Peer Review reports
From: Utility of conventional clinical risk scores in a low-risk COVID-19 cohort
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23 Mar 2021 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 2 May 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Biauw Chi Ong |
| 14 Jun 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 18 Jun 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Gail Brenda Cross |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 18 Jun 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 18 Jun 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Gail Brenda Cross |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 18 Jun 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 20 Jun 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Biauw Chi Ong |
| 21 Jun 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
| 12 Jul 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Gail Brenda Cross |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 12 Jul 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| 27 Jul 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Gail Brenda Cross |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| 27 Jul 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
| 5 Sep 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Biauw Chi Ong |
| 30 Sep 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Gail Brenda Cross |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 30 Sep 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 5 Oct 2021 | Editorially accepted | |
| 24 Oct 2021 | Article published | 10.1186/s12879-021-06768-3 |
You can find further information about peer review here.