Performance and utility of more highly sensitive malaria rapid diagnostic tests

BMC Infectious Diseases

Table 1 Details of published and unpublished studies used in this study

First author, year, reference	Country	Study description	HRP2	PCR/other NAAT method	qPCR	co-RDT
Acquah et al. 2021 [19]	Ghana	Cross-sectional prevalence		x	x	x
Das et al. 2017 [12]	Myanmar, Uganda	Cross-sectional prevalence	x	x	x	x
Druetz et al. 2020 [16]	Haiti	Cross-sectional prevalence				x
Galatas et al. 2020 [20]	Mozambique	Cross-sectional prevalence	x	x		x
Girma et al. 2019 [21]	Ethiopia	Cross-sectional prevalence		x	x	x
Hofmann et al. 2018 [14]	PNG	Cross-sectional prevalence		x	x	x
Landier et al. 2018 [13]	Myanmar	Cross-sectional prevalence	x	x	x	x
Liu et al. 2019 [22]	Myanmar	Cross-sectional prevalence		x		x
Manjurano et al. 2021 [23]	Tanzania	Cross-sectional prevalence		x		x
Mwesigwa et al. 2019 [24]	The Gambia	Cross-sectional prevalence		x
Owalla et al. 2020 [25]	Uganda	Cross-sectional prevalence, Clinical diagnosis			x	x
Yeung et al. 2020 [15]	Cambodia	Cross-sectional prevalence, Active case detection			x	x
Hartley et al. 2020 [26]	Tanzania	Clinical diagnosis			x	x
Hofmann et al. 2019 [27]	Tanzania	Clinical diagnosis		x	x	x
Plucinski et al. 2017 [28]	Angola	Clinical diagnosis	x			x
Briand et al. 2020 [29]	Benin	Pregnant women		x
Unwin et al. 2020 [30]	Indonesia	Pregnant women		x		x
Vásquez et al. 2018 [31]	Colombia	Pregnant women		x		x
Vásquez et al. 2020 [32]	Colombia	Pregnant women		x	x	x
Unpublished studies
Bridges et al. [10]	Zambia	Cross-sectional prevalence, Active case detection		x		x
Saad et al. [11]	Cambodia	Cross-sectional prevalence, Active case detection		x	x
Bennett et al. [9]	Laos	Cross-sectional prevalence, Active case detection		x		x

The four columns to the right show which other diagnostics were used in each study

ISSN: 1471-2334