Skip to main content

Table 3 Average cluster-level proportion of utilization of malaria interventions by malaria infection, anaemia status and area of residence

From: Impact of malaria control interventions on malaria infection and anaemia in areas with irrigated schemes: a cross-sectional population-based study in Sudan

Variables

Malaria infection

Anaemia status

Area of residence

Categories

Mean (95%CI)

Total

p value

Categories

Mean (95%CI)

Total

p value

Categories

Mean (95%CI)

Total

p value

Population utilization of malaria diagnosis (%)

Positive

54.1 (46.5–61.6)

126

0.192

Anaemic

46.7 (38.8–54.6)

168

0.489

Rural

48.4 (40.9–55.9)

3339

0.552

Negative

49.2 (42.6–55.8)

4000

Non-anaemic

49.0 (40.0–58.0)

129

Urban

53.4 (38.4–68.3)

787

Population utilization of appropriate malaria treatment (%)

Positive

33.3 (28.7–38.0)

122

0.965

Anaemic

32.9 (19.9–45.9)

148

0.438

Rural

31.1 (19.9–42.3)

3002

0.242

Negative

33.2 (23.5–42.8)

3518

Non-anaemic

29.6 (20.3–39.0)

122

Urban

42.8 (26.5–59.0)

638

Population utilization of LLINs (%)

Positive

14.0 (10.8–17.1)

136

0.070

Anaemic

20.1 (13.3–26.9)

140

0.352

Rural

18.1 (13.0–23.2)

3236

0.203

Negative

17.1 (12.9–21.3)

4342

Non-anaemic

18.4 (13.1–23.7)

182

Urban

13.0 (6.7–19.2)

874

Population coverage with IRS (%)

Positive

36.9 (11.4–62.4)

135

 < 0.001

Anaemic

69.4 (58.0–80.9)

163

0.827

Rural

75.6 (66.5–84.9)

3604

0.059

Negative

71.7 (62.9–80.4)

3975

Non-anaemic

70.1 (58.3–82.0)

135

Urban

49.7 (24.3–75.1)

874