Skip to main content

Table 2 Identified barriers and facilitators to interventions targeting youth across the five domains of Nilsen, 2015’s Determinant Framework [17]

From: Barriers and facilitators to HIV prevention interventions for reducing risky sexual behavior among youth worldwide: a systematic review

Barriers

Facilitators

1. Characteristics of the implementation object

1. Characteristics of the implementation object

1.1 Barriers to intervention acceptability among youth

-Incompatibility of intervention content with the needs of youth [33, 43]

-Long duration of the intervention [33, 35]

-Complexity of the intervention [35]

1.1 Facilitators to intervention acceptability among youth

-Compatibility of intervention content with the needs of youth [35,36,37]

1.2 Barriers to intervention acceptability among community members

-Incompatibility of intervention content with the needs of community members [44]

1.2 Facilitators to intervention acceptability among implementers

-Relative advantage of the intervention [32]

Total facilitators: 2

1.3 Barriers to youth’s participation in the intervention

-Age requirements that excluded other youth [33]

-Restricted days and times of the intervention [34]

 

1.4 Barriers to risky sexual behavior reduction among youth

-Limited intervention content (e.g., intervention content addresses individual factors such as knowledge without addressing structural factors such as poverty, unemployment) [32, 44]

Total barriers: 7

 

2. Characteristics of the users/adopters

2. Characteristics of the users/adopters

2.1 Barriers to intervention acceptability among youth

-Adult/old implementers [37]

2.1 Facilitators to intervention acceptability among youth

-Approachability/friendliness implementers [33, 37]

-Experience of implementers [37]

2.2 Other barriers to intervention success

-Implementers’ lack of knowledge related to intervention content [44]

-Poor education or training of implementers [44]

-Implementers’ lack of exemplary or positive behavior [44]

Total barriers: 4

2.2 Other facilitators to intervention success

-Training of implementers [32]

-Implementers’ knowledge related to intervention content [44]

Total facilitators: 4

3. Characteristics of the end users

3. Characteristics of the end users

3.1 Barriers to risky sexual behavior reduction among youth

-Low perceptions of risk of sexually transmitted infections including HIV [33, 38, 42,43,44]

-Fear of relationship breakdown [33, 38, 42, 43]

-Desire for pregnancy/children [42, 43]

-Being stubborn/hard hardheaded [42, 43]

-Belief that one is incapable of change [42, 44]

-Negative attitudes towards condom use [32, 44]

-Poor decision-making skills [44]

-Lack of self-confidence [42]

-Concern for privacy [33]

-Fear of side effects of contraceptives [44]

-Having high sensation seeking [41]

-Being under the influence of alcohol/drugs [42]

-Being reliant on avoidance strategies [42]

-Being unprepared [42]

-Preferring not to adopt an HIV prevention method (e.g., condoms use) [43]

-Limited sexual health knowledge [44]

-Negative experiences associated with using contraceptives [43]

-Desire to meet basic material needs [44]

3.1 Facilitators to risky sexual behavior reduction among youth

-Fear of pregnancy/sexually transmitted infections including HIV [32, 37, 43]

-Having strong ambitions/being future oriented [39, 44]

-Being knowledgeable [42]

-Having good problem-solving skills [42]

-Having high self-confidence [42]

-Intentions/readiness to change [36]

-Negative experiences in a relationship [39]

-Being self-reliant [39]

-Having high self-motivation [39]

-Having high self-respect [42]

-Having high sense of responsibility [42]

-Low socio-economic status (e.g., lack of money to pay for sex) [44]

3.2 Barriers to youth’s participation in the intervention

-Concern for privacy [32, 44]

-Fear of stigma [44]

3.2 Facilitators to youth’s participation in the intervention

-Perceived benefits of the intervention [37]

Total facilitators: 13

3.3 Other barriers to intervention success

-Being stubborn/hardheaded/uncooperative [44]

-Having limited knowledge (e.g., about the intervention [44]

-Low literacy [44]

Total barriers: 23

 

4. Characteristics of the context

4. Characteristics of the context

4.1 Interpersonal

4.1 Interpersonal

4.1.1 Barriers to risky sexual behavior reduction among youth

-Partner’s refusal to use an HIV prevention method (e.g., condom use, HIV testing [32, 33, 38, 39, 42]

-Lack of financial support from the family [38, 39, 43]

-Peer pressure [38, 43, 44]

-Lack of child-parent communication on sexual issues [36, 38]

-Controlling partner [42, 43]

-Relationship issues (e.g., current boyfriend and unstable relationships) [41, 42]

-Parent’s refusal of an HIV prevention method (e.g., HIV testing [32]

-Violent partner [36, 41]

-Partner’s negative attitudes towards condom use [38]

-Poor role models [38]

-Lack of restrictive parenting [38]

-Partner suspect fidelity if the other partner request protected sex [42)

-Partner’s desire for pregnancy [42]

-Partner is under the influence of drugs [42]

-Partner’s preferences not to adopt an HIV prevention method (e.g., condom use) [39]

4.1.1 Facilitators to risky sexual behavior reduction among youth

-Partner’s consent to use an HIV prevention method (e.g., condom use [42, 43]

-Family support [39, 44]

-Restrictive parenting [38, 44]

-Positive peer influence [38]

-Teacher advice [38]

-Parental advice [39]

-Stable relationships [42]

-Partner does not suspect fidelity if the other partner request protected sex [42]

-Family/parental religious beliefs (e.g., raised in a family with religious beliefs against engaging in risky sexual behavior) [44]

4.1.2 Other barriers to intervention success

-Lack of support for critical thinking among youth [44]

 

4.2 Community

4.2 Community

4.2.1 Barriers to risky sexual behavior reduction among youth

-Gender-biased norms [36, 38, 39, 43, 44]

-Myths about contraceptives [32, 44]

-Norms discouraging discussion of sexual issues between parents and children [32, 44]

-Limited resources/services in the community (e.g. programs for youth, condoms) [32, 33]

-Cultural beliefs [44]

4.2.1 Facilitators to risky sexual behavior reduction among youth

-Norms encouraging healthy sexual behavior (e.g., abstinence and delaying of sexual debut) [44]

-Religious beliefs discouraging risky sexual behavior [38]

4.2.2 Barriers to youth’s participation in the intervention

-Violence in the community/neighborhood [34]

-Incarceration [34]

 

4.3 Organizational or institutional

4.3 Organizational or institutional

4.3.1 Barriers to risky sexual behavior reduction among youth

-Limited resources (e.g., condoms, human resources) [44]

-Inaccessibility of services (e.g., condoms, healthcare facilities) [44]

-Poor quality of services (e.g., lack of confidentiality) [44]

4.3.1 Facilitators to intervention acceptability among youth

-Accessibility and friendliness of the intervention venue [33]

Total facilitators: 12

4.3.2 Barriers to youth’s participation in the intervention

-Inaccessibility of intervention venue [34, 37]

 

4.3.3 Other barriers to intervention success

-Limited resources (e.g., financial and human resources) [44]

-Restrictions on depicting of condoms in schools [44]

-Poor quality of services (e.g. lack of confidentiality, inappropriate clinical advice) [44]

-Inaccessibility of services (e.g., healthcare facilities [44]

 

4.4 Structural

 

4.4.1 Barriers to risky sexual behavior reduction among youth

-Economic constrains [32, 43]

-Poverty [32]

-Unemployment [32]

-Limited economic opportunities [44]

-Women’s subordinate status [44]

-Cost of services (e.g. secondary education) [39]

-Inaccessibility of services (e.g. schools) [39]

-Gender-based violence [39]

 

4.4.2 Other barriers to intervention success

-Poverty [44]

-Limited demand for services (e.g., condoms) [44]

-Cost of services (e.g., condoms) [44]

Total barriers: 42

 

5. Characteristics of the strategy of facilitating implementation

5. Characteristics of the strategy of facilitating implementation

5.1 Barriers to intervention acceptability among youth

-Use of non-participatory facilitating methods [32]

5.1 Facilitators to intervention acceptability among youth

-Use of same sex youth group [36, 37]

-Use of different or mixed facilitating methods [35]

-Implementation of intervention with fidelity [37]

5.2 Other barriers to intervention success

-Failure to implement the intervention with fidelity [44]

-Use of non-participatory facilitating methods [44]

-Use of corporal punishment [44]

-Sexual abuse [44]

Total barriers: 5

5.2 Facilitators to youth’s participation in interventions

-Mobilization of community members to influence youth to attend the intervention [32]

-Integration of intervention with other services [32]

-Provision of detailed intervention information to parents [32]

-Using outreach activities [32]

-Building of a trusting relationship with young people [32]

-Use of same age or peer implementers [32]

-Provision of incentives [32]

 

5.3 Other facilitators to intervention success

-Dissemination of intervention information to community members [32, 36, 37]

-Implementation of intervention with fidelity [40, 44]

-Use of participatory facilitating methods [44]

-Decreased corporal punishment [44]

-Collaboration among different stakeholders in delivering the intervention [32]

Total facilitators: 15

Grand total barriers: 81

Grand total facilitators: 46