

In-depth and semi-structured interviews

20, African-American MSM

5

Campbell et al., 2013

USA

Grounded theory approach

Qualitative interviews

48, same-sex male couples

6

Mustanski et al., 2014

USA

Mixed method research with Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skills model

Mixed method study, focus group interviews

75, adolescent gay and bisexual males

7

Ostergren et al., 2011

USA

Phenomenological research

Semi-structured interviews, thematic analysis

462, non-condom using MSM

8

Neville et al., 2016

New Zealand

Phenomenological research

Qualitative descriptive approach, Thematic analysis

960, MSM

9

Schnarrs et al., 2012

USA

Phenomenological research

In-depth, semi-structured interviews

75, men who engaged in bisexual behavior

10

Tadele, 2010

Ethiopia

Grounded theory approach

In-depth interviews and focus group discussion

24, MSM

11

Li et al., 2016

China

Descriptive and exploratory qualitative study design with the health belief model

In-depth semi-structured interviews, thematic analysis

17, MSM

12

Beoughe et al., 2012

USA

Grounded Theory approach

Semi-structured interviews

12, discordant gay couples

13

Harawa et al., 2006

USA

Phenomenological research

Semi-structured focus group interviews

30, African-American men have sex with men and women

14

Valente et al., 2019

Kenya

Phenomenological research

Semi-structured interviews

25, MSW (male sex workers) and 11 male clients of male sex workers

15

Chakrapani et al., 2013

India

Grounded theory research

In-depth interviews, focus-group discussions and key-informant interviews

93, MSM

16

Adam et al., 2010

Canada

Phenomenological research

In-depth semi-structured interviews

102, high-risk gay and bisexual men

17

Adam et al., 2000

Canada

Phenomenological research

Semi-structured one-on-one interviews

102, gay and bisexual men

18

Adams et al., 2009

New Zealand

Critical theory research

Face-to-face semi-structured individual interviews

22, MSM

19

Balán et al., 2009

USA

Phenomenological research

In-depth interviews

31, Latino MSM

20

Boulton et al., 2010

England

Sociological analysis

Open-ended interviews

78, gay men who engaged in anal intercourse without a condom

21

Diguez et al., 1996

USA

Phenomenological research with mixed method design

Semi-structured interviews

182, gays

22

Eisenberg et al., 2011

USA

Phenomenological research

Semi-structured in-depth interviews

34, young MSM

23

Giano et al., 2019

USA

Phenomenological research

Semi-structured interviews

40, MSM

24

Harawa et al., 2010

USA

Grounded theory with mixed method design

In-depth follow-up semi-structured interviews

17, MSM

25

Harper et al., 2016

USA

Phenomenological research

Semi-structured qualitative interviews

36, Black gay and bisexual young men living with HIV

26

Hospers et al., 1994

Holland

Phenomenological research

Focus group interviews

19, gay men who engaged in risk-taking behavior with casual partners

27

Hubach et al., 2014

USA

Grounded theory approach

Semi-structured interviews

77, behaviorally bisexual men

28

Klassen et al., 2019

Canada

Social ecological analysis

Semi-structured interviews

19, gay men

29

Kong, 2008

China

Phenomenological research

In-depth semi-structured face-to-face interviews

30, MSW

30

Malebranche, 2009

USA

Phenomenological research

Semi-structured, one-on-one interviews

29, self-identified Black MSM

31

Musinguzi et al., 2015

Uganda

Phenomenological research

Semi-structured interviews

85, self-identified adult MSM

32

Middelthon, 2001

Norway

Phenomenological research

Repeated in-depth interviews

20, young gay men

33

Siegler et al., 2014

South Africa

Phenomenological research

In-depth interviews

34, South -African MSM

34

Starks et al., 2017

USA

Phenomenological research with thematic analysis

Semi-structured interviews

17, HIV-negative gay male couples

35

Zhang et al., 2018

China

Phenomenological research

Semi-structured interviews

35, male students who have sex with men

36

Wang et al., 2005

China

Phenomenological research

Focus group discussion, individual interview, observation

Unclear, MSM from five cities

37

Zou, 2008

China

Phenomenological research with mixed method design

Individual in-depth interviews

20, MSM

38

Ofreneo et al., 2020

Philippines

Critical realist inquiry

Semi-structured interviews

17, MSM

39

Rwstar et al., 2019

Philippines

Situated socio-ecological perspective research

Semi-structured interviews

23 transgender women and 7 cisgender MSM