Skip to main content

Table 4 Estimated odds ratio, standard error, 95% confidence interval, and P-values for effects of spatial scale on tick bite risk. The linear model included a random effect of publication. There was a significant effect of spatial scale (Wald test statistic [df = 2] = 8.36, P = 0.0152)

From: Systematic review and meta-analysis of tick-borne disease risk factors in residential yards, neighborhoods, and beyond

Spatial scaleOdds ratioSECIPNumber of studiesNumber of records
Yard1.351.19[0.97, 1.88]0.079928
Outside neighborhood2.461.48[1.14, 5.3]0.021333