Table 4 Frequency of different combinations of ARG among Enterococcus species
No. of ARG | ARG combinations | No. (%) of ARGs in E. faecalis (n = 69) | No. (%) of ARGs in E. faecium (n = 10) | Total No. (%) (n = 79) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Without ARG | – | 1 (1.4) | – | 1 (1.2) |
1 ARG | ant(6′)Ia | 5 (7.2) | – | 16 (20.2) |
ant(3′)-IIIa | 7 (10.1) | 2 (20) | ||
aph(3′)-IIIa | 2 (2.8) | – | ||
2 ARGs | aph(3′)-IIIa + ant(3′)-III | 8 (11.5) | 2 (20) | 26 (32.9) |
ant(6′)Ia + ant(3′)-IIIa | 4 (5.7) | – | ||
ant(6′)Ia + aph(3′)-IIIa | 8 (11.5) | – | ||
ant(3′)-IIIa + aac (6′)-Ie | 1 (1.4) | – | ||
ant(3′)-IIIa + aph(3′)-IIIa | 2 (2.8) | – | ||
ant(6′)Ia + aac (6′)-Ie | 1 (1.4) | – | ||
3 ARGs | ant(3′)-IIIa + aph(2″)-Ic + ant(4′)Ia | 1 (1.4) | – | 22 (27.8) |
ant(6′)Ia + ant(3′)-IIIa + aph(3′)-IIIa | 10 (14.4) | 2 (20) | ||
ant(6′)Ia + aph(3′)-IIIa + aph(2″)-Ic | 1 (1.4) | – | ||
ant(3′)-IIIa + aph(3′)-IIIa + ant(4′)Ia | 1 (1.4) | – | ||
ant(3′)-IIIa + aph(3′)-IIIa + aph(2″)-Ic | 1 (1.4) | – | ||
ant(3′)-IIIa + aph(3′)-IIIa + aac (6′)-Ie | 1 (1.4) | – | ||
ant(6′)Ia + aac (6′)-Ie + aph(2″)-Ic | 1 (1.4) | – | ||
ant(6′)Ia + ant(3′)-IIIa + aph(2″)-lb | 1 (1.4) | 1 (10) | ||
ant(6′)Ia + aph(3′)-IIIa + aac (6′)-Ie | – | 1 (10) | ||
ant(3′)-IIIa + aph(2″)-ld + aph(3′)-IIIa | 1 (1.4) | – | ||
4 ARGs | ant(6′)Ia + ant(3′)-IIIa + aph(2″)-ld + aph(3′)-IIIa | 2 (2.8) | 1 (10) | 12 (15.1) |
ant(6′)Ia + ant(3′)-IIIa + aph(3′)-IIIa + aac (6′)-Ie | 4 (5.7) | – | ||
ant(6′)Ia + ant(3′)-IIIa + aph(2″)-lb + aph(3′)-IIIa | 1 (1.4) | – | ||
ant(3′)-IIIa + aph(2″)-ld + aph(3′)-IIIa + aph(2″)-Ic | 1 (1.4) | – | ||
ant(6′)Ia + ant(3′)-IIIa + aph(2″)-ld + aac (6′)-Ie | 1 (1.4) | – | ||
ant(6′)Ia + ant(3′)-IIIa + aph(3′)-IIIa + aph(2″)-Ic | 1 (1.4) | – | ||
ant(3′)-IIIa + aph(2″)-lb + aph(3′)-IIIa + ant(4′)Ia | 1 (1.4) | – | ||
5 ARGs | ant(6′)Ia + ant(3′)-IIIa + aph(2″)-lb + aph(3′)-IIIa + aac (6′)-Ie | 1 (1.4) | – | 2 (2.5) |
ant(6′)Ia + ant(3′)-IIIa + aph(2″)-lb + aph(2″)-ld + aph(3′)-IIIa | – | 1 (10) |