| |
AIC
|
BIC
|
RMSEA
|
CFI
|
TLI
|
Likelihood Ratio
|
|---|
|
Model 1b
|
28,375.563
|
28,834.33
|
0.042
|
0.82
|
0.892
|
1721.48
|
|
Model 2c
|
28,374.800
|
28,829.74
|
0.042
|
0.83
|
0.892
|
1722.72
|
|
Model 3d
|
25,211.71
|
25,636.06
|
0.046
|
0.83
|
0.896
|
1625.80
|
|
Model 4e
|
25,208.17
|
25,624.88
|
0.045
|
0.85
|
0.898
|
1626.27
|
- a: all 4 models have the same measurement model; changes of pathways were only applied to structural models
- b: Model 1 is original model with all the proposed association as Fig. 2 and demographic variables of age, marital status, employment, etc
- c: Model 2 is the model with only significant demographic variables, namely, age and marital status
- d: Model 3 is the model with all significant demographic variable and significant latent association, with additional association of depression symptoms to sexual risk behavior
- e: Model 4 is the model used in our results, with association indicated in Fig. 2
