Skip to main content

Table 1 Clinical and microbiological characteristics of all study cases

From: Evaluation of two different semi-automated homogenization techniques in microbiological diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: disperser vs. bead milling method

 

PJI1 (n = 40)

AF2 (n = 40)

Median patient age, yr (range)

75 (46–89)

72 (50–93)

No. (%) of females

18 (45)

24 (57)

Site of arthroplasty (no. [%])

  

Hip

20 (50)

20 (50)

Knee

20 (50)

20 (50)

Type of surgery (no. [%])

  

Explantation of the entire joint prosthesis

25 (62)

19 (47)

Explantation of prosthesis components

(femoral, acetabular, tibial, inlay)

14 (35)

18 (45)

Debridement and prosthesis retention

1 (3)

3 (8)

Patients with major diagnostic criteria for PJI* (no./total no. [%])

  

≥ 2 positive cultures

32/35 (91)

0

≥ 2 positive cultures + Presence of sinus tract

2/35 (6)

0

Negative culture + Presence of sinus tract

1/35 (3)

0

Average number of positive samples per patient/

Average total number of samples per patient

3.5/4.5

0/4.5

Patients with negative major criteria and minor pre- and intraoperative scoring based diagnostic criteria for PJI* (no./total no. [%])

  

Score ≥ 6 (infected)

5/5 (100)

0

Score 4–5 (inconclusive)

0

0

Score ≤ 3 (not infected)

0

40

  1. 1Periprosthetic joint infection; 2Aseptic failure; *According to the 2018 Definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection;