Skip to main content

Table 4 Estimated odds ratio, standard error, 95% confidence interval, and P-values for effects of spatial scale on tick bite risk. The linear model included a random effect of publication. There was a significant effect of spatial scale (Wald test statistic [df = 2] = 8.36, P = 0.0152)

From: Systematic review and meta-analysis of tick-borne disease risk factors in residential yards, neighborhoods, and beyond

Spatial scale

Odds ratio

SE

CI

P

Number of studies

Number of records

Yard

1.35

1.19

[0.97, 1.88]

0.0799

2

8

Outside neighborhood

2.46

1.48

[1.14, 5.3]

0.0213

3

3