Skip to main content

Peer Review reports

From: Comparison of rRNA-based and DNA-based nucleic acid amplifications for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Ureaplasma urealyticum in urogenital swabs

Original Submission
16 Oct 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Oct 2017 Author responded Author comments - Xin Jin
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Oct 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 Nov 2017 Author responded Author comments - Xin Jin
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Nov 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Jan 2018 Author responded Author comments - Yuying Liang
Resubmission - Version 4
4 Jan 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alina Deshpande
23 Mar 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel Golparian
1 Apr 2018 Author responded Author comments - Yuying Liang
Resubmission - Version 5
1 Apr 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 5
23 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel Golparian
30 Apr 2018 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Francesco Di Gennaro
3 May 2018 Author responded Author comments - Yuying Liang
Resubmission - Version 6
3 May 2018 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
3 Dec 2018 Editorially accepted
12 Dec 2018 Article published 10.1186/s12879-018-3580-0

You can find further information about peer review here.

Back to article page