Skip to main content

Table 4 Antimicrobial resistance rates (shown as percent resistance) amongst pediatric population based on literature review (2010–2017)

From: Antimicrobial resistance among GLASS priority pathogens from Pakistan: 2006–2018

Priority pathogens

Year of publication

Year of study

Category

N

AMP

CRO/CTM

CAZ

MEM/IPM

GEN

AK

CIP/OFX

SXT

CLOX

VAN

Refs.

K. pneumoniae

2013

2006–2011

I

104

   

20

  

20

   

[62]

E. coli

2010**

2009–2010

I

30

73.3

63.4

50.3

2.9

  

40.3

   

[63]

2012**

2009–2010

I

30

73.3

46

46.2

20

  

40.3

   

[64]

2016

2012–2015

I

811

84.9*

(89.8–80)

78

 

5.3

  

50.6*

(32.7–68.57)

   

[65]

2016

2010–2011

I

35

     

77.5*

(77.1–78)

  

[66]

2016

2010–2012

II

46

91

   

40

 

39

  

[67]

Acinetobacter sp.

2012

2009–2010

I

17

   

52.9

66.6

46.6

    

[64]

2014

2010–2011

I

12

   

100

100

100

    

[33]

2016

2014

I

112

   

66

71.2

83.3

    

[68]

2017

2014

I

100

   

94.7

100

95.78

    

[69]

S. Typhi

2012α

2002–2004

II

189

 

0

    

0

   

[70]

2010α

2007–2008

II

16

 

0

    

46

   

[71]

S. aureus

2011

2004–2007

II

304

        

4.3

 

[72]

2012

2009–2010

I

35

         

0

[64]

  1. The pathogen/antimicrobial combination used was in accordance with WHO GLASS. n value: Number of isolates included in the study reported. Category of studies included: I: Hospital based studies, II: Lab-based surveillance/Community studies. Data from lab-based (Category I) and community surveillance (Category II) studies were not merged
  2. Resistance was graded as: very low (0–10%): in italic; low (11–30%): plain font; moderate (30–50%): underlined; high (≥ 50%): bold font
  3. AMP ampicillin, CRO/CTM ceftriaxone/cefotaxime, CAZ ceftazidime, MEM/IPM meropenem/imipenem, GEN gentamicin, AK amikacin, CIP/OFX ciprofloxacin/ofloxacin, SXT sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim, CLOX cloxacillin, VAN vancomycin, sp. species
  4. *Data from studies conducted during the same year was merged and shown as median percentage (with 95% confidence intervals)
  5. **Both these studies were from the same institute and thus data overlap likely
  6. αThe years that these studies were conducted have no overlap, data presented according to the year of study to reflect temporal resistance trends