Skip to main content

Table 2 Sub-group analysis of the pooled prevalence of hepatitis B infection in Nigeria

From: Hepatitis B virus infection in Nigeria: a systematic review and meta-analysis of data published between 2010 and 2019

Sub-group variables

Variable category

Included studies

Prevalence % (95% CI)

I2%

p-heterogeneity

p-difference

Study group

Blood donor

4

13.2 (9.7–17.8)

72.5

0.012

0.129

Pregnant women

17

7.7 (5.8–10.2)

90.1

p < 0.001

 

HIV positive

7

9.9 (6.7–14.4)

88.6

p < 0.001

 

HIV positive pregnant women

2

7.0 (2.4–18.7)

93.3

p < 0.001

 

Others

17

10.8 (8.6–13.5)

91.1

p < 0.001

 

Mean methodological quality

JBI ≤ 6

9

9.1 (6.0–13.4)

92.7

p < 0.001

0.795

JBI > 6

38

9.6 (8.1–11.3)

91.0

p < 0.001

 

Region/ zone

North West

7

12.1 (7.2–19.6)

93.3

p < 0.001

0.005

North East

1

7.1 (5.0–10.0)

NA

1.0

 

South West

15

9.7 (7.1–13.1)

94.3

p < 0.001

 

South East

6

5.9 (3.8–9.2)

76.7

p < 0.001

 

South South

6

7.1 (4.9–10.0)

73.6

0.002

 

North Central

10

11.2 (8.5–14.7)

89.6

p < 0.001

 

Mixed

2

11.6 (10.0–13.5)

5.0

0.305

 

Year of publication

2010–2014

18

10.1 (7.9–13.0)

92.6

p < 0.001

0.467

2015–2019

29

9.0 (7.4–11.0)

90.4

p < 0.001

 

Method of diagnosis

ELISA

21

10.0 (7.8–12.6)

93.2

p < 0.001

0.066

RDT

20

8.4 (6.5–10.6)

90.7

p < 0.001

 

PCR

1

8.3 (5.1–13.4)

NA

NA

 

EIA

4

11.9 (8.4–16.7)

75.6

0.006

 

ICT

1

17.2 (10.81–26.3)

NA

NA

 

Setting

Rural

4

10.7 (5.01–21.4)

94.3

p < 0.001

0.008

Urban

31

8.2 (6.9– 9.9)

88.0

p < 0.001

 

Mixed

12

12.6 (10.3–15.3)

86.9

p < 0.001

 

Age

≤ 17

6

11.4 (7.5–17.1)

87.2

p < 0.001

0.140

> 17

12

12.7 (8.4–18.8)

94.2

p < 0.001

 

Mixed

23

8.2 (6.8–10.0)

90.8

p < 0.001

 

Not stated

6

7.8 (5.5–10.9)

73.2

0.002

 
  1. ELISA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, PCR polymerase chain reaction, ICT immunochromatography, EIA enzyme immunoassay, RDT rapid diagnostic test