From: Silent existence of eosinopenia in sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Author | Year | Country | Study design | Clinical Setting | Reference standard | Severity of sepsis | Sample Size | Prevalence | Male | Mean/median Age | Control Patients | Cutoff (Cells/mm^3) | Timing of Eosinophils counts assessment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Abidi [15] | 2008 | Morocco | Prospective | ICU | ACCP/SCCM1 | Sepsis; severe sepsis; septic shock | 177 | 120/177 | 101/177 | 42 | SIRS + Negative | 50 | Admission |
SIRS | 40 | ||||||||||||
Anand [17] | 2016 | India | Prospective | ICU | ACCP/SCCM | severe sepsis | 170 | 125/170 | 107/170 | 52 | SIRS | 50 | Admission |
Garnacho [18] | 2014 | Spain | Prospective | ICU | ACCP/SCCM | severe sepsis; septic shock | 160 | 117/160 | 79/160 | 63 | SIRS | 25 | Day1 |
Day2 | |||||||||||||
Moura [21] | 2011 | Brazil | Retrospective | ICU | ACCP/SCCM | Sepsis; severe sepsis; septic shock | 282 | 99/282 |  | 58.6 + −20 | SIRS + Negative | 100 | Admission |
Lavoignet [19] | 2016 | France | Retrospective | ED | ACCP/SCCM | Sepsis; severe sepsis; septic shock | 692 | 125/692 | 0.45 | 59 + − 17.2 | Non-infection | 100 | Continuous testing in one-week duration |
50 | |||||||||||||
10 | |||||||||||||
López [20] | 2010 | Spain | Retrospective | ICU | ACCP/SCCM | Sepsis; severe sepsis; septic shock | 244 | 55/244 | 165/244 | 54.4 + − 19.8 | Non-infection | 10 | Day1 |
50 | |||||||||||||
40 | Day5 | ||||||||||||
Shaaban [16] | 2010 | USA | Prospective | ICU | ACCP/SCCM | Sepsis; severe sepsis; septic shock | 68 | 31/68 | 33/68 | 68 | SIRS + noSIRS | 50 | Admission |