Skip to main content

Table 1 The characteristics of included studies

From: Silent existence of eosinopenia in sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Year

Country

Study design

Clinical Setting

Reference standard

Severity of sepsis

Sample Size

Prevalence

Male

Mean/median Age

Control Patients

Cutoff

(Cells/mm^3)

Timing of Eosinophils counts assessment

Abidi [15]

2008

Morocco

Prospective

ICU

ACCP/SCCM1

Sepsis; severe sepsis; septic shock

177

120/177

101/177

42

SIRS + Negative

50

Admission

SIRS

40

Anand [17]

2016

India

Prospective

ICU

ACCP/SCCM

severe sepsis

170

125/170

107/170

52

SIRS

50

Admission

Garnacho [18]

2014

Spain

Prospective

ICU

ACCP/SCCM

severe sepsis; septic shock

160

117/160

79/160

63

SIRS

25

Day1

Day2

Moura [21]

2011

Brazil

Retrospective

ICU

ACCP/SCCM

Sepsis; severe sepsis; septic shock

282

99/282

 

58.6 + −20

SIRS + Negative

100

Admission

Lavoignet [19]

2016

France

Retrospective

ED

ACCP/SCCM

Sepsis; severe sepsis; septic shock

692

125/692

0.45

59 + − 17.2

Non-infection

100

Continuous testing in one-week duration

50

10

López [20]

2010

Spain

Retrospective

ICU

ACCP/SCCM

Sepsis; severe sepsis; septic shock

244

55/244

165/244

54.4 + − 19.8

Non-infection

10

Day1

50

40

Day5

Shaaban [16]

2010

USA

Prospective

ICU

ACCP/SCCM

Sepsis; severe sepsis; septic shock

68

31/68

33/68

68

SIRS + noSIRS

50

Admission

  1. Footnotes: ACCP/SCCM1 American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine; Negative: negative results of bacterial culture, SIRS systemic inflammatory response syndrome, ICU intensive care unit