Skip to main content

Table 2 Quality Appraisal/Risks of Bias of included studies (PEDro Tool)

From: Effectiveness of mobile text reminder in improving adherence to medication, physical exercise, and quality of life in patients living with HIV: a systematic review

Study

Eligibility Criteria

Random allocation

Concealed allocation

Baseline comparability

Blinding of subjects

Blinding of therapist

Blinding of assessors

Adequate follow-up

Intention to treat analysis

Between-group comparison

Point estimates and variability

Total score

Quality index

Gross et al. (2019) [23]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

7/10

High

Ruan et al. (2017) [20]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

No

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

5/10

Moderate

Nsagha et al. (2016) [26]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

4/10

Moderate

Sabin et al. (2015) [27]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

6/10

High

Moore et al. (2015) [24]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

No

No

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

6/10

High

Maduka and Tobin-West., (2013) [22]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

9/10

High

Mbuagwu et al. (2012) [21]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

9/10

High

da Costa et al. (2012) [18]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

Yes

6/10

High

Pop-Eleches et al. (2011) [25]

Yes

Yes

No

Yes

No

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

5/10

Moderate

Lester et al. (2010) [19]

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

No

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

8/10

High

  1. The PEDro scale was used to determine and summarize the quality of the included studies
  2. NB: Eligibility criteria is not awarded a score in the scoring