Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of studies included in this systematic review and meta-analysis

From: Safety and effectiveness of antimalarial therapy in sickle cell disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Author

Country

Study period (months)

Drug regimen

No. of participants

Genotype

Adverse events (%)

Patients with detectable parasitaemia and/or malaria clinical episodes (%)

No. of deaths

Success rate (95% CI)

Olaosebikan et al., 2015

Nigeria

14

MQAS

90

SS/SC

24

7.78

4

61% (compared to PG)

SPAQ

90

13.8

13.33

0

36% (compared to PG)

PG

90

5.4

21.11

3

–

Diop et al., 2010

Senegal

6

PL

30

SS

3.33

13.33

0

86.67%

SP

30

3.33

0

0

100%

Nakibuuka et al., 2009

Uganda

5

SP

120

SS

6.6 and 1.6 (vomiting, Pruritus)

14

0

50% (compared to CQ)

CQ

122

11.5 and 1.8 (vomiting, Pruritus)

24.6

0

–

Eke et al., 2003

Nigeria

9

PL

30

SS

Not reported

31

1

69%

PM

36

38.9

0

61%

PG

35

15.6

0

84%

Nwokolo et al., 2001

Nigeria

6

PG

57

SS

19.6

18.2

None

81.80%

MQ

56

31.6

10.8

None

89.20%

Warley et al., 1965

Uganda

21

PL

66

SS

NA

31.82

None

68.18

CQ + benzathine penicillin

60

NA

11.67

None

88.33

  1. CQ = Chloroquine, MQ = Mefloquine, MQAS = Mefloquine-artesunate, NA = Not available, PL = Placebo, PG = Proguanil, PM = Pyrimethamine, SP=Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine, SPAQ = Sulfadoxine pyrimethamine-amodiaquine, SS = homozygous sickle haemoglobin