Peer Review reports
From: Utility of conventional clinical risk scores in a low-risk COVID-19 cohort
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
23 Mar 2021 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
2 May 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Biauw Chi Ong |
14 Jun 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
18 Jun 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Gail Brenda Cross |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
18 Jun 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
18 Jun 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Gail Brenda Cross |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
18 Jun 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
20 Jun 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Biauw Chi Ong |
21 Jun 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report |
12 Jul 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Gail Brenda Cross |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
12 Jul 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
27 Jul 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Gail Brenda Cross |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
27 Jul 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
5 Sep 2021 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Biauw Chi Ong |
30 Sep 2021 | Author responded | Author comments - Gail Brenda Cross |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
30 Sep 2021 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
5 Oct 2021 | Editorially accepted | |
24 Oct 2021 | Article published | 10.1186/s12879-021-06768-3 |
You can find further information about peer review here.