Skip to main content

Table 5 Performance outcomes of a bioclinical score for ADA and T.SPOT

From: Use of T-SPOT.TB for the diagnosis of unconventional pleural tuberculosis is superior to ADA in high prevalence areas: a prospective analysis of 601 cases

Score

(non: TPE)

Assay

(cut-off value a)

Sensitivity

Specificity

PPV

NPV

Accuracy

§X2

§P value

¶X2

P value

 

ADA(40)

23.5

96.9

80.0

70.5

71.4

5.82

0.016

0.80

0.370

0

(32:17)

PB T.SPOT(24)

76.5

62.5

52.0

83.3

67.3

    
 

PF T.SPOT(466)

76.5

84.4

72.2

87.1

81.6

    

2

ADA(40)

51.0

94.4

92.9

57.1

68.7

21.42

< 0.001

7.26

0.006

 

PB T.SPOT(24)

79.4

64.5

76.4

68.3

73.3

    

/3/5

(107:155)

PF T.SPOT(466)

76.1

80.4

84.9

69.9

77.9

    

6/8/9

ADA(40)

73.2

86.7

95.9

43.3

75.8

10.26

0.001

0.14

0.705

(30:127)

PB T.SPOT(24)

93.7

93.3

98.3

77.8

93.6

    
 

PF T.SPOT(466)

89.8

90.0

97.4

67.5

89.8

    
 

ADA(40)

81.6

80.0

98.8

18.2

81.6

0.04

0.840

0

> 0.999

11

(5:98)

PB T.SPOT(24)

85.7

60.0

97.7

17.6

84.5

    
 

PF T.SPOT(466)

80.6

80.0

98.8

17.4

79.0

    
  1. ADA adenosine deaminase, BMI body mass index, TPE tuberculous pleural effusion, NPV negative predictive value, PPV positive predictive value
  2. Age < 45 yrs., male and BMI < 22 scored 6, 3, 2 points, respectively
  3. §Comparisons were performed for sensitivity between ADA and PF T.SPOT using chi-square test
  4. ¶ Comparisons were performed for specificity between ADA and PF T.SPOT using chi-square test
  5. a Values are expressed as IU/L for ADA, and as SFCs/106 mononuclear cells for T-SPOT.Data are presented as percentage