Skip to main content

Table 3 The results of NAT yields for five different assays using the TMA and PCR methods

From: The impact of nucleic acid testing to detect human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, and hepatitis B virus yields from a single blood center in China with 10-years review

Method

TMA

PCR

Overall

Assays

Procleix® Ultrio® Assay

Procleix® Ultrio Plus® Assay

Procleix® Ultrio Elite® Assay

Total

Cobas® TaqScreen MPX Test

Cobas® TaqScreen MPX Test, version 2.0

Total

 

Number of tested donations

584,540

131,614

444,201

1,160,355

73,052

838,288

911,340

2,071,695

Non-discriminating reactive

Numbers

797

271

695

1763

/

/

/

1763

NAT yields (per million)

1363.47

2059.05 **

1564.61 **##

1519.36

/

/

/

850.99

HBV

Numbers

444

127

708

1279

66

857

923

2202

NAT yields (per million)

759.57

964.94 *

1593.87 **##

1102.25

903.47 @@

1022.32**## @@

1012.79

1062.90

HCV

Numbers

0

2

0

2

0

0

0

0

NAT yields (per million)

0.00

15.20 *@@

0.00

1.72

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

HIV

Numbers

1

0

1

2

0

1

1

3

NAT yields (per million)

1.71

0.00

2.25

1.72

0.00

1.19

1.10

1.45

NAT+ELISA (HBV, HCV and HIV)

Numbers

445

129

709

1283

66

858

924

2207

NAT yields (per million)

761.28

980.14 *

1596.12 **

1105.70

903.47

1023.51

1013.89 &

1065.31

NAT+ELISA (ALL kinds)

Numbers

1242

400

1404

3046

66

858

924

3970

NAT yields (per million)

2124.75

3039.19 **

3160.73 **

2625.06

903.47

1023.51

1013.89

1916.31

  1. Bold values indicate significant differences
  2. HBV hepatitis B virus, HCV hepatitis C virus, HIV human immunodeficiency virus, ELISA enzyme linked immunosorbent assay, NAT nucleic acid amplification testing, PCR polymerase chain reaction, TMA transcription-mediated amplification
  3. *p < 0.05,**p < 0.01, compared to Procleix® Ultrio® Assay; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, compared to Procleix® Ultrio Plus® Assay; @@p < 0.01, compared to Procleix® Ultrio Elite® Assay; &p < 0.05, compared to TMA method