Skip to main content

Table 1 Individual-level agreement of PMTCT HIV testing results versus UAT surveillance

From: Evaluation of Senegal’s prevention of mother to child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) program data for HIV surveillance

Region

Site

N

Comparison between the results of HIV testing for PMTCT (R) and those of Sentinel Surveillance (S)

Positive Percent Agreement

Negative percent agreement

PMTCT HIV Prevalence (%)

UAT surveillance HIV Prevalence (%)

R-S+

R + S+

R + S-

R-S-

West

CS Mbao

174

1

4

0

169

80.0

100.0

2.9

2.3

CS Roi Baudoin

196

0

2

0

194

100.0

100.0

1.0

1.0

CS de Mbour

300

2

5

2

291

71.4

99.3

2.3

2.3

CS khombole

272

0

2

0

270

100.0

100.0

0.7

0.7

Centre de santé 10eme

238

1

7

1

229

87.5

99.6

3.4

3.4

PMI Medina

300

0

3

0

297

100.0

100.0

1.0

1.0

PS Nianing

138

0

2

0

136

100.0

100.0

1.4

1.4

PS Nguekhokh

175

0

0

0

175

NA

100.0

0,0

0,0

PS de Mboro

175

0

2

0

173

100.0

100.0

1.1

1.1

North

CS Dagana

166

0

1

1

164

100.0

99.4

0.6

1.2

CS Linguere

99

0

1

0

98

100.0

100.0

1.0

1.0

CS Matam

219

1

1

0

217

50.0

100.0

0.9

0.5

CS Louga

272

0

0

0

272

NA

100.0

0,0

0,0

CS Saint Louis

112

0

0

0

112

NA

100.0

0,0

0,0

PS Bokidiawé

150

0

0

0

150

NA

100.0

0,0

0,0

PS Ourossogui

186

0

2

0

184

100.0

100.0

1.1

1.1

PS de Samyabal

159

0

1

0

158

100.0

100.0

0.6

0.6

Centre

CS Diourbel

297

1

5

0

291

83.3

100.0

2.0

1.7

CS Fatick

164

0

2

0

162

100.0

100.0

1.2

1.2

CS Kasnack

299

0

3

0

296

100.0

100.0

1.0

1.0

CS Koungheul

279

0

2

0

277

100.0

100.0

0.7

0.7

CS Ndoffane

175

0

3

0

172

100.0

100.0

1.7

1.7

CS Sokone

293

2

2

0

289

50.0

100.0

1.4

0.7

CS Touba

298

0

2

0

296

100.0

100.0

0.7

0.7

CS kaffrine

184

0

3

0

181

100.0

100.0

1.6

1.6

PS Dianké

119

0

0

0

119

NA

100.0

0,0

0,0

PS Tataguine

175

0

0

0

175

NA

100.0

0,0

0,0

PS de Ngoye

163

0

2

0

161

100.0

100.0

1.2

1.2

SOS Kaolack

300

0

3

0

297

100.0

100.0

1.0

1.0

South

C.S Vélingara

81

0

1

3

77

100.0

96.3

1.2

4.9

C.S de Goudomp

299

0

4

0

295

100.0

100.0

1.3

1.3

C.S de Sédhiou

115

0

4

0

111

100.0

100.0

3.5

3.5

CS C Senghor Ziguinchor

292

1

11

0

280

91.7

100.0

4.1

3.8

CS Bignona

298

0

9

0

289

100.0

100.0

3.0

3.0

CS Boumkiling

159

0

2

0

157

100.0

100.0

1.3

1.3

CS Kolda

298

5

8

0

285

61.5

100.0

4.4

2.7

CS Salémata

71

0

0

0

71

NA

100.0

0,0

0,0

CS Saraya

33

0

0

0

33

NA

100.0

0,0

0,0

CS Tambacounda

301

0

0

0

301

NA

100.0

0,0

0,0

PS Missira

160

0

0

0

160

NA

100.0

0,0

0,0

PS Diawara

175

0

0

2

173

NA

98.9

1,1

0,0

PS Diaobé

150

4

2

0

144

33.3

100.0

4.0

1.3

PS de Kabrousse

149

0

2

0

147

100.0

100.0

1.3

1.3

Overall

8658

18

103

9

8528

85.1 (77.2–90.7%),

99.9 (95%CI: 99.8–99.9)

Median = 1.1

(IQR: 1.0)

Median = 1.0

(IQR: 1.6)

p-value = non-significant

  1. 1. Percentage of positive agreement = (R + S+/R + S+ and R-S+)
  2. 2. Percentage of negative agreement = (R-S-)/ (R-S- and R + S-)
  3. With R−/R+ the results of HIV testing for PMTCT
  4. And S-/S+ the results of HIV Sentinel Surveillance
  5. a) The positive percentage agreement (PPA) was calculated as the proportion of pregnant women tested HIV-positive through ANC SS HIV testing (using a combined 4th generation ELISA) who were identified as HIV-positive through routine PMTCT testing (using a 2-rapid testing serial algorithm)
  6. b) The negative percentage agreement (NPA) was calculated as the proportion of pregnant women tested HIV-negative through ANC SS HIV testing (using a combined 4th generation ELISA) who were identified as HIV-negative through routine PMTCT testing (using a 2-rapid testing serial algorithm)